Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Different wedding invites for bridesmaids partner

236 replies

Sunnyheart · 29/03/2025 08:14

Hello all,

I wanted some opinions on this situation.

I am a bridesmaid for a friend this summer, and received the official invite to the wedding yesterday. When I went to respond on their wedding website, my partner and I had different tabs for our RSVP. I am listed as attending the whole day ( lunchtime ceremony, afternoon reception which includes sit down meal & speeches etc, and evening do) however my partner was listed as only attending the evening do. I messaged my friend to check this was right and in fact he is able to attend the ceremony ( which finishes at 1) and the evening do from 7pm.

Am I being unreasonable to find this strange ?
My partner and I totally understands costs etc and limits to numbers, but part of me does find this rude.

We will need to travel and stay over night in order to attend, and as the venues are slightly out in the sticks it would be logistically a pain for my partner to go back and forth between a hotel and the venues.

I will caveat by saying that my friend hasn't met my partner even though we have been together for 3 years, as my friend has lived across the country for years now. We are very much firm friends and we have known eachother since college, but not as close day to day as we once were and don't see eachother for months at a time.

My partner doesn't really want to attend which I totally understand , although I would love to have him there ofcourse ( and for selfish reasons it would be much more ideal as I don't feel comfortable driving the distance so it will be the cost of a train there and back , looking at close to £100)

Thank you all.

OP posts:
GirlWhatHaveYouDoneYoureAPinkPonyGirl · 29/03/2025 12:52

Very poor etiquette from the couple and I work in the industry.
I would decline to be bm and offer to attend evening as a couple.

MagdaLenor · 29/03/2025 12:46

DappledThings · 29/03/2025 12:44

Because there just are different parts. There's a formal and legal ceremony and a meal. That is two separate bits any way round. Even if the ceremony and meal are in the same hotel they aren't one part. If the ceremony is in a church even more so.

Then an evening bit is another one. You nearly always have to clear the meal room and move to another.

Surely the reception is a follow on from the ceremony? Is there a reason why you'd invite people to your ceremony but not your reception? Sorry if I appear obtuse, but that's the bit I struggle to understand.

DappledThings · 29/03/2025 12:44

MagdaLenor · 29/03/2025 12:38

So why not just have one part and everyone comes along? I think that's what I'm struggling to understand.

Because there just are different parts. There's a formal and legal ceremony and a meal. That is two separate bits any way round. Even if the ceremony and meal are in the same hotel they aren't one part. If the ceremony is in a church even more so.

Then an evening bit is another one. You nearly always have to clear the meal room and move to another.

MagdaLenor · 29/03/2025 12:38

DappledThings · 29/03/2025 12:36

Not really. That's just when the different bits start.

So why not just have one part and everyone comes along? I think that's what I'm struggling to understand.

Hoppinggreen · 29/03/2025 12:38

Gloriia · 29/03/2025 10:03

The op is a bridesmaid though. Surelt you'd have a concession to your no partners rule if the person was part of the bridal party?

No we didn't.
We knew the partners/husbands of all but 1 Bridemaid and she was in a very new relationship so he wasn't invited.
Same with Groomsmen, if we knew their OH then they were invited but if not then no.
Our wedding, our choice and it wasn't a cost issue. We just wanted to spend the day with people we knew.
In fact our entire wedding was purely around what me and DH wanted, nobody elses opinion counted at all

DappledThings · 29/03/2025 12:36

MagdaLenor · 29/03/2025 12:31

No, it's weird having the gap in the middle!

Not really. That's just when the different bits start.

Bowies · 29/03/2025 12:36

How many bridesmaid are there?

I would expect your DP to be invited, however it’s true he would be by himself during the wedding ‘breakfast’, so can see some logic - especially if they are trying to keep within a budget.

Why is he saying he doesn’t want to go? Why doesn’t he want to go to support you and witness you being a bridesmaid? It’s not all about him. Surely he can entertain himself for a few hours and get some food.

