Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

To not understand downsizing as a means to release cash?

327 replies

Shinynose · 16/02/2025 16:23

I live in a 4 bed detached house and now DC are adults it's too big and requires too much maintenance, so that's a good reason to downsize.

However, people often talk of downsizing as a way to fund their retirement or help DC with house purchases of their own. I can't make the maths work.

My house is worth about £500k, a not insignificant sum. It's in The South East but in a cheaper part, in the slightly nicer part of a not that nice town.

This "nice" bit doesn't really have smaller houses, for something smaller it would have to be a bungalow, which would cost about the same, possibly more than my current house.

I could move back to where my first house was, a 3 bed terraced ex council house, but that would cost £350k and after costs would raise maybe £100k (?), a lot of money but not a lot to live on for very long, and a significant reduction in quality of life.

Is this kind of downsizing only for people who live in very expensive areas and who are prepared to move a long way from home? Or am I missing something?

OP posts:
blueshoes · 16/02/2025 16:29

What do one or two beds cost further afield?

The idea is that once you are retired, you don't need to live near your job (usually a city) and can go out to a cheaper area for a smaller property.

It does release cash but nowhere does it say the cash released will be enough to retire on.

Of course if your property is worth 2m, then you have more options and cash to play with. How long is a piece of string?

DustyLee123 · 16/02/2025 16:27

I agree, I’m in a 4 bed detached but I couldn’t afford a 2 bed bungalow where I am. I’m better staying put and making a bedroom/bathroom downstairs here.