Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Nurseries cannot charge extra to access free hours: updated guidance

185 replies

MidnightPatrol · 21/02/2025 14:59

The DfE has updated their guidance to say while nurseries may ask for voluntary contributions towards nappies, food etc - they may not have mandatory top up fees to access free hours. Councils will have the power to fine providers who are asking parents to pay extra.

news.sky.com/story/amp/parents-must-not-pay-mandatory-extra-charges-to-access-free-childcare-government-says-13313166

This is surely only going to reduce access to free hours for the majority, and push up costs for those paying for unfunded hours? And quite possibly, lead to nurseries closing.

Other consequences which we are already seeing:

  • Minimum attendance to access free hours (4 days for the 30 hours or 3 days for 15). I am not clear if this would be banned under the guidance.
  • Nurseries not offering the free hours
  • Unfunded hours becoming more expensive to offset

YABU - nurseries should not be able to charge extra
YANBU - nurseries need to be able to cover their costs

Given the funding is not enough to provide places, what exactly do the government expect the nurseries to do?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Sophsgil · 07/03/2025 21:16

Shinyandnew1 · 05/03/2025 14:17

They had the nerve to send a message with it saying they hoped parents would be pleased with the positive changes they saw to their fees.

So, have some parents monthly bills gone down?

Apparently, according to them, but definitely not according to anyone I spoke with!

CarpetKnees · 07/03/2025 16:25

SheilaFentiman · 07/03/2025 09:47

Cool, what would you do?

I think I would look for parents to get a pot of childcare vouchers that was approx equivalent annually to the current allowance (eg £75 per week for 52 weeks, or whatever, possibly with a bit of regional variation). I wouldn't make these term time only or anything as that's quite outdated now, IMO.

Then the parents could spend these at any Ofsted registered provider as easily as cash. If they wanted to spend them upfront or save them up for times (eg December) when money was tighter, that would be fine. If they never used them, the vouchers would be cancelled periodically, maybe once a year or once the child started school.

Then it would be a true subsidy but with more flexibility for the parents to mix and match childcare if they want, to change provider etc.

Yup.
This makes sense to everyone except successive Governments.

TickingAlongNicely · 07/03/2025 13:42

Yes, with school nurseries session prices matching the voucher prices.

Daisytails · 07/03/2025 13:34

SheilaFentiman · 07/03/2025 09:47

Cool, what would you do?

I think I would look for parents to get a pot of childcare vouchers that was approx equivalent annually to the current allowance (eg £75 per week for 52 weeks, or whatever, possibly with a bit of regional variation). I wouldn't make these term time only or anything as that's quite outdated now, IMO.

Then the parents could spend these at any Ofsted registered provider as easily as cash. If they wanted to spend them upfront or save them up for times (eg December) when money was tighter, that would be fine. If they never used them, the vouchers would be cancelled periodically, maybe once a year or once the child started school.

Then it would be a true subsidy but with more flexibility for the parents to mix and match childcare if they want, to change provider etc.

That would be ideal, give them your the provider and then pay the rest. If you wanted to pay less then you find a different provider. I’ve been saying the same all along. It could still be arranged through the tax free childcare site to ensure that the vouchers are used for registered settings.

SheilaFentiman · 07/03/2025 09:47

surreygirl1987 · 06/03/2025 19:58

Erm yes, I would make many other changes to the system...

Cool, what would you do?

I think I would look for parents to get a pot of childcare vouchers that was approx equivalent annually to the current allowance (eg £75 per week for 52 weeks, or whatever, possibly with a bit of regional variation). I wouldn't make these term time only or anything as that's quite outdated now, IMO.

Then the parents could spend these at any Ofsted registered provider as easily as cash. If they wanted to spend them upfront or save them up for times (eg December) when money was tighter, that would be fine. If they never used them, the vouchers would be cancelled periodically, maybe once a year or once the child started school.

Then it would be a true subsidy but with more flexibility for the parents to mix and match childcare if they want, to change provider etc.

surreygirl1987 · 06/03/2025 19:58

SheilaFentiman · 06/03/2025 06:09

When you say “unfortunately” - would you change contract law to put special conditions on nursery contrast? Bearing in mind if you made nurseries give eg 3 months notice of fee increases, parents would have to give 3 months notice to leave, say. Or would you make some other change to the system?

Erm yes, I would make many other changes to the system...

SheilaFentiman · 06/03/2025 06:09

surreygirl1987 · 05/03/2025 22:04

Yep. Unfortunately they can. Nursery owners have parents over a barrel and they know it.

When you say “unfortunately” - would you change contract law to put special conditions on nursery contrast? Bearing in mind if you made nurseries give eg 3 months notice of fee increases, parents would have to give 3 months notice to leave, say. Or would you make some other change to the system?

surreygirl1987 · 05/03/2025 22:04

SheilaFentiman · 05/03/2025 16:48

Leaves nurseries in a very difficult position if parents start refusing to pay - presumably they can’t just ‘expel’ the children for this reason without potentially facing legal action?

