Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder why civil service haters don't understand that cutting 10,000 jobs is going to hurt everyone

362 replies

Everythingisnumbersnow · 13/03/2025 16:24

I can't believe Labour is doing what they're doing

OP posts:
Pudmyboy · 14/03/2025 01:06

9fthighfence · 13/03/2025 16:32

So we should employ people so that they can spend the money we give them? Is that the basis for your argument? If so that’s a rubbish argument. The taxpayer would still be better off if these public servants were made redundant and found alternative work doing something productive.

I am reminded of the government in the '70s (think it was under Heath though may've been Callaghan) trying to keep full employment by job sharing, literally two people doing the same job, it was bonkers and didn't work

Papadonut · 14/03/2025 00:43

I work with CD grade 7 I believe so he's earning good money. His attendance is poor and he's as useful as a chocolate fire guard. He's so bad at his job that he's a become a running joke. So OP wants this guy to retain his cushy salary and keep getting promoted? He's earning at least 60k now. Personally I wouldn't pay a penny for his 'skill'.

I am not a Labour supporter but this is the first thing they do that I 100% support.

Portakalkedi · 13/03/2025 23:47

Bear in mind that just because Labour are saying this, doesn't necessarily mean it will happen, likr most other stuff they say.

Walkaround · 13/03/2025 23:47

Stop investing in the elderly, for a start - they are not profitable.

Walkaround · 13/03/2025 23:46

It would be interesting to see how the British public reacted to the Government behaving like an investment bank. 🤣

Walkaround · 13/03/2025 23:37

Bailamosse · 13/03/2025 23:37

Your questions show the gap between public and private sector.

Of course there’s a gap - they have completely different roles.

Bailamosse · 13/03/2025 23:37

Walkaround · 13/03/2025 23:34

Hmm. Except that depends on how you assess what makes a top or bottom performer - the global recession, after all, wasn’t caused by people their investment bank employers had been judging to be poor performers, and it wasn’t the people who caused it who suffered the worst consequences.

Your questions show the gap between public and private sector.

logicisall · 13/03/2025 23:36

I've worked in both private and public sectors. Was mystified that any work was actually done in the public sector. Bloated and inefficient with unmotivated staff. At one point my entire team had no work to do for a week! One member always called in sick on a Monday, with no repercussions.

Walkaround · 13/03/2025 23:34

Bailamosse · 13/03/2025 23:19

@BooomShakeTheRoom No. Everyone is quartiled every year, and as PP said, the bottom 5-10% of staff are cut every year, on an ongoing basis. There were also large scale redundancies from 2007-2017.

They are run extremely lean and efficiently now. Every single process is measured and assessed constantly.

OP’s AIBU was not is it a shame for the people involved; of course it always is. They were making the point that everyone would be affected by this, which they will not.

The idea that the reduction in disposable cash of 10,000 civil servants, spread all over the UK may somehow result in the downfall of a Tier 1 US Investment Bank did make me laugh on my journey home though.

Edited

Hmm. Except that depends on how you assess what makes a top or bottom performer - the global recession, after all, wasn’t caused by people their investment bank employers had been judging to be poor performers, and it wasn’t the people who caused it who suffered the worst consequences.

Slumbering · 13/03/2025 23:28

It’s about bloody time! I hope Starmer does as he says and sends the extra money to the front line where it really is needed.

Bailamosse · 13/03/2025 23:19

@BooomShakeTheRoom No. Everyone is quartiled every year, and as PP said, the bottom 5-10% of staff are cut every year, on an ongoing basis. There were also large scale redundancies from 2007-2017.

They are run extremely lean and efficiently now. Every single process is measured and assessed constantly.

OP’s AIBU was not is it a shame for the people involved; of course it always is. They were making the point that everyone would be affected by this, which they will not.

The idea that the reduction in disposable cash of 10,000 civil servants, spread all over the UK may somehow result in the downfall of a Tier 1 US Investment Bank did make me laugh on my journey home though.

Merryoldgoat · 13/03/2025 23:15

mumda · 13/03/2025 23:05

I worked for a local authority for a short while. It was absolutely appalling to see the inefficiency.

I was in an LA too. Honestly one of the worst times of my life. I ended up putting on 2 stone whilst I was there.

Upupandaway10 · 13/03/2025 23:12

Everythingisnumbersnow · 13/03/2025 16:24

I can't believe Labour is doing what they're doing

The Tories wouldn't even do this.

An overhaul of MP's expenses and House Of Lords would be welcome

Walkaround · 13/03/2025 23:12

florasl · 13/03/2025 23:07

I’ve at no point said that I worked in the Civil Service, I said I worked in the public sector. It is all exactly the same though.

