Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

£100,000 free hours limit - means extra £40,000 gross income?

204 replies

FrightHorizons · 02/03/2025 14:15

I’ll be going back to work after mat leave in September.

I have two children, one will be 3 in September and the other 9 months in August.

The only childcare scheme I can claim is 15 free hours for the 3 year old.

For the 3 year old, the 15 hours I can’t claim is £300pcm. This is £5,600 inc TFC.

For the 9 month old, the 30 hours I can’t claim is £700pcm. This is £10,400 inc TFC.

This means I need to make about £16,000 net to pay those childcare costs.

This means earning an extra £40,000 gross to pay that £16,000 difference. Is that right?

I’d love to know how many other parents are finding themselves in this situation - nursery fees are now £2,250 a month for the littlest one too (they were £1,900 when the first started at the same age!).

I am wondering if I have got my sums wrong!

OP posts:
samarrange · 02/03/2025 19:16

Laralou999 · 02/03/2025 18:53

We’re going on a nomad visa and keeping our UK based jobs. Nursery is less than £600 a month over there, so it makes financial sense for us

Ah yes, the digital nomad visa comes with tax breaks if I remember correctly. Good luck with settling into a new life. 🙏

whompingwillo · 02/03/2025 19:13

We are in the same situation, I’m the lower earner and I earn barely anything once childcare fees are paid, it was a big discussion about whether or not to be a SAHM but i deciddd to go to work for very little pay for the benefits of continuing work

in our area (just outside London) there are a lot of SAHMs for this exact reason, to earn more than nursery fees you need to be on around £40k just for 1 child and a lot of people don’t want to have their child at nursery fulltime just to take home a couple of hundred exrra a month if they can afford not to but it’s taking a hugely skilled workforce out of the work place

LondonNootropics · 02/03/2025 19:06

Yep it sucks, i’ll get hounded for this but £100k isn’t a high enough salary to just lose every bit of support available.
Definitely top up your pension to get you under £100k and submit a self assessment tax return to confirm this each year.

Laralou999 · 02/03/2025 18:53

samarrange · 02/03/2025 18:03

Income tax is at a 45% marginal rate in Spain above €60k (£50k) per year. Plus there is the equivalent of NI at about 7% on income below that. So whatever you gain by not being on the (stupid) 60% effective marginal rate from £100-120k will be largely cancelled out by the fact that you're paying more in tax before you get to that number.

Also, salaries in Spain are typically a lot lower than the UK, unless you have a way to work remotely while staying on UK money. But then houses are cheaper if you avoid the absolute premium areas. In any case, uprooting your family to a country where (I'm guessing) not all of you speak the language is a hell of a life decision, and probably shouldn't be done purely for the momentary satisfaction of sticking it to HMRC.

We’re going on a nomad visa and keeping our UK based jobs. Nursery is less than £600 a month over there, so it makes financial sense for us

WednesburyUnreasonable · 02/03/2025 18:51

DonnyBurrito · 02/03/2025 18:36

Sorry, I didn't realise this legislation was specifically targeted at parents of nursery aged children! Can you link me to the part on the .gov website where it states that high earners should contribute to their pensions so they can access free childcare?

Oh wait, that doesn't exist! Because it's a loophole.

It’s not a loophole. Regulation 14(3)(c) of the Childcare (Free of Charge for Working Parents) (England) Regulations 2022 provides that a child is not eligible for free hours if a parent expects “their adjusted net income to exceed £100,000”

You may not agree with the decision but it is absolutely a deliberate policy choice to use “adjusted net income” in that legislation. It would have been easy to draft it differently if the government wanted to capture income pre-salary sacrifice pension contributions.

neverwakeasleepingbaby · 02/03/2025 18:49

Hankunamatata · 02/03/2025 18:44

All my wage and part if husbands wage paid childcare. We lived frugally until we got them into school

If the situation was instead "I couldn't vote as a woman so neither should you" then do you feel that is still ok?
Why the hell do we have to pay to work in this country? It's absolutely insane. Do people not want to change this for others going forward? Even if they suffered themselves?

