Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Evening only wedding invitations - are they really THAT bad?

165 replies

HellDorado · 13/03/2025 19:04

I know this gets discussed at length on threads about specific weddings, but I’m thinking more about the concept in general.

I’m in my 40s and in the UK. I’ve been going to weddings all my life and only once have I been to one with no extra guests in the evening. I know the concept is alien in some cultures, but I’m talking white British - as far as I knew it was pretty universal. Yet I see people on here of a similar age and background to me claiming they’d never heard of it before Mumsnet, which I find really hard to believe.

What I find harder to believe is the level of annoyance, from mild irritation through to downright fury, at the very idea, let alone actually receiving such an invitation. Angry and sarcastic comments about B-list guests; about how tight the couple must be and that it’s obviously a ruse to get more presents; that it’s all about having the Instagram day (I don’t know how that applied to the evening dos I went to in the 90s) and that people should “cut their cloth” and have their reception in the village hall (that apparently everyone has nearby) just in case cousin Mildred is offended at not getting a three-course meal.

My first question would be, does nobody have relatives or friends to whom they are less close than others - but who they still value? Not everyone aunt is a favourite aunt; not every friend a best friend. That doesn’t mean they’re not important at all. I’m also not arrogant enough to assume that all my friends consider me amongst their closest friends. Is it really that big an issue? I can understand if you consider someone your best friend that it might be a shock if they see it as a much more casual friendship, but the disparity isn’t usually that extreme.

My second question is, can nobody, in the immortal words of the cast of Grange Hill, just say no? In a lot of the threads I see on here, people aren’t actually upset about not getting a full day invitation; they’re annoyed at the very idea of being invited to an evening do, especially if travel is involved. But is it really better to not get the invitation at all? I might well turn down an invitation that involves a long journey and potentially an overnight stay - but that doesn’t mean I’m insulted to be asked. In fact I’d much rather be asked and have to say than have some assume I won’t and not bother to ask. But on MN invitation seems to equal expectation.

As I say, I understand individual circumstances might make it upsetting - e.g. someone you picked as a bridesmaid only inviting you on the evening, or being the only one of six cousins not being invited to the full day. But as an overall concept, I’m struggling to see the grave offence.

OP posts:
JaceLancs · 13/03/2025 20:18

I got married in 1989 and it was the norm - church or registry wedding - followed by a sit down meal for closest family and friends - then a night do often in a different venue for all and sundry
We had 50 ish people at the meal and 120 at night - the older ones from the lunch do didn’t stay long at the evening do either!
My DB and many friends were the same - but we didn’t have big venue weddings either - it might be local pub or restaurant for day do and hire a village hall for the evening

LumpyPumpkin · 13/03/2025 20:17

I wanted my wedding to easy for my guests as I've been to a few weddings that were at beautiful places but ended up having to spend a fortune to get to/from.

So, I got married in a registry office. It only had capacity for about 30 guests. But it was affordable and easy for all our guests to get to. We invited lots more people to join us for the evening do. Hiring somewhere big enough for everyone to attend ceremony would've been too expensive for us.

Reception was straight after at a pub. It was free hire, cheap drinks and ideal location. Food provided for everyone in the form of a buffet (we did tell people in advance that we weren't doing a hot meal so no-one was taken by surprise). Entertainment was a live band followed by disco.

The people who we didn't invite to the ceremony are not 'B Listers' and I don't think anyone was offended.

I think it's absolutely fine to have evening only guests, especially for venues that are easy to get to. I wouldn't be offended if I was invited to an evening-only anywhere. But if it was somewhere miles away, I would just politely decline if I didn't want to go.

Maddy70 · 13/03/2025 20:16

Evening invites are the best. Party with your friends

Thisismyalterego · 13/03/2025 20:15

I think I've only been to one wedding where there haven't been evening guests and that was because it was held a long distance away from where most of the guests lived (for very good and sad reasons) so it wasn't appropriate to expect people to travel and pay for overnight accommodation just to attend in the evening. When I married in the early 80's, it was definitely very usual to invite workmates, neighbours etc in the evening. We didn't expect gifts and we had a free bar and a decent buffet for everyone.

ejmog · 13/03/2025 20:13

It's so common now as you can do snall registry offices so 15 people max , but they still love you enough to see them celebrate, the other option is have big registry or church and low down the party expectations

Springhassprungxx · 13/03/2025 20:12

I received an evening invite just today - delighted to have been invited at all!

user2848502016 · 13/03/2025 20:11

I think it's very normal to have evening only guests- it was when we got married in the 00s anyway. I have had a few evening only wedding invitations and never been offended.
The only one I found a little thoughtless was when we were invited to the ceremony and then the evening party but not the middle bit so we had to hang around for hours - wish they had just invited us to the evening only.

Coffeeishot · 13/03/2025 20:08

Cosyblankets · 13/03/2025 20:04

I've only ever known it to be a problem on here.
No one I know in real life is in the least bit offended by an evening invitation because everyone I know lives in the real world where there isn't an endless pot of money and people have mortgages and kids and other things to spend their money on

I think.this nails it people don't have pots of money for free bars and 300 guests, lots of couples pay for their own weddings so funds might be limited.

MayaPinion · 13/03/2025 20:06

Depends. My wedding was in my hometown though I’d lived in another country for years and most guests flew in for it. The evening guests were local friends of my siblings and parents. All they needed to pay for were their taxis and drinks. I very much doubt anyone bought a ‘special’ outfit. Most of them brought a card and a bottle of wine or champagne, and that was more than enough. I think that’s fine and it was great to see people I hadn’t seen for ages.

It's different if one aunt gets invited to the whole day and the other only gets invited to the evening party, or it’s a 6 hour drive, or requires a stay in an exorbitantly priced hotel in the middle of nowhere, or you’re only invited to the evening but sent the link to the gift registry and expected to buy an expensive present.

I find weddings interminable (even my own). They’re so boring. The band and dancing at the end of the night is by far the best bit, I’d given the choice I’d choose just to go to the evening party only!

Cosyblankets · 13/03/2025 20:04

I've only ever known it to be a problem on here.
No one I know in real life is in the least bit offended by an evening invitation because everyone I know lives in the real world where there isn't an endless pot of money and people have mortgages and kids and other things to spend their money on

SerafinasGoose · 13/03/2025 20:01

I'm not fond of weddings under any pretext so tend to attend only those of the people who are important to me.

Evening invitations don't cause gratuitous offence. If I don't want to go, I simply decline.

This only strays into CF territory when would-be guests are expected to invest time and money travelling long distances to attend for an evening only.

ClaudineMallory · 13/03/2025 19:58

mummyh2016 · 13/03/2025 19:55

@ClaudineMallory of course it's contradictory if you only read the first and last sentences of my post.

Ok. Just a bit confused. Sorry

meganorks · 13/03/2025 19:56

They are absolutely fine and Mumsnet is the only place they aren't. I can see the argument that if you've gone a long way for just the evening it's a lot. But I've done that loads of times and never thought to be offended! Just happy to go and celebrate.

Mumsnet absolutely fucking hates weddings! But everyone I know loves them! I suppose it makes a difference who's wedding it is. But where you have lots of mates going it's great.

mummyh2016 · 13/03/2025 19:55

@ClaudineMallory of course it's contradictory if you only read the first and last sentences of my post.

Comedycook · 13/03/2025 19:54

We went to a wedding where we were only invited to the evening do ..it didn't bother me but the problem was the buffet had been decimated by the day guests so by the time the evening guests arrived, there were scraps left. It was a poor show. Id have been fine if there had been food!

Pebbles16 · 13/03/2025 19:53

TeenToTwenties · 13/03/2025 19:11

Yes they are that bad, unless it is something like work colleagues or extended hobby friends who all live v close to reception venue.

I disagree.
We had a small wedding (less than 50 people) and had a rule that if we hadn't seen the people in the five years we'd been together, they would be invited, but not part of the main group.
The evening guests were my great uncles/aunts/ second cousins' children (if we knew them), neighbours who weren't that close personally, neighbours' children, when neighbours were invited (my neighbour's boys who I had babysat as a teen schlepped up from Glastonbury Festival to make it. I was honoured, this was before Glastonbury was ridiculous and we are only 50 miles away).
My best friend's parents...
There were various reasons.
DH and I completely agreed on what we would do and, given we got married 100 miles away from where we live, we invited colleagues for the whole day.
25 years later, we still believe that we invited everyone correctly.
My grandmother's sisters were incredibly strange, didn't RSVP and hung out in the churchyard to see who had been invited over them. They were horrified that we had people from other cultures there. Grandma (who was not inclined to swear) said, after the event "fuck them, we all had a great time and they would have been such hard work".

Talipesmum · 13/03/2025 19:52

PeachesPeachesPeachesPeachesPeaches · 13/03/2025 19:16

Totally normal if it’s a local wedding.