I work on a daily basis with Homes England, DEFRA and the Department for Communities and they are exactly the same level of waste and incompetence, just on a much bigger scale.

Except when talking about job losses in the civil service, it is all completely different.

Walkaround · 13/03/2025 23:10

You’re still confused. No politician has specified 10,000 civil service posts will be cut - they’ve refused to put a number on that, they have just said reforms will likely lead to thousands of job cuts. I am sure they mean considerably more than 10,000 civil service jobs will ultimately go. The only numbers that can reliably be given are the number of people working in NHS England, which is a quango, and employs around 15,000 people, none of whom are civil servants and it’s NHS England’s scrapping that is generating all the discussion about 10,000 job losses in one go. It is not the same thing as “the NHS,” and is not part of the civil service, either. The NHS England role will be taken back under civil service control - no doubt by employing some former NHS England staff, thus increasing civil service numbers in the relevant department.

Booboobagins · 13/03/2025 23:07

NHS England has been a burden on NHS services since it came into place. It's bureaucratic and expensive, so much so that it can't even buy medical products at tge price an NHS Trust can. NHS Trusts have also needed to employ many more non medical staff to cope with the bureaucracy too.

Im not in the detail of all this btw, but I'm sure there will be work to make sure the responsibilities that need to be performed centrally or regionally will be retained, possibly in local government, but yes, I'm looking forward to seeing the disaster the Torys brought in gone for good. It was the start of the disease that has seen many NHS services privatised.

Good riddance.

florasl · 13/03/2025 23:07

Walkaround · 13/03/2025 22:06

None of which has anything to do with the civil service, as you clearly work for local government, so are not a civil servant.

I’ve at no point said that I worked in the Civil Service, I said I worked in the public sector. It is all exactly the same though.

I work on a daily basis with Homes England, DEFRA and the Department for Communities and they are exactly the same level of waste and incompetence, just on a much bigger scale.

mumda · 13/03/2025 23:05

Merryoldgoat · 13/03/2025 16:39

I worked briefly in the public sector and as a paid up leftie it killed me how inefficient and bloated it was.

I so wanted the rhetoric to be untrue but it’s not.

I worked for a local authority for a short while. It was absolutely appalling to see the inefficiency.

rainingsnoring · 13/03/2025 22:53

TrainGame · 13/03/2025 22:37

It's a huge experiment. His approval ratings remain good though.

There is talk now in the USA of deliberately creating a recession for similar reasons.

Let's see...

Elon Musk is a risk taker. His risks pay off. I don't like him much and I don't like what he's doing but on the other hand, I can see that government debts are out of hand and going to sum zero. So far, no one found a solution. We do need some kind of action - we can't go on like this forever.

The pied piper must be paid.

I agree with most of that. What is crystal clear is that the approach of the last 40+ years has not worked and that something needs to change. I don't like Trump or Musk but at least they are trying a new approach.

Tryingtokeepgoing · 13/03/2025 22:50

Motnight · 13/03/2025 21:46

NHS England staff are not civil servants.

I didn’t say they were. I was responding to OPs post about cutting 10,000 civil service staff. The numbers quoted above are ONS numbers. The NHS employs 1.5m or so…and so if the OP meant the NHS England cuts then 10,000 is even more of a rounding in terms of total NHS staff!

TrainGame · 13/03/2025 22:37

rainingsnoring · 13/03/2025 22:31

It doesn't look as if Musk's DOGE efforts will cut the massive US deficit though.
I think it's unlikely in the UK too.
Let's see.

It's a huge experiment. His approval ratings remain good though.

There is talk now in the USA of deliberately creating a recession for similar reasons.

Let's see...

Elon Musk is a risk taker. His risks pay off. I don't like him much and I don't like what he's doing but on the other hand, I can see that government debts are out of hand and going to sum zero. So far, no one found a solution. We do need some kind of action - we can't go on like this forever.

The pied piper must be paid.

TrainGame · 13/03/2025 22:33

@Walkaround sad but true! Made me laugh but in a grim way!

Walkaround · 13/03/2025 22:32

TrainGame · 13/03/2025 22:24

Wow OP I don't think I've ever come across such an entitled and misinformed series of posts on MN.

You do realise that civil servants are paid out the tax receipts from CORPORATE WORKERS - ie, companies that actually SELL a product or service for a PROFIT.

The Civil Service generates nothing. Nada. Zilch. It COSTS the tax payer MONEY to run each and every year. It is FULL to the BRIM of WASTRELS and waste-generating pointless activities and many on here agree with this sentiment.

