Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder what will happen about the government's 'free' breakfast club proposal?!

264 replies

Redlocks30 · 23/02/2025 13:30

They have been talking a lot today about saving families £450 a year, but I just can't see how this is going to work?

They are paying 60p per child per day, which might pay for a Weetabix and a bit of toast, but doesn't take into account the staffing (and any energy costs) that this will require!

We already have a small school with a successful breakfast club running, with smallish numbers but all can sit down and eat together. Parents pay a reasonable amount for it and this pays for 1/2 members of staff, depending on numbers. If this was opened up to all parents as a free option, we simply wouldn't have enough space to put everyone in the hall-it would be mayhem.

The school budget doesn't have any spare cash in it for TA staffing costs (normally paid for by parents paying) so where are schools expected to find this money from?

OP posts:
LittleHangleton · 23/02/2025 20:38

Redlocks30 · 23/02/2025 20:27

I think finding space is red herring, you can have different classes eating at different times.

The government offer is going to be 30 minutes before the start of school for childcare and breakfast so finding space for all of those children for that same half an hour is not a red herring.

They all eat dinner in school.

Redlocks30 · 23/02/2025 20:27

I think finding space is red herring, you can have different classes eating at different times.

The government offer is going to be 30 minutes before the start of school for childcare and breakfast so finding space for all of those children for that same half an hour is not a red herring.

OP posts:
0ohLarLar · 23/02/2025 20:26

You obviously don't work full time then if you don't use breakfast club

I work hybrid, as does my DH. On each of our 2 days wfh school gate opens 8.35, we drop and start work at home at 9. The 5th day they walk to school with my friend.

twistyizzy · 23/02/2025 20:24

IVFmumoftwo · 23/02/2025 20:21

Get rid of the two child cap policy for one.

Or maybe don't have kids that you can't afford to pay for. Some of us limited our family size because of what we could afford.

Showercap22 · 23/02/2025 20:23

Good luck finding the staff. We've had to stop after school club Thursdays and Fridays because we couldn't find anyone to staff it.

IVFmumoftwo · 23/02/2025 20:21

twistyizzy · 23/02/2025 18:05

And yet no-one is asking why parents aren't able to feed their own kids breakfast! If the government think that schools can provide a proper breakfast for 60p then why can't parents and why aren't we tackling the root cause?
Obviously I know the answer ie money. But if you've got such a societal problem that so many parents can't feed their kids breakfast then you've got much bigger problems and providing underfunded breakfast clubs, which many schools caht afford to run, is just an ineffective sticking plaster.

Get rid of the two child cap policy for one.

twistyizzy · 23/02/2025 20:21

BurntBroccoli · 23/02/2025 19:55

That would be difficult for some kids who may not have eaten since the evening before. I know I can't concentrate when my stomach is growling loudly. So a half day of school wasted and may cause behavioural problems and disruption.

But ultimately that's the responsibility of parents, not schools.
Schools should be for educating kids ie reading/writing. They should not be a form of social services, although they are heading that way!

Midgeymoo12 · 23/02/2025 20:20

Why can’t children have breakfast provided at home?

Blushingm · 23/02/2025 20:19

It's been a thing in Wales for years.

sashh · 23/02/2025 20:18

Another76543 · 23/02/2025 14:00

Children are at school for 190 days a year. Where is the £450 per year saving figure coming from? That's £2.36 per day. Most schools are giving/planning to give simple breakfasts such as pieces of bagel/cereal/slice of toast? Even with multiple children, a slice of toast would not cost parents that much.

I cannot fathom a policy which is giving free food to very wealthy families. It doesn't seem a sensible use of resources.

I was not in a deprived area or a poor family. I often went to primary school hungry.

I think finding space is red herring, you can have different classes eating at different times.

The other problems with staffing I think are bigger problems.

justanothercrapbedtime · 23/02/2025 20:18

I am a working parent. There is already morning childcare provision available, which i can afford. I don't use breakfast club because i think its too long a day for children to regularly be in where they get such low levels of adult engagement.

