Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that funding free breakfast clubs is wrong-headed?

384 replies

WaahWaahWinston · 01/03/2025 13:44

Government is to fund free breakfast clubs for all primary school children. This doesn't strike me as the best use of money for schools; I imagine there are better things to spend money on that would be of greater educational benefit to children.

It may help a tiny proportion of families but breakfast is probably the easiest and cheapest meal for families to provide to children. (I doubt breakfast clubs will be providing full English or other cooked breakfasts of the sort that one could argue families are hard-pushed to provide.)

So I don't see the compelling need. Why spend money on this of all things, when there must be other improvements that could be funded which would improve education specifically?

OP posts:
AngryLikeHades · 01/03/2025 14:56

Could part of the reason for breakfast club be maybe to alleviate the pressure on parents that might have other issues like a disabled child that requires more energy and attention that might not be the child receiving breakfast but possibly a sibling that needs taking/organising transport/medical appointments etc.
Breakfast club in this case might not be about finances but a little assistance with child care for a small amount of time.

Grammarnut · 01/03/2025 14:55

POSTC123 · 01/03/2025 14:52

I’m assuming this isn’t about a few slices of toast but about productivity and enabling people to work.

Well, most childcare policy is about making sure women (mostly) go out to work rather than stay idly at home rearing their own children. It's a win-win, more workers (so wages stagnate) plus more business for low-wage paying industries like nurseries. What's not to like?

100PercentFaithful · 01/03/2025 14:55

Who is going to run them? Current teachers and LSAs don’t want to do it. I can’t imagine there are that many people who want to do it.

user9876543211 · 01/03/2025 14:55

Scrubberdubber · 01/03/2025 14:44

Breakfast club aside I personally think universal free meals is pointless it would be better to raise eligibility threshold it used to be the parents income under 16k now it's 7.4k which is insane when you think about it.

I wouldn't worry about "stigma" even when I was a kid I had free meals and no one knew because you paid with your fingerprint. Now it's all booked online at least at primary age so no way for the other kids to know who gets it free.

Apparently in London all kids get free school meals just why when certain neighbourhoods in London everyone is a millionaire. Why do they need free meals??

Well the millionaire's kids are not generally going to state schools. And you'd be surprised. One of the most deprived schools in London is in one of the highest income per capita post codes. It's not the kids from the neighbouring £10m houses filling the classrooms.

FrippEnos · 01/03/2025 14:55

WaahWaahWinston · 01/03/2025 13:51

@SulkySeagull I'm all for an extra half hour of school...but make it an extra half hour of teaching!! Or homework club at the very least. Not just free childcare.

Congratulations you have just blown through the directed time allocation in schools. What are you willing to take out to make this extra teaching happen.

And I was with you until you did this the free breakfast is a cheap and easy way of getting brownie points from the electorate whilst getting parents in to work.
Very little to do with improving education at all.

Mrsttcno1 · 01/03/2025 14:54

BaronessEllarawrosaurus · 01/03/2025 14:48

I make it with milk, that takes the calories up to 300

You’d need to be using about 200ml of milk to get 150cals out of it, your 40g of oats would be absolutely swimming in milk.

And even then, it’s essentially a bowl of gloop with very little in the way of goodness, it might fill you but it’s certainly not fuelling your body particularly well. Where’s your protein, your fruit, your healthy fats etc in there?

A healthy balanced breakfast could be oats, milk, peanut butter with some fruit for example, but calling 40grams of oats swimming in milk just to hit calories a great breakfast option is madness

JenniferBooth · 01/03/2025 14:54

HoskinsChoice · 01/03/2025 14:13

That's a good thing isn't it? Some people find it difficult to find a job that works around school drop off times. This is a great way to help people back into work whist also ensuring all kids are fed. The concept is brilliant, it's win/win... whether it's achievable is another thing.

Its the lack of honesty about it that people are objecting to.

TY78910 · 01/03/2025 14:52

WaahWaahWinston · 01/03/2025 14:45

@TY78910 I believe it was. But why shifted into this? Why not other aspects of state 'education provision'?

Well the money wasn't there in the first place. Someone came up with an initiative - 1 in 4 kids in the UK are in poverty. We need to encourage parents to go to work. Ah I know! Free breakfast club. Great. How are we going to fund it we don't have money. Let's tax someone else.

It wasn't the other way round - we think of taxing this group more, what shall we do with the money?

What programme would you launch instead?

WaahWaahWinston · 01/03/2025 14:52

@Mrsttcno1 You make it sound like ALL children are turning up to school starving and in all cases it's because of poverty. i.e. you're making it sound like if we don't have this policy, this is what will happen to all children.

And you seem to be implying that this policy (rather than any other policy e.g. food vouchers for parents or parenting classes or something) is the ONLY solution to prevent that outcome.

I'm just saying that I don't think the societal need is such as to warrant this particular policy, when there are better things to spend the money on in education. It certainly feels like a sledgehammer to crack a nut. I'd have thought MOST families can afford breakfast and, as a previous poster asked, if not, then the benefits system needs looking at.

OP posts:
Grammarnut · 01/03/2025 14:52

I agree. The money could be better spent on improving school libraries, more sport or showing parents how to pour cornflakes in a bowl, stick milk on it and serve it to DC with a spoon.

user9876543211 · 01/03/2025 14:52

This reply has been deleted

Post withdrawn at author's request

So if the parents don't, or can't, we as a society should sanction the children bearing the brunt of that?

FFS

POSTC123 · 01/03/2025 14:52

I’m assuming this isn’t about a few slices of toast but about productivity and enabling people to work.

AndActuallyWhyYoureAtIt · 01/03/2025 14:51

WaahWaahWinston · 01/03/2025 13:51

@SulkySeagull I'm all for an extra half hour of school...but make it an extra half hour of teaching!! Or homework club at the very least. Not just free childcare.

So you don't agree with breakfast clubs full stop.. even when the parents are paying.
I used a breakfast club for my son throughout primary school so I could get to work on time, it cost me £10 per week. Paying a childminder to do the school run would have cost me £15 per day, surely you can get that finding that money would be impossible to a lot of families.

SockFluffInTheBath · 01/03/2025 14:51

Smartiepants79 · 01/03/2025 14:47

On supporting the children whose families actually need it. Not just a blanket policy. Breakfast club for those who qualify for pupil premium?? Fantastic idea. Perhaps even extend who can access pupil premium. Breakfast club for all including kids like mine who are very lucky to have multiple options for breakfast sitting in their fridge at home? Pointless waste of money.
Money for an extra TA to support the SEN pupils, money to provide free uniform or extra curricular for those that can’t afford it. The list is endless.
My school would be grateful for some money for basic supplies!

Understand (former teacher, trained in a deprived part of Birmingham), but anything highlighting FSM kids is to be avoided since it can embarrass them into declining. General funding of schools is woeful, but taking a piece of toast from a hungry child will not fix everything else.

AnnaBegins · 01/03/2025 14:50

Breakfast club at our school is over £4. They don't make a profit. So if the government are funding it at 63p per child, how are schools possibly going to make it work?!

BaronessEllarawrosaurus · 01/03/2025 14:48

Mrsttcno1 · 01/03/2025 14:47

Nope, it’s not.

40g of oats is around 160 calories. The general guidance is that breakfast should be anywhere from around 300-400 calories.

I make it with milk, that takes the calories up to 300

SockFluffInTheBath · 01/03/2025 14:48

This reply has been deleted

Post withdrawn at author's request

Christ, are you for real? How long does that take, how much does it cost, and who feeds the child in the meantime?

BaronessEllarawrosaurus · 01/03/2025 14:47

It is different with the free school meals because the staff are already budgeted for. This is an extra that they aren't funding staff for. Provide school with money that they can provide something during registration but don't add extra time without providing staff costs

Mrsttcno1 · 01/03/2025 14:47

BaronessEllarawrosaurus · 01/03/2025 14:42

40g of oats is correct, it's what I make for myself, ok a teenager would need more but once cooked that's a decent amount.

This school has now confirmed its pulling out, it can't make the finances work.

BBC News - Bacup school concerned about 'unviable' breakfast club scheme - BBC News
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgwmx2vyx9o

Nope, it’s not.

40g of oats is around 160 calories. The general guidance is that breakfast should be anywhere from around 300-400 calories.

Smartiepants79 · 01/03/2025 14:47

SockFluffInTheBath · 01/03/2025 14:40

What would you rather the money be spent on?

On supporting the children whose families actually need it. Not just a blanket policy. Breakfast club for those who qualify for pupil premium?? Fantastic idea. Perhaps even extend who can access pupil premium. Breakfast club for all including kids like mine who are very lucky to have multiple options for breakfast sitting in their fridge at home? Pointless waste of money.
Money for an extra TA to support the SEN pupils, money to provide free uniform or extra curricular for those that can’t afford it. The list is endless.
My school would be grateful for some money for basic supplies!

FrodisCapering · 01/03/2025 14:46

This reply has been withdrawn

Post withdrawn at author's request

Clearinguptheclutter · 01/03/2025 14:46

I’m for anything that makes it easier for parents to be able to juggle parenting and work

WaahWaahWinston · 01/03/2025 14:45

@TY78910 I believe it was. But why shifted into this? Why not other aspects of state 'education provision'?

OP posts:
Scrubberdubber · 01/03/2025 14:44

Randomsabreur · 01/03/2025 14:06

Kids coming to school on time, not being hungry, improves behaviour which is good for everyone.

Being universal reduces stigma and increases uptake plus cut off of eligibility for free school meals is a cliff edge with people just above still struggling

Breakfast club aside I personally think universal free meals is pointless it would be better to raise eligibility threshold it used to be the parents income under 16k now it's 7.4k which is insane when you think about it.

I wouldn't worry about "stigma" even when I was a kid I had free meals and no one knew because you paid with your fingerprint. Now it's all booked online at least at primary age so no way for the other kids to know who gets it free.

Apparently in London all kids get free school meals just why when certain neighbourhoods in London everyone is a millionaire. Why do they need free meals??

Mountainfrog · 01/03/2025 14:44

MidnightPatrol · 01/03/2025 14:05

I think it’s less about providing food, and more about providing wraparound care.

Every parent I know has an absolute nightmare with wraparound care.

The school day bears little resemblance to the working day, pre and post school care difficult to find and often expensive,

Even an extra 30 minutes at the start of the day is a massive help in parents getting g to work on time.

Absolutely this. I have wrap around care only for one of my children and only two days a week (we have been on waiting lists for the others). It has affected me being able to apply for jobs, change hours or do overtime… if there was easily available wrap around (as a universal thing rather than very much supply/demand/waiting list arrangement) so many parents could find/change/expand their working potential.

also my kids are terrible for not choosing/getting on and eating their vreakfast at home but would eat with the others at b.c.