Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

What do you think of Blake Lively?

337 replies

NameChangeChic · 05/02/2025 13:13

From what I’ve heard with the current drama surrounding her I’m shocked. Did anyone’s opinions of her change?

ps this isn’t a bashing thread

OP posts:
wipeywipe · 24/02/2025 21:54

and nothing in that article proves that they did wage a PR campaign. Maybe they did, maybe they didn't, we will shall see.

The article is also disingenuous, fame has always been fickle hence why image is so important & PRs are ruthless in protecting their clients brand. You don't need to be a victim of a PR campaign to receive bad press, over-saturation is a thing & of course social media heightens it.

wipeywipe · 24/02/2025 21:43

Why? Because I think the joke was stupid? And because I think there is a lot of grey around the whole situation?

AliceMcK · 24/02/2025 21:41

Atomickitten · 24/02/2025 18:37

She could have easily absorbed a breach of contract penalty, but she knew they desperately wouldn’t want her to leave. She had them over a barrel .

Absolutely, JB and his team sunk everything into this movie, they had been working on it for years, BL could have walked away with barely a dent in her purse or reputation. I fully believe she saw this as her power play moment.

WhyDidPunxutawneyPhilHaveToSeeHisShadow · 24/02/2025 21:38

I can't work out if you're being naive or deliberately obtuse.
"Blake Lively, Justin Baldoni, and the Collapse of the Hollywood #MeToo Era | The New Yorker" https://www.newyorker.com/culture/critics-notebook/blake-lively-justin-baldoni-and-the-collapse-of-the-hollywood-metoo-era

wipeywipe · 24/02/2025 21:33

The texts where he is quoted as saying he wants to feel as though she could be buried?

Then the text acknowledging they can destroy her but obviously can't say that!

None of the above prove they did actually bury her though & as I said upthread they also discussed her "downfall" despite not doing anything.

wipeywipe · 24/02/2025 21:31

@WhyDidPunxutawneyPhilHaveToSeeHisShadow

Why? What you heard? - is meant to be funny as it's addressing the elephant in the room, namely that their names have been in the press/on social media non-stop.

That bit is crystal clear but their names are in the press because of a sexual harassment allegation. Not something to be glib about.

This is how it's been spun, that he's minimised it.

Spun by who? I saw the clip & that was my own conclusion.

It wasn't a joke about sexual harassment.

No, it was a joke about being under an intense media storm due to sexual harassment hence why it backfired spectacularly.

Stupid thing to do.

Mingenious · 24/02/2025 21:30

Bornnