Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Scared of what labour will do

760 replies

Wantachangefor2024 · 22/02/2025 01:58

Is anyone else terrified of what labour will enforce. The tax on farmers. Will they means test pip? Will they tax state pension more? What else will they do and where will it all end. They ruthlessly without no care took away the winter fuel allowance. Means testing and taxing state pension would massively impact my family

OP posts:
Alexandra2001 · 23/02/2025 10:16

Katypp · 23/02/2025 09:23

Maybe we should go back there. Unpopular opinion, I know.
The problem is, as long as people know they will effectively be bailed our regardless, there's no incentive to take personal responsibility.
To reiterate, I am not talking about vulnerable people who did not have choices around workplace pensions. I am talking about those who actively chose not to pay in.

Its probably not an unpopular opinion, nationwide, on here yes.

But the reality would be going back to a time when the elderly died in their homes in their 1000s and or we see the elderly begging on the streets OR we reintroduce the poor house, probably better, the feckless can die out of sight then.

indigovapour · 23/02/2025 10:15

@EasternStandard no, to that type of poster there will always be rich people (because "rich" simply means anyone with more than them) and they will always be paying too little tax.

PandoraSox · 23/02/2025 10:14

Katypp · 23/02/2025 10:03

How would pushing landlords out of the market and reducing the amount of houses to rent help anything?

Why would it do that? Sensible, balanced rent ceilings could easily be set so that Landlords can still make a profit without ripping people off.

Alexandra2001 · 23/02/2025 10:13

TheNuthatch · 23/02/2025 09:46

By that logic, families currently living in a 1960s tower block in the NW of England should be given the opportunity to move to a better, higher rent area to improve their children's prospects.
All paid for by the taxpayer of course.

Well, if you want to break the cycle of poverty and low achievement, then yes, that is desirable.

The alternative is these kids live on benefits and or low wages & so on....

ploppydoppy · 23/02/2025 10:05

Then they need to commute. Or businesses need to start moving out if they can't get staff. The rest of us shouldn't be funding inflated rentals. Housing benefit has fuelled rent rises.

But commuting can be extortionate. How can you have no hospitals, schools, shops etc in cities?
There should be a lot more social housing

Katypp · 23/02/2025 10:03

PandoraSox · 23/02/2025 10:02

The answer is rent controls, not punishing the less well off. Stop the greedy private landlords profiteering at the expense of the tax payer. That would be good for everyone including people not on benefits but who are also being ripped off.

Edited

How would pushing landlords out of the market and reducing the amount of houses to rent help anything?

PandoraSox · 23/02/2025 10:02

Viviennemary · 23/02/2025 09:55

Then they need to commute. Or businesses need to start moving out if they can't get staff. The rest of us shouldn't be funding inflated rentals. Housing benefit has fuelled rent rises.

The answer is rent controls, not punishing the less well off. Stop the greedy private landlords profiteering at the expense of the tax payer. That would be good for everyone including people not on benefits but who are also being ripped off.

Katypp · 23/02/2025 10:02

Viviennemary · 23/02/2025 09:55

Then they need to commute. Or businesses need to start moving out if they can't get staff. The rest of us shouldn't be funding inflated rentals. Housing benefit has fuelled rent rises.

It's not that simple though. I agree that teachers, nurses, train drivers etc should commute because, despite the relentless rhetoric to the contrary, they are well paid.
What about the overnight cleaners, nmw Hotel workers, shop workers etc?

Viviennemary · 23/02/2025 09:55

ploppydoppy · 23/02/2025 09:12

If you can’t afford to live in an area without claiming lots in housing benefit you have to move. Plenty of parts of the UK are cheap to live in.

But expensive parts of the country eg London need plenty of people with jobs that don't pay enough to enable them to pay rent without help?

Then they need to commute. Or businesses need to start moving out if they can't get staff. The rest of us shouldn't be funding inflated rentals. Housing benefit has fuelled rent rises.

Fluffypuppy1 · 23/02/2025 09:52

indigovapour · 23/02/2025 09:36

@Fluffypuppy1 I'm not sure if you're new here, but people really aren't interested in facts surrounding the non-dom discussion. You're just supposed to complain about evil rich people paying zero tax.

😂 no, not new here. I just can’t believe that people somehow believe that non-doms were getting subsidised by the state for living here.

Just the VAT on every restaurant bill, beauty/hair appointment, clothes, handbags, cars, holidays etc adds up to an absolute fortune.

EasternStandard · 23/02/2025 09:49

Absolutely. All rich people are evil Tories. Therefore we don't need them.

Pretty much Labour's campaigning. Some slow learning there with the non dom change post GE. They're still working on the rest of the evils funding services.

TheNuthatch · 23/02/2025 09:46

Alexandra2001 · 23/02/2025 09:16

There really isn't.... average rents outside of London are around £1400 per month... in Plymouth, one of the UKs poorer cities, the average 3 bed rent is £1250 pm.

Why should families be up rooted from social and family connections to live in a run down 1960s tower block in the NW of England.... all you re doing is ensure the kids life prospects will be even worse than they are already.

By that logic, families currently living in a 1960s tower block in the NW of England should be given the opportunity to move to a better, higher rent area to improve their children's prospects.
All paid for by the taxpayer of course.

Katypp · 23/02/2025 09:44

EasternStandard · 23/02/2025 09:41

@indigovapour It's important they all leave and we have no evil rich people, it will really help us to fund services

Absolutely. All rich people are evil Tories. Therefore we don't need them.

