Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To not pay for an unwanted child?

516 replies

Anudawan · 19/03/2025 21:00

Hypothetical.

it came up at work today.

if the pregnancy was a result of a one night stand, regardless of whether precautions were taken, if the man doesn’t want the pregnancy and the woman decides to continue, should he be able to opt out of child support?

my personal answer and I’m not sure on the nuance (ie do you have be on the birth certificate and thus can claim parental responsibility in order to be compelled to pay maintenance or a dna test to compel the man) my personal answer is no, he cannot or shouldn’t be able to opt out once the child is born. All sex (with a woman of reproductive age) carries the risk of pregnancy, you can lower the risk but never fully remove it. Abstinence is the only way to do that. To do the action you’ve got to be prepared for the consequences. It’s very easy to flippantly say ‘get an abortion’ but for some women that isn’t viable.

OP posts:
OneTealDog · 19/03/2025 23:47

DissidentDaughter · 19/03/2025 23:46

Regarding ‘more research for male birth control’, Gabrielle Blair comments in her article:

“But what about birth control? If a woman doesn’t want to risk an unwanted pregnancy, why wouldn’t she just use birth control? If a women can manage to figure out how to get an abortion, surely she can get birth control, right? Great questions.

Modern birth control is possibly the greatest invention of the last century, and I am very grateful for it. It’s also brutal. The side effects for many women are ridiculously harmful. So ridiculous, that when an oral contraception for men was created, it wasn’t approved because of the side effects. And the list of side effects was about a third as long as the known side effects for women’s oral contraception.”

Or just not have sex with random men

OneTealDog · 19/03/2025 23:47

I had a pregnancy from a ons and he won't pay. Won't be involved in his daughter's life.

Kinda sad really...

But his choice.

I get money from him or else I would have starved.

I'm now married with three children

DissidentDaughter · 19/03/2025 23:46

AlmostAJillSandwich · 19/03/2025 23:38

To reply to the several who have quoted my post and asked questions, like i said, unpopular opinion.
Also i know it would never actually be workable as a law because there's no way to prove if contraception was used or not and he said she said. It's just what i personally think would be the fair way to let BOTH genders have some say in becoming a parent or not. If a woman cannot be forced to be a parent and can choose abortion men should be able to choose not to be held responsible for babies they dont want because they obviously cannot force a woman to have an abortion. When pregnancy occurs women hold all the cards, can choose to keep when partner doesnt want to be a parent, or abort even if partner desperately wants the baby.

Basically we need more research for male birth control, women have tons of options, men get condom or the snip. They need something less parmanent than sterilisation, but more reliable than a condom.

To the person who said how would it be fair to the child as it only focuses on parents wants not childs needs, that would fall on the mother who knows she'd be going it alone financially. Her ability to provide for the child should be part of her decision to keep as solo financier, or abort if she cannot afford it by herself.

Regarding ‘more research for male birth control’, Gabrielle Blair comments in her article:

“But what about birth control? If a woman doesn’t want to risk an unwanted pregnancy, why wouldn’t she just use birth control? If a women can manage to figure out how to get an abortion, surely she can get birth control, right? Great questions.

Modern birth control is possibly the greatest invention of the last century, and I am very grateful for it. It’s also brutal. The side effects for many women are ridiculously harmful. So ridiculous, that when an oral contraception for men was created, it wasn’t approved because of the side effects. And the list of side effects was about a third as long as the known side effects for women’s oral contraception.”

Male Birth Control Study Killed After Men Report Side Effects

Science has failed yet again to come up with hormonal birth control for men. The most recent study was stopped because the men reported problems with side effects like mood swings and acne.

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/11/03/500549503/male-birth-control-study-killed-after-men-complain-about-side-effects

Bertiel33 · 19/03/2025 23:46

Firefly1987 · 19/03/2025 23:44

Ok probably should've said "carry a child to term" then instead of conceive. But we have enough forms of contraception to make conceiving a child we don't want very unlikely.

No contraception is 100%

notwavingbutsinking · 19/03/2025 23:45

I have a great deal of sympathy for decent men who find themselves in the position of reluctant fatherhood. Abstinence as a method of contraception is simply not grounded in reality.

I firmly believe that men should NOT be able to opt out of supporting a child that they have fathered, and that the current system for child support in this country is not fit for purpose and that children are suffering as a result.