You obviously don't work full time then if you don't use breakfast club

30 minutes is going to make no difference to working parents

Han86 · 23/02/2025 20:09

BurntBroccoli · 23/02/2025 19:55

That would be difficult for some kids who may not have eaten since the evening before. I know I can't concentrate when my stomach is growling loudly. So a half day of school wasted and may cause behavioural problems and disruption.

True, but those children will currently exist and manage til lunchtime or schools already know of these children and feed them breakfast anyway.

AquaPeer · 23/02/2025 20:06

Greenfencebrowntree · 23/02/2025 19:29

It is a battle, but it's just tough luck and they can go hungry till snack time at 10.30am ish if they really don't eat. I also had one like this, and even when we did breakfast club he wouldn't eat there.

Well sure at the moment it’s tough luck until lunch time. But there is no denying she’d perform better at school that morning if she had eaten something

JasperTheDoll · 23/02/2025 20:06

MegTheForgetfulCat · 23/02/2025 14:15

My fear is that the parents who already pay for wraparound care in breakfast club (ours is from 7.30-9) will be asked to pay more to subsidize the "free" half hour breakfast club for everyone else under the new scheme.
I haven't read into the new trial and so some of these questions may have been answered, but how on earth is this supposed to work - can children just be dropped off ad hoc or do they need to book? If the former then how do they know how much toast, milk etc to order and how many staff need to be there? And if there is a booking system, will there be consequences if they don't show up (presumably not if this is a universal service)? Or is the government/other parents basically going to be subsidizing an option for them to show up if they feel like it, with food then inevitably going to waste if the numbers fluctuate a lot?

I have the same worries too. Our wraparound provision is ran by an external private company but on school premises. They rent the hall from the school to use for the provision before and after school. I'm worried that they will either be forced out to give the space to the free sessions or our fees will increase to cover the running costs for the free spaces that will be joining our paid childcare.

fitzwilliamdarcy · 23/02/2025 20:05

At the rate we’re going, schools will be expected to provide dinner and baths for children soon.

BurntBroccoli · 23/02/2025 19:55

Han86 · 23/02/2025 18:53

Rather than free breakfast I think they missed a trick with free school lunches for all children. Easier to implement. Still feeding hungry children.
But as others have put, a breakfast club and therefore earlier drop off is all about getting people to supposedly work.

That would be difficult for some kids who may not have eaten since the evening before. I know I can't concentrate when my stomach is growling loudly. So a half day of school wasted and may cause behavioural problems and disruption.

0ohLarLar · 23/02/2025 19:46

Not to mention - many women leave the workforce entirely when forced to choose between time with their kids mon-fri and a job, due to long hours/commutes.

You would actually get more women/parents working if more part time was a default.

0ohLarLar · 23/02/2025 19:44

I get annoyed about this stuff.

I am a working parent. There is already morning childcare provision available, which i can afford. I don't use breakfast club because i think its too long a day for children to regularly be in where they get such low levels of adult engagement.

They are already in school at 15 to 1 or 30 to 1 ratios from 8.30 to 3.30. Many are then in clubs or childcare from 3.30 to 6.

When are these children supposed to get time with parents who can talk to them, hear them read etc?

Instead of providing more and more and more childcare, the government should be facilitating both mothers and fathers of younger children to work a little less. Encourage employers to create job shares and 25 hour roles. There is a mental health crisis among a generation of children, our children clearly need more parenting. Educators and childcare staff cannot raise our children. We can't keep farming them out to ever longer hours of childcare with 10 kids to only 1 adult who barely knows them.

The government need to remember, these kids are the workers of the future. The productivity crisis is a long game, the best solution is for us to be a little more present for children in the crucial early years and give them the resilience and confidence that will enable them to be the workforce of the future. We need the future entrepeneurs who will take a risk, explore a new idea, not anxious, emotionally stunted individuals.

