Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Michelle Keegan has incredible genes

284 replies

namechangeagain4 · 22/03/2025 23:17

I mean, her mum is nice looking, for sure. But Michelle is next level!

www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14510279/Michelle-Keegans-mother-Jackie-silence-birth-grandchild.html

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Bathnet · 23/03/2025 08:54

She was never unattractive but she’s had LOADS of work done to her face

WhereIsMyJumper · 23/03/2025 08:50

Whether it’s genes or whether she has had work done doesn’t really matter to me. I find her so beautiful that I feel like it should be illegal to look that good 😂

Realityofinvisibility · 23/03/2025 08:49

Bakedpotatoes · 23/03/2025 08:48

They don't have to change but post partum is a very vulnerable time and I don't really understand why people need to voice every last opinion especially on a woman who has recently given birth and is likely emotionally and physically exhausted. The old saying, if you don't have anything nice to say, should apply to a lot more things.

I agree completely. I’ve actually reported this thread as some of the comments are vile and so unkind

Bakedpotatoes · 23/03/2025 08:48

NorthernGirl1981 · 23/03/2025 08:31

I imagine a lot of women on this thread have thought for a very long time that Michelle’s face and her looks are just a result of plastic surgery and that sadly she had ruined her natural beauty.

Why does the fact she’s had a baby mean that those opinions now have to change?

They don't have to change but post partum is a very vulnerable time and I don't really understand why people need to voice every last opinion especially on a woman who has recently given birth and is likely emotionally and physically exhausted. The old saying, if you don't have anything nice to say, should apply to a lot more things.

Tabitha005 · 23/03/2025 08:47

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

SandyLanes · 23/03/2025 08:47

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Tabitha005 · 23/03/2025 08:45

FancyNewt · 23/03/2025 04:36

She's a good actress and done well for herself. I think that's all that needs to be said.

I’ve watched a couple of series with her in them and thought she’s a very average actor. She was particularly awful in the series where Joanna Lumley played her MIL. Mind you, there’s precious few really bloody great actors around these days!

ThereWillBeGold · 23/03/2025 08:42

Bakedpotatoes · 23/03/2025 08:32

This woman has recently given birth and is getting ripped apart for her looks. So what if she's had some surgery - she looks incredible in my opinion.

Post partum is hard enough and if she were to come on here incognito to look for some advice and saw this thread, I'm sure she'd be upset. Sometimes this place is utterly horrible and this thread is a great example.

Exactly what I'm thinking. Thinking back to when I had my children, how emotionally and physically affected I felt after. If I'd read nasty comments about me, I'd have been really upset.

I always thought Michelle was stunning when I first saw her in Coronation Street years ago.

Realityofinvisibility · 23/03/2025 08:42

NotHavingAFunTime · 23/03/2025 08:38

Agree. It’s almost as if the thread was started just so everyone could jump on with the ‘she has had work done’ comments and pics. Nasty thread.

I don’t understand why people judge women for having Botox/fillers/surgery etc. it’s their choice it doesn’t affect anyone else ? Why so much judgment?

Realityofinvisibility · 23/03/2025 08:41

NorthernGirl1981 · 23/03/2025 08:31

I imagine a lot of women on this thread have thought for a very long time that Michelle’s face and her looks are just a result of plastic surgery and that sadly she had ruined her natural beauty.

Why does the fact she’s had a baby mean that those opinions now have to change?

People who ‘voice’ those kind of opinions are unkind or jealous, maybe both. She hasn’t ruined her natural beauty ?? She has had some procedures done and so what ? It’s her face!

sweetgingercat · 23/03/2025 08:40

I think she’s a terrible actress, she can’t emote and she has none of those micro movements in her features that enable
her to get into a role and give it depth. Botox won’t help in this regard.

I do agree she was very pretty before in a sort of unique way and the work she has done has given her the sort of generic enhanced beauty you see in a lot of celebs.

it doesn’t help that she’s married Mark Wright (he’s so pointless) and they have cultivated a super glam lifestyle and become meaningless tabloid fodder.

NotHavingAFunTime · 23/03/2025 08:38

IClose · 23/03/2025 08:23

I just love how we are so supportive of beautiful women on here 😖. Especially those that are successful.

Women destroying other women…girls destroying other girls…just like the playground.

Agree. It’s almost as if the thread was started just so everyone could jump on with the ‘she has had work done’ comments and pics. Nasty thread.

Bakedpotatoes · 23/03/2025 08:32

This woman has recently given birth and is getting ripped apart for her looks. So what if she's had some surgery - she looks incredible in my opinion.

Post partum is hard enough and if she were to come on here incognito to look for some advice and saw this thread, I'm sure she'd be upset. Sometimes this place is utterly horrible and this thread is a great example.

InWithThePlums · 23/03/2025 08:31

Realityofinvisibility · 23/03/2025 08:14

What’s wrong with her ears ?? They just look like normal ears to me !

Agree!

NorthernGirl1981 · 23/03/2025 08:31

ThereWillBeGold · 23/03/2025 08:26

Well said, some really nasty comments here. Especially about a woman who's just had a baby.

I imagine a lot of women on this thread have thought for a very long time that Michelle’s face and her looks are just a result of plastic surgery and that sadly she had ruined her natural beauty.

Why does the fact she’s had a baby mean that those opinions now have to change?

Realityofinvisibility · 23/03/2025 08:28

ThereWillBeGold · 23/03/2025 08:26

Well said, some really nasty comments here. Especially about a woman who's just had a baby.

I agree. It’s quite unkind.

JMSA · 23/03/2025 08:28

She’s absolutely beautiful, with or without surgery. It’s not true that anyone with money - and the means to access surgery - could look that good. Look at Charlotte Crosby.
Love her or loathe her, Kim Kardashian is the same … completely stunning regardless.

ThereWillBeGold · 23/03/2025 08:26

IClose · 23/03/2025 08:23

I just love how we are so supportive of beautiful women on here 😖. Especially those that are successful.

Women destroying other women…girls destroying other girls…just like the playground.

Well said, some really nasty comments here. Especially about a woman who's just had a baby.

IClose · 23/03/2025 08:23

I just love how we are so supportive of beautiful women on here 😖. Especially those that are successful.

Women destroying other women…girls destroying other girls…just like the playground.

cramptramp · 23/03/2025 08:22

She’s from the Cheryl Cole school of good genes. Both were pretty girls when young, I remember Michelle when she started in Coronation st, and I thought she was good looking then. But as the years have gone by, money, grooming, and a bit of cosmetic surgery have made her beautiful. The same thing happened with Cheryl Cole.

Realityofinvisibility · 23/03/2025 08:14

niuwyoosername · 22/03/2025 23:36

She has unfortunate ears.

What’s wrong with her ears ?? They just look like normal ears to me !

Noperope · 23/03/2025 08:13

All the money in the world couldn't make me (or the majority of people) look like that in a bikini so it's not purely down to surgery.

To think Michelle Keegan has incredible genes
Realityofinvisibility · 23/03/2025 08:13

strawlight · 22/03/2025 23:27

Yes she’s very pretty, but has also had quite a lot of work done to her face. I am very glad they’ve finally had a baby!

She really looked like kylie Jenner before having work done I’d never realised . I think it’s the lower part of her face they had similar small mouths

LlynTegid · 23/03/2025 08:10

Let us judge Michelle Keegan's acting ability instead of all this comment and speculation, I suggest.

Chuchoter · 23/03/2025 08:06

Emily MacDonagh who is married to Peter Andre is two years younger than Michelle, so is a comparable age and looks better.

Swipe left for the next trending thread