These things can both be true simultaneously. You can acknowledge that yes, it is a crappy situation for a man to be in, whilst also making sure that he pays for his child, for the sake of that child.

Boredofbeinganadult · 19/03/2025 23:44

AllosaurusMum · 19/03/2025 23:37

How?
Women who don't want their baby abort it or give it up for adoption. They're not expected to continue paying for a cold they don't want.
They had sex just like a man with an unwanted pregnancy, but they're not punished with child support for a unwanted child. They're allowed to give it away

This

Firefly1987 · 19/03/2025 23:44

Bertiel33 · 19/03/2025 23:34

Fertility issues aside, how can you know you will never conceive a child from sex??

Ok probably should've said "carry a child to term" then instead of conceive. But we have enough forms of contraception to make conceiving a child we don't want very unlikely.

Bertiel33 · 19/03/2025 23:42

AllosaurusMum · 19/03/2025 23:37

How?
Women who don't want their baby abort it or give it up for adoption. They're not expected to continue paying for a cold they don't want.
They had sex just like a man with an unwanted pregnancy, but they're not punished with child support for a unwanted child. They're allowed to give it away

Do you think it is so easy just to get an abortion or give a child away for adoption?
The burden of contraception falls so much on women, it's always our fault when it fails and men should be allowed to shag whoever they want without any regard to the consequences.
Men have choices, I don't know why that's so hard to accept.

Allthegoodnamesarechosen · 19/03/2025 23:40

AlmostAJillSandwich · 19/03/2025 21:22

My opinion on this is very unpopular.

In cases where contraception has been used but failed (i don't count 'just' pulling out before ejaculation as contraception) or where men have trusted a womans word she's on birth control and been lied to, then i think that legally, if the man doesn't want the baby, but the mother does and chooses to continue with a pregnancy, then he should be legally waived of financial responsibility on the provision he is also not involved in the babies life and waives his parental rights. If he wants to be involved, either from the beginning or later on with mothers agreement, then he becomes liable for child support and parental rights. It's in or out, not best of both worlds being a dad but not paying.

It is completely the womans decision to continue the pregnancy knowing it would be as a single parent without financial help from the father, but also that he has no parental rights and she can block all involvement from him.

In cases where hes not given a shit about using contraception and been happy to risk pregnancy, he doesn't get an out financially, but can choose not to play a part beyond financial.

I think even Solomon would find it hard to judge this situation correctly! Because, you know, people don’t always tell the truth about their actions (especially when ‘carried away’ by lust).

AlmostAJillSandwich · 19/03/2025 23:38

To reply to the several who have quoted my post and asked questions, like i said, unpopular opinion.
Also i know it would never actually be workable as a law because there's no way to prove if contraception was used or not and he said she said. It's just what i personally think would be the fair way to let BOTH genders have some say in becoming a parent or not. If a woman cannot be forced to be a parent and can choose abortion men should be able to choose not to be held responsible for babies they dont want because they obviously cannot force a woman to have an abortion. When pregnancy occurs women hold all the cards, can choose to keep when partner doesnt want to be a parent, or abort even if partner desperately wants the baby.

Basically we need more research for male birth control, women have tons of options, men get condom or the snip. They need something less parmanent than sterilisation, but more reliable than a condom.

To the person who said how would it be fair to the child as it only focuses on parents wants not childs needs, that would fall on the mother who knows she'd be going it alone financially. Her ability to provide for the child should be part of her decision to keep as solo financier, or abort if she cannot afford it by herself.

FiveOClockSomewhere · 19/03/2025 23:38

Only if you were misled. I.e hole in condom, or they had sex with you without consent.

AllosaurusMum · 19/03/2025 23:37

Anudawan · 19/03/2025 21:10

Except it’s very different?

How?
Women who don't want their baby abort it or give it up for adoption. They're not expected to continue paying for a cold they don't want.
They had sex just like a man with an unwanted pregnancy, but they're not punished with child support for a unwanted child. They're allowed to give it away

Bertiel33 · 19/03/2025 23:34

Firefly1987 · 19/03/2025 23:33

@Bertiel33 but as a woman I can have as much sex as I like and know I will never have to conceive a child. Not really the same is it?

Fertility issues aside, how can you know you will never conceive a child from sex??