Greenfencebrowntree · 23/02/2025 19:29

AquaPeer · 23/02/2025 19:25

I think what the poster has said above is extremely common. I have one who won’t eat breakfast and one who does.

the one who won’t just sits there not eating whilst we rush around getting ready and reminding her to eat constantly- but time runs out and you just have to leave for school. Then no food has been eaten. That’s massively common.

im almost certain she’d eat in a room with friends tho.

i doubt that (at a population level) it’s common for parents not to be able to afford breakfast. Many more parents either leave too early to make sure anything is eaten, or have the same battles I’ve described

Edited

It is a battle, but it's just tough luck and they can go hungry till snack time at 10.30am ish if they really don't eat. I also had one like this, and even when we did breakfast club he wouldn't eat there.

AquaPeer · 23/02/2025 19:25

twistyizzy · 23/02/2025 18:39

Of course it is but it's part of being a responsible parent to ensure your child goes to school having had breakfast! Doing this just takes responsibility off parents and onto the state.

I think what the poster has said above is extremely common. I have one who won’t eat breakfast and one who does.

the one who won’t just sits there not eating whilst we rush around getting ready and reminding her to eat constantly- but time runs out and you just have to leave for school. Then no food has been eaten. That’s massively common.

im almost certain she’d eat in a room with friends tho.

i doubt that (at a population level) it’s common for parents not to be able to afford breakfast. Many more parents either leave too early to make sure anything is eaten, or have the same battles I’ve described

twistyizzy · 23/02/2025 19:12

Carrrrot · 23/02/2025 19:11

I agree with you. It’s not my take but one of the potential benefits mooted when the scheme was announced.

More bollocks from BP then

Carrrrot · 23/02/2025 19:11

twistyizzy · 23/02/2025 19:08

Kids who are routinely late/school refusing aren't going to be tempted back with a slice of toast!

I agree with you. It’s not my take but one of the potential benefits mooted when the scheme was announced.

twistyizzy · 23/02/2025 19:08

Carrrrot · 23/02/2025 19:04

Plenty of people are asking!

Imo it’s a mixture of poverty and problematic home environments. Plus easing kids into the school day with breakfast was seen at the start of this scheme as potentially being helpful for kids routinely late for school or school refusing. And iirc also mooted as benefiting working parents.

I work at a food charity. We do breakfast/snack items for a local secondary. The standard offering is 20kg of bananas a week, which I buy wholesale at around £19/box. There’s a huge need.

Edited

Kids who are routinely late/school refusing aren't going to be tempted back with a slice of toast!

Carrrrot · 23/02/2025 19:04

twistyizzy · 23/02/2025 18:05

And yet no-one is asking why parents aren't able to feed their own kids breakfast! If the government think that schools can provide a proper breakfast for 60p then why can't parents and why aren't we tackling the root cause?
Obviously I know the answer ie money. But if you've got such a societal problem that so many parents can't feed their kids breakfast then you've got much bigger problems and providing underfunded breakfast clubs, which many schools caht afford to run, is just an ineffective sticking plaster.

Plenty of people are asking!

Imo it’s a mixture of poverty and problematic home environments. Plus easing kids into the school day with breakfast was seen at the start of this scheme as potentially being helpful for kids routinely late for school or school refusing. And iirc also mooted as benefiting working parents.

I work at a food charity. We do breakfast/snack items for a local secondary. The standard offering is 20kg of bananas a week, which I buy wholesale at around £19/box. There’s a huge need.

Redlocks30 · 23/02/2025 19:00

Well, toasted buttery bagels whilst reading books and doing the register in the classroom is unlikely to be any part of this plan anyway. It's all about offering half an hour of childcare before the school day starts so won't be anything to do with children being in class with their class teacher.

It will be interesting seeing how the early adopters find the scheme.

OP posts: