Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

What do you think of Blake Lively?

337 replies

NameChangeChic · 05/02/2025 13:13

From what I’ve heard with the current drama surrounding her I’m shocked. Did anyone’s opinions of her change?

ps this isn’t a bashing thread

OP posts:
LBFseBrom · 23/02/2025 21:57

Atomickitten · 23/02/2025 21:52

Do you comment on every thread you know nothing about just to say you don’t know anything about it?

I did the same, said I'd never heard of him :-). I still haven't except on here, presume he has become a she. Is he famous?

Mirabai · 23/02/2025 21:54

Atomickitten · 23/02/2025 21:28

They signed stating they didn’t agree. They can argue signed under duress as needed to get film made. If they disputed and won the dispute, they still lose because Blake is not going to finish making the film. AND JB gets dragged through the mud if it goes to court. And has to cut his losses on the film. Maybe Blake has to pay a penalty for breach of contract but it’s nothing to her. But she apparently sneakily didn’t sign her contract so actually would have had to pay nothing .
If BL won dispute she’d get the rights to film via morality clause. As it happened she forced producer to go with her cut of the film and give her a producer credit saying she wouldn’t promote it otherwise. And tried to block JB from premier party. Blake’s power is her husband and best friend. Not herself per se. What exactly about my comments are you referring to as “ bollocks” , “twaddle” , “laughable” and “not worth engaging with”? You just sound like someone who’s worked themselves up and has resorted to throwing insults because they can’t properly debate. I think the only valid point you’re inadvertently making is that it’s you, not I, that’s actually not worth engaging with :)

Ludicrous. I can’t up even be bothered to read it. “Signed under duress” 🤣

Atomickitten · 23/02/2025 21:52

MasterBeth · 05/02/2025 15:03

I don't really know who she (?) is. Sounds like a bloke's name.

Do you comment on every thread you know nothing about just to say you don’t know anything about it?

Atomickitten · 23/02/2025 21:48

Bornnotbourne · 05/02/2025 13:39

I don’t know but it end with us was the biggest pile of bollocks I’ve ever encountered and massively detrimental to lives of women worldwide. It’s

Why?

Atomickitten · 23/02/2025 21:40

StopStartStop · 23/02/2025 21:35

I've heard her name, linked with MM and Amber Heard (sp?). Don't know who she is, what she does. Wouldn't recognise her. Therefore I conclude she is neither famous nor important. 😂To me, anyway.

Then don’t comment

Coconutter24 · 23/02/2025 21:36

XWKD · 05/02/2025 13:44

She strikes me as a nasty person, and did so before the sexual abuse allegations. That doesn't mean she deserves sexual abuse, or that she is lying.

Why does she strike you as a nasty person?

StopStartStop · 23/02/2025 21:35

I've heard her name, linked with MM and Amber Heard (sp?). Don't know who she is, what she does. Wouldn't recognise her. Therefore I conclude she is neither famous nor important. 😂To me, anyway.

Atomickitten · 23/02/2025 21:33

Aworldofmyown · 23/02/2025 17:01

I think there is a weird "Blake Lively is awful" narrative in the press right now, this makes me suspicious! It would seem someone is paying for a fantastic PR team.

Oh yes I don’t doubt it. She has attacked JBs reputation. Is he supposed to accept it or get a PR team on the case?

Atomickitten · 23/02/2025 21:28

Mirabai · 23/02/2025 20:40

No they did not enter into legal dispute over the contents. They signed. And that is a tacit admission of the behaviour however they chose to word the accompanying clause.

If they didn’t sign they got into legal dispute and if their version is true they win and Blake has to finish the film regardless.

BL did not get the rights to the film and the twaddle about relative power of actresses who are only as good as their last non and billionaire producers is laughable and not worth engaging with.