Kitte321 · 02/03/2025 18:49

DonnyBurrito · 02/03/2025 18:36

Sorry, I didn't realise this legislation was specifically targeted at parents of nursery aged children! Can you link me to the part on the .gov website where it states that high earners should contribute to their pensions so they can access free childcare?

Oh wait, that doesn't exist! Because it's a loophole.

https://www.gov.uk/check-eligible-free-childcare-if-youre-working

It’s really quite clear but perhaps have a read to educate yourself. I’d particularly refer you to the section related to adjusted net income.

JoyousEagle · 02/03/2025 18:45

Can you link me to the part on the .gov website where it states that high earners should contribute to their pensions so they can access free childcare?

Well the threshold for accessing it is specifically your income less pension contributions.

DazzyRascale · 02/03/2025 18:44

I knew this thread would descend into the normal jealousy of people earning over £100k.

I can 100% guarantee everyone would be seeking to do the same if they were a high earners

Hankunamatata · 02/03/2025 18:44

All my wage and part if husbands wage paid childcare. We lived frugally until we got them into school

MsCactus · 02/03/2025 18:43

JoyousGreyOrca · 02/03/2025 17:02

And generally when you have children, you get back more than you pay in, but when you do not have children, you pay in more than you get back. Education, pregnancy, birth, NHS care for children is all expensive. Healthy adults usually cost only the general costs for road repairs, police, defence, etc.

You have to earn around £45k a year just to cover your own costs from the welfare system - your schooling, your healthcare, your state pension. So anyone earning more than £45k is paying for others on top of their own bill (on average) everyone earning under that is paying less than their own bill.

I think you have to think of kids as future adults who cover their own bill as well. So a young child has the school coats, healthcare costs etc - which they contribute back when they start earning and paying taxes

DonnyBurrito · 02/03/2025 18:42

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

DonnyBurrito · 02/03/2025 18:41

Justsomethoughts23 · 02/03/2025 18:32

100k salary is not “rich” but is definitely paying more than their fair share into the country whilst genuinely rich people (usually non PAYE) get away with paying very little.

Only 2% of UK earn over 100k. She is rich, especially comparatively.

DonnyBurrito · 02/03/2025 18:36

Kitte321 · 02/03/2025 18:06

It’s not a loophole. It’s the rule. ‘Adjusted net income’. It’s to incentivise people to put money in pensions.
But carry on with your ‘disgust’ if you like
🤷‍♀️

Sorry, I didn't realise this legislation was specifically targeted at parents of nursery aged children! Can you link me to the part on the .gov website where it states that high earners should contribute to their pensions so they can access free childcare?

Oh wait, that doesn't exist! Because it's a loophole.

Andwhoisasking · 02/03/2025 18:32

DonnyBurrito · 02/03/2025 18:30

News just in! Rich people not paying taxes impacts the poor and needy!

🙄

If you think rich people need any help with not wanting to pay their fair share, you obviously haven't been paying attention.

Oh dear. The issues this country faces in one post.

WimbyAce · 02/03/2025 18:32

I mean tbf I'd rather the OP got free child care than those that don't even work. At least she is contributing to society.

Justsomethoughts23 · 02/03/2025 18:32

DonnyBurrito · 02/03/2025 18:30

News just in! Rich people not paying taxes impacts the poor and needy!

🙄

If you think rich people need any help with not wanting to pay their fair share, you obviously haven't been paying attention.

100k salary is not “rich” but is definitely paying more than their fair share into the country whilst genuinely rich people (usually non PAYE) get away with paying very little.

DonnyBurrito · 02/03/2025 18:30

Andwhoisasking · 02/03/2025 18:01

Oh behave yourself. It’s attitudes like yours which make sure we have a majority population of net takers. We disincentive net contributors from paying tax at every turn. This results in less for everyone as you’ll find when they slash 5bn from the welfare bill.

Edited

News just in! Rich people not paying taxes impacts the poor and needy!

🙄

If you think rich people need any help with not wanting to pay their fair share, you obviously haven't been paying attention.

