Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

State school 6th forms oversubscribed

436 replies

LordGiveMeStrength · 16/02/2025 19:56

AIBU to be concerned about the impact the new VAT on private schools will have on state school 6th forms?

Our local 6th form open days have been jam packed with so many year 11s moving from private schools.

Issues I see:

  1. kids who have been at the local state secondary school since year 7 have been told their space in the 6th form is not guaranteed and if they don’t get as high GCSE results as other potential pupils they will not have a spot. The nearest private schools have amazing GCSE results so very likely to displace existing students to other state school options a far distance from their homes.
  2. infrastructure - the local school is already heaving so accommodating a huge influx is not possible, buildings are already crumbling and it will take a long time before investment actually happens to improve the facilities.
  3. false economy- currently kids in private schools don’t cost the government to be educated. Government’s plans are that money raised from VAT will pay for additional teachers (but I don’t see that happening immediately). If lots of private schools kids move to the state system not only will government not collect that VAT, but they will all be liable for educating pupils who previously were in the private sector. I believe the current cost from central government to educate in 6th form is £5k with additional payments for more academic subjects (eg further maths A level pupils will equal an additional £900 per pupil per year in the state schools). Apologies if these sums aren’t correct.

https://inews.co.uk/inews-lifestyle/private-school-parents-vat-state-sixth-forms-3473062?srsltid=AfmBOopXOi5842QMq-qO1NqHGR9g9-4BOi6Gc0v_dlhBbFBTMmU5Prsi

OP posts:
Blu3F1re · 18/02/2025 20:25

neverthelastone · 18/02/2025 20:20

Parents won’t care if the opportunities available to their kids suddenly get taken by a load of ex-private school pupils instead?

Parents won’t care if their kid’s school suddenly is more stretched, and there is extra competition for resources from a lot of new kids who are already well-trained in academic, music and extracurricular achievements?

Ah, silly me, why is anyone bothered then? 🤣

No they really won’t. All I cared about during the Alevel years was that my kids were off their phones, studying, keeping up with homework, sorting UCAS and managing to enjoy life too. The stuff you listed is not anything I’d give a second thought about. Sooo wouldn’t have been crying into my pillow re who was given “head hirl”!🤣

OhCrumbsWhereNow · 18/02/2025 20:21

Blu3F1re · 18/02/2025 19:55

No they’re not 6 x 9-7 is not a big ask and plenty of state pupils get stellar grades. Who says they rank by grades anyway?

The school in their admissions info.

The minimum ask is 6 x 9-7 incl English and Maths. In the event of oversubscription (it is very oversubscribed) then they rank candidates in order of grades. So the places go to the highest scoring - basically if you are not on track for a clean sweep of 9s then you're unlikely to get a place.

Yes there will be lots of state candidates who will score those kind of results. But there will now also be a lot of private school candidates and locally the private schools are the very highly selective variety.

neverthelastone · 18/02/2025 20:21

Blu3F1re · 18/02/2025 20:13

I think some private school posters on here are a little naive and arrogant as regards state pupil
grades.

If overall private school pupils’ grades aren’t better, then why is the government and everyone else so keen to tax them?

neverthelastone · 18/02/2025 20:20

Blu3F1re · 18/02/2025 20:16

Hate to break it to you but music lessons,enrichment trips etc are meaningless in UCAS applications. Most parents I know don’t give a shit about any of it.

Parents won’t care if the opportunities available to their kids suddenly get taken by a load of ex-private school pupils instead?

Parents won’t care if their kid’s school suddenly is more stretched, and there is extra competition for resources from a lot of new kids who are already well-trained in academic, music and extracurricular achievements?

Ah, silly me, why is anyone bothered then? 🤣

Blu3F1re · 18/02/2025 20:16

neverthelastone · 18/02/2025 20:13

Right, but what’s the point of the policy if it doesn’t make any money?

Yet again as on all of these threads, posters say it won’t make any difference, and then they say, well it’s a good thing anyway if more kids shift to state.

How is it a good thing if the education funding available per pupil actually goes down, plus lots of schools go bust making local people who work in them redundant? How is that a win for anyone? More stretched state schools and a bit more unnecessary unemployment? Doesn’t sound like a result to me?

The only rationale for the VAT policy is that it will make money. That’s what the govt has sold it on. If it doesn’t make any money, the state system gets even more stretched but the remaining students in the private sector get an even bigger advantage, isn’t that just a massive own goal? How could it be anything but? It only works if private school pupils don’t switch!

The pleasant fantasy that a lot of sharp-elbowed former private school parents will change the local state school for the better is just that, a stupid fantasy. a) Are the existing state parents just too useless to advocate for their DC? That’s a silly idea to start with! And b) even if this idea worked, all these new parents will just be advocating for their DC over yours. Now their DC appear in your kids’ schools and get all the music lessons, and the enrichment trips, and the best roles in plays and the head girl posts and the top grades, instead of your kids 🤣

Edited

Hate to break it to you but music lessons,enrichment trips etc are meaningless in UCAS applications. Most parents I know don’t give a shit about any of it.

Blu3F1re · 18/02/2025 20:13

I think some private school posters on here are a little naive and arrogant as regards state pupil
grades.

neverthelastone · 18/02/2025 20:13

MayaPinion · 18/02/2025 19:48

But this is great news. I think it will do the state system the world of good to have within it the children of wealthy, opinionated, and high achieving parents who are interested and pushing for a quality education for their offspring. It will drive up standards all round. Once those influential, well connected, interested parents have skin in the state school game there will be benefits for all the pupils at the school.

I once went to a state school performance that had been choreographed by one of the parents - a former West End choreographer. It was 100 levels above any other school show I’d ever seen. It was brilliant and the children were glowing with pride and enjoyment. Imagine all kids being able to access opportunities like that.

Right, but what’s the point of the policy if it doesn’t make any money?

Yet again as on all of these threads, posters say it won’t make any difference, and then they say, well it’s a good thing anyway if more kids shift to state.

How is it a good thing if the education funding available per pupil actually goes down, plus lots of schools go bust making local people who work in them redundant? How is that a win for anyone? More stretched state schools and a bit more unnecessary unemployment? Doesn’t sound like a result to me?

The only rationale for the VAT policy is that it will make money. That’s what the govt has sold it on. If it doesn’t make any money, the state system gets even more stretched but the remaining students in the private sector get an even bigger advantage, isn’t that just a massive own goal? How could it be anything but? It only works if private school pupils don’t switch!

The pleasant fantasy that a lot of sharp-elbowed former private school parents will change the local state school for the better is just that, a stupid fantasy. a) Are the existing state parents just too useless to advocate for their DC? That’s a silly idea to start with! And b) even if this idea worked, all these new parents will just be advocating for their DC over yours. Now their DC appear in your kids’ schools and get all the music lessons, and the enrichment trips, and the best roles in plays and the head girl posts and the top grades, instead of your kids 🤣

OhCrumbsWhereNow · 18/02/2025 19:59

Motherofacertainage · 18/02/2025 19:57

Schools tend to prioritise their own yr 11s as we have to report to the government which destinations they go to post 16 and are penalised if we have NEETs ( not in education, employment or training) so it shouldn't have massive impact on students currently in state schools. We have always had a big influx from the local private at sixth form when parents realise that they don't necessarily get value for money for A levels at private school. In our case our results are very similar and some years better than our nearest private. State schools also get fairly well funded for post 16 so often sixth forms are subsidising the rest of the school.

How competitive is the bar at your 6th form though?

Motherofacertainage · 18/02/2025 19:57

Schools tend to prioritise their own yr 11s as we have to report to the government which destinations they go to post 16 and are penalised if we have NEETs ( not in education, employment or training) so it shouldn't have massive impact on students currently in state schools. We have always had a big influx from the local private at sixth form when parents realise that they don't necessarily get value for money for A levels at private school. In our case our results are very similar and some years better than our nearest private. State schools also get fairly well funded for post 16 so often sixth forms are subsidising the rest of the school.

OhCrumbsWhereNow · 18/02/2025 19:57

madamweb · 18/02/2025 19:52

You seem to have a very low opinion of the ability of state school children. My son and his friends would all see those minimum requirements as a walk in the park. My step son got a string of 8s and 9s despite never making any noticeable effort.

Seriously?

I am pointing out that parents are rightly concerned that if their child has a blip on the day and gets an 8 instead of a 9 then they will not get the 6th form place.

You stepson might well have found that he should have got off his backside and done some work when his 8s weren't good enough.

And why should I have a low opinion of state school children? My DD is one.

neverthelastone · 18/02/2025 19:56

wombat15 · 18/02/2025 15:24

People on this thread haven't missed OPs point which was apparently concern about the impact the new VAT on private schools will have on state school 6th forms. Your point has been made (ad nauseam) on countless other threads.

Most of these posters clearly haven’t got this point at all from the thread, though. Lots posting that there is no impact near them or it won’t happen or whatever.

There won’t be an impact until the next admissions round, but however much individual posters say there won’t be an effect near them, the reality is that a) it’s the impact overall that will matter; b) it won’t be until the end of the year that it’s evident or not.

If overall, say, 20% of kids that would have gone into private sixth forms switch to state, then it will have an effect on state school sixth form admissions. None of the sixth forms in my LEA hold places for existing students or have a priority for state students — it’s competitive admission by GCSE results, so if there is a substantial switch to state, then it will affect existing students in the state sector. Schools in my LEA are also currently very oversubscribed in the 10-19 age range. Some local authorities may not be in that position, but plenty are.

Also, the idea that if there are undersubscribed subjects in some A-level courses you can just add some extra pupils, because then they won’t cost anything more, is just laughable. Many posters on this thread seem to have no idea about how schools and sixth forms are run and funded.

Blu3F1re · 18/02/2025 19:55

OhCrumbsWhereNow · 18/02/2025 19:50

Example:

School A has 100 places for 6th form
60 places go to internal candidates with required grades (6 x 9-7 incl English and Maths).
40 places available for external candidates.

In 2023 there were 70 external candidates - 10 from private schools. Oversubscription ranking of grades gives those 40 places to the top 40 external.

In 2025 there are now 100 external candidates - 40 from highly selective private schools. Oversubscription ranking of grades gives out those 40 places to the top scorers.

What are the chances of external state school students v selective private school students of being those top scorers? Especially when the MINIMUM required for entry is 6 GCSES at 9-7 including English and Maths...

If you are a local state school parent hoping for that school are you going to be happy about a bigger group in the rankings, especially when almost 50% are from very selective private schools? Your chances of a place are obviously reduced.

Edited

No they’re not 6 x 9-7 is not a big ask and plenty of state pupils get stellar grades. Who says they rank by grades anyway?

Temporaryanonymity · 18/02/2025 19:55

I have a year 11 son. Of course sixth forms are muttering darkly about having to get good results. It has always been so.

OhCrumbsWhereNow · 18/02/2025 19:54

madamweb · 18/02/2025 19:50

Round here then state schools out perform the private schools at GCSE anyway

Round here, you are talking about private schools with 92% of all GCSE grades being 9-7.

madamweb · 18/02/2025 19:52

OhCrumbsWhereNow · 18/02/2025 19:50

Example:

School A has 100 places for 6th form
60 places go to internal candidates with required grades (6 x 9-7 incl English and Maths).
40 places available for external candidates.

In 2023 there were 70 external candidates - 10 from private schools. Oversubscription ranking of grades gives those 40 places to the top 40 external.

In 2025 there are now 100 external candidates - 40 from highly selective private schools. Oversubscription ranking of grades gives out those 40 places to the top scorers.

What are the chances of external state school students v selective private school students of being those top scorers? Especially when the MINIMUM required for entry is 6 GCSES at 9-7 including English and Maths...

If you are a local state school parent hoping for that school are you going to be happy about a bigger group in the rankings, especially when almost 50% are from very selective private schools? Your chances of a place are obviously reduced.