They signed stating they didn’t agree. They can argue signed under duress as needed to get film made. If they disputed and won the dispute, they still lose because Blake is not going to finish making the film. AND JB gets dragged through the mud if it goes to court. And has to cut his losses on the film. Maybe Blake has to pay a penalty for breach of contract but it’s nothing to her. But she apparently sneakily didn’t sign her contract so actually would have had to pay nothing .
If BL won dispute she’d get the rights to film via morality clause. As it happened she forced producer to go with her cut of the film and give her a producer credit saying she wouldn’t promote it otherwise. And tried to block JB from premier party. Blake’s power is her husband and best friend. Not herself per se. What exactly about my comments are you referring to as “ bollocks” , “twaddle” , “laughable” and “not worth engaging with”? You just sound like someone who’s worked themselves up and has resorted to throwing insults because they can’t properly debate. I think the only valid point you’re inadvertently making is that it’s you, not I, that’s actually not worth engaging with :)

Mirabai · 23/02/2025 20:52

non = role

Mirabai · 23/02/2025 20:40

Atomickitten · 23/02/2025 19:56

Erm they clearly did dispute and did not accept liability by stating, while signing, they had a different perspective. If they didn’t sign, JB loses the millions he’s spent ( money that he’s loaned ) plus chances are Blake pursues the complaint anyway , gets the rights to the film ( as per the morality clause ) and makes it without him. And yes, A list actors / celebs hold more cards and influence than a billionaire producer. Money just wasn’t going to win that battle. It’s about power and influence.

No they did not enter into legal dispute over the contents. They signed. And that is a tacit admission of the behaviour however they chose to word the accompanying clause.

If they didn’t sign they got into legal dispute and if their version is true they win and Blake has to finish the film regardless.

BL did not get the rights to the film and the twaddle about relative power of actresses who are only as good as their last non and billionaire producers is laughable and not worth engaging with.

Atomickitten · 23/02/2025 19:56

Mirabai · 23/02/2025 19:48

Bollocks. Do you know how many films have been below up during or post production due to legal wrangling? If Blake’s complaints were completely without foundation lawyers would have advised to dispute and not admit any liability because it could come back to bite them as it has.

I’ve no idea why you think Blake’s connections trump a billionaire producer - it’s just total nonsense. She didn’t have a fraction of his money.

Edited

Erm they clearly did dispute and did not accept liability by stating, while signing, they had a different perspective. If they didn’t sign, JB loses the millions he’s spent ( money that he’s loaned ) plus chances are Blake pursues the complaint anyway , gets the rights to the film ( as per the morality clause ) and makes it without him. And yes, A list actors / celebs hold more cards and influence than a billionaire producer. Money just wasn’t going to win that battle. It’s about power and influence.

Mirabai · 23/02/2025 19:48

Atomickitten · 23/02/2025 19:35

No, it’s very simple , if they didn’t sign there was no film. They made clear they didn’t agree but signed anyway to get the film done. Blake’s connections and influence in Hollywood trump those of billionaire producer etc. It appears to me that Blake wanted control of the film , she made a power play and she got her way.

Bollocks. Do you know how many films have been below up during or post production due to legal wrangling? If Blake’s complaints were completely without foundation lawyers would have advised to dispute and not admit any liability because it could come back to bite them as it has.

I’ve no idea why you think Blake’s connections trump a billionaire producer - it’s just total nonsense. She didn’t have a fraction of his money.

Atomickitten · 23/02/2025 19:35

Mirabai · 23/02/2025 19:30

If they don’t agree they don’t sign it’s as simple as that. They had the option and so did JB of disputing any or all points legally. BL did not hold all the cards - she was up against the director, producer and billionaire co-owner of the studio and their lawyers.

It’s mainly Steve Sarowitz the billionaire co-founder of the studio’s millions actually.

No, it’s very simple , if they didn’t sign there was no film. They made clear they didn’t agree but signed anyway to get the film done. Blake’s connections and influence in Hollywood trump those of billionaire producer etc. It appears to me that Blake wanted control of the film , she made a power play and she got her way.

Mirabai · 23/02/2025 19:30

Atomickitten · 23/02/2025 19:23

that clearly says to me that wayfarer don’t agree but realise if they sign then the film is over , JB loses millions he’s sank into it already . They could not lose Blake , she knew she held all the cards

If they don’t agree they don’t sign it’s as simple as that. They had the option and so did JB of disputing any or all points legally. BL did not hold all the cards - she was up against the director, producer and billionaire co-owner of the studio and their lawyers.

It’s mainly Steve Sarowitz the billionaire co-founder of the studio’s millions actually.