ThatGreatMember · 29/03/2025 12:34

Anewuser · 29/03/2025 08:48

If it’s a traditional wedding, you’ll be on the top table so where do you think he’ll be sat? On a table with people he doesn’t know.

If I were your partner, I’d happily stay at the hotel until the evening do. Get a taxi there and enjoy the evening with you.

It makes no sense him going to the ceremony or sit down meal.

This.

You will be busy with the bridal party but your attention will be divided as he willnot know anyone.

JudgeJ · 29/03/2025 12:32

Deerrobin · 29/03/2025 08:48

I don’t think the bride and groom have done anything wrong in not inviting someone they haven’t met. Equally, no issue with him choosing not to go if he’d rather not attend on that basis.

Surely these days when people tend to live and work over a wide area of the world it can't be unknown for the bridal couple not to have met the partner of one of their friends.

MagdaLenor · 29/03/2025 12:31

DappledThings · 29/03/2025 12:29

It's not cheap. It's just extending the evening invitation to the ceremony as well.

No, it's weird having the gap in the middle!

Gravytanned · 29/03/2025 12:31

I think it’s fine.
They don’t know him and if he really doesn’t know anyone else there, why invite him to sit at a table with randoms all afternoon.

I would have given you a heads up but that’s the only think that would bother me.

DappledThings · 29/03/2025 12:29

mewkins · 29/03/2025 12:23

Absolutely nothing wrong with extra guests for the evening. Weird and cheap to invite for the ceremony, send them away and then invite them back. Even weirder to do this to one half of a couple 😆

It's not cheap. It's just extending the evening invitation to the ceremony as well.

MagdaLenor · 29/03/2025 12:29

DappledThings · 29/03/2025 12:00

It really isn't. Completely normal to have extra people in the evening. And then just a nice gesture to clarify they are welcome to the ceremony as well.

It's only a problem if you take invitations to be a demand on your time for which you should be recompensed rather than just what they are; an invitation you are free to accept or decline.

I think it must be cultural. I was raised to include everyone, and if you were invited to a wedding, you were invited. You weren't told what bits you were or weren't allowed to be part of.
I think it's why it seems strange to me.

Ilady · 29/03/2025 12:28

In your case I think that the bride should have talked to you about only inviting you oh to the evening event. I don't think that she thought this true. She wants you there as a bridesmaid but it not worth the cost of having your oh their for the full day.
To be honest I think that she is being cheeky expecting you to be happy with this and still be a bridesmaid. I can see why your oh does not want to go.

Do you really want to be bridesmaid? Do you really want the cost of a hen weekend and all the bridesmaids will pay her cost that weekend? Then you spend the majority of the day helping her out and waiting for your oh to turn up to the evening part of the wedding? Would you be happy to spend that day on your own at the wedding? Would you know the other guests?

I think you should say to her that since I agreed to be your bridesmaid that I would have expected my oh to be invited to the full wedding. How no one else like her mother would have if X is bridesmaid you need to invite her oh for the full day.
Any couple I know would be getting help from parents in regards to the guest list and planning and in some case the parents might be helping them financially with this.

To be honest I would not be buying her an expensive wedding gift after this.

MagdaLenor · 29/03/2025 12:26

Question285 · 29/03/2025 12:05

I usually find these split wedding invites grating, but in this case I’d be ok with the set up in your partner’s shoes. Why would he want to hang around watching people take photos and then listen to speeches about people he doesn’t know while sitting with strangers? I’d be much happier relaxing in the hotel room with room service and joining my partner for the evening do.

Why would he hang around in town centre or hang around a hotel room?

ShhhhhItsASurprise · 29/03/2025 12:25

As I said upthread, I wouldn’t.

I didn’t invite family if I hadn’t seen them recently!

mewkins · 29/03/2025 12:23

DappledThings · 29/03/2025 11:55

Three parts is a totally standard wedding. Ceremony, reception, evening do.