Edited

You seem to have a very low opinion of the ability of state school children. My son and his friends would all see those minimum requirements as a walk in the park. My step son got a string of 8s and 9s despite never making any noticeable effort.

madamweb · 18/02/2025 19:50

OhCrumbsWhereNow · 18/02/2025 19:39

Because children after a top state 6th form who are external state candidates will now be competing with external private school candidates who previously may have chosen to stay in private provision.

Given the uptick in applications from children likely to be arriving with top grades (DD's comp has selective private day schools nearby) it means less possibility that school will take those who just miss getting the required grades.

I know a decent number of children last year who were turned down from schools because they just missed getting that 7 in Maths or English even when their selected A level subjects were neither.

Current Y10 and Y11 are big birth years as well.

LAC, PP and EHCP only get priority places if they hit the grade requirements. AFAIK there is no special lower ask.

Edited

Round here then state schools out perform the private schools at GCSE anyway

OhCrumbsWhereNow · 18/02/2025 19:50

Blu3F1re · 18/02/2025 19:43

But state school kids get great grades too and you said there were several options. Internal will have an advantage and all kids need to get the grades they need. Makes no odds where the other kids come from if you don’t get the grades needed for your course.

Example:

School A has 100 places for 6th form
60 places go to internal candidates with required grades (6 x 9-7 incl English and Maths).
40 places available for external candidates.

In 2023 there were 70 external candidates - 10 from private schools. Oversubscription ranking of grades gives those 40 places to the top 40 external.

In 2025 there are now 100 external candidates - 40 from highly selective private schools. Oversubscription ranking of grades gives out those 40 places to the top scorers.

What are the chances of external state school students v selective private school students of being those top scorers? Especially when the MINIMUM required for entry is 6 GCSES at 9-7 including English and Maths...

If you are a local state school parent hoping for that school are you going to be happy about a bigger group in the rankings, especially when almost 50% are from very selective private schools? Your chances of a place are obviously reduced.

MayaPinion · 18/02/2025 19:48

neverthelastone · 18/02/2025 13:53

Pretty much everyone on this thread has completely missed the point.

Private school parents pay tax towards the state education system but don’t “use” it. If they switch back into state the amount of education funding per capita student goes down.

There is a threshold percentage beyond which enough parents switch back into state that it costs the taxpayer more than the amount raised by the extra VAT — so the education funding per student drops below amount before the VAT was added, and the policy then loses the education system money compared to the preexisting situation.

Add to that, the impact on jobs and the rest of local economies if sone private schools close (the people who work in them aren’t rich: they are normal teachers, admin staff, caretakers, dinner staff, etc.). To those who say “well they can go and work in the state sector”, you’ve missed the point — the state sector won’t then have enough extra cash to employ them!

The policy hasn’t yet had an impact because it was brought in mid-year and many private schools haven’t even been allocated a VAT number from HMRC, so the impact won’t be felt until later in this year and ongoing from there.

It might not be happening in your area. There might be loads of places in great state schools in your area. (There aren’t in mine.) But it only takes just enough private school pupils to switch to state in total across the country, and then not only does the VAT policy not raise any money, it starts to lose the state education system money. (That is, of course, exactly what happened in Greece when they tried this and later had to reverse it.) We don’t know yet when, or if, that will happen, as the impact hasn’t even started to set in yet.

BUT - will all of you on this thread who think it’s not a problem still support the policy if it starts losing money? If the amount the state has to educate your child actually drops per head, no new teachers appear, and no new funding? Will you still support it then? (Remember: it doesn’t even need to be happening in your area as long as the total numbers moving from private to state across the country exceed a particular margin - and we don’t even know yet what margin that will be as the costing for the policy was so badly done.)

But this is great news. I think it will do the state system the world of good to have within it the children of wealthy, opinionated, and high achieving parents who are interested and pushing for a quality education for their offspring. It will drive up standards all round. Once those influential, well connected, interested parents have skin in the state school game there will be benefits for all the pupils at the school.

I once went to a state school performance that had been choreographed by one of the parents - a former West End choreographer. It was 100 levels above any other school show I’d ever seen. It was brilliant and the children were glowing with pride and enjoyment. Imagine all kids being able to access opportunities like that.