I can only assume you've been sleeping under a rock for the past couple of months because DOGE run by Elon Musk in the USA - someone who generates a profit, who has been the most profitable man on this earth and pays a vast amount of tax and which pays for the civil service in the USA and enables the US government to run, has been following Milie's waste cutting example from Argentina.

You really should read up about Xavier Milie because it's quite the education in small government and reducing the budget deficit to the point that Argentina which has been a basket case of an economy (remember it going bankrupt and needing to be saved by the IMF? Thought not), for around 3 decades has finally produced a SURPLUS for the first time in many years.

This is nothing short of miracle and has been noted by ALL western government around the world. Love or loathe Milie and Musk, but this is what is coming and do you know why???

Why??

Because the USA is $37 TRILLION IN DEBT.

The UK is £3 TRILLION in debt.

If you don't end the gravy train at some point, there will be no more trains and certainly no more gravy. Ever. In fact there won't even be enough food to feed the little piggies and they will become weak and possibly perish. Goodbye capitalism, goodbye everything we've ever known. Hello gruesome country-wide poverty aka a bankrupt country.

That's what western economies are facing. Going BUST like Argentina.

Do you know what we pay every month in interest on our debt in the UK?

£100 billion each MONTH. This is unsustainable. Our interest bill is going up and up and up to the point that it becomes a self-perpetuating cycle of suicidal debt.

So the idea of a small state, a civil service reduced by 50%, yes 50% very much appeals to politicians because they'd like life to continue on as we know it and not plunge us into catastrophic financial crisis.

And those 10,000 people can go and find work in jobs that actually produce a PROFIT and pay some TAXES, which could go some way to paying our debts that we have accumulated through too many hand outs and too large a state, ie, too many civil servants doing not very much at all.

No a rising tide should not lift all boats, freeloading boats that don't contribute anything should be cut loose because they risk sinking the whole damned fleet.

They could try to get jobs in a burgeoning arms industry - that’s a definite growth sector.

rainingsnoring · 13/03/2025 22:31

TrainGame · 13/03/2025 22:24

Wow OP I don't think I've ever come across such an entitled and misinformed series of posts on MN.

You do realise that civil servants are paid out the tax receipts from CORPORATE WORKERS - ie, companies that actually SELL a product or service for a PROFIT.

The Civil Service generates nothing. Nada. Zilch. It COSTS the tax payer MONEY to run each and every year. It is FULL to the BRIM of WASTRELS and waste-generating pointless activities and many on here agree with this sentiment.

I can only assume you've been sleeping under a rock for the past couple of months because DOGE run by Elon Musk in the USA - someone who generates a profit, who has been the most profitable man on this earth and pays a vast amount of tax and which pays for the civil service in the USA and enables the US government to run, has been following Milie's waste cutting example from Argentina.

You really should read up about Xavier Milie because it's quite the education in small government and reducing the budget deficit to the point that Argentina which has been a basket case of an economy (remember it going bankrupt and needing to be saved by the IMF? Thought not), for around 3 decades has finally produced a SURPLUS for the first time in many years.

This is nothing short of miracle and has been noted by ALL western government around the world. Love or loathe Milie and Musk, but this is what is coming and do you know why???

Why??

Because the USA is $37 TRILLION IN DEBT.

The UK is £3 TRILLION in debt.

If you don't end the gravy train at some point, there will be no more trains and certainly no more gravy. Ever. In fact there won't even be enough food to feed the little piggies and they will become weak and possibly perish. Goodbye capitalism, goodbye everything we've ever known. Hello gruesome country-wide poverty aka a bankrupt country.

That's what western economies are facing. Going BUST like Argentina.

Do you know what we pay every month in interest on our debt in the UK?

£100 billion each MONTH. This is unsustainable. Our interest bill is going up and up and up to the point that it becomes a self-perpetuating cycle of suicidal debt.

So the idea of a small state, a civil service reduced by 50%, yes 50% very much appeals to politicians because they'd like life to continue on as we know it and not plunge us into catastrophic financial crisis.

And those 10,000 people can go and find work in jobs that actually produce a PROFIT and pay some TAXES, which could go some way to paying our debts that we have accumulated through too many hand outs and too large a state, ie, too many civil servants doing not very much at all.

No a rising tide should not lift all boats, freeloading boats that don't contribute anything should be cut loose because they risk sinking the whole damned fleet.

It doesn't look as if Musk's DOGE efforts will cut the massive US deficit though.
I think it's unlikely in the UK too.
Let's see.