Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Is it really that common to be a grandparent in your late 40s?

538 replies

AntiHop · 19/02/2025 16:09

A few times recently, people have made the incorrect assumption that my 3 year old dd is my grandchild. I'm 47.

This really surprises me, as in my social group, and my family, no one has become a grandparent at that age. Not a single one of my friends had their kids in their 20s. (I have met people who've had kids in their 20s since becoming a parent myself.)

I definitely don't look older than I am. I'm lucky that my skin is doing well. If you lined me up with the friends of my age, you'd guess we are all 47ish. Perhaps people perceive me we older as so many people have cosmetic procedures now, changing the perception of what someone looks like at my age?

I do appreciate that I'm an older mum. Of the friends I grew up with, several of them had babies after my three year old was born.

This is nor meant to be a debate about the rights and wrongs of being an older mum. I'm just curious to know - if you saw a 47 year old with a 3 year old, would you assume that's the grandmother without it crossing your mind that she could be the mother?

OP posts:
PenguinLover24 · 20/02/2025 10:38

HamptonPlace · 20/02/2025 09:18

well a 24 year age gap will do that...

Agreed, to be fair he looked younger 🤣

Iwantmyoldnameback · 20/02/2025 10:29

As a lot of women in their late 40s are menopausal I think that makes people think grandmother.

user1471505356 · 20/02/2025 10:11

Butlins used to have glamorous grandmother contests in the 60s, had to stop because many contestant were in their early 30s.

89redballoons · 20/02/2025 10:02

If you look at the data (like the ONS data, here), it's still much more common to have a baby in your early 20s than early 40s.

In 2022, which is the most recent dataset, about 10 times as many 23 year olds gave birth as 44 year olds did - 16,915 vs 1,653. I'm sure it varies a lot by region and social circle, so you can be in a bubble of older mums or younger mums, but statistically it's not unlikely that a 47 year old woman in charge of a toddler could be the toddler's grandmother.

Agree it's rude to assume thougn.

HamptonPlace · 20/02/2025 09:18

PenguinLover24 · 20/02/2025 05:29

I wouldn't personally notice. My dad was 47 when I was born and everyone assumed he was my grandad. They also assumed he was my mum's dad rather than her husband, she was 23 when she had me. (I'm now 30).

well a 24 year age gap will do that...

Scrubberdubber · 20/02/2025 09:11

Coloursofthewind2 · 20/02/2025 08:47

I'd say overall, 47 is quite old to have a 3 year old (sorry) but probably younger than average to be a grandmother. So if you look 47 people might assume young grandmother rather than older mum.

People should always err on the side of caution when guessing though and say mum rather than nan out loud. Then if you get it wrong you flatter someone rather than offend them.

Agreed I'd assume mum then it's at least a compliment if you're wrong. I met a mother yesterday and I was convinced she was nan I hope I didn't look shocked when the child called her mum.

Being a grandmother in your late forties isn't shocking at all it just means two generations had their children in their twenties, I'm an actual young mum and if my child had a child the same age I had them I'd be in my early thirties.

Biologically it would be extremely hard for most women to fall pregnant at 44 without IVF. Even with IVF I believe the chances are slim so I would inwardly assume it was grandma

Coldwatergloves · 20/02/2025 08:53

Where I live it would be more likely for a 47yo to be the gran that the mum of a 3yo, yes. I would assume gran, auntie, then mum.

Coloursofthewind2 · 20/02/2025 08:47

I'd say overall, 47 is quite old to have a 3 year old (sorry) but probably younger than average to be a grandmother. So if you look 47 people might assume young grandmother rather than older mum.

People should always err on the side of caution when guessing though and say mum rather than nan out loud. Then if you get it wrong you flatter someone rather than offend them.

ElsieMc · 20/02/2025 08:45

I was a grandparent at 40. I was sometimes mistaken for their mum. I am now 62 and was mistaken recently for my 22 year old gs's mum. Yet I look my age.

I guess its social perceptions. My own dm was often mistaken for my gm back in the early seventies as she was in her early fifties and I think people had their kids a little younger then.

Rosenkohle · 20/02/2025 08:43

Having a baby at 44 is very unusual, so of course it's more likely to be seen as grandma if you're almost 50 with a toddler.

GretchenWienersHair · 20/02/2025 08:34

I have a younger cousin who’s the exact same age as my DD. Her mum, my aunt, is the same age as as my mum. I could be my cousin’s sister. She could be my DD’s grandmother. Guess what we don’t do - argue about who had our girls at the best time.