It only becomes a problem when people choose to take offence at being invited to something and see it as setting an expectation on them. I've always taken it at face value; that my presence is welcomed at the ceremony (as it's public anyway if in a church) and for the evening do if it suits me. Not that I'm excluded from the other bit.

If it suits me I go, if it doesn't I dont. But I don't take any pointless offence about being invited.

Absolutely nothing wrong with extra guests for the evening. Weird and cheap to invite for the ceremony, send them away and then invite them back. Even weirder to do this to one half of a couple 😆

Hwi · 29/03/2025 12:15

dogpool · 29/03/2025 11:34

A ridiculous "rule" in this day and age. Many have very long term partners, have children, and never marry. Why should these relationships not be considered a legitimate as those who have decided to spend money to have a wedding? And I say that as a married woman.

You know the meaning of the word 'legitimate', right?

Question285 · 29/03/2025 12:05

I usually find these split wedding invites grating, but in this case I’d be ok with the set up in your partner’s shoes. Why would he want to hang around watching people take photos and then listen to speeches about people he doesn’t know while sitting with strangers? I’d be much happier relaxing in the hotel room with room service and joining my partner for the evening do.

Dweetfidilove · 29/03/2025 12:04

He could travel with you, attend the ceremony, then retire doe the rest of the day.
Pointless skipping the meal then rejoining for the piss up. No-one has time for a fractured day. Lord only knows why weddings have become such a palaver.

Pomegranatecarnage · 29/03/2025 12:03

It wouldn’t bother me, I’d enjoy the peaceful interlude at the hotel more than the wedding meal to be honest. I don’t think YABU though, as I think your friend should’ve told you before. Personally, I’d go alone and take it as an opportunity to try out a long drive by yourself.

BobbyBiscuits · 29/03/2025 12:00

Laststraw25 · 29/03/2025 11:56

It’s astonishing to me that anyone thinks it’s okay to leave a guest loitering around having only having invited him to 2/3 of the day! Particularly the partner of three years to one of your bridesmaids!

It would never happen here, because it lacks basic manners, etiquette and being hospitable. The idea any bride can just bypass common decency because it’s “her” day is really next level self absorption to me.

If you can’t afford the wedding then don’t make it so unbearably long and drawn out, consider the comfort of your own guests.

You're not wrong. I would never have such a big complicated wedding. But sadly there isn't much OP can say other than he won't be coming. I'd certainly hope she wouldn't drop out over it. But yeah, it's certainly not my style whatsoever.

DappledThings · 29/03/2025 12:00

MagdaLenor · 29/03/2025 11:57

No, it's a problem when you can't actually afford to have a three part wedding, so some people get excluded.
I realise that this is probably a cultural thing and many British people like to have these tiers. Although I've been to 2 Scottish weddings which were fantastic, and everyone was included in the whole wedding.

It really isn't. Completely normal to have extra people in the evening. And then just a nice gesture to clarify they are welcome to the ceremony as well.

It's only a problem if you take invitations to be a demand on your time for which you should be recompensed rather than just what they are; an invitation you are free to accept or decline.

scotstars · 29/03/2025 11:59

Does he know anyone else attending? You will surely be on top table so I'm not surprised they haven't invited him to full day if they haven't met and I wouldn't know who to sit him with either. He's probably best to stay home - surely even living a distance away if you and your friend are that close they would have had an opportunity to meet before now?

MagdaLenor · 29/03/2025 11:58

Laststraw25 · 29/03/2025 11:56

It’s astonishing to me that anyone thinks it’s okay to leave a guest loitering around having only having invited him to 2/3 of the day! Particularly the partner of three years to one of your bridesmaids!

It would never happen here, because it lacks basic manners, etiquette and being hospitable. The idea any bride can just bypass common decency because it’s “her” day is really next level self absorption to me.

If you can’t afford the wedding then don’t make it so unbearably long and drawn out, consider the comfort of your own guests.

This ⬆️

Swipe left for the next trending thread