Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Wtf is wrong with people when it comes to hidden disabilities?

717 replies

Whatthebarnacles · 05/03/2025 08:53

Full on rant incoming! Ready to be flamed in the depths on MN hell for this but it really is a hill I'm happy to die on so whatever will be, will be!

I'm absolutely sick to the back teeth of certain people on here who eye roll and sneer that those with hidden disabilities should be treated the same as neuro typical people.

Non verbal, lashing out? Report to police for assault - how dare they lay a hand on someone else 🙄

Can't sit still / constantly stims? Expel them from school - why should my "normal child" be affected?🙄

Stares and makes noises? Tell them you're uncomfortable and to stop immediately, we have the right not to be ogled.🙄

Can we please just stop it?! It's like the world's gone mad! All the years of effort to try and make people aware of hidden disabilities just seems to have crumbled an i've seen it happenn in here over the last 6 months or so more than ever. There seems to be an almighty wave of this incredibly farcical "BUT ME AND MINE" or "MY RIGHTS" just smash through the work that had been done and its depressing as shit.

Would you call the police or kick off on someone who spilled a cuppa over you then laughed? Or caught your face , if...

  1. They were 4 years old? Nope, so why would you for someone with intellectual disabilities? You would talk to the carer. Rightly so.
  1. If they had Parkinsons? Would you bollocks. Because you can SEE that disability and because its a physical one, then it can't be helped, right?
  1. They were clearly ND?
There are countless people in here who would because, according to them, they do not have the right / there needs to be consequences / they're an adult regardless / i am woman hear me roar etc.

I cant get my head around the lack of understanding

And don't get me started on those who turn these things into "us women" need to defend ourselves. And faux outrage "would they have done it to a man? I don't think so!" Urgh. Yes... they would. A disability is a disability, a stim is a stim, a jolt is a jolt. Hair is dangly, splashing someone or spilling something is funny, stimming is calming on the inside whilst frantic in the outside.

Frankly, it turns my stomach. Why is the world so angry at people who are different at the moment?!

I can only presume that the number of people now having been diagnosed is pissing these people off. I've honestly never ever heard so much "just because they're xyz doesn't mean that..." in my life. See also "they need to learn" or "they should know"...

I fret for my son growing up in this. He doesn't stand a cat in hells chance.

YABU - Of course ND people, should be treated the same as NT people when it comes to differing behaviour, regardless of mental age or physical disabilities associated with their condition.

YANBU - MN is rife with it at the moment, I've noticed that too.

Annnnnd..... crucify me. GO!!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Violinist64 · 06/03/2025 09:33

@Itisbetter, my father used to help with swimming classes at the special school this boy was sent to. The boy was much happier in that environment and doing well. A mainstream classroom with forty other small children behaving unpredictably (in the boy's eyes) and perhaps making noises that hurt his ears was categorically the wrong setting for him. The smaller school with specialist teachers was the best place for him. He certainly was not "blighted for ever" because everything improved for him afterwards. However, had the teacher not acted in the way she saw fit at the time and, almost certainly at the end of her tether, having run out of all other options in her view, another child could well have been "blighted for life" by being badly hurt. Also, remember that it was a very different world in 1971.

AshKeys · 06/03/2025 09:27

Itisbetter · 06/03/2025 07:59

I think what’s difficult is reading some of these threads on disability where people describe their experience of being hurt or inconvenienced or otherwise impacted by a disabled person. There are a huge number of disabled people in the world. They really aren’t committing the majority of these sorts of crimes. In fact they are far far more likely to be victims of crime themselves. The person causing your child upset at school is much more likely to come from a damagingly dysfunctional home life than have been born with a lifelong neurological disability.

The best place to educate our disabled children is with their siblings and neighbours so that they grow as part of our community.

Our children are already facing a future where they will be shouldering the burden of a huge elderly population. Why on earth would we not be doing everything in our power to limit the number of dependent disabled adults who cannot function in society? It’s short sighted and foolish to ostracise those that cannot function cope with help I’m mainstream school or indeed in mainstream life. If you do want to fight to protect your child then step up and fight for inclusion. Speak up when you hear racism, sexism or ableism because those are the attitudes that are going to drain their futures of promise and reduce their outcomes.

The vast majority of disabled people (whether disability is ‘hidden’ or not) have capacity and know right from wrong. It is really only a very small proportion who do not. Capacity is not something that can be learnt in mainstream schools.

If you put a child with severe ‘hidden’ disability in a mainstream class with children being taught GCSE History but they can’t read let alone follow the lesson then what exactly are they getting out of it? Sure the rest of the class might get warm and fuzzy feelings of being inclusive or ‘kind’ but the disabled child is being failed. If we want to limit the number of dependent disabled adults then a specialist setting where they can use their time learning life skills, to read, basic money-management, employability skills, etc is what is needed.

Also children from damagingly dysfunctional homes more often than not do have lifelong neurological disability. What they don’t have is parents capable of engaging with services to diagnose this, or the ability to provide the supports needed - often because they have lifelong neurological disabilities themselves. These disabilities can be caused by alcohol (FASD), drugs, or neglect.

Itisbetter · 06/03/2025 09:22

Violinist64 · 06/03/2025 09:09

No, whatever issues the violent child has, (s)he is the one who should not be there if the school is unable to control the behaviour. Why should the bullied child have to suffer? Is the child with the problems more important than everyone else? No child will be safe in this environment, all will be worried that they will be the next target. The constant disruption will mean that no constructive learning can take place
When l was six, we had, what we thought at the time, was an extremely naughty boy in our class. Years later, l found out he was autistic. He had already been held back a year. On this particular morning, l cannot remember what he was doing that was even worse than normal. What l can remember is the teacher, who was near retirement age, tying the boy to the chair. He left our school after that to go to a special school. Of course, l cannot approve of the actions of the teacher, but I can completely understand why she did this. It was 1971, there were nearly forty five and six year olds in her class and no other adult in the room apart from the teacher. She would have been terrified that either the boy or one of us might be badly injured.

We don’t really advocate tying children up because we don’t have resources to care for them. I’m sorry you had to witness that it’s very obviously clouded your views. It sounds like the child’s life would have been forever blighted by his care. Really upsetting to read about. Imagine if that had been your experience of school.

verysmellyjelly · 06/03/2025 09:20

@Itisbetter Yes, I completely agree with you there. And I would consider any child who can't communicate to be very vulnerable, no question.

Itisbetter · 06/03/2025 09:16

I think @verysmellyjelly ”most vulnerable” has to have context. A learning disabled or autistic child who cannot communicate is far more vulnerable to abuse because they cannot advocate for themselves at all. In a flood or fire they are obviously better placed to save themselves than someone who is immobile.

verysmellyjelly · 06/03/2025 09:12

@NonplasticBertrand I am autistic.

Violinist64 · 06/03/2025 09:09

Itisbetter · 05/03/2025 17:44

You sent your child to a mainstream school. She will be in a class with disabled people, people of different race, religion, and class, people who have been abused, damaged, and deprived, people who are in care and people who are wealthy and pampered, that’s what mainstream is. If exposure to this environment is beyond her capabilities then she shouldn’t be there.

No, whatever issues the violent child has, (s)he is the one who should not be there if the school is unable to control the behaviour. Why should the bullied child have to suffer? Is the child with the problems more important than everyone else? No child will be safe in this environment, all will be worried that they will be the next target. The constant disruption will mean that no constructive learning can take place
When l was six, we had, what we thought at the time, was an extremely naughty boy in our class. Years later, l found out he was autistic. He had already been held back a year. On this particular morning, l cannot remember what he was doing that was even worse than normal. What l can remember is the teacher, who was near retirement age, tying the boy to the chair. He left our school after that to go to a special school. Of course, l cannot approve of the actions of the teacher, but I can completely understand why she did this. It was 1971, there were nearly forty five and six year olds in her class and no other adult in the room apart from the teacher. She would have been terrified that either the boy or one of us might be badly injured.

NonplasticBertrand · 06/03/2025 09:09

verysmellyjelly · 06/03/2025 08:54

@Tapofthemorning This is exactly what I was referring to with my first comment on this thread. Advocacy around hidden disabilities was originally a good and somewhat necessary thing, because yes, they do exist and were generally rather unknown to the public for a long time.

But unfortunately, much of this advocacy has been so poorly done, and in a particular climate of our day, that it has actually led to an unintended impact on people with visible disabilities who are often far more vulnerable and more unwell. Hidden disability advocacy has often taken the stance that this group is the "most vulnerable" (lol, remind you of anything...) and the most overlooked and the most in need of special privileges and care. And crucially, it's a model of disability that encourages people to identify into it via identity based models and/or self diagnosis. With serious visible disabilities, that's just not how it works.