There’s another thread at the moment about female singers and the clothes they wear. A poster wrote a comment along the lines of “Muslim women wear hijabs - patriarchy. Singers wear leotards - patriarchy. How many centimetres should a woman wear for the optimum?” and I feel the same way about women having children. Early 20s - too young. Terrible choice. Early 40s - too young. Terrible choice.

How about we all just mind our own business and let women have children when they choose to without judging them based on how you would feel with a child at that age. Honestly, it’s infuriating.

itsallabitofamystery · 20/02/2025 08:28

For me to be a grandmother at 47, my daughter would need to have a baby at the age of 23...which is how old I was when I had her. So it all depends on the age of the mother when she decides to have kids.

My friendship group is split. Probably half of us had kids in our 20s and now have teens, and half are just starting out. I know which side I prefer to be on, but would I want my daughter having a baby at 23? Perhaps not, but it'll be entirely up to her and her circumstances.

CerealPosterHere · 20/02/2025 08:26

Well I'm 47 yo and have a 23yo dd, she turns 24yo in a few weeks. So could easily be a grandmother at our age.

I'd say having a baby at 44yo is more unusual than someone having a baby in their early 20s.

Hamilton6382 · 20/02/2025 08:19

Sheeparelooseagain · 20/02/2025 08:02

Around here you would be more likely to be the grandmother. Those having babies in their 40s tend to be women with larger families.

I’m not sure that’s generally the case though. In my experience it is the exact opposite. I know a lot of senior professionals who had their one and only child when they were 40+.

In my team at work the youngest person to have a child was 35 and the oldest 44. All bar one had just the one child. I know some froze their eggs.

Member984815 · 20/02/2025 08:10

I had my kids young , my mum was 40 and a grandmother, at 47 she had about 5 grandkids she also had her family young . These days people I was at school with have just started their families so I have adult children or teens and theirs are toddlers so I don't think it's very common these days .

ServantsGonnaServe · 20/02/2025 08:06

Tourmalines · 20/02/2025 07:59

She didn’t say it was the only time , she said optimum .

It was also a common time to have kids in the previous generation.

I had mine at 30 after a 7 year relationship and my mum joked she had given up on grandchildren! She had me and my sibling at 25 and 27 which was very normal in her group.

ServantsGonnaServe · 20/02/2025 08:04

I don't think its that outrageous. I'm not quite 40 and I have a fair number of Facebook schoolfriends who are celebrating 18th birthdays and grandchildren now.

50 is in the same ballpark as 47 and at 50, it's perfectly possible to assume someone had a baby at 25 and their kid had a baby around 20... which would give a 45-50y/o year old a 0-5 child.

Sheeparelooseagain · 20/02/2025 08:02

Around here you would be more likely to be the grandmother. Those having babies in their 40s tend to be women with larger families.

Tourmalines · 20/02/2025 07:59

Stai · 20/02/2025 07:53

If ‘nature’ intended us to have pregnancies in our 20s, it would have made us have menopause in our 30s.

She didn’t say it was the only time , she said optimum .

Stai · 20/02/2025 07:53

Gogogo12345 · 20/02/2025 00:51

Biologically it's the optimum time. It's what nature intended

If ‘nature’ intended us to have pregnancies in our 20s, it would have made us have menopause in our 30s.

XWKD · 20/02/2025 07:43

It's fairly common to be a grandmother or a mother of a young child in that age group, given that child-bearing age spans several decades.

When I was young, it wasn't unusual to have different generations of a family in school together.

Autumndayz77 · 20/02/2025 07:31

I had my last at 39 and two of my friends became grandparents the same year. This was to their older step Kids tho. I was also older than two of my aunty’s were when they became Grandmas. So, yes it does happen!

I was defo old enough to be the mum of a number of women in the baby group I attended (in fact my favourite mum to chat to was 19!)

SillySeal · 20/02/2025 07:31

I wouldn't really think much of it but my eldest DC will be 24 when I'm 47 so I could well be a grandmother at that age.

Where I live it is not unusual for people to be having children from 20 into their 40s, seems a real mix so I would never presume anything.

BountifulPantry · 20/02/2025 07:27

@SardinesOnGingerbread I’ve learned that any age anyone has a child ever is 100% WRONG.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

SardinesOnGingerbread · 20/02/2025 07:12

BountifulPantry · 19/02/2025 17:04

This thread is insane 😂😂😂

Indeed! So far, I've learned that my 24 year old self was crazy to have a first baby (married, financially stable), that I probably wasn't cognitively developed enough, and that I'm probably poor and working class. 25 years on, and all the kiddos are doing well, two through university and third going through. No clear evidence of the trauma they doubtless faced. Laughing at some of the comments here.