Evisam · 02/03/2025 18:20

85k net!!! Well you can afford 40k+ for childcare and still take home more than most of us could dream of. This is on top of your partner's wage too.

Will you be moaning about the VAT on school fees too?

0ohLarLar · 02/03/2025 18:18

I don’t understand why you don’t get an au pair/nanny?
Surely, that’s the cheaper option

You can't really easily get au pairs now. They were something which existed due to an endless supply of eastern Europeans willing to work for a room & £80 a week "pocket money". It's a heavily abused scheme that was never meant to provide full time childcare for under 5s - it was meant to provide wraparound care for school aged children.

Nannies are very expensive - can be £50k a year which you have to pay from your post tax salary.

0ohLarLar · 02/03/2025 18:06

You do have the maths wrong. To have an extra £16,000 in your take-home after income tax and national insurance you need to earn an extra £32k ish to get the. I don't know where the £40k figure you got came from.

Its not wrong. At 100k to 120k your personal allowance is clawed back. 140k salary gets you about £85k net, whereas £100k salary gets you c. £69k net. So you have to earn 40k pre tax to get £16k after, and thats if you have no pension or student loan coming out on top.

Kitte321 · 02/03/2025 18:06

DonnyBurrito · 02/03/2025 17:37

It's not 'everybody else' that can access free childcare. It's lower earners, to begin to repair the vast inequality in society. There has to be a cut off at some point, and 100k is extremely generous.

I'm not jealous, I'm disgusted by rich people increasing societal inequality by using loopholes to benefit themselves.

To compare paying for nursery (which is for 4 years at an absolute maximum) to lifetime access to the NHS is a false equivalence. Nice try, though.

It’s not a loophole. It’s the rule. ‘Adjusted net income’. It’s to incentivise people to put money in pensions.
But carry on with your ‘disgust’ if you like
🤷‍♀️

samarrange · 02/03/2025 18:03

Laralou999 · 02/03/2025 14:23

We’re paying £2300 a month for 2. Thinking of baby 3 and moving to Spain for this reason. After mortgage fixed rate running out and everything else going up, it doesn’t feel financially stable to stay in this country despite us having 2 corporate jobs

Edited

Income tax is at a 45% marginal rate in Spain above €60k (£50k) per year. Plus there is the equivalent of NI at about 7% on income below that. So whatever you gain by not being on the (stupid) 60% effective marginal rate from £100-120k will be largely cancelled out by the fact that you're paying more in tax before you get to that number.

Also, salaries in Spain are typically a lot lower than the UK, unless you have a way to work remotely while staying on UK money. But then houses are cheaper if you avoid the absolute premium areas. In any case, uprooting your family to a country where (I'm guessing) not all of you speak the language is a hell of a life decision, and probably shouldn't be done purely for the momentary satisfaction of sticking it to HMRC.

Andwhoisasking · 02/03/2025 18:01

DonnyBurrito · 02/03/2025 17:37

It's not 'everybody else' that can access free childcare. It's lower earners, to begin to repair the vast inequality in society. There has to be a cut off at some point, and 100k is extremely generous.

I'm not jealous, I'm disgusted by rich people increasing societal inequality by using loopholes to benefit themselves.

To compare paying for nursery (which is for 4 years at an absolute maximum) to lifetime access to the NHS is a false equivalence. Nice try, though.

Oh behave yourself. It’s attitudes like yours which make sure we have a majority population of net takers. We disincentive net contributors from paying tax at every turn. This results in less for everyone as you’ll find when they slash 5bn from the welfare bill.

ConcernedFriendgbvc56 · 02/03/2025 17:56

DonnyBurrito · 02/03/2025 17:37

It's not 'everybody else' that can access free childcare. It's lower earners, to begin to repair the vast inequality in society. There has to be a cut off at some point, and 100k is extremely generous.

I'm not jealous, I'm disgusted by rich people increasing societal inequality by using loopholes to benefit themselves.

To compare paying for nursery (which is for 4 years at an absolute maximum) to lifetime access to the NHS is a false equivalence. Nice try, though.

Would you like some vinegar for that chip?