Katypp · 23/02/2025 09:43

Fluffypuppy1 · 23/02/2025 09:31

Claiming back VAT on purchases in the UK was discontinued in Jan 2021.

Are you sure about that? I think we may have heard more about it!
I think you are talking about the VAT refund scheme for tourists which is an entirely different thing.

EasternStandard · 23/02/2025 09:41

indigovapour · 23/02/2025 09:36

@Fluffypuppy1 I'm not sure if you're new here, but people really aren't interested in facts surrounding the non-dom discussion. You're just supposed to complain about evil rich people paying zero tax.

@indigovapour It's important they all leave and we have no evil rich people, it will really help us to fund services

indigovapour · 23/02/2025 09:36

@Fluffypuppy1 I'm not sure if you're new here, but people really aren't interested in facts surrounding the non-dom discussion. You're just supposed to complain about evil rich people paying zero tax.

Fluffypuppy1 · 23/02/2025 09:31

Alexandra2001 · 23/02/2025 09:18

They'll be avoiding VAT/Claiming back as much as they can....

Claiming back VAT on purchases in the UK was discontinued in Jan 2021.

Katypp · 23/02/2025 09:23

Alexandra2001 · 23/02/2025 09:13

I totally get what you mean, we've provided for ourselves, i worked in an industry with good wages and pension provision and paid taxes to support people who either couldn't or wouldn't make better provision for their retirement.

I didn't mind these taxes..... my mum, after her divorce, had 3 kids to provide for, no childcare, no money, father did a runner overseas.... and relied on social security, other tax payers support us all.... she went back to work when my sister was 13, so a child looked after children....not possible now.

The problem is "How do we provide for people who refused to make provision for their old age?"

If we say they get nothing or less than they do now, then of course they will suffer.... its back to the deserving and undeserving poor!

Maybe we should go back there. Unpopular opinion, I know.
The problem is, as long as people know they will effectively be bailed our regardless, there's no incentive to take personal responsibility.
To reiterate, I am not talking about vulnerable people who did not have choices around workplace pensions. I am talking about those who actively chose not to pay in.

4C0rners · 23/02/2025 09:22

MichaelandKirk · 23/02/2025 09:21

I honestly do worry. Labour are truly awful. They have no idea how to run a successful company. Not one of them has any experience at all. Reeves is out of her depth. Listening to Phillipson on BBC. Does she want to trash the education system? She clearly has a chip on her shoulder.

I’m far less worried than when, Boris and Co were in power.

MichaelandKirk · 23/02/2025 09:21

I honestly do worry. Labour are truly awful. They have no idea how to run a successful company. Not one of them has any experience at all. Reeves is out of her depth. Listening to Phillipson on BBC. Does she want to trash the education system? She clearly has a chip on her shoulder.

EasternStandard · 23/02/2025 09:20

If nom doms weren't attractive to other countries and us Reeves wouldn't have belatedly realised that's the case.

Hence altering the policy. She was a bit slow on the uptake but changed it in the end.

Alexandra2001 · 23/02/2025 09:18

Fluffypuppy1 · 23/02/2025 09:14

Non-doms don’t pay much in income tax, but spend an absolute fortune whilst in the country so pay way more in VAT.

They'll be avoiding VAT/Claiming back as much as they can....

Alexandra2001 · 23/02/2025 09:16

Goldfishgreen · 23/02/2025 09:04

Housing benefit needs to be looked at again. There are plenty of places in the UK I couldn’t afford to live in as I can’t afford it. Why should my taxes pay for others to do so? If you can’t afford to live in an area without claiming lots in housing benefit you have to move. Plenty of parts of the UK are cheap to live in.

There really isn't.... average rents outside of London are around £1400 per month... in Plymouth, one of the UKs poorer cities, the average 3 bed rent is £1250 pm.

Why should families be up rooted from social and family connections to live in a run down 1960s tower block in the NW of England.... all you re doing is ensure the kids life prospects will be even worse than they are already.

Fluffypuppy1 · 23/02/2025 09:14

ploppydoppy · 22/02/2025 20:34

Not if they’re paying less than 1% of the Treasury’s income. That’s not significant by any measure.

I was pretty shocked non doms contribution was so low tbh.

Non-doms don’t pay much in income tax, but spend an absolute fortune whilst in the country so pay way more in VAT.

Alexandra2001 · 23/02/2025 09:13

Katypp · 23/02/2025 08:55

It all comes back to personal responsibility though, doesn't it?
No. I would not want people to 'freeze in a tent' but it is fundamentally unfair that people who did the sensible thing and made arrangements by paying a few pounds a week into a workplace pension should have to bail out those who didn't.
I'm not talking about vulnerable people with no pension, I am talking about people who made a decision not to pay into their pension and had the same opportunities to do so.
I'm not interested in whataboutery either or the many reasons people may have chosen to opt out. The fact is they could have paid in and they didn't.
I worked with a woman who, when aito-enrollment cane in, went to the bother of opting out of paying £2 a week ffs!

I totally get what you mean, we've provided for ourselves, i worked in an industry with good wages and pension provision and paid taxes to support people who either couldn't or wouldn't make better provision for their retirement.

I didn't mind these taxes..... my mum, after her divorce, had 3 kids to provide for, no childcare, no money, father did a runner overseas.... and relied on social security, other tax payers support us all.... she went back to work when my sister was 13, so a child looked after children....not possible now.

The problem is "How do we provide for people who refused to make provision for their old age?"

If we say they get nothing or less than they do now, then of course they will suffer.... its back to the deserving and undeserving poor!