Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Living alone is tough financially

368 replies

Addictedtofizzydrinks34 · 08/03/2025 21:43

If you have a mortgage or rent a home alone..maybe different if you're mortgage-free or perhaps only renting a room or something.
You have to make sure you can afford everything each month. If anything breaks/needs repairing, you foot 100% of the bill. All renovations are paid for solely by you.
You have to make sure you have money aside for various things.
Living alone has many advantages, but financially it's tough and I'm not sure I can do it for much longer. It's stressful unless you have a lot of savings I think.

OP posts:
mrsm43s · 09/03/2025 09:21

BassesAreBest · 09/03/2025 08:53

Obviously (and rightly) you'll pay more tax if you earn £50k than someone only earning £25k, regardless of relationship status.

I don’t think it’s obvious and right at all, and the tax system penalises single earner households (not just single people). How is it fair, for instance, that a two person household with a single income of £50k has less net income than a two person household where each person earns £25k? UC is worked out on household income, so it does seem unfair tax is individual. But that is a different issue!

Because you are taxed per person.

Are you really suggesting that single people should be rewarded by being given preferential tax breaks not available to people in relationships?

doodahdayy · 09/03/2025 09:15

We can't have everything in life

Cattreesea · 09/03/2025 09:11

I am with you OP.

It is tough to have only one wage coming in and single parents especially have all my admiration for managing to keep going.

Also we don't want women to be trapped in abusive relationships because they can't afford to leave.

Council tax especially should have a 50% discount for single households.

Sharptonguedwoman · 09/03/2025 09:10

mrsm43s · 08/03/2025 22:02

Would it not be cheaper to rent a room in a shared house, take in a lodger or rent a 2 bed place with a friend?

Renting a room in a shared house can be fraught with problems. Some shares are great, some are grim.

Suzuki76 · 09/03/2025 09:03

On the subject of getting a job as the SAHP - nobody says they have to work full time. I worked 21 hours a week when DS was in nursery and needed commuting time either side. 22 were covered by the "Free" Hours Childcare system and we got 20% Tax Free Childcare contribution on the other 4 hours a week.

backtothemeadow · 09/03/2025 09:00

I’m not sure what that has to do with the topic though!

EG94 · 09/03/2025 08:57

backtothemeadow · 09/03/2025 08:54

Childcare isn’t forever (I am well versed in this as I have two children who aren’t school age!) either.

And how many mums left work to look after kids and are now fucked financially as their DH didn’t pull his weight and they haven’t earnt a full stamp and have not reached their full earning potential. Don’t have a good financial safety net. See it on here all time they’re approaching divorce and feel it’s so unfair DH has good job good pension and they have… nothing because childcare was expensive

backtothemeadow · 09/03/2025 08:54

BassesAreBest · 09/03/2025 08:49

But if they’re in a couple and the other person loses their job, there are two people who can potentially look for work, doubling their chances of at least one of them getting a job quickly (and then of course whoever doesn’t have the job could do the childcare). Or if the children are school age then the SAHP could look for a job around that to bring in a bit extra. Or the SAHP could do something like childminding, so no childcare issues.

Childcare isn’t forever (I am well versed in this as I have two children who aren’t school age!) either.

BassesAreBest · 09/03/2025 08:53

Obviously (and rightly) you'll pay more tax if you earn £50k than someone only earning £25k, regardless of relationship status.

I don’t think it’s obvious and right at all, and the tax system penalises single earner households (not just single people). How is it fair, for instance, that a two person household with a single income of £50k has less net income than a two person household where each person earns £25k? UC is worked out on household income, so it does seem unfair tax is individual. But that is a different issue!

backtothemeadow · 09/03/2025 08:52

mrsm43s · 09/03/2025 08:06

A person in a relationship earning £25k is taxed exactly the same as a single person earning £25k.

A person in a relationship earning £50k is taxed exactly the same as a single person £50k.

Obviously (and rightly) you'll pay more tax if you earn £50k than someone only earning £25k, regardless of relationship status.

There's no specific tax rates depending on your relationship status!

That isn’t what people are saying, which I do think you know.

If I was to say ‘I earn £25,000 per year’ then I think most people would agree that I’d struggle in the current climate.

If I said ‘I earn £50,000 per year’ then most people would agree that’s a good salary and I shouldn’t struggle.

But out of that £50,000 I’d have to pay for

rent / mortgage
electricity
internet
insurance
council tax with a 25% discount (not 50)

And other expenses aren’t a 50/50 split. Food, as we’ve established, entertainment and the like.