Blu3F1re · 18/02/2025 19:43

OhCrumbsWhereNow · 18/02/2025 19:39

Because children after a top state 6th form who are external state candidates will now be competing with external private school candidates who previously may have chosen to stay in private provision.

Given the uptick in applications from children likely to be arriving with top grades (DD's comp has selective private day schools nearby) it means less possibility that school will take those who just miss getting the required grades.

I know a decent number of children last year who were turned down from schools because they just missed getting that 7 in Maths or English even when their selected A level subjects were neither.

Current Y10 and Y11 are big birth years as well.

LAC, PP and EHCP only get priority places if they hit the grade requirements. AFAIK there is no special lower ask.

Edited

But state school kids get great grades too and you said there were several options. Internal will have an advantage and all kids need to get the grades they need. Makes no odds where the other kids come from if you don’t get the grades needed for your course.

TizerorFizz · 18/02/2025 19:40

Yes - various courses have a capacity but it’s not part of the admissions procedure to state openly maths is preferred over English. The GCSE scores are added up and preferred subjects considered balanced against space available.

OhCrumbsWhereNow · 18/02/2025 19:39

Blu3F1re · 18/02/2025 19:01

Why is it affecting the chances of state schools? PP , EHCPs and cared for children will always be the priority and anybody else just needs to make sure they get applications in on time. Local feeder state schools will be on it. 6th form colleges are open to anybody and you say you have several, there will also still be movement on results day.

Because children after a top state 6th form who are external state candidates will now be competing with external private school candidates who previously may have chosen to stay in private provision.

Given the uptick in applications from children likely to be arriving with top grades (DD's comp has selective private day schools nearby) it means less possibility that school will take those who just miss getting the required grades.

I know a decent number of children last year who were turned down from schools because they just missed getting that 7 in Maths or English even when their selected A level subjects were neither.

Current Y10 and Y11 are big birth years as well.

LAC, PP and EHCP only get priority places if they hit the grade requirements. AFAIK there is no special lower ask.

redphonecase · 18/02/2025 19:26

TizerorFizz · 18/02/2025 17:22

@PocketSand Are you saying 6th form admissions have preferred subjects at GCSE and admit if the dc applying shine at maths but turn away others with 7/8 grades in other subjects? That’s unfair and I’ve never seen that. Dc can be good at a range of subjects and get into a 6th form based on arts subjects as well as sciences.

Our local state 6th form college takes on the basis of filling the gaps they have, if you're not from a feeder school. So someone wanting to do humanities will be more likely to get in than someone doing all sciences.

SpanThatWorld · 18/02/2025 19:17

Gogogo12345 · 18/02/2025 17:16

Not all state schools though.

Nothing applies to all state schools.

But there are a tiny number of students likely to flee indy education due to VAT and most state schools are doing their job properly so this attempt to whip up panic is all a bit redundant.

Schools are mostly judged on their Progress 8 figures. There is only marginal gain in trying to push your A level grades up by importing other students.

KingTutting · 18/02/2025 19:01

6th forms have adapted and changed from when I went 35 years ago, I’m sure they can do it again.
When I went everyone who was going to sixth form just went to the one in your school or in my case the one we were expected to go to (separate but next to my school). Now everyone shops about to get the choices they want and there are more qualifications available. Not everyone thinks of just going to uni now so look for other pathways.

Maybe this will be a positive with the falling birth rate and helps out a lot of places.

Blu3F1re · 18/02/2025 19:01

starlilly88 · 18/02/2025 17:51

It must be different throughout the country. I live in SE and in an area with a high number of private schools. The 6th form colleges are also excellent. One of the colleges closed applications early this year due to the high numbers. It is definitely affecting the chances of state school kids round here. Private school parents are seeing the financial advantage of a place at the excellent colleges

Why is it affecting the chances of state schools? PP , EHCPs and cared for children will always be the priority and anybody else just needs to make sure they get applications in on time. Local feeder state schools will be on it. 6th form colleges are open to anybody and you say you have several, there will also still be movement on results day.