Agree - I think it’s fine to have a more extended party bit as long as the invitees are all close by, ie they don’t have to stay overnight. But it’s a bit more cheeky if you’re asking people to travel - I mean, of course you can say no, but if I’m asking people to come far and book a room for the night, they should be invited to the whole thing in my opinion.

BansheeOfTheSouth · 13/03/2025 19:51

People who can't afford a massive venue for their wedding followed by sit down meal for 200 guests but could afford a buffet and disco for 200 aren't snubbing anyone.

Registry offices are very limited in numbers too. Not everyone has MN 6 figure salaries to pay for £50k weddings but still want to celebrate with their friends and family.

If you don't like evening only invites, don't go.

AirborneElephant · 13/03/2025 19:50

They’re fine, as long as those invited are relatively local, and people actually cater for them (decent buffet, at least one welcome drink, dancing / entertainment). That’s an invite to an evening party, and is fine. It when it’s a complete afterthought that it seems selfish.

ClaudineMallory · 13/03/2025 19:46

mummyh2016 · 13/03/2025 19:42

No they're not at all, it honestly puzzles me why people get so annoyed. I think the only exceptions imo is if you go on the hen do and only invited on the evening or if the wedding is not local. It actually happened to me at the same wedding, I went on a hen do (abroad) and then only had an evening invite despite the wedding being 70 miles away. I made my excuses and didn't attend.

So, you were bothered by an evening only invitation - you didn't think it was the right thing and you were annoyed? That seems to contradict your first sentence. Unless I have misunderstood.

AliasGrape · 13/03/2025 19:45

I’m 45, been attending multiple weddings per year since I was a child, and can only think of two that didn’t have evening guests and those were because they were destination weddings.

We had separate evening only guests, I don’t know if they were offended but I doubt it for most of them since we’d been to their weddings as evening guests.

We specified no gifts, and provided several free drinks for evening guests, plus food.

Cash bar after the money we put behind it ran out though - another thing that is completely normal, I’ve never been to a wedding with free drinks all evening.

Also completely normal for nearly every wedding I’ve been to is no children/ close family children only.

I’m frequently baffled by the outrage about these things on mumsnet wedding threads - but I also suspect I’m probably a bit common!

cardibach · 13/03/2025 19:45

PrettayGood · 13/03/2025 19:39

Is it still a thing? I don’t think I’ve been to a wedding in the last 2 decades where B listers turn up in the evening.

What is the point? Just invite the guests you want and can afford to host, and have them there all day. I’d never accept an invitation to an evening do, not that I e ever had one.

‘B listers’? Really? Everyone in your life from your parents to your friend from book club are of exactly the same importance to you are they?
Wedding receptions are often dominated by family and obligation invitations. The evening allows you to have friends there too. And nobody I know considers it an insult - they get it. Having say 70 to sit down and another 100 later if you can afford that is inviting the guests you can afford, just in a different (and totally normal) way from trying to find a venue that can seat 170 for a seated meal, never mind the cost.

2025willbemytime · 13/03/2025 19:44

First decision I made when planning the wedding was everyone was coming to everything. Then h decided he didn't want an evening do so it became a moot point but we'd have stuck to my plan if he hadn't wanted to leave after the reception.

I'm not offended if just invited to the evening do but I am disappointed as I want to see the marriage taking place. It is the whole point for me.

GellerYeller · 13/03/2025 19:43

We had close family and friends at the ceremony and reception then work colleagues and friends of parents to the evening.
We didn’t feel comfortable with people we weren’t close to at the service so let our parents have free rein for the evening as a compromise.
I worked in a big company with lots of teams on one floor. So settled on in inviting just my own team to the evening. Which was perfectly fine except for one woman in another team who was INCENSED not to be included even though I barely knew her.
If I’m buying dinner for 50 people I’m choosing those I’m closest to.
I wouldn’t be offended to be an evening guest. Unless it was immediate family!
Edited to add: I know someone who had a registry office service, all welcome to that, followed by ten people in the private dining room of an exclusive country club. Party for 50 later on. One couple refused to travel and stay over for just being invited to the service then entertain themselves until the party. That seems fair enough to me.

mummyh2016 · 13/03/2025 19:42

No they're not at all, it honestly puzzles me why people get so annoyed. I think the only exceptions imo is if you go on the hen do and only invited on the evening or if the wedding is not local. It actually happened to me at the same wedding, I went on a hen do (abroad) and then only had an evening invite despite the wedding being 70 miles away. I made my excuses and didn't attend.

Swipe left for the next trending thread