Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Do you divide up the cost per person or per rooom?

190 replies

NatureNatur · 10/02/2025 19:16

Friend is hiring a house abroad for a big birthday (v short plane away) Around 5 couples going, and 3 singletons. It's for 4 days.

I have confirmed I am going, but said my DH will have to see closer to the time. We have young kids and no family who could have them for longer than one night really. Elderly or unwilling family either side.

Just had the cost through and it's £400 per person. I had thought it would be worked out by room - e.g. I can just pay to have a bedroom and if DH joins for one night - all good as he would be in my room. Was I unreasonable to presume this?

But it's costed per person - so would be £800 for a room, and the singletons pay £400 for their room.

Is this fair? Of course we can't justify DH paying £400 for one night so I'm going to need to say that and then i gues costs are going to go up for everyone so ppl aren't going to be happy and DH just stays home.

Do you divide up the overall cost by person or by bedroom?

OP posts:
MsMonique · 12/02/2025 14:37

@mrsm43s but nobody is getting half a room per person. These a couples, in the OP. I wouldn't describe being in "half a room" when I'm sharing with my partner. Everyone is getting a room and sharing the same facilities.

Magnastorm · 12/02/2025 14:33

mrsm43s · 12/02/2025 14:16

But no one has suggested that. No one at all.

All people are suggesting is that two people in two rooms should pay more than two people sharing a room.

No, you have said that you object to paying "double" for "twice as many people".

Which clearly implies that you think that someone sharing a room with a partner should have access to all the facilities of the rental without paying their fair share.

I bet when you go out to dinner you insist on splitting the bill equally even though you had 3 courses + wine when everyone else just had a main and soft drink, because that's "fair".

mrsm43s · 12/02/2025 14:22

Readmorebooks40 · 12/02/2025 14:11

It should be split per head. You are sharing a house so you need to factor in that you are all sharing the living room, kitchen, bathroom, cooking facilities, electric etc. Its only fair all adults pay the same however couples should get the bigger rooms if they are sharing.

If everyone is paying the same, then each adult needs to get the same. So that is either everyone getting one room per person, or everyone sharing and getting half a room per person. I'm happy with either.

What's not reasonable is some people think that some people should get one room per person for the same price as others get half a room per person. It's very greedy to expect to get double for the same price.

The whole kitchen/bathroom/living room etc is a red herring.

Two people in two rooms is TWO lots of kitchen/bathroom/living room PLUS two rooms

Two people one room is TWO lots of kitchen/bathroom/living room PLUS only one room.

The people in the second group should obviously pay less per person that the people in the first group - because they are getting less.

mrsm43s · 12/02/2025 14:16

Magnastorm · 12/02/2025 14:02

Anyone who thinks that someone sharing a room with another person should get the rental for free is selfish and greedy and expecting a free ride.

But just keep ignoring the point being made that the price of a holiday rental is not just about bedrooms.

But no one has suggested that. No one at all.

All people are suggesting is that two people in two rooms should pay more than two people sharing a room.

Readmorebooks40 · 12/02/2025 14:11

It should be split per head. You are sharing a house so you need to factor in that you are all sharing the living room, kitchen, bathroom, cooking facilities, electric etc. Its only fair all adults pay the same however couples should get the bigger rooms if they are sharing.

Changingplace · 12/02/2025 14:06

mrsm43s · 12/02/2025 13:59

But why do people who don't wish to share think its OK to dictate that two people (any two, regardless of relationship status) aren't allowed to save money by sharing a room if they want to? (and thereby bringing the villa costs down for everyone)

Don't share if you don't want to, but it is unreasonable to expect 2 people in 2 rooms to not pay more than 2 people sharing one room.

It's not to do with being single or being married. It's to do with sharing a room between two, or having two rooms for two people.

Anyone who expects two rooms for 2 people at the same cost as one room shared between two people is selfish and greedy and expecting others to subsidise them.

Nobody is dictating anything, it’s a holiday invite, go or don’t go.

If the way it’s been arranged by the person doing all the planning, researching and organising isn’t to your liking just don’t go, or organise something yourself another time.

If anyone I invited on holiday moaned this much about it I’d rather they just stayed home tbh, they’d soon start complaining about having to split a joint food shop per person or moaning that someone used an extra slice of bread.

