Maxie Allen and Rosalind Levine arrested - The vindictiveness of the school and police overreach

Making a false allegation is not - necessarily - a criminal offence, and is usually not something for which a person may lawfully be arrested.

Defamation is not a crime, in this country, any more.

Because the edit button is available. For the same reason as those who disagree with me edit too. Because they can.

Complain to MN to get it removed if you do not like it. Post a link to your campaign if you wish.

Why do you have to edit every bloody post of yours

Wrong I think schools can be wrong and can be right. I've said that countless times. By all means challenge them. So you are incorrect! Why are you lying and pretending I said that? At no point have I said that. In fact I have said that schools can be wrong and are wrong sometimes.

That will likely stick in your throat that I called you a liar and believe schools can be wrong!

Now please explain why you fabricate things?

Also in this case we do not know as the parents are withholding evidence after admitting to being abusive to staff. And given they are not reporting them for false accusation one would assume there is a reason for that.

…which is not what happened in this case.

Your position means schools are never wrong and should therefore never be challenged. That’s just irresponsible.

Professionals are not always seen as being right. In teaching, the teachers are usually seen as being wrong. Hence why they are public enemy number 1 in the UK. All they have to do is tell a family something as simple as the word no and we have a double page spread in the daily fail!

Mine do not breach the rules. Someone clearly has a beef with being called out as using mental health as a slur then crying that they 'simply did nothing wrong' pretending to have done nothing all the while using an tactic well known by a certain group of people in the world.

You're 100% right. I apologise for getting drawn into it. I think for some of us who have had poor experiences from schools and then not believed because professionals are always seen as right, it can be quite difficult on these kinds of threads.

This thread seems to have lost the crux of the matter which is:
Parents and children have been bullied and badly treated. Parents wrongfully arrested and attempts made to silence them.

This is appalling to be happening in this country in this day and age.

People are stupid and naive, we should all be standing together against this oppression yet people would rather argue about who said what???

Unbelievable......

Whippy is screenshotting her replies and posting them when they get deleted despite saying earlier "Posts get deleted when they breach the rules on here and someone complains that they breach the rules. Disagreeing with me is not breaching the rules." Irony at it's finest.

There’s been some overly-zealous/regressive moderation on a few threads today, including the one about the tribunal into the blackball pool ladies’ competition.

Really? I have no idea what’s got into the Mumsnet moderators but it’s completely absurd that they’ve deleted my comments which contained nothing offensive whatsoever, and simply asked the poster who I and others had already said we no longer wished to engage with to stop replying to my posts. No idea what petty person is reporting my posts asking for them to be deleted, either, how pathetic.

WillimNot 'In his culture men and boys don't say sorry?' I wonder which culture that would be? I'm lost for words.

whippy1981 · Today 11:39

Everything you write flies in the face of the facts. The Police had access to all of the messages and emails and stated that they couldn't find anything at all of a harassing nature.

You're making this up as you go. Are you related to Donald Trump?

I've not had any post deleted based on censoring discussions. Sorry wrong again!

I've said on this thread numerous times (which has been ignored) that everyone is entitled to their opinion and that it isn't wrong to share those opinions either.

Posts get deleted when they breach the rules on here and someone complains that they breach the rules. Disagreeing with me is not breaching the rules.

Oh dear, that poster now appears to have had my response to you deleted at the behest of that irrational poster.

Ironically showing precisely the behaviour that the article is about, trying to censor other people’s perfectly reasonable discussions.

I do not know nor do you as no one has said either way. The fact that they gloated about doing something to the teacher suggests there is evidence it happened.

I was raped and it was NFA'd by the CPS. The rape still happened despite on paper the police have said NFA. It could've happened and be NFA'd.

If they feel it was a false allegation then they legally can report that. They haven't. They have contacted the police and complained about how it was handled but not reported the teacher for false allegation just spent the time contacting the media instead of seeking justice.

Surely they have evidence to show the police it was a false allegation so could easily get an arrest but are choosing not to for what reason?

Which of course the parents are legally within their rights to report them. If there is evidence the teachers did this then that would happen. If not and the evidence showed they acted based on what they were subjected to then that could also support more harassment.

The parents haven't reported them to either the TRA or the police. I would be wondering why their first port of call was the media and not to get justice if they were wronged. They do not seem in any sort of urgency to get justice just their faces in the paper. Now I would ask why that is? They complained to the police about how it was handled but never made a report about the teacher which they were well within their right to do so should they have evidence.

By all means respond to those who do not consider things objectively and who demonstrate a lack of understanding. You seem to be in that camp.

Not convinced either nor have I said I am convinced they are correct - you seem to not be objective about the fact that I have used the word 'if' throughout and have said I need more information - the missing information the parents have omitted.

The irony! ha!

If it met the legal definition of harassment then they in fact did harass.

As you know perfectly well, it didn't meet the criteria and they absolutely did not harass the acting head. Those are plain facts.

Everybody knows the TRA and OFSTED are useless. That’s why they need replacing with a proper regulator and professional body which will immediately suspend staff pending investigation when misconduct is reported, then strip them of their professional qualifications and ban them from working in the sector if the misconduct is substantiated, as well as levying sufficiently large fines to provide a significant financial disincentive for illegal behaviour on the school and Local Authority in question. This would be in line with how other sectors such as law, finance and medicine are regulated, and is clearly required to stop schools behaving as though they can break the law with impunity because there is no effective regulatory oversight and it is left up to individual parents to enforce the law rather than the regulator and professional body doing so.

I shalln’t respond to you again because - as other posters have noted - it is a waste of time trying to reason with somebody who refuses to consider things objectively and has demonstrated such a lack of understanding of the relevant legal requirements, yet inexplicably remains convinced that they’re correct regardless of all of the evidence proving that they are not.

This irony! ha!

There is a regulatory body - the TRA. The parents have a right to report this person to the police if they think this is a false accusation. They haven't done so.

They can report to the TRA if they consider this as being misconduct. They haven't.

They did none of what they could've done.