This was early on in the thread - but of course a private business can give notice (probably one month's notice) to a customer, especially if that customer is not paying in line with the contract.

Yep. Unfortunately they can. Nursery owners have parents over a barrel and they know it.

SheilaFentiman · 05/03/2025 16:48

Leaves nurseries in a very difficult position if parents start refusing to pay - presumably they can’t just ‘expel’ the children for this reason without potentially facing legal action?

This was early on in the thread - but of course a private business can give notice (probably one month's notice) to a customer, especially if that customer is not paying in line with the contract.

jannier · 05/03/2025 16:36

littleluncheon · 05/03/2025 15:38

For the ones who just do funded hours probably yes - no more top up fees, just free hours and very expensive private hours.

Unfortunately this is the way that government wants the system to operate with non funded hours subsidising their underpaid funded hours so they can say it's free and nursery is over charging....politics many fall for.

Completelyjo · 05/03/2025 15:54

littleluncheon · 05/03/2025 15:38

For the ones who just do funded hours probably yes - no more top up fees, just free hours and very expensive private hours.

This is the thing with the funded hours, it just puts the cost of childcare up for those who need it for actual childcare.
Want to send your child to a private nursery and use the funded hours for a few hours a day? Great for you. Need childcare through the week and not term time only? Well you just end up paying through the nose to subsidise the free hours for others!

I genuinely don’t understand what the issue is with offering the funded hours as a subsidy. It equates to £X per month but nursery 1 costs £Y per month and nursery 2 costs £Z per month and then just subtract the local authority amount off the bill at the end.

If you want a totally free nursery it should be limited to school nurseries imo.

littleluncheon · 05/03/2025 15:38

Shinyandnew1 · 05/03/2025 14:17

They had the nerve to send a message with it saying they hoped parents would be pleased with the positive changes they saw to their fees.

So, have some parents monthly bills gone down?

For the ones who just do funded hours probably yes - no more top up fees, just free hours and very expensive private hours.

Shinyandnew1 · 05/03/2025 14:17

They had the nerve to send a message with it saying they hoped parents would be pleased with the positive changes they saw to their fees.

So, have some parents monthly bills gone down?

FrannyScraps · 05/03/2025 12:57

Sophsgil · 05/03/2025 09:10

And as predicted, “we are not talking about this with parents at this time, we have 300 children here, send another email and we may get back to you in a week or so”. NOT good enough.

That is also true! I imagine they've been inundated.

Sophsgil · 05/03/2025 09:10

And as predicted, “we are not talking about this with parents at this time, we have 300 children here, send another email and we may get back to you in a week or so”. NOT good enough.

WhatFreshHellisThese · 05/03/2025 09:06

172%!!! Their spin is rather disingenuous and very thoughtless

Sophsgil · 05/03/2025 09:04

My nursery emailed last night, conveniently nearly at the cut off for notifying them of changes, to say my fees for my daughter’s funded place are going up 172%. I had a panic attack. I’m a single mum on a low income, but not low enough for benefits as I have savings. I simply can’t afford it. They had the nerve to send a message with it saying they hoped parents would be pleased with the positive changes they saw to their fees. I’m guessing this is for 2s and under. My daughter turns 3 this month and the gvt funding drops 25%ish but because the ratios change to 1:8 or 1:13, they have lower staff costs. Going to attempt to discuss it with them but they are rubbish at communication. My daughter adores the 2 mornings a week she does and is extremely sociable. If I have to pull her out we still have to walk past her beloved nursery twice a day which will be very upsetting. I have no idea what to do
.

ExIssues · 02/03/2025 17:22

LittleRedRidingHoody · 21/02/2025 16:13

Isn't the funding £2 an hour or something ridiculous?

Our local nursery (Home Counties) is charging £120 a day or £105 after 15 hours (spread out across the year) and will 100% stop offering funded hours if pushed because there aren't enough nurseries anyway and spaces are in demand.

It's all very well forcing nurseries to accept funded hours but at the end of the day it'll end in closures and nurseries (most of which are private businesses trying to turn a profit, remember!) not offering funded hours which just leaves parents even more screwed. There needs to be a conscious effort to create and run nurseries that accept the hours, but realistically who is going to do this? No one is going to be lining up to run businesses for no profit - and the government seem to be making no plans to do this either.

It's £11 for under 2s, £8 for 2 year olds, £5 for 3-4 , that sort of amount. That is what the council get then they decide how much to pass on.

I can only guess the council don't pass it all on? These rates seem ok compared to local childcare costs. Local nurseries charge the same for any age child though.