I don’t think group holidays are for you if you’re unable to work this out.

Magnastorm · 12/02/2025 14:02

Anyone who thinks that someone sharing a room with another person should get the rental for free is selfish and greedy and expecting a free ride.

But just keep ignoring the point being made that the price of a holiday rental is not just about bedrooms.

mrsm43s · 12/02/2025 13:59

Changingplace · 12/02/2025 13:47

If you took it upon yourself to be the person organising and researching the villa you could find one that had as many bedrooms as you like.

But why do people who don't wish to share think its OK to dictate that two people (any two, regardless of relationship status) aren't allowed to save money by sharing a room if they want to? (and thereby bringing the villa costs down for everyone)

Don't share if you don't want to, but it is unreasonable to expect 2 people in 2 rooms to not pay more than 2 people sharing one room.

It's not to do with being single or being married. It's to do with sharing a room between two, or having two rooms for two people.

Anyone who expects two rooms for 2 people at the same cost as one room shared between two people is selfish and greedy and expecting others to subsidise them.

Changingplace · 12/02/2025 13:47

JimHalpertsWife · 12/02/2025 13:26

But there is only a finite number of rooms in the villa.

If you took it upon yourself to be the person organising and researching the villa you could find one that had as many bedrooms as you like.

mrsm43s · 12/02/2025 13:47

MsMonique · 12/02/2025 13:40

@JimHalpertsWife yes you could say that, but why would you?

Because a double sized private space to yourself is nicer and more luxurious than half a shared space, obviously. Why do singles not see that.

Assuming all rooms are equal (and I've repeatedly said that different pricing for different rooms based on size and facilities is fine).

Two people sharing a room should pay the same as any two other people sharing a room, regardless of relationship status.

Two people having two separate rooms should pay more than two people sharing a room between them, because they are getting much more than two people sharing a room.

MsMonique · 12/02/2025 13:40

@JimHalpertsWife yes you could say that, but why would you?

JimHalpertsWife · 12/02/2025 13:26

Changingplace · 12/02/2025 13:08

Fine, so if you’re in this situation just say that, I don’t think anyone is suggesting you can’t.

But there is only a finite number of rooms in the villa.

crankytoes · 12/02/2025 13:26

@mrsm43s
But you aren't just paying for a room. You are paying for a villa. So you are paying for the kitchen and bathrooms, living area and all the facilities

Why would you be paying half as much for this stuff as a single person?

Added to which no bills has equally sized rooms. Couples will get a bigger room. If you want to pay the same amount as a couple as a single person the. You'd have to be ready to accept you'll be as likely to have to smallest room as the single person.

crankytoes · 12/02/2025 13:22

@LittleBigHead

Single people generally get the worst rooms or no private room at all.
Yes they would typically get the smaller room because it's for them only. A couple get a bigger room because they have to share. So everyone gets the same amount of space.

And if everyone is paying the same then it makes sense that two people sharing would get a bigger room as they have to share that bigger space between the two of them

Youremylobster86 · 12/02/2025 13:10

sweetpickle2 · 12/02/2025 13:08

You're not paying for the room, you're paying for the holiday!!!

I'm glad the people I go away with are just happy to be involved and go away for the experience with friends rather than figuring out who sleeps in what square footage of room per night.

Exactly!
Forget about the rooms. You're splitting the holiday cost. As long as everyone has a bed and someone's not on the sofa it's the only fair way.

sweetpickle2 · 12/02/2025 13:08

JimHalpertsWife · 12/02/2025 13:00

Yes bit then if dh and I were paying the individual cost we could say "fine then we will have a room each please"

You're not paying for the room, you're paying for the holiday!!!

I'm glad the people I go away with are just happy to be involved and go away for the experience with friends rather than figuring out who sleeps in what square footage of room per night.

Changingplace · 12/02/2025 13:08

JimHalpertsWife · 12/02/2025 13:00

Yes bit then if dh and I were paying the individual cost we could say "fine then we will have a room each please"

Fine, so if you’re in this situation just say that, I don’t think anyone is suggesting you can’t.

Minnie798 · 12/02/2025 13:07

Per person . If it’s per room, the single people will pay more than the couples.

ComtesseDeSpair · 12/02/2025 13:07

NeedToChangeName · 11/02/2025 15:13

Bummer for the single people, always expected to take the worst rooms!

Yes - which is precisely why it’s fairer to price per person rather than per room: that way a single person doesn’t generally mind taking the less nice single bed / bunk bed room that most couples wouldn’t want, because it isn’t being treated as being of equal value and they aren’t paying the same price for it as a couple is for a spacious king room.

JimHalpertsWife · 12/02/2025 13:00

MsMonique · 12/02/2025 12:56

I agree with this.

Yes bit then if dh and I were paying the individual cost we could say "fine then we will have a room each please"

MsMonique · 12/02/2025 12:56

Youremylobster86 · 12/02/2025 09:34

The total cost of the villa should be split equally between the guests. Rooms are irrelevant.

I agree with this.

LittleBigHead · 12/02/2025 12:53

KnickerlessParsons · 12/02/2025 09:25

Per person. Otherwise the single people are being penalised for being single like they always are

💯

Single people generally get the worst rooms or no private room at all.

mrsm43s · 12/02/2025 10:48

Changingplace · 12/02/2025 09:23

Basically single people want to treat a couple sharing differently to how they treat two singles sharing. That's selfish and expecting the couple to subsidise them, and seems to be rooted in some kind of desire to punish couples and charge them more for less because they happen to enjoy each other's company

Couples who live together sharing a room is completely different to two single people sharing, especially if they live together - would a couple going to hotel typically book one room or two?

Two people in a couple will typically have two incomes, so can each pay their own way, rather than selfishly think that because they have the option of pooling funds that a single person should subsidise them by 50%.

The couple aren’t getting less, most couples are getting exactly the same as they would do at home and it’s grabby to think single people should cover their holiday.

No. Two people sharing a room is two people sharing a room, regardless of relationship status. Not everyone in a relationship shares a room at home, or sleeps well sharing a room.

Just because a couple have two incomes (because they work two jobs) doesn't mean that a single person is entitled to be subsidised by them. A whole room per person costs more than half a room per person. Someone wanting a whole room needs to pay for a whole room, someone prepared to share should only expect to pay for half the cost of their room.

No one is expecting the single person to pay towards the couples holiday in any way, shape or form. A single person in a double room to themselves is already upping the cost for everybody by necessitating a house with more bedrooms that if everyone was prepared to share. They, at least, need to cover the cost of their own, private double room.

There's a reason why I only do hotel holidays if I'm going with singles, because it takes away their chance to try to duck out of paying their share. They always want to pay the shared rate but not to actually share. They also seem to want to jump in the taxi for free "it's not costing any more to have me in there with you" etc, etc.

If I'm paying per person and not everyone is sharing rooms, I'm expecting my own private room and my DH to have his own private room too. It's what single people expect for that cost, why not me and DH too? Why am I entitled to less than my fellow travellers (or to pay more) because I happen to be in a relationship?

Youremylobster86 · 12/02/2025 09:34

The total cost of the villa should be split equally between the guests. Rooms are irrelevant.

Changingplace · 12/02/2025 09:30

mrsm43s · 11/02/2025 22:52

Nah.

Two equal rooms.
One room, one price.
Half the room, half the price.

Two people sharing have half a room each, so they pay half the room price each.

One person, not sharing, has the whole room to themselves, so has to cover the whole room cost themselves. They get twice the space to themselves and privacy. It's selfish and greedy to expect to get twice as much for the same price.

If everyone is sharing then fine. But people choosing not to share need to understand that luxury they are choosing comes at a cost. They can't expect a 50% discount because they're single. Nor should they expect a couple to pay a 100% uplift for the same thing just because they're in a relationship.

No one would expect 2 single people sharing a twin room to pay the same per person as two married people taking two separate rooms. It works the same in reverse.

Relationship status is irrelevant. It's cheaper to buy half of something than it is to buy the whole. It's a simple as that.

It’s not about just the room, when you’re booking a house/villa you’re paying for access to the whole of the accommodation.

Nobody is buying half of anything, you’re paying for your place in the accommodation.

Couples with typically two incomes shouldn’t expect to get something for half the price a solo person does, they should both pay their way. It’s selfish and greedy to think solo people should subsidise their trip.

Swipe left for the next trending thread