I'm not saying there are no serious hidden disabilities, btw. Of course there are. Just that the nature of the advocacy has been so ham handed and tangled up with identitarian politics that it has ended up pushing a false hierarchy. The reality is that most of the time (albeit not absolutely always) it still is actually visibly disabled people who are the most vulnerable.

You sound like a mens right activist complaining that women's rights are overblown! If you read the evidence base, particularly on stigma and social exclusion, you will find autism tops the charts and takes a terrible toll on the mental health of autistic people and carers. We could also look at the life expectancy of people with global neurodevelopmental conditions...

verysmellyjelly · 06/03/2025 08:54

@Tapofthemorning This is exactly what I was referring to with my first comment on this thread. Advocacy around hidden disabilities was originally a good and somewhat necessary thing, because yes, they do exist and were generally rather unknown to the public for a long time.

But unfortunately, much of this advocacy has been so poorly done, and in a particular climate of our day, that it has actually led to an unintended impact on people with visible disabilities who are often far more vulnerable and more unwell. Hidden disability advocacy has often taken the stance that this group is the "most vulnerable" (lol, remind you of anything...) and the most overlooked and the most in need of special privileges and care. And crucially, it's a model of disability that encourages people to identify into it via identity based models and/or self diagnosis. With serious visible disabilities, that's just not how it works.

I'm not saying there are no serious hidden disabilities, btw. Of course there are. Just that the nature of the advocacy has been so ham handed and tangled up with identitarian politics that it has ended up pushing a false hierarchy. The reality is that most of the time (albeit not absolutely always) it still is actually visibly disabled people who are the most vulnerable.

Kendodd · 06/03/2025 08:53

Porcuporpoise · 06/03/2025 08:32

Your friend needs better professional support. What you describe is not that unusual with severely disabled adults and workable solutions can be found (not so much difficult as expensive and requiring a modicum of imagination).

What solution would you suggest?
My friends son has no concept of right and wrong, and it's just impossible for him to consider other people.

Porcuporpoise · 06/03/2025 08:32

Kendodd · 06/03/2025 08:26

That's awful. I'm so sorry that happened to you.
I mentioned upthread a friends teenage son is very disabled with non verbal autism. He's big and strong and has no comprehension. He plays with himself a lot (then has a screaming meltdown if he gets cum on himself). He has also started putting his hands on women and girls in the street. My friend has had big multi agency meetings about how to tackle this. From what she's told me nobody has a clue what to do or a workable solution.
He also kicks animals while he's out if he's near one. A poster upthread said her son is very sorry afterwards if he hurts somebody, my friends son has no concept of 'sorry' or right and wrong.

Your friend needs better professional support. What you describe is not that unusual with severely disabled adults and workable solutions can be found (not so much difficult as expensive and requiring a modicum of imagination).

Kendodd · 06/03/2025 08:31

Another problem I see is that a potential solution might be to have two or even three carers (my friends son only goes out with minimum two people as it is). Where are all these people coming from though? There's already a labour shortage as it is. One of my friends sons carers is leaving, she can't find anyone else. Oh, and she pays £21 per hour up north, still can't find anyone.

Kendodd · 06/03/2025 08:26

labamba007 · 06/03/2025 04:43

I was sexually assaulted by someone with a disability. The police came to his defence. I was 11 and will never forget it.

There has to be a line op.

That's awful. I'm so sorry that happened to you.
I mentioned upthread a friends teenage son is very disabled with non verbal autism. He's big and strong and has no comprehension. He plays with himself a lot (then has a screaming meltdown if he gets cum on himself). He has also started putting his hands on women and girls in the street. My friend has had big multi agency meetings about how to tackle this. From what she's told me nobody has a clue what to do or a workable solution.
He also kicks animals while he's out if he's near one. A poster upthread said her son is very sorry afterwards if he hurts somebody, my friends son has no concept of 'sorry' or right and wrong.

Itisbetter · 06/03/2025 07:59

I think what’s difficult is reading some of these threads on disability where people describe their experience of being hurt or inconvenienced or otherwise impacted by a disabled person. There are a huge number of disabled people in the world. They really aren’t committing the majority of these sorts of crimes. In fact they are far far more likely to be victims of crime themselves. The person causing your child upset at school is much more likely to come from a damagingly dysfunctional home life than have been born with a lifelong neurological disability.