So while two people on £25,000 each aren’t considered to be on a good salary, one person on £50,000 is, but actually have much higher costs.

BassesAreBest · 09/03/2025 08:49

mrsm43s · 09/03/2025 07:57

But if their childcare costs more than their wage, it's pointless, and they are no better off.

But if they’re in a couple and the other person loses their job, there are two people who can potentially look for work, doubling their chances of at least one of them getting a job quickly (and then of course whoever doesn’t have the job could do the childcare). Or if the children are school age then the SAHP could look for a job around that to bring in a bit extra. Or the SAHP could do something like childminding, so no childcare issues.

westisbest1982 · 09/03/2025 08:21

Of course nobody should have to stay in an abusive relationship, but realistically what do you do if you’re on your own, have no family support, a job that doesn’t pay much - if you have a job? Renting a one bedroom flat in an average part of my northern city costs £900, a huge chunk of your take home pay even if you earn the UK median salary of £34K.

Differentstarts · 09/03/2025 08:11

aCatCalledFawkes · 09/03/2025 08:08

Well no one should have to stay in a DV relationship, I left a very abusive relationship 11yrs ago. However, the benefits system is meant to help people when they need it, you're not supposed to get your child to 18/19yrs, then realise that they stop and your down £800. When I was on tex credits, every time I took a payrise they went down and as my children got older they also went down. It couldn’t have been clearer to me that this was not a long term solution.

Edited

But you can't plan life, people become disabled, partners die, people lose jobs . People's circumstances are complicated

aCatCalledFawkes · 09/03/2025 08:08

Differentstarts · 09/03/2025 07:58

I don't need a plan as I'm luckily or unluckily am disabled so am quite protected and have that safety net. I also have a partner. Also by the time my kids are grown I will hopefully have paid of the mortgage. I know im in a fortunate situation but I can understand a lot aren't through no choice of their own and people shouldn't be punished for escaping domestic abuse, becoming a widow or just not finding a good healthy relationship. Nobody should have to stay in a relationship for financial reasons and nobody should get pregnant for financial reasons

Well no one should have to stay in a DV relationship, I left a very abusive relationship 11yrs ago. However, the benefits system is meant to help people when they need it, you're not supposed to get your child to 18/19yrs, then realise that they stop and your down £800. When I was on tex credits, every time I took a payrise they went down and as my children got older they also went down. It couldn’t have been clearer to me that this was not a long term solution.

mrsm43s · 09/03/2025 08:06

bigvig · 09/03/2025 07:11

This is true plus they are taxed more. If two people earn 25 grand each they'll pay less tax than one person earning 50,000. I think tax should be equal and per household income not per person.

A person in a relationship earning £25k is taxed exactly the same as a single person earning £25k.

A person in a relationship earning £50k is taxed exactly the same as a single person £50k.

Obviously (and rightly) you'll pay more tax if you earn £50k than someone only earning £25k, regardless of relationship status.

There's no specific tax rates depending on your relationship status!

Differentstarts · 09/03/2025 07:58

aCatCalledFawkes · 09/03/2025 07:51

Surely though you know the day is coming when you won’t get benefits anymore when they finish school? What if you plan?

My daughter leaves school this year at 18yrs and I will see a drop in child benefit, child maintenance and an increase in council tax. However, I came off benefits years ago and earn enough now to support myself and two children without them. Thankfully I’ll only see a drop in about £300 which is what her driving lessons are costing at the moment.

I don't need a plan as I'm luckily or unluckily am disabled so am quite protected and have that safety net. I also have a partner. Also by the time my kids are grown I will hopefully have paid of the mortgage. I know im in a fortunate situation but I can understand a lot aren't through no choice of their own and people shouldn't be punished for escaping domestic abuse, becoming a widow or just not finding a good healthy relationship. Nobody should have to stay in a relationship for financial reasons and nobody should get pregnant for financial reasons

mrsm43s · 09/03/2025 07:57

Newmeagain · 09/03/2025 07:33

@mrsm43s of course they can get a job. Lone parents do. My ex left and I went back to work when my dc was only a few months old. And I had no help with childcare.

But if their childcare costs more than their wage, it's pointless, and they are no better off.

Differentstarts · 09/03/2025 07:53

Spectre8 · 09/03/2025 07:50

So single people shouldn't be listened to then. Only those who have lived both are worthy of being listened to. Just wow

That is not even close to what I meant and iv been sticking up for single people through out this whole thread as I have lots of single friends and I know how hard life is for them and I also know how much money I would lose if I didn't have my kids.

aCatCalledFawkes · 09/03/2025 07:51

Differentstarts · 08/03/2025 22:43

But do they have it worse 🤔 I'd be a lot poorer if I didn't have my kids as I wouldn't be entitled to any benefits. Just like a pp whose £800 a month worse off now her daughters an adult. Single people do get screwed over you can't deny that

Surely though you know the day is coming when you won’t get benefits anymore when they finish school? What if you plan?