Mirabai · 23/02/2025 19:25

Atomickitten · 23/02/2025 18:37

And no I’m not suggesting she should suck it up because she’s rich… that makes no sense whatsoever …what I’m saying is, why would JB jeapardise the film , his career and financial security by treating the star of his film who is more famous and better connected in Hollywood than he is , by subjecting her to sexual harrassment? Unless he’s completely ignorant, yet making a film about dv…. It doesn’t add up to me.

Men behave like they do in Hollywood because they are chauvinist and entitled and they get away with it for the most part. JB won’t have considered he was putting his career on the line because that kind of behaviour is normal in that world if you listen to other actresses.

Atomickitten · 23/02/2025 19:23

Mirabai · 23/02/2025 19:20

Well they would wouldn’t they. But Wayfarer acknowledged the complaints with the comment: “Although our perspective differs in many aspects, ensuring a safe environment for all is paramount”

that clearly says to me that wayfarer don’t agree but realise if they sign then the film is over , JB loses millions he’s sank into it already . They could not lose Blake , she knew she held all the cards

Mirabai · 23/02/2025 19:20

Atomickitten · 23/02/2025 18:30

JB’s legal team have denied this? Is there any proof? I’ve seen evidence of some weird messages from Blake to Justin , she could have been joking of course, her idea of humour or style of communication.

Well they would wouldn’t they. But Wayfarer acknowledged the complaints with the comment: “Although our perspective differs in many aspects, ensuring a safe environment for all is paramount”

LadyTottingham · 23/02/2025 19:19

Just last week her own husband publicly made a flippant 'joke' relating to the ongoing drama between his wife and Justin. Glad to see him taking his wife's SH case seriously.

Sorry, too much not adding up for me at the moment.

Atomickitten · 23/02/2025 19:06

Aworldofmyown · 23/02/2025 19:01

Why does anyone man jeopardise his career and family? Because he thinks he will likely get away with it, and they usually do.

Those sort will harass someone they think has less power than them, and therefore they can get away with it. Take Harvey Weinstein , Al Fayad, Jimmy Saville as examples . Blake had all the power in this situation, JB was over a barrel.

Aworldofmyown · 23/02/2025 19:01

Why does anyone man jeopardise his career and family? Because he thinks he will likely get away with it, and they usually do.

Atomickitten · 23/02/2025 18:59

Aworldofmyown · 23/02/2025 18:58

Really??

Really what ?!

Aworldofmyown · 23/02/2025 18:58

Atomickitten · 23/02/2025 18:40

Erm, JB is basically a nobody next to JD! Why would a “nobody” jeapardise his career and film by sexually harassing a “somebody “ I.e. Blake. ?? Doesn’t add up to me

Really??

Atomickitten · 23/02/2025 18:48

Scammersarescum · 23/02/2025 18:43

It's easy work for them. Society already hates women.

As for Ms Lively, none of us know her. I haven't seen her act so I can't comment on that. I can say she is certainly very beautiful and her husband comes across as a nice chap in the football documentary and that's almost it.

One thing I can say is that when a woman says she has been bullied and subjected to sexually appropriate behaviour, my first instinct is to believe her. As it would be if a woman told me she had been raped or subjected to male violence. Women lying about those things is rare.

Patriarchy pits women against each other. Breaking patriarchy permanently involves standing up for other women and strengrhening sisterhood.

So I believe Blake and I very much hope she's OK.

My first instinct was to believe Blake too, but after reading the available evidence it appears she made a power play over JB and his film and I haven’t seen any proof of sexual harassment

Scammersarescum · 23/02/2025 18:43

TheKeatingFive · 05/02/2025 14:26

Whoever that PR firm are that Baldoni hired to trash her (just like Depp did to Heard) - they are as morally depraved as it gets.

It's sickening how easy it is to get society to hate women.

And this shouldn't be a PR battle. It should be a legal one, behind closed doors.

It's easy work for them. Society already hates women.

As for Ms Lively, none of us know her. I haven't seen her act so I can't comment on that. I can say she is certainly very beautiful and her husband comes across as a nice chap in the football documentary and that's almost it.

One thing I can say is that when a woman says she has been bullied and subjected to sexually appropriate behaviour, my first instinct is to believe her. As it would be if a woman told me she had been raped or subjected to male violence. Women lying about those things is rare.

Patriarchy pits women against each other. Breaking patriarchy permanently involves standing up for other women and strengrhening sisterhood.

So I believe Blake and I very much hope she's OK.