Fupoffyagrasshole · 02/03/2025 17:19

Or in my nursery @JoyousGreyOrca if you are late picking up you get charged 1£ a minute - the money goes directly to the staff member who had to stay behind

JoyousGreyOrca · 02/03/2025 17:06

Yes the reason private nurseries struggle to keep qualified staff is they are usually paid just above the minimum wage, get statutory sick pay or are on zero hour contracts, and are treated like utter crap. The reason the staff stand with your child with their coats on, waiting for you to pick them up at 6pm when the nursery closes, is they only get paid till 6 pm. If you are late, they work for free.

surreygirl1987 · 02/03/2025 16:46

PerkyGreyWasp · 02/03/2025 14:51

I don't think anyone begrudges childminders running as a business, or nurseries needing to make appropriate profits, but that is very different to a CEO exploiting hard working families, underpaying their hardworking staff and allowing risky adult ratios in order to line their own pockets.

This. Sadly exploitation is rife in this industry.

PerkyGreyWasp · 02/03/2025 14:51

Tiki808 · 02/03/2025 11:21

You must be completely naive if you think a private business shouldn’t make any profit, and what you need to look at is how much they have spent to make £2 million profit. If there is no profit in it, there will be no nurseries at all. My wife and I are childminders and we look after four children, our heating is on full time and our electricity/gas bill in the south of England is £400 a month, as other people have said, childminders and nurseries are struggling with the cost of living crisis. And yet people think it’s okay for us to look after children at less than minimum age if they’re over three. We are self-employed and don’t think anyone should be telling us what we can charge for especially the government. If that is to be the case then we should be getting paid by the government for sick pay pension and holiday pay. Show me another industry where you are self-employed but the government tell you how much you can charge, it’s absolutely outrageous and we will leave the the profession that we love as it is just not viable to make ends meet.

I don't think anyone begrudges childminders running as a business, or nurseries needing to make appropriate profits, but that is very different to a CEO exploiting hard working families, underpaying their hardworking staff and allowing risky adult ratios in order to line their own pockets.

surreygirl1987 · 02/03/2025 12:40

Tiki808 · 02/03/2025 11:21

You must be completely naive if you think a private business shouldn’t make any profit, and what you need to look at is how much they have spent to make £2 million profit. If there is no profit in it, there will be no nurseries at all. My wife and I are childminders and we look after four children, our heating is on full time and our electricity/gas bill in the south of England is £400 a month, as other people have said, childminders and nurseries are struggling with the cost of living crisis. And yet people think it’s okay for us to look after children at less than minimum age if they’re over three. We are self-employed and don’t think anyone should be telling us what we can charge for especially the government. If that is to be the case then we should be getting paid by the government for sick pay pension and holiday pay. Show me another industry where you are self-employed but the government tell you how much you can charge, it’s absolutely outrageous and we will leave the the profession that we love as it is just not viable to make ends meet.

Of course it can make profit, but my goodness there's a point where a rich nursery owner needs to stop pleading poverty! My kids' old nursery owner was literally a multi millionaire. Her house was a mansion. You should have seen the cars she drove. She was raking it in.... from parents paying £80 a day in nursery fees. But when the nursery had to close for a day due to roof repairs etc she'd still charge the parents the fees anyway (the general attitude was if you don't like it, find another nursery). When my child's funding finally kicked in at age 3, the 'top-up' fees were extortionate. All the parents were discussing it and trying to figure out if this was allowed. If someone questioned it, she was hugely hostile and again, suggested if the parent didn't want to pay, fine another nursery (knowing the other local nurseries were hugely subscribed). She has us all over a barrel and she knew it. I'm not saying all child-care providers are like this, but some really do exploit parents, and absolutely do rake it in. From the sounds of it this is nothing like you, but if you are going to accuse parents of being 'naive' about needing to make a profit, I will suggest that you yourself are naive about what some nursery owners are up to in exploring parents.

Tiki808 · 02/03/2025 11:21

PerkyGreyWasp · 21/02/2025 18:31

Childcare businesses and their CEOs are making huge profits off the backs of children and their parents. My sister's nursery charge between £4 & £8 PER HOUR as a 'consumables fee' for children who use the funded hours, meanwhile the company made 2.5 million in profits last year

You must be completely naive if you think a private business shouldn’t make any profit, and what you need to look at is how much they have spent to make £2 million profit. If there is no profit in it, there will be no nurseries at all. My wife and I are childminders and we look after four children, our heating is on full time and our electricity/gas bill in the south of England is £400 a month, as other people have said, childminders and nurseries are struggling with the cost of living crisis. And yet people think it’s okay for us to look after children at less than minimum age if they’re over three. We are self-employed and don’t think anyone should be telling us what we can charge for especially the government. If that is to be the case then we should be getting paid by the government for sick pay pension and holiday pay. Show me another industry where you are self-employed but the government tell you how much you can charge, it’s absolutely outrageous and we will leave the the profession that we love as it is just not viable to make ends meet.

Anonimouze · 25/02/2025 07:30

JLou08 · 21/02/2025 16:03

The funding is enough, those charging top ups are just greedy. There are no extra charges at my DCs nursery. The nursery has amazing facilities, a stable and knowledgeable staff team and have 2 nutritious home cooked meals every day.

Mine is exactly the same! It’s a lovely small
nursery. I pay nothing. One goes 30 free hours and the other 15. They give both DC breakfast and dinner.

Ive got no idea how.