Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think we absolutely have to ban social media for under 16s.

209 replies

Bitethehandthatfeedsyou · 29/03/2025 06:59

I just don’t understand with all evidence that we have to say how awful it is for young people why we’re not banning in for under 16s. I’ve not spoken to 1 parent who wouldn’t be in favour of it.

I do know it’s not a silver bullet and there is ann idea that young people would be penalised for big tech not taking responsibility for exploiting children.

Quite rightly smoking, vaping and alcohol are out of bounds for under 18s and arguably access to social media and a young age is as harmful / more harmful than any of these.

On a cynical note too, surely it would be a huge vote winner for whichever party goes about implementing it too.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
MrsSkylerWhite · 29/03/2025 12:20

Completely agree with OP.

Another76543 · 29/03/2025 12:19

Bringmeahigherlove · 29/03/2025 10:13

Tempting maybe in the same way alcohol is but the vast majority of teens can’t gain access to alcohol on a day-to-day basis. There needs to be tight regulations that prevent under age people accessing these sites. In an ideal world they would be limited yes but this is very difficult to maintain across families and schools - you need both on board to make it effective. Schools have banned smartphones. I’m a teacher. They’re not allowed them out in school but does this prevent usage? No. They sneak them into the toilets or in corridors or out on the yard. They are addicted to them. I’d also support a smartphone ban as well as social media.

There are plenty of children who aren’t addicted to smartphones. The difference is often the attitude of parents. Why are children even taking smartphones to school if they’re banned on school premises? Some schools have banned smartphones altogether, allowing only brick phones which have to be handed in at the start of the day. Yes, some try to break those rules, but they are in the minority. Parents need to take responsibility for this and not just expect government to legislate. We can’t say that children should be given free rein at 16 or 18, having been banned at 15. That will create even more problems as they won’t have been taught to use it sensibly.

Bartoz · 29/03/2025 12:18

Saltedbuttertree · 29/03/2025 07:59

I've noticed it's mainly the older parents who let their kids have unrestricted internet access, give them iPads age 3 etc. Say what you want about me becoming a mum at 16 but at least I'm young enough to understand how the internet works and how easy it is for kids to stumble upon something fucked up online.

Anyway I'm sure in the next five or ten years as people of my generation become parents at more respectable ages you'll see more parents not letting their kids use social media

This is a very good point.

summershere99 · 29/03/2025 11:30

SeaSwim5 · 29/03/2025 09:30

You don’t see how allowing a bunch of 16 year olds free access to social media with no previous experience would be a disaster?

You don’t see how allowing 13 year olds free access to social media already IS a disaster?

WhenYouSayNothingAtAll · 29/03/2025 11:02

Bringmeahigherlove · 29/03/2025 10:08

Not really. That may be the case whilst they’re in primary. Once children get to their teenage years they can find ways to have social media without their parents knowing.

DD is 13 and still can’t download her own apps(even free ones) because she doesn’t actually have the password to her apple id account and it asks for it every time so she has to ask first. I’m sure things will change once she gets older .

JessieLongleg · 29/03/2025 10:33

So many problems with social media one video of a baby being dangerous treated on mainstream account. And social media will do nothing as not classed a violence. Which show why so much bad some happens on social media!

altaego · 29/03/2025 10:25

how exactly do you suggest this ban is policed? for whatever reason, children get access to smart phones, laptops, tablets.. and some parents are great at keeping a check on what their kids are doing, sadly a lot of parents dont really care, its keeping the child quiet and out of their hair... until it all goes tits up!

there are already loose rules in place, you have to be 13 for facebook and snapchat i think, yet plenty of 10 and 11 year olds have it?

i think things would be different if social media was a paid subscription service

MissJoGrant · 29/03/2025 10:21

Oioisavaloy27 · 29/03/2025 10:13

I agree there's absolutely no reason why youngsters need the internet till they are 16 it's posing more danger than anything these days leaving children wide open to all sorts.

Wait, you'd restrict the entire Internet for under 16s?

Newstartawaits2938 · 29/03/2025 10:21

*vaping

MissJoGrant · 29/03/2025 10:20

Assuming it was restricted, you would have to decide what exactly was social media.

Is WhatsApp social media?
Are YouTube comments social media?
Is YouTube itself a social media platform?

Bringmeahigherlove · 29/03/2025 10:13

Another76543 · 29/03/2025 09:28

A total ban makes it even more tempting for teens. It’s far better to somehow ensure use is limited so it doesn’t become addictive (through schools banning smartphones and by keeping the kids busy with other things).

Tempting maybe in the same way alcohol is but the vast majority of teens can’t gain access to alcohol on a day-to-day basis. There needs to be tight regulations that prevent under age people accessing these sites. In an ideal world they would be limited yes but this is very difficult to maintain across families and schools - you need both on board to make it effective. Schools have banned smartphones. I’m a teacher. They’re not allowed them out in school but does this prevent usage? No. They sneak them into the toilets or in corridors or out on the yard. They are addicted to them. I’d also support a smartphone ban as well as social media.

Oioisavaloy27 · 29/03/2025 10:13

I agree there's absolutely no reason why youngsters need the internet till they are 16 it's posing more danger than anything these days leaving children wide open to all sorts.