My daughter leaves school this year at 18yrs and I will see a drop in child benefit, child maintenance and an increase in council tax. However, I came off benefits years ago and earn enough now to support myself and two children without them. Thankfully I’ll only see a drop in about £300 which is what her driving lessons are costing at the moment.

Spectre8 · 09/03/2025 07:50

Differentstarts · 09/03/2025 07:19

I think the people we need to listen to are the people who have lived both. Multiple posters have written how much worse of they are now their children are grown and they are living alone. Posters have also written how much better of they are now they have a family after living alone. Having a partner doubles income and gives a safety net for job loss or illness. Single parents although harder then couples still often get a lot financial help from benefits and also a safety net for job loss, illness. A single adult household with a mortgage don't lose your job or get ill as you will be screwed as there is no safety net so get used to working 80hrs a week and your ziplock fruit.

So single people shouldn't be listened to then. Only those who have lived both are worthy of being listened to. Just wow

wfhwfh · 09/03/2025 07:34

If you are affluent, living alone is a lovely luxury as you don’t have anyone to share your space or potentially jeopardise your financial security. Especially if you are someone who likes their own company.

If you are at all hard-up, it’s really tough with no financial buffer. I agree that some people stay in less-than-desirable relationship situations for financial reasons which is really sad

Newmeagain · 09/03/2025 07:33

@mrsm43s of course they can get a job. Lone parents do. My ex left and I went back to work when my dc was only a few months old. And I had no help with childcare.

Spectre8 · 09/03/2025 07:32

DaniMontyRae · 08/03/2025 23:54

No, but a little bit of recognition from parents getting those benefits that childfree people don't have the massive safety net they have would be nice. And even parents who don't claim those benefits - at least they know if things go wrong financially the state will step in. Added to that couples are either benefitting from 2 tax free allowances or having one person home keeping the house - feels pretty luxurious to me. There's also more options if one person gets sick.

I'd especially like recognition, primarily from the government, that the current benefits system supports businesses in keeping wages artificially low by providing so many people with top ups. This screws over single, childfree people the most as they are some of the least likely to be eligible for benefits and they don't get two tax free allowances.

Edited

Exactly this. Just the recognition alone would be great bit this thread shows there is not one ounce of empathy at all.

Spectre8 · 09/03/2025 07:31

mrsm43s · 08/03/2025 23:36

One wage supporting one person with no impediments to climbing the career ladder shouldn't need benefits.

If you're a low earner, then you're going to find life tough.

But single doesn't need to equal low earner. Indeed, with no other responsibilities, singles without dependents are the best placed to climb the career ladder. And they have the luxury of only themselves to provide for.

If you have disabilities, you can claim benefits, regardless of relationship status.

You don't get to claim benefits for bringing up kids you don't have, obviously.

I've never claimed a benefit in my life (although I hope state pension is still around once I get there!). Never whinged about them either.

Basically you say "only I am providing for me, its not fair!". The counter argument is "I wish I had the luxury of only providing for me, but we have four people to provide for on that one same salary".

It's not a luxury!!!! You choose to get into a relationship with someone. Noone hold a gun to your head and made you. And for the majority its then a choice to have children. Often more than 1 and then they complain it's unaffordable.

Ace56 · 09/03/2025 07:29

Alaimo · 09/03/2025 07:06

Absolutely. DH and I live together in a 1-bed flat so per person our rent is very cheap. My neighbour is a single guy and has to pay the same amount of rent all by himself.

I do find it interesting that in my part of the world (Scandinavia) house sharing is quite uncommon except for students. Instead there are lots of 30-50m2 studios and 1-bed flats so even most people in their 20s live alone or with a partner. Even in more popular cities (except Stockholm maybe) there are studios at £4-500, and my 1-bed flat is around £800 including all bills (and no council tax to pay). Of course it's still more beneficial to be a dual income household, but it's not prohibitively expensive to live alone, unlike in much of the UK.

Yes, this. I don’t think people realise that in most of Europe, living alone is not as expensive as it is here, and most single people live alone easily, even in their 20s when they’re not earning that much. House shares are really only for students.

The fact that in this country some people in their 30s/40s/50s need to house share is a travesty imo. Everyone should be able to afford at least a basic one bed flat/studio on their own.