Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

What is your household income, how much is benefits, and how are you coping?

814 replies

Gabrilla · 19/03/2025 11:16

Genuinely curious after so many threads on here about benefit changes. Please feel free to name change!

I’ll start:

Salaries for both of us total 90k. Only benefits are £102 month child benefit, though we also get tax-free childcare and 15hrs free at nursery.

Total income is about 6k a month, mortgage and bills 3k, nursery 1k, commuting costs £500, groceries cost £500, husband pays CMS and other bits to his children totalling about £500 leaving us about £500 for everything else.

Feels like we’re constantly penny-pinching.

OP posts:
rosemarble · 19/03/2025 15:51

frillygillymilly · 19/03/2025 15:39

@rosemarble how is it high particularly when you add in housing and having dc?

Well of course, if you have a pot of money and spend it all then there won't be much left.

I'm struggling with your line of argument.

If I earn 90K and have no children and no mortgage, that number still sits at the same place on the chart of household income as someone who earns 90K and spends it all on housing and children.

I understand that having children and a large mortgage makes a difference to how far your 90K goes.

Don't keep telling me that OP has children and so therefore her 90K isn't a high household income. It might not be high enough for the things she wants to do, but compared to the income in the country it is higher than average.

frillygillymilly · 19/03/2025 15:51

I don’t know what the answer is. Not having kids? Leaving the country?

I'm encouraging my dc too definitely. The UK is fucked, all of the west will suffer due yo ageing populations but we are in a particular bad spot.

fitzwilliamdarcy · 19/03/2025 15:49

I don’t know what the answer is. Not having kids? Leaving the country?

The recommendation is that HR taxpayers move to one of the Scandi countries. You'll likely still pay lots of tax but you'll actually see the benefit of it by living in a society where you can access things that work properly. At the moment, you just pay loads of tax, get nothing back and nothing works properly because it's all underfunded.

Gabrilla · 19/03/2025 15:47

I looked up my street the other day and found most of the houses are owned outright (there’s a lot of people here who’ve been here for decades, mostly in their 50s-60s). We’ve got to know the neighbours and they’re mostly middle-aged tradesmen and a SAHM who does a bit of childcare for the grandkids.

No way a tradesperson and a SAHP would be able to afford to buy on this street now unless they had a gigantic inheritance. But it would be possible if the same couple were renting because housing benefit pays for it.

I don’t know what the answer is. Not having kids? Leaving the country?

OP posts:
Jalopy77 · 19/03/2025 15:47

£2643 benefits.

frillygillymilly · 19/03/2025 15:46

Low income high tax country…….

with little to show for the high tax

frillygillymilly · 19/03/2025 15:45

@JHound I know! but the poster I was responding to didn't understand why dc should be included in the comparison. I was trying to help her comprehend the difference housing & children make.

kurotora · 19/03/2025 15:44

I don’t get how you can feel poor on 90k. We have a combined household income of approx £65k (self employment for me, and disability, so this varies), one child, 3 cats and a dog, mortgage in the south east and I feel we’re doing well for ourselves! I’d certainly like to be able to afford cool holidays, but we don’t struggle for necessities. I grew up in poverty so this feels like good money.

JHound · 19/03/2025 15:43

frillygillymilly · 19/03/2025 15:33

So the OP without dc (no idea why you want to compare to households without dc) is an income 90% higher than the rest of the population

Add the fact she is spending 2k a month on a mortgage (guessing) & this drops down to an income higher than only 75%

Add 2 dc & income drops to higher than only 53% of the population.

OP is supporting children.

Isitforreal1942 · 19/03/2025 15:42

frillygillymilly · 19/03/2025 15:12

...and this is how you stand by your claim than 90K is not a high joint income?

But it isn't a high income. We are a low wage country & 90k today is 48k in the early 00s. Why don't you understand wage inflation or inflation or tax @rosemarble?

Low income high tax country…….

frillygillymilly · 19/03/2025 15:41

@JHound use the IF calculator

Pamalarrr · 19/03/2025 15:41

Joint income of £149,000. No benefits

frillygillymilly · 19/03/2025 15:41

@1apenny2apenny falls on deaf ears.

JHound · 19/03/2025 15:41

frillygillymilly · 19/03/2025 15:10

@rosemarble Why do you think it's 160k?

It's probably around 200k net for a couple to be in the 1% which would be approx 340k gross.

Where did you get that figure from?

frillygillymilly · 19/03/2025 15:39

@rosemarble how is it high particularly when you add in housing and having dc?

frillygillymilly · 19/03/2025 15:39

@bluegoosie

Either fixed the housing market or raise the real wages.

They can't do either

rosemarble · 19/03/2025 15:37

frillygillymilly · 19/03/2025 15:25

@rosemarble use the IF calculator.

The median full time salary is about 37/38k.

OK, so how a household income of 90K low - say it's 2 full time wages, it's still above average, and certainly not low.
I think I must be missing something.

fitzwilliamdarcy · 19/03/2025 15:36

Josiezu · 19/03/2025 13:58

@littleorangefox
*Salary - £2200
UC - £1500
Scottish Child Payment - £425
Child Benefit - £305
ADP - £290
Total: £4720

We're managing just fine :)*

I’m not surprised.

I do find it crazy that families can earn a relatively small portion of OP’s and then be topped up to almost 80% of OP’s take home.

It truly is a nuts system sometimes and there are times when it just doesn’t actually pay that much to work.

This is why some people are so quick to moan about it being “tone deaf” for someone to comment on the buying power of a £90k salary these days, because the reality is they assume it’s 3 times the amount but actually a family earning 1/3 of OP’s income are left with a fairly similar amount of money at the end of the month. Probably stings even more when OP’s family have to work 2 full time jobs for only 1k more than a family on 2 part time jobs and benefits.