The best place to educate our disabled children is with their siblings and neighbours so that they grow as part of our community.

Our children are already facing a future where they will be shouldering the burden of a huge elderly population. Why on earth would we not be doing everything in our power to limit the number of dependent disabled adults who cannot function in society? It’s short sighted and foolish to ostracise those that cannot function cope with help I’m mainstream school or indeed in mainstream life. If you do want to fight to protect your child then step up and fight for inclusion. Speak up when you hear racism, sexism or ableism because those are the attitudes that are going to drain their futures of promise and reduce their outcomes.

whatnooow · 06/03/2025 07:37

thecherryfox · 06/03/2025 00:01

people saying about when someone with a disability injures another person and it’s not ok- do you understand that they can’t help hurting other people. My son is autistic and during his meltdowns he will lash out and hurt himself or others - 90% of the time I’m on the receiving end of that. He cannot comprehend what he is during in that moment, but as soon as he is out of that ‘mindset’ and calms down he comprehends what he has done and cannot apologise enough and feels guilty for the rest of the day. It’s not like these children or adults do it on purpose and blames it on their disability, they physically cannot help it.

also the people saying ‘well I have autism and I don’t hurt people’ - I hope you realise disabilities are a spectrum and just because some don’t doesn’t mean some do. I really would have thought people who struggle with it themselves or have children with it would have more understanding or compassion but it seems to be the complete opposite

I think people do understand it's not their fault, but the outcome of an attack on a person doesn't change.

It's difficult for everyone involved.

labamba007 · 06/03/2025 04:43

I was sexually assaulted by someone with a disability. The police came to his defence. I was 11 and will never forget it.

There has to be a line op.

Stirabout · 06/03/2025 02:25

Proudestmumofone1 · 06/03/2025 00:12

@Whatthebarnacles if I could like your post x1000 I would.

As someone who works with children and young people with autism and fights for their rights legally, I absolutely despair at some of the recent threads on here.

It is the biggest privilege of my life to work with such amazing children and young people - how anyone can judge someone on a scared, anxious, externalising behaviour which is highlighting their internal overwhelm I have no idea.

When deciding on a primary school for my daughter, I deliberately chose a mainstream state school over a local private setting as I feel so strongly that I want her to grow up with an inclusive mind and to accept all children for who they are. Within her school there are plenty of “children disturbing the lesson” - give a shit.

Learning to be kind, compassionate and inclusive to all is a far greater lesson in life than any maths or English lesson that may have a “five min disruption “. Remind me of the last time you all used trigonometry….

The current discourse (led by the orange dick in America) around disabilities is genuinely terrifying.

But I promise you, your son will always be welcomed, loved and accepted in my world. And by future generations who are being shown we are all equal, valued humans.

Wow
Very concerned about the lack of respect for education here

As an aside as an Architect I use Trig all the time. It’s especially important for land and building surveys and along with the Golden section also for design

Without Trig I would not have passed my Maths exams to get into Uni

Please don’t think education is unimportant. Those kids at the back that want to learn amongst all this disruption are the ones that are silently suffering. They may grow up to be kind and accepting but if they lose their career dreams along the way it’s highly unlikely.

Stirabout · 06/03/2025 02:13

DaveyTheCavy · 06/03/2025 00:02

Well remember the Jonty Bravery case where a man with autism and also PD diagnoses (he was unable to live 100%/independently due to them IIRC) pushed a child off a balcony in an art gallery, badly injuring the child? Would posters on MN have been ok with him getting away with it? I wouldn't. He should have been in a residential secure unit, not in the community.

and this is the point really.
Others have stated autistic people that lash out don’t know they are doing it at the time and will lash out at whoever. Surely if family or professionals know someone could be dangerous they should be monitored when in public to protect the public. It’s simply not good enough to say they are autistic they do this sometimes.
The above case is a good example. The authorities and family should have been aware he was a danger to people and should have been unsupervised at all times

WalkingonWheels · 06/03/2025 01:30

Proudestmumofone1 · 06/03/2025 00:12

@Whatthebarnacles if I could like your post x1000 I would.

As someone who works with children and young people with autism and fights for their rights legally, I absolutely despair at some of the recent threads on here.

It is the biggest privilege of my life to work with such amazing children and young people - how anyone can judge someone on a scared, anxious, externalising behaviour which is highlighting their internal overwhelm I have no idea.

