Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think it is long overdue that we brought in dog licencing

189 replies

Eurghh · 13/02/2025 12:12

This is not a dog-bashing thread.

Dog poo is a massive issue in the UK - I agree some areas are worse than others, but i have lived in various places, holidayed all over, and it really is pretty bad pretty much everywhere. This country is already on its knees with paying for services out of the public fund, but SOMETHING has to be done about the huge number of people who let their dogs mess on the ground for the rest of us to contend with.

I think we need to bring back licences, which will pay for:

  • dog wardens to regularly patrol problem areas, and issue fines
  • a nightly hose down of pavements in problem areas and also all around pavements leading to schools
  • cctv to identify people who don't pick up after their dogs
  • dna database

All of this needs to be funded by dog licences.

YABU - the system is fine as it is
YANBU - please bring in licences for dog owners

Atttached to show a photo I took today which prompted me to write this, this quantity of poo is common round here, and I live in a naice well-to-do London borough.

To think it is long overdue that we brought in dog licencing
OP posts:
DinoLil · 13/02/2025 13:26

So, are we adding in a cat license with this? Cats who roam and shit all over your garden. Are you going to add in provision for hosing down gardens every night?

Resilience · 13/02/2025 13:24

I'd happily pay a dog licence fee and hand over a DNA sample of my dog. I'm as fed up of the next person of stepping in dog shit or not being able to take my dog to places where they're now banned because of the irresponsible behaviour of other owners. I don't think a license scheme will change much though.

The cost of the scene will never be covered by the revenue it raises. No government will ever set it at a rate that would cover it because it would be prohibitively expensive, deeply unpopular, and ethically questionable. Existing legislation exists for tackling dog poo that allows a £100 fixed penalty notice up to £1000 fine if not paid within time. To increase it even marginally you'd
require new legislation and fines are always set within established parameters. You are not ever going to see a £50,000 fine for dog fouling. So the revenue will always be limited.

There are better ways to tackle the issue of dog poo. The last time we ran a pr campaign on dog fouling it reduced it by nearly half, and up to 90% in some areas.

Dotjones · 13/02/2025 13:24

Yes people should have to buy an annual licence to keep a dog. The revenue could be used to fund a dog enforcement team, a bit like traffic wardens, who patrol the streets and issue fines to people who don't obey the rules. They could have the power to confiscate animals or arrest owners for more serious offences like not picking up excrement or putting it in a stranger's wheelie bin.

Ideally there should be a test you have to pass to get a licence, the same way you do to drive. There would be a theory test and a practical test covering things like restraining a violent animal.

The licence could also resemble a driving licence in that there are different tests for different types of dog. Say you want to ride a powerful motorbike, you can't just take a test for that class, you have to pass tests and gain experience on lower-powered machine. People should have to spend a few years getting experience with tiny dogs before they can move onto something larger like a labrador.

AuraBora · 13/02/2025 13:22

Also the doggy poo bags everywhere you go ,stuffed into crevices and hanging on trees. Even in the most beautiful spot in the Lake District I saw this recently. I cannot understand the mentality...

AuraBora · 13/02/2025 13:20

Agree 💯- sick to death of toddler and small child stepping in the mess.
I've actually seen my neighbour letting his dog foul on a green nr our house. Was nightime and he thought he'd get away with it. We don't speak since that as I had a massive go at him.

FoxtonFoxton · 13/02/2025 13:18

helpfulperson · 13/02/2025 13:16

I think we should have licensing for all pets. That might reduce the issues rescues are having to deal with. And compulsory microchips for dogs and cats and maybe others.

Microchipping dogs has been compulsory since 2016.

JudgeJ · 13/02/2025 13:18

taxguru · 13/02/2025 12:22

We did used to have dog licences but they were scrapped a few decades ago.

Typically UK - scrap something rather than do it properly!

The problem was it was usually those who couldn't care less about other people and kept very violent dogs who didn't bother with such things as dog licences, same as they didn't bother with car tax, working for a living, tv licences etc., they were life's perpetual takers.

MissMarplesNiece · 13/02/2025 13:18

I love dogs and I am writing this from a place of concern about their welfare.

I think we need a total rethink about dogs and dog ownership. The problem starts because it's too easy to breed dogs and too easy to buy dogs. Animal shelters are overwhelmed with the poor creatures being abandoned. The amount of dog mess on the pavements is disgusting. I don't know what the answer is - is it more licensing, registering breeders, compulsory sterilisation of dogs, heavy fines, dog wardens, spot checks, cameras in the worst dog fouled areas to catch owners (I'm sure it's the same few dog owners who allow their dogs to do this over and over)? It seems yet another thing that as a country we won't be able to afford but for the sake of the welfare of dogs and the places where we live, we have to do something.

Someone on my road put a very polite notice on their lawn asking people not to let dogs foul on the grass, and some mean minded, spiteful person hung a full dog poo bag on the sign. This, sadly, is a sign of the poor attitude and contempt of some people when asked politely not to do something so maybe we need things to be compulsory and enforced with penalties.

mondaytosunday · 13/02/2025 13:17

I do think dogs should be licensed annually and must show proof of vaccinations to get one and a reduction if they are neutered. But you are living in cloud cuckoo land if you think hosing down pavements and checking cctv for non scoopers is ever going to happen!

helpfulperson · 13/02/2025 13:16

I think we should have licensing for all pets. That might reduce the issues rescues are having to deal with. And compulsory microchips for dogs and cats and maybe others.

MadameCholetsDirtySecret · 13/02/2025 13:15

But it won't stop the bad owners. They just won't bother to licence the dog. Just like those who drive without a licence or insurance.

FoxtonFoxton · 13/02/2025 13:14

VickyEadieofThigh · 13/02/2025 13:12

It didn't "used to work", though. Responsible owners paid for the licence, the other 50% didn't. There was ZERO enforcement and dog shite EVERWHERE.

This. It never worked!

FoxtonFoxton · 13/02/2025 13:13

Eurghh · 13/02/2025 12:43

They will have to work it out. Backyard breeders will be banned. Prison if found to be BB.
Massive clamp down. If people can't afford the licence, they can't afford a dog.

Once the project gets started, there will be some money to deal with the dog poo on the streets in the immediate, but also deal with getting a database sorted, and between vets and breeders, a list compiled. Everyone has to pay. Or you don't keep the dog. Then we find those who got theor dog from a backyard breeder, and we clamp down on the breeders, and bill the owners double.

The language around "destroying" dogs is very emotive - far more than the language we use about slaughtering (humanely, apparently!) farmed animals. I wish we'd view these animals more similarly!

Whose they? Local underfunded councils? Will the police be carrying out arrests? They can't even cover attending burglaries. Where do you think all this money is coming from to fund the multiple agencies required to cover such a massive undertaking? It's not from a £100 a year license from those who you can get to pay. Think of the resources needed to hunt down dog owners who haven't registered for a license -which were abolished for just that reason in the 1980s. Catching those who let their dogs shit and proving it was them -how? Full coverage CCTV everywhere? Nobody is scraping up random dog shit for DNA testing.
I'm not trying to crap on your idea; I get why you want it to happen. It won't though, simply because it just won't work. I'm as sick of dog shit left on paths as anyone (and don't get me started on the cats shitting on my drive!) but licensing won't pay for pavement hosing. The cost of licensing will pay for licensing admin.
Our village is actually very good for dog poo picking up and the vast majority do it. Locals leave dog poo bags on the top of bins for people to take -I add a few rolls a month for people to use. Seems to help. It's a start anyway.

VickyEadieofThigh · 13/02/2025 13:12

BeaAndBen · 13/02/2025 12:52

It used to work, so it’s clearly not impossible.
£250 a year, with a reduction to £100 if you register with a vet and get the animal chipped and neutered, perhaps?

Unregistered dogs impounded, destroyed after 6 weeks if not claimed? That might light a fire under the arses of those supposed dog lovers who won’t do the minimum to train and look after their pets.

We have too many dogs and cats compared with the number of people prepared to look after them properly. The charities are bursting at the seams with unwanted animals.

Dogs in particular who aren’t properly trained and socialised by uninformed owners who just see “Aww, cute puppy” are a problem. With people at work all day and the “cute” breeds often being bred from active, inquisitive working breeds in need of stimulation, you end up with poorly behaved, over-excited dogs with no recall running about in public spaces and crapping in parks and playgrounds a long way from their owners.

It’s unfair on the dogs and it’s unfair on everyone else.

Responsible pet owners are their animals get tarred with the same brush as dingbats who buy a puppy or a kitten from a friend of a friend and have no idea what they are doing.

It didn't "used to work", though. Responsible owners paid for the licence, the other 50% didn't. There was ZERO enforcement and dog shite EVERWHERE.

Sevenamcoffee · 13/02/2025 13:11

LlamaDharma · 13/02/2025 13:01

To be honest as bad as so e dog owners are, things are a lot better now then they were in the 1970s when we did have a dog license scheme. It was when we had dog licences that packs of dogs roamed the streets all day because people chucked them out when they went to work in the morning and let them back in at tea time. We were occasionally locked inside at primary school while teachers chased dogs away with buckets of water that were mating in the playground. It was a pointless scheme and did absolutely nothing having a dog licence. In fact those were some of the most grim years in dog ownership in the uk. What would a license look like today and how would it be enforced? What if people refuse to buy one? With prisons full and dog pounds full what are they actually going to do to enforce it? There's nowhere to lock owners up if they refuse and there's nowhere to lock their dogs up I til they pay. Don't get me wrong, as a dog owner I'm in favour of some sort of registered ownership scheme but i just don't see how it is going to work. Ultimately the real problem is that owning a dog is a right. It should be a privilege that comes with understanding your responsibility to the dog and society.

I forgot about being locked in school! Also my mum chucking water at random make dogs circling the house because our dog was in season.

VickyEadieofThigh · 13/02/2025 13:10

You mean, the dog licencing that was a thing until 1987? That was abandoned then because:

  1. It was widely ignored, with only about 50% of dog owners buying a licence.
  2. It was impossible to enforce.
  3. The cost of enforcing would be exorbitant.

I know everyone thinks they've thought of a way to make the twats who don't clean up after their dogs, have out of control/dangerous/etc dogs behave themselves - but it wouldn't. It would only be obeyed by the responsible owners.

For that reason, YABU.

EasternStandard · 13/02/2025 13:09

It's ridiculous near us

The school walk is littered with dog poo

Sevenamcoffee · 13/02/2025 13:06

I feel like I was constantly standing in dog poo in the seventies and eighties. However it is still a big problem. There would have to be a lot of wardens on the streets to catch people in the act and I think people who don’t care about letting their dogs foul are to not that likely to bother paying.

People seem to pay thousands for dogs and still are terrible anti-social dog owners so I’m not sure the argument stands that a license would stop irresponsible people from getting a dog. I suppose it might stop some people.

LlamaDharma · 13/02/2025 13:06

Eurghh · 13/02/2025 12:48

I am around the same age as you, and I disagree that it was worse. I don't live far from where I grew up, so it's not an area thing.

I have been to Rome, didn't actually notice any roaming dogs. Nor was the shit at the volume that it is round here.

You should go to Paris. There's dog shit absolutely everywhere on the streets there. 🤢

LlamaDharma · 13/02/2025 13:04

IBloodyLoveMyBlanket · 13/02/2025 13:03

Not heard the word gormless in ages. Grin

If someone doesn't clean up their dog's shit, their dog should be confiscated. Maybe the licence fee could provide places for these dogs to go. But there isn't going to be limitless space is there? So people will learn, if you want to keep your dog, clean up its shit.

It's still not going to happen.

IBloodyLoveMyBlanket · 13/02/2025 13:03

Anotherparkingthread · 13/02/2025 12:56

Have you ever met any of the actual British public, outside of Mumsnet extremists? Lol. That isn't happening don't be so gormless.

Not heard the word gormless in ages. Grin

If someone doesn't clean up their dog's shit, their dog should be confiscated. Maybe the licence fee could provide places for these dogs to go. But there isn't going to be limitless space is there? So people will learn, if you want to keep your dog, clean up its shit.

LlamaDharma · 13/02/2025 13:01

To be honest as bad as so e dog owners are, things are a lot better now then they were in the 1970s when we did have a dog license scheme. It was when we had dog licences that packs of dogs roamed the streets all day because people chucked them out when they went to work in the morning and let them back in at tea time. We were occasionally locked inside at primary school while teachers chased dogs away with buckets of water that were mating in the playground. It was a pointless scheme and did absolutely nothing having a dog licence. In fact those were some of the most grim years in dog ownership in the uk. What would a license look like today and how would it be enforced? What if people refuse to buy one? With prisons full and dog pounds full what are they actually going to do to enforce it? There's nowhere to lock owners up if they refuse and there's nowhere to lock their dogs up I til they pay. Don't get me wrong, as a dog owner I'm in favour of some sort of registered ownership scheme but i just don't see how it is going to work. Ultimately the real problem is that owning a dog is a right. It should be a privilege that comes with understanding your responsibility to the dog and society.

Anotherparkingthread · 13/02/2025 12:56

IBloodyLoveMyBlanket · 13/02/2025 12:51

If you don't pay car tax the car gets impounded, and then if you don't pay the release fine the car gets destroyed. The same could work for dogs.

Have you ever met any of the actual British public, outside of Mumsnet extremists? Lol. That isn't happening don't be so gormless.

rainylake · 13/02/2025 12:52

I used to live in Berlin, where a licence is needed to own a dog.

The level of dog poo on the streets was off the scale. It made the UK look pristine. You always had to watch where you were walking or you’d step in it.

BeaAndBen · 13/02/2025 12:52

It used to work, so it’s clearly not impossible.
£250 a year, with a reduction to £100 if you register with a vet and get the animal chipped and neutered, perhaps?

Unregistered dogs impounded, destroyed after 6 weeks if not claimed? That might light a fire under the arses of those supposed dog lovers who won’t do the minimum to train and look after their pets.

We have too many dogs and cats compared with the number of people prepared to look after them properly. The charities are bursting at the seams with unwanted animals.

Dogs in particular who aren’t properly trained and socialised by uninformed owners who just see “Aww, cute puppy” are a problem. With people at work all day and the “cute” breeds often being bred from active, inquisitive working breeds in need of stimulation, you end up with poorly behaved, over-excited dogs with no recall running about in public spaces and crapping in parks and playgrounds a long way from their owners.

It’s unfair on the dogs and it’s unfair on everyone else.

Responsible pet owners are their animals get tarred with the same brush as dingbats who buy a puppy or a kitten from a friend of a friend and have no idea what they are doing.

Swipe left for the next trending thread