Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Army recruitment of unemployed youth

142 replies

MistressoftheDarkSide · 19/03/2025 19:43

Here pigeons, have a cat.

According to the Express and Mail, Liz Kendall thinks that going into the forces would be a good idea for unemployed youngsters. Surprised this has apparently flown under the MN radar. I wonder where this is all going, she mused, with wide eyed faux naivety.

OP posts:
MargueriteInBloom · 19/03/2025 21:46

Hedjwitch · 19/03/2025 20:03

The phrase " cannon fodder" is such an outdated trope. That related to conscription to the front line where soldiers actually faced cannon. Warfare has changed a tad since then.

Have you told that Ukrainians?

British troops sent in Afghanistan maybe?

FranticHare · 19/03/2025 21:45

TheFairyCaravan · 19/03/2025 21:40

There was young care leaver in my son’s regiment. He had had a pretty shit life of it, tbh. Anyway to cut a long story short, DS1 and his senior found him hanging one weekend. They, the police and paramedics got him back, but he died a few days later in hospital.

I firmly believe the armed forces is absolutely not the place for young care leavers or those who have had a traumatic childhood. They need a strong support network behind them. They need someone there when times are shit, when times are good and when times are really tough. They need to know there’s always someone there at the end of the phone for them. Yes, they’ve got their armed forces family, but they need a family behind them too.

Edited

But many don’t have a strong network, because their back ground is shit. They may have no family, or their family are abusive. Their friends maybe heading down the gangs, knives, drugs route,

Of course armed forces are not for all - but equally you can’t say it’s wrong for all either.

I feel huge sympathy to the young man you mention, and also for your son for finding him. That must have been pretty horrific.

100PercentFaithful · 19/03/2025 21:44

It has always been thus.

ExIssues · 19/03/2025 21:44

EmailFocus · 19/03/2025 20:09

Ds's boyfriend is a soldier, he joined when he was 16. They recruited from his school - didn't recruit at ds's (leafy suburb) school, which is telling. Ds's boyfriend is of mixed opinion (unsurprisingly), they have really helped quite a few kids gain some stability but he reckons he's one of the few who didn't grow up in a dysfunctional environment but they don't encourage you to apply for promotions or seeks them out because they have you by the short and curlies but he's ambitious so has pursued opportunities on his own. I think any job is better than no job - have experience of family members spending a year in their bedroom - that is the pits. And when he stays with us - ds's bedroom is absolutely spotless!

The army recruited from my ex's school...a private school. Not a fancy one either - it's since become a state school.

People I know in the army and navy love it. They get to do loads of skiing, sailing, mountaineering etc, travel, there's great cameraderie.

JenniferBooth · 19/03/2025 21:43

Well if something like this IS implemented the people who join would need to know the UK would have their backs if (God forbid) they suffered an injury
The cuts coming to disability benefits say otherwise.

FranticHare · 19/03/2025 21:41

APATEKPHILLIPEWATCH · 19/03/2025 21:36

Yes I agree with you and it’s a big part of it. My point is if the U.K. had to have the same attitude (and who fucking knows WTF is going on with the world right) we’d get on with it because that’s what humans do. But many people want that life - it’s a good, beneficial life to so many and it really makes young people

But it’s not just Israel. Many other countries have conscription, and it’s not viewed as negative. Austria, Sweden, Finland, Denmark etc. Think there are 9 counties just in Europe.

TheFairyCaravan · 19/03/2025 21:40

APATEKPHILLIPEWATCH · 19/03/2025 21:29

Relatively few army officer see conflict. Especially these days. And actually speaking as someone who experienced childhood trauma, it doesn’t help having a mundane calm life. Sometimes a bit of conflict is what’s needed to deal with trauma.

What should homeless people and care leavers do then if they have nowhere to go? They don’t have to stay if they don’t like the Army. But you’ll find the vast majority of people DO like the Army. Just because it isn’t slipping into a middle class subset it doesn’t make it a bad option compared to sleeping on the streets.

There was young care leaver in my son’s regiment. He had had a pretty shit life of it, tbh. Anyway to cut a long story short, DS1 and his senior found him hanging one weekend. They, the police and paramedics got him back, but he died a few days later in hospital.

I firmly believe the armed forces is absolutely not the place for young care leavers or those who have had a traumatic childhood. They need a strong support network behind them. They need someone there when times are shit, when times are good and when times are really tough. They need to know there’s always someone there at the end of the phone for them. Yes, they’ve got their armed forces family, but they need a family behind them too.

APATEKPHILLIPEWATCH · 19/03/2025 21:36

AquaPeer · 19/03/2025 21:35

No it’s because their core cultural value is around being a defensive nation prepared to fight against another holocaust/ expulsion on the basis of “never forget, never again”
thats why young people want to learn how to protect Isreal, for the day they have to do it.

As you saw with thousands returning from abroad to do just that - voluntarily - after October 7th

there is simply no comparison to the uk

Yes I agree with you and it’s a big part of it. My point is if the U.K. had to have the same attitude (and who fucking knows WTF is going on with the world right) we’d get on with it because that’s what humans do. But many people want that life - it’s a good, beneficial life to so many and it really makes young people

FranticHare · 19/03/2025 21:36

APATEKPHILLIPEWATCH · 19/03/2025 21:27

Because of conscription. They aren’t taught it’s something to fear or lower themselves to, or to try and wriggle out of doing.

I think if we still had conscription here our attitude would be the same - seeing it as a positive thing.

I have family in other countries where they will need to do conscription at some point (from what I understand it’s linked to when you leave education). The young people don’t view it as negative at all. It just is.

I think it can genuinely install some positives like resilience into young people. Promote independence. Forcing them to be part of a team, and to think how their actions/attitudes effects the team around them. These things can only be good for society as a whole,

I wouldn’t support conscription here. It’s not for all. But if we did for some reason, I would like to see a huge spread of roles that the young people could choose from - what pp have said about Germany’s previous approach sounds interesting.

Lessexpected · 19/03/2025 21:35

I’d rather young people gave service than sat at home on the dole getting into trouble.

AquaPeer · 19/03/2025 21:35

APATEKPHILLIPEWATCH · 19/03/2025 21:27

Because of conscription. They aren’t taught it’s something to fear or lower themselves to, or to try and wriggle out of doing.

No it’s because their core cultural value is around being a defensive nation prepared to fight against another holocaust/ expulsion on the basis of “never forget, never again”
thats why young people want to learn how to protect Isreal, for the day they have to do it.

As you saw with thousands returning from abroad to do just that - voluntarily - after October 7th

there is simply no comparison to the uk

DancefloorAcrobatics · 19/03/2025 21:31

Lavender14 · 19/03/2025 20:43

The issue I have is that the army specifically target vulnerable, isolated, disillusioned young people. My question is why they are the main subset of young people being targeted by recruitment. It feels almost predatory.

What would the alternative be?

If you grow are in a thriving area with lots of different types of entry level jobs with good progression, the Forces would just be another employer offering similar things ...
In deprived areas, they are probably the only employer who offer a job with career progression.

TheFairyCaravan · 19/03/2025 21:30

DH served 35yrs in the RAF. He left school with a handful of qualifications, but the RAF made him, tbh. I never thought he’d leave, even in the months before his exit date he was enquiring about a service extension, it was turned down, and he was gutted. Saying that, he got an excellent job, through the resettlement process, earning more than we ever dreamed of, and within weeks he was happier than he’d been in years. He’d become completely institutionalised and was fearful of jumping ship. A few weeks after he left, he got his lump sum, and his pension kicked in which was great.

DS1 is in the army, he’s 30 and has been in 11yrs. He’s had enough. Out of the cohort who he joined with, there’s 3 or 4 left. He can leave and do whatever he wants because I refused to sign the paperwork for him to join at 16, despite that being what he wanted, so he has 11 GCSEs & 3 A levels. He, also, has the qualifications he’s gained in the army.

He has got to a very good rank, and earns a good wage, which is one of the main problems with him leaving tbh. All he has to pay for atm is his room in the mess and his phone. He knows what he thinks he wants to do but it will be years before his salary becomes comparable to what it is now so it’s a big decision to make.

All he ever wanted to be was a soldier, right from when he was tiny so it’s sad to see him so disillusioned. We had to appeal for him to go in because he suffered with migraines as a child, and that was a no no. They didn’t care about his hay fever, and still don’t, they prescribe him antihistamines because it’s been quite bad the past few years. I really thought he’d do a full career, but it seems not. He loved it at the beginning, he volunteered for everything and has been all over the world. Not anymore though.

APATEKPHILLIPEWATCH · 19/03/2025 21:29

Lavender14 · 19/03/2025 21:15

I would say yes because what's the alternative - usually it means young people who have experienced trauma and adverse childhood experiences coming across more trauma which let's be honest the army are not great at dealing with. Being homeless/ care experienced/ lacking in education/ being in poverty may make people more likely to sign up but only because they're desperate and aren't getting the right support to empower them otherwise. If someone genuinely wants to enlist understanding the dangers and makes an informed choice then that's fair enough but I don't think specifically targeting the homeless or care leavers instead of other young people is fair, no.

@nfkl in theory what you say about positive male role models is great but having worked in army camps the domestic abuse and misogyny I've witnessed has been some of the worst I've encountered.

Relatively few army officer see conflict. Especially these days. And actually speaking as someone who experienced childhood trauma, it doesn’t help having a mundane calm life. Sometimes a bit of conflict is what’s needed to deal with trauma.

What should homeless people and care leavers do then if they have nowhere to go? They don’t have to stay if they don’t like the Army. But you’ll find the vast majority of people DO like the Army. Just because it isn’t slipping into a middle class subset it doesn’t make it a bad option compared to sleeping on the streets.

APATEKPHILLIPEWATCH · 19/03/2025 21:27

AquaPeer · 19/03/2025 21:15

quite a different cultural background going on there though, isn’t there? The army means a very different thing to Israelis

Because of conscription. They aren’t taught it’s something to fear or lower themselves to, or to try and wriggle out of doing.

Lavender14 · 19/03/2025 21:15

APATEKPHILLIPEWATCH · 19/03/2025 20:46

Is it predatory if they give young people who may otherwise be homeless a decent living, a skill and a roof over their heads? They target where they get highest success rates as any organisation should and would. They turn people’s lives around. Thats a good thing.

I would say yes because what's the alternative - usually it means young people who have experienced trauma and adverse childhood experiences coming across more trauma which let's be honest the army are not great at dealing with. Being homeless/ care experienced/ lacking in education/ being in poverty may make people more likely to sign up but only because they're desperate and aren't getting the right support to empower them otherwise. If someone genuinely wants to enlist understanding the dangers and makes an informed choice then that's fair enough but I don't think specifically targeting the homeless or care leavers instead of other young people is fair, no.

@nfkl in theory what you say about positive male role models is great but having worked in army camps the domestic abuse and misogyny I've witnessed has been some of the worst I've encountered.

AquaPeer · 19/03/2025 21:15

APATEKPHILLIPEWATCH · 19/03/2025 20:40

Also the nail biting over “forcing” re conscription doesn’t work like that in reality. I know people in Israel, where conscription is mandatory for all young people until at least 18 - 20. They WANT to join the Army, they look forward to it, and it’s not all frontline roles, some people are yoga teachers in the Army. The thought of it being “forced” is laughable to Israelis - and they have one of the strongest most efficient armies in the world as a result, high resilience in young people and have very low unemployment rates

quite a different cultural background going on there though, isn’t there? The army means a very different thing to Israelis

thankyounextplease · 19/03/2025 21:08

AquaPeer · 19/03/2025 21:07

The armed forces has never been a place for people just because they’re unemployed.

if you’re indicating that they’re trying to collect cannon fodder for Ukraine, boots on the ground isn’t really the way wars are fought now. No one wants to train and pay billy the dimwit to put professional soldiers in danger

“Out of every one-hundred men, ten shouldn’t even be there, eighty are just targets, nine are the real fighters, and we are lucky to have them, for they make the battle. Ah, but the one, one is a warrior and he will bring the others back.”

AquaPeer · 19/03/2025 21:07

The armed forces has never been a place for people just because they’re unemployed.

if you’re indicating that they’re trying to collect cannon fodder for Ukraine, boots on the ground isn’t really the way wars are fought now. No one wants to train and pay billy the dimwit to put professional soldiers in danger

onewayoryourmother · 19/03/2025 21:06

nfkl · 19/03/2025 20:24

Young men in particular need physical activity to drain their energy, they need to face dangers to understand risk and the value of life, they need communal living and rules to understand how to not be selfish, they need to see a bigger picture of community and country to grow a sense of duty and loyalty, they need male role models.

Bring conscription back or something similar. Women tend to mature naturally, many young men rather real life, strong experiences to get the grow up memo. Modern life took that from them, hence the oversupply of manchilds and selfish cowards.

This is a really interesting post. I am separated from and divorcing my H, who is an incredibly selfish man who came from a very cosseted background where - due to his mother’s anxiety - he wasn’t exposed to anything that allowed him to build life skills and experience.

I’m now now dating someone who had a much more independent childhood, similar to mine, that built resilience. He served for 6 years from ages19-25 until he was injured and had to leave. He is far more surfacely ‘blokey’ than my H but very, very much more kind, empathetic, considerate and - in a totally non engulfing way - protective of me.

Selfishness runs through my H like a stick of rock and the opposite runs through my partner. Partly it’s early childhood I’m sure, but I’m certain the army had a big impact (positively) on his emotional development.

we are all mid 40s just for context.

reversegear · 19/03/2025 21:04

JenniferBooth · 19/03/2025 20:57

Its simple really If she got what she suggested there would be even less women working in social care because they would be in the Army

@JenniferBoothoh I see, well if it did ever go back to ye old days it was only for 18 months, I think in some countries it’s 6-12 months. So that’s the time when 18-20 are at uni or looking for work.

Also given that most carers in this country are from overseas and the UK carers are older I’m not sure the correlation works. I work with care in the home sectors and it’s not as common as people think to need carers or going care homes.

Around 2.5% of adults need homes.

Slumbering · 19/03/2025 21:03

PaintDecisions · 19/03/2025 20:47

Because young healthy men have always been what the forces need. Not clapped out 40 something perimenopausal women or elderly men. Although probably because we'd tell the PTIs to fuck off rather than do as we're told....

@PaintDecisions Can we please not have clapped out, 40 something, peri menopausal and women all in the same sentence? It’s a bit ignorant sounding.

Good luck with positivity and self love when you’re in your forties.

Llttledrummergirl · 19/03/2025 21:02

They need to sort out the recruitment process for people who want to join first. It's so fucked up people leave before they begin

RaininSummer · 19/03/2025 21:01

They have amazing apprenticeships on offer but our disaffected youth would have to man or woman up, get fit and put the games consoles down. Also mental health would likely preclude jouning up.

Gall10 · 19/03/2025 21:01

MistressoftheDarkSide · 19/03/2025 20:11

Yeah, my Dad joined the navy at 17. He's a nuclear test veteran. He has plenty to say about modern warfare and the military, as he deals with the ongoing impact of purely coincidental yet very rare splenic lymphoma. Cannon fodder is a euphemism.

I hope your dad is doing well….its terrible how they were treated at that time and have failed to receive acknowledgment of their long term health issues.