When deciding on a primary school for my daughter, I deliberately chose a mainstream state school over a local private setting as I feel so strongly that I want her to grow up with an inclusive mind and to accept all children for who they are. Within her school there are plenty of “children disturbing the lesson” - give a shit.

Learning to be kind, compassionate and inclusive to all is a far greater lesson in life than any maths or English lesson that may have a “five min disruption “. Remind me of the last time you all used trigonometry….

The current discourse (led by the orange dick in America) around disabilities is genuinely terrifying.

But I promise you, your son will always be welcomed, loved and accepted in my world. And by future generations who are being shown we are all equal, valued humans.

A five minute distraction? Really? Have you ever been in a classroom? Just over half the children in the lady Year 2 class I taught had EHCPs, and some without had severe behavioural issues. Evacuating the classroom multiple times a day because of chairs being thrown, a child who would regularly scream so hard she'd burst blood vessels in her nose so the classroom would look like a murder scene, a child who enjoyed ripping everything off the walls and tearing up books and classwork, another one who would take shoes off and hurl them at faces, one who would regularly soil themselves... And the list goes on.

Out of 5 hours a day of teaching time, the children in that particular class were getting half an hour at best, and even that would be disrupted constantly.

What you're saying is, nothing of value is ever being taught, so NT children should just get on with it because they'll never use trigonometry anyway?

That just beggars belief.

BassesAreBest · 06/03/2025 01:22

Remind me of the last time you all used trigonometry….

Earlier today (well, yesterday now). Your point?

Itisbetter · 06/03/2025 01:21

Allthegoodnamesarechosen · 05/03/2025 23:23

‘Needing two carers doesn’t necessarily mean you are “potentially dangerous” it could mean you have life threatening seizures or are a flight risk or can’t always get home unaided. It’s also quite possible that the support worker is not needed for “company” but more for safety (eg someone who can’t ask for directions but get lost easily’

Okay :

asking directions … given that they walk up and down the lane (which has only one very uninviting footpath going off it ) pretty much every day unless very cold or pouring with rain…doubtful

Flight risk : total failure there then, as detailed

Seizures: don’t know but Unmade rural cul-de-sac not a great choice for a walk in this case.

None of these ‘explanations’ answered why the Carers do not walk near the guy, and are immersed in their smartphones rather than performing their (presumable) job of looking after him and being active companions. So he can run off and enter gardens and houses at will

I understand that their role is to ‘look after’ the client, but they are not fulfilling this role. So next time they negligently allow him to go into someone’s house or garden and the householder does not placate or satisfy their uninvited guest and the situation escalates……

Too late to say lessons have been learnt for the small child on the Tate roof - except of course they haven’t.

None of these ‘explanations’ answered why the Carers do not walk near the guy, and are immersed in their smartphones rather than performing their (presumable) job of looking after him and being active companions. So he can run off and enter gardens and houses at will. But their job may not be to be “active companions. You seem to think they should be engaging the man in chat and standing right next to him at all times like a nanny to a preschooler. That may be a long long way from their role. A PA is engaged to support the client not mummy them. I obviously don’t know this situation or person but it sounds like they’d like to go for a walk alone. For whatever reason that’s not possible so they have found a quiet place with few options so the route is the same and the man is able to walk ahead a little and have a semblance of freedom.

DaveyTheCavy · 06/03/2025 01:14

JoyousGreyOrca · 05/03/2025 23:52

He was found guilty of the murder of the woman and child destruction. He was not found guilty of the murder of the unborn baby, as legally that is not possible in England. My original comment is correct.

He wasn't diagnosed as ND, though or have I missed something?

DaveyTheCavy · 06/03/2025 01:13

I don't think bullying and violence should be considered the same as a child having a vocal tic or stimming. Those are things a child can't help. Jayden can choose to flip tables but he needs discipline of he makes that choice. Same with bullies.

andfinallyhereweare · 06/03/2025 00:57

I think it’s hard for everyone involved

SapphireSeptember · 06/03/2025 00:27

JoyousGreyOrca · 05/03/2025 23:52

He was found guilty of the murder of the woman and child destruction. He was not found guilty of the murder of the unborn baby, as legally that is not possible in England. My original comment is correct.

I don't know what your original comment was, I wasn't replying to you. And I know it's not legally possible, I'm saying it SHOULD be. 🤦🏻‍♀️ The reading comprehension on this site gets worse every day, I swear.