Edited

The poster you've quoted has a household income of £2k more than mine despite the fact that, judging by the net salaries, I think I earn twice as much. It's bonkers to me.

1apenny2apenny · 19/03/2025 15:35

There’s lots of people putting their salaries and outgoings. The benefits threads normally attract lots of people saying they get PIP, DLA etc but there’s hardly any on here saying how much they get in benefits just posts telling people that earning £90k is loads and stop moaning. I’d be willing to bet those people are highly educated in demanding roles with 2 parents working and juggling family life. Why shouldn’t they earn well, after all they are the people paying all the tax.

frillygillymilly · 19/03/2025 15:34

Housing vs income increases has fucked young people.
And no wonder birth rates are falling faster than predicted.

northernballer · 19/03/2025 15:34

Gabrilla · 19/03/2025 15:24

This is so interesting.

I have a friend through a baby class who used to work sixteen hours at Tesco, her partner does thirty hours there, they live in a rented house a few streets away that is very similar to ours (though more recently decorated!) and honestly their lifestyle is better than ours in terms of spare cash. She’s been very open with me about what they get (a few bottles of wine deep!) and although it’s less than our income, she doesn’t have to pay much to her rent, lower bills and nothing for childcare. She says she’ll go back to work when the youngest is three as she plans to have another in a year or two.

It does make me wonder what the point is. I know that in a few years I’ll have more cash but it’s still going to largely go on the mortgage. Then when we’re old the house will be sold to pay for our care costs, and we’ll be alongside my friend in a home somewhere at eighty-five whilst her fees are paid by the government.

I’ve always seen the value in working hard but now I have a baby, I am doubting it all and time with her feels more valuable.

But presumably she has less that £16k in savings and won't be putting anything in her pension, has an insecure home as she rents and won't have an asset to sell if she does need care and therefore will be stuck in whatever home the state pays for rather than being able to choose somewhere half decent.

I get it's hard, and I hate to say it but kids get more expensive when they hit the teenage years. Hobbies, driving lessons, Uni costs, ridiculous appetites all add up. We bring home about £130k and have 3 teenagers and whilst we have a lovely life we are not rolling in it. I was also brought up by a single parent in a council house though and compared to that i am very lucky that I have stability.

We get no help whatsoever (don't need any so thats fair) but I would far rather be in my position than your friends.

frillygillymilly · 19/03/2025 15:33

So the OP without dc (no idea why you want to compare to households without dc) is an income 90% higher than the rest of the population

Add the fact she is spending 2k a month on a mortgage (guessing) & this drops down to an income higher than only 75%

Add 2 dc & income drops to higher than only 53% of the population.

NewsOverloading · 19/03/2025 15:33

Gabrilla · 19/03/2025 14:26

Can’t do that as I use it to commute to work? We need a seven seater for any trips as a family.

So if you need a 7 seater then your DH already had 3 or 4 children before you met? So he's supporting 4-5 kids on a mediocre salary in an expensive area.

bluegoosie · 19/03/2025 15:30

frillygillymilly · 19/03/2025 15:06

I'm trying not to sound too negative but I think everyone's quality of living has dropped significantly over the last 20 years. Real wages have not kept pace with inflation. 90K sounds like a lot but it's actually worth around 45K back before 2008 crash.

This is exactly it, we never recovered from the 08 crash. But many who are now mortgage free or have a very low mortgage don't understand that.

Housing and child care costs in the UK take up a phenomenal amount of our incomes compared to our EU neighbours:

As of April 2024, the median annual earnings for full-time employees in the United Kingdom were approximately £37,430

UK Childcare Costs:
The average weekly cost of a full-time nursery place for a child under two in Great Britain was £302.10 in 2024. Annually, this amounts to approximately £15,706.

UK Housing Costs:
The average UK house price was £290,000 in November 2024. Assuming a 25-year mortgage with a 10% deposit and an interest rate of 4% (more like 6% now but I'm counting all the people who have longer fixed rates), the monthly mortgage payment would be approximately £1,380, totaling £16,560 annually. This is similar to the mean rent for a two bed apartment in the UK (According to the HomeLet Rental Index, for February 2025 is £1,275.)

Combining these expenses, the total annual cost for childcare and housing is approximately £32,266. This represents about 86% of the single median annual earnings or 43% of a joint two earner household income. NB: this is pre-tax!!

Compare this with Germany:

In Germany, the average annual cost of childcare is approximately €2,028 per year, and housing costs are around €11,484, totaling €13,512. With an median average annual salary of €45,700, these expenses represent about 30% of the single median average income, and 15% of the median 2 earners household income

Look at these figures and tell me why we feel squeezed?

If just child care and housing are costing you 43% of your family's pre-tax income how does anyone have any money left at the end of the month to do anything?

Even if you take out the childcare: housing is still costing you a disproportionate amount of your pre-tax earnings

Side note: Taking a historical perspective in 1913 Round about a Pound a Week was published by Maud Pember Reeves. This study provides valuable insights into the financial challenges faced by working-class families in London during that period.

Working class families lived on £1 per week and spent 25% of their earnings on housing.

Middle class families spent 15% of their earnings on housing

The Upper middle class spent 6% of their earning on housing

NB: in the Edwardian era most households only had 1 earner!

Compared this what we spend on housing now: >40% of the median single wage! I don't care if our houses are better insulated, and I'm not dying of TB. Either fixed the housing market or raise the real wages.

frillygillymilly · 19/03/2025 15:28

And housing costs absolutely matter because so much of the population is mortgage free.

Swipe left for the next trending thread