Firefly1987 · 19/03/2025 23:33

@Bertiel33 but as a woman I can have as much sex as I like and know I will never have to conceive a child. Not really the same is it?

Bertiel33 · 19/03/2025 23:30

Whatthefuck3456 · 19/03/2025 21:28

Men should have the same rights as a woman. If the woman doesn’t want the child she can terminate, if the man doesn’t want the child it’s tough if the woman does. So should women be aloud a termination then? Or should they learn to not have sex too!

Men and women do have the same choice over what happens to their bodies.

The difference is where the choice ends. Mens choice ends when the sperm leaves his body. No contraception is 100% effective so he can choose to accept the risk if pregnancy or solely have sex with women he wants to procreate with.

DissidentDaughter · 19/03/2025 23:30

@Ghosttofu99 thanks, glad you read/found it interesting.

It’s very thorough in addressing all the “Yeah, but…” arguments! 💥

FrippEnos · 19/03/2025 23:26

I have said this on other threads.
Yes any man that gets a woman pregnant should be paying for their child.

Here is the bit that people don't like, DNA testing should be standard at birth, that way the Father cannot get out of it and the CM should be garnished straight from their wages.

Icedtea200 · 19/03/2025 23:24

Comedycook · 19/03/2025 21:37

But this argument is focusing purely on the adults involved and the choices they made and whether they are being treated fairly. The child is the innocent party and this argument totally ignores their needs.

So true. The only consideration here should be the innocent one, which is the child. Disgusts me that anyone can think otherwise.

Ghosttofu99 · 19/03/2025 23:23

DissidentDaughter · 19/03/2025 22:52

@Anudawan found a non-Twitter version by the author “Men are Responsible for 100% of Unwanted Pregnancies”

(happens to come from an abortion-averse stance) but the points made re consequences/accountability around pregnancy are still valid… and very witty!

https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/abortion-pregnancy-pro-life_uk_5ba20e08e4b046313fc0bda5

Edited

“There’s a lot to be unpacked just in that story, but I’ll simply point out, in case you weren’t aware, that as a society, we really don’t mind if women suffer, physically or mentally, as long as it makes things easier for men.”

Brilliant article, thanks for sharing

OneTealDog · 19/03/2025 23:23

Koulibiak · 19/03/2025 23:20

Rather than teaching them ONS are wrong, I would rather they have all the information to make an informed decision. Teens (and many adults…) have poor impulse control. That’s why it’s important they know the facts - and the law - beforehand.

ONS can also be very satisfying if both parties are consenting. I don’t agree that they are fundamentally “wrong”.

You can teach them they are wrong, it's not something to do,...

IHaveAlwaysLivedintheCastle · 19/03/2025 23:20

Two: he has no responsibility towards the child or the woman if he has been clear that he doesn’t want the child brought into existence.

At the risk of getting a deletion that has to be one of the stupidest things I've read on here.

Koulibiak · 19/03/2025 23:20

OneTealDog · 19/03/2025 23:08

Hopefully you teach them ons are wrong

Rather than teaching them ONS are wrong, I would rather they have all the information to make an informed decision. Teens (and many adults…) have poor impulse control. That’s why it’s important they know the facts - and the law - beforehand.

ONS can also be very satisfying if both parties are consenting. I don’t agree that they are fundamentally “wrong”.

DissidentDaughter · 19/03/2025 23:19

YourLuckyPearlGoose · 19/03/2025 23:11

One: it has nothing to do with frogmarching anyone anywhere. It’s two people each making the decision that best suits them.

Two: he has no responsibility towards the child or the woman if he has been clear that he doesn’t want the child brought into existence.

The only foolproof way of a bloke being “clear that he doesn’t want the child brought into existence” is to refrain from intercourse.

IHaveAlwaysLivedintheCastle · 19/03/2025 23:17

Which way round is it supposed to be?

Anyone who thinks a man can opt out of paying to support children he created is so unreasonable it's not even worth debating. If men don't want children, get a vasectomy or don't have sex.

Ghosttofu99 · 19/03/2025 23:16

Comedycook · 19/03/2025 21:01

Child maintenance isn't a reward for the mother and a punishment for the father....it's for the child. The circumstances around the conception are irrelevant. Children conceived from one night stands still need to eat.

Common sense answer ^

Swipe left for the next trending thread