Newstartawaits2938 · 29/03/2025 10:09

I agree but don't know how it can be . All you have to do is enter a different date of birth and that's it, your in.
Same with smoking /raping, it's all well and good banning them, but it doesn't stop anyone from getting them.
My sons previous high school had a huge amount of kids vaping as soon as they left the school gates. We moved him from that school for various reasons and he now attends a high school that has a lot of rich kids , and you need to take an entrance exam. This school is infact worse and there is open drug use INSIDE the school that they can't get a grip on. It is very scary and luckily for me at the moment my son isn't interested as he has health anxiety so too scared to try anything. Very worrying to see this and noone seems to be able to do anything about it

Bringmeahigherlove · 29/03/2025 10:08

WhenYouSayNothingAtAll · 29/03/2025 09:33

Let’s be honest here, a ban would only help parents who don’t want their kids on SM but don’t want to or know how to say no.
DD’s been asking for various apps since she was y3 (her friends DID indeed have the apps) I just kept saying no.

Not really. That may be the case whilst they’re in primary. Once children get to their teenage years they can find ways to have social media without their parents knowing.

Never2many · 29/03/2025 10:01

We need to take it further. We need to ban mobile phones for under 16’s.

It’s not just what’s on social media that is the issue, but the amount of bullying that is perpetuated via their smartphones.

Children absolutely do not need a mobile phone. We’ve been conditioned into believing that they do. That we need to be able to be in touch with then at all times, that we need to be able to track their every move. That without mobile phones they’ll become social outcasts.

We buy our children iPads at the age of 3, because parents can’t bear to teach their children table manners, or deprive them of Roblox. And so by the time they get to about 10 they’re unable to live without technology and we’ve become convinced that they need it. They don’t.

The social media companies are never going to comply. So we need to remove the means of using social media.

And yes, I know that some will say kids will just use a computer, but those aren’t nearly as portable or present as a mobile phone.

Bitethehandthatfeedsyou · 29/03/2025 09:55

Also social media is literally addictive. Why should it be treated differently to anything else that’s addictive and harmful.

OP posts:
Bitethehandthatfeedsyou · 29/03/2025 09:54

i mean there are lots of regulated apps that under 16s can’t access, like some financial apps for example so there is definitely a way to do it.

OP posts:
FrozenFeathers · 29/03/2025 09:35

I agree and I also think kids should receive lessons in media-literacy, if they are not already, so they will be prepared to what they'll face once they do go on social media.

WhenYouSayNothingAtAll · 29/03/2025 09:33

Bringmeahigherlove · 29/03/2025 09:24

Not good enough. Schools teach this, lots of parents do too. It’s toxic and addictive. Young people are not old enough or rational enough to navigate that world. A ban is the only way.

Let’s be honest here, a ban would only help parents who don’t want their kids on SM but don’t want to or know how to say no.
DD’s been asking for various apps since she was y3 (her friends DID indeed have the apps) I just kept saying no.

ImAChangeling · 29/03/2025 09:32

The simple solution would be to make it illegal for under 16s to have a profile, with massive fines for the social media companies and any adults aiding them.

Like buying alcohol.

SeaSwim5 · 29/03/2025 09:30

summershere99 · 29/03/2025 09:11

I’m all for it but how would it be enforced?

I think there is a growing push back from parents against allowing kids access to social media and smartphones and I hope that continues.

The argument for saying they need to learn how to use some social media at 13 is nonsense. For what purpose?! They’re all ready very tech savvy by then without needing to add social media into the mix.

It makes me think those parents don’t understand the addictive nature of it and how certain ads and posts are targeted at children. It’s not really something that can be managed safely because there’s very little control over what you’re seeing.

The best thing to do right now with younger teens is for parents to have close control of their phones and not allow them access to social media. Check messages. Don’t let your kids have their phones in their rooms over night. I’m shocked at how many kids that I’ve spoken to are up till all hours gaming or on their phones! Parents need to take action here too.

You don’t see how allowing a bunch of 16 year olds free access to social media with no previous experience would be a disaster?

Another76543 · 29/03/2025 09:28

Bringmeahigherlove · 29/03/2025 09:24

Not good enough. Schools teach this, lots of parents do too. It’s toxic and addictive. Young people are not old enough or rational enough to navigate that world. A ban is the only way.

A total ban makes it even more tempting for teens. It’s far better to somehow ensure use is limited so it doesn’t become addictive (through schools banning smartphones and by keeping the kids busy with other things).

Bringmeahigherlove · 29/03/2025 09:24

Scottishexplorer · 29/03/2025 07:11

I don’t think it’s necessary to ban. Better to teach responsible use.

Not good enough. Schools teach this, lots of parents do too. It’s toxic and addictive. Young people are not old enough or rational enough to navigate that world. A ban is the only way.

hectorzeroni · 29/03/2025 09:23

Definitely

I have a teen and I’ve also found it was such a headache and faff sorting out parental controls etc on his iPhone. It honestly feels like they intentionally make sure it’s not straightforward to limit screen time etc.

I also hate the addictive video shorts that seem to be part of all social media sites now. It’s not just TikTok anymore- YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat all have those endless reels of short videos to scroll through.

Yes I know that ‘parents should parents’ id just appreciate to have better tools to make sure my children are safe as possible online, and not feel like I’m fighting against something.

localhere · 29/03/2025 09:19

I agree but I shudder to think what social media would become if it were only for OVER 16s. It’s bad enough as it is