Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

VAT on private schools paved the way for disability cuts

70 replies

BellesAndGraces · 19/03/2025 14:21

Charging VAT on private schools was such a vote winner for Labour. Pitted the so called “haves” against the “have-nots” and distracted everyone from the rest of Labour’s policies. Many who couldn’t afford to privately educate their own kids were “full of glee” at Labour’s policy. They didn’t care that many of those parents were sending their kids to private schools to address SEN that were not met in state schools.

Now, Labour is cutting disability benefits, but the divisive nature of the VAT policy may have left the “haves” feeling less inclined to speak out against a policy that disproportionately affects the “have-nots.” Well played, Labour—it turns out they’ve been playing chess while the Tories were stuck on chequers.

OP posts:
SirDanielBrackley · 19/03/2025 16:06

How on earth you make that connection is totally beyond me.

YABU

ListenToTheRiver · 19/03/2025 16:06

My children go to private school. The fact that some people reacted with glee to VAT on school fees doesn’t make me not feel sorry for people who may lose benefits due to yet more bad decisions by this government. I’m not interested in tit for tat, I want a government that does the right things and we haven’t had one of those for a while.

Goawayableistbigots · 19/03/2025 16:03

Edited as quoted Nodddy's ableist post, now thankfully deleted.

Cabbagefamily · 19/03/2025 16:00

Completely ridiculous and irrelevant.

VickyEadieofThigh · 19/03/2025 16:00

JassyRadlett · 19/03/2025 15:23

I think It's Not All About You, actually.

Indeed. It's a ridiculous inference to draw.

x2boys · 19/03/2025 15:58

BellesAndGraces · 19/03/2025 14:21

Charging VAT on private schools was such a vote winner for Labour. Pitted the so called “haves” against the “have-nots” and distracted everyone from the rest of Labour’s policies. Many who couldn’t afford to privately educate their own kids were “full of glee” at Labour’s policy. They didn’t care that many of those parents were sending their kids to private schools to address SEN that were not met in state schools.

Now, Labour is cutting disability benefits, but the divisive nature of the VAT policy may have left the “haves” feeling less inclined to speak out against a policy that disproportionately affects the “have-nots.” Well played, Labour—it turns out they’ve been playing chess while the Tories were stuck on chequers.

People who send their children to private school for unmet SEN are priviliged that they are able to do that
The real disgrace is thst there are thousands of kids whose needs are not being met and their parents cant afford private school either.

noblegiraffe · 19/03/2025 15:53

Christ is there nothing they won’t shoe-horn a whinge about VAT into?

Chaotica · 19/03/2025 15:50

That's a very implausible link. You need a better argument for it than the one you've given.

Nodddy · 19/03/2025 15:49

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

NancyBellaDonna · 19/03/2025 15:39

Utter tosh!

randomchap · 19/03/2025 15:25

That's spectacularly tenuous.

JassyRadlett · 19/03/2025 15:23

I think It's Not All About You, actually.

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 19/03/2025 15:22

Ridiculous post. You need to try a bit harder next time.

frillygillymilly · 19/03/2025 15:22

but the divisive nature of the VAT policy may have left the “haves” feeling less inclined to speak out against a policy that disproportionately affects the “have-nots.”

I thought the issues with the VAT & the anger is because some of the "haves" are now "haves-nots"?

ilovesooty · 19/03/2025 15:21

Telemicus · 19/03/2025 14:49

I think that is extremely tenuous. Labour is generally increasing tax and cutting expenditure. You are linking unrelated things.

Agreed. The two aren't related.

frillygillymilly · 19/03/2025 15:20

Many who couldn’t afford to privately educate their own kids were “full of glee” at Labour’s policy.

I think the vast majority didn't/don't particularly care.

frillygillymilly · 19/03/2025 15:19

That's a reach!

Mightymoog · 19/03/2025 15:18

No, you don't make any sense there

Ph3 · 19/03/2025 14:53

Personally I don’t think that they paved the way as you put it. But the “haves” against the “haves-not” is how British society goes around. The “haves-not” believe that the “haves” as in people that send their kids to private school are super rich and have no issues and the “haves” think the “haves-not” get too many benefits and are lazy that don’t want to work. Meanwhile the truly rich ones don’t care about VAT, aren’t subject to the same tax rules as employees and carry on as they were.

Telemicus · 19/03/2025 14:49

I think that is extremely tenuous. Labour is generally increasing tax and cutting expenditure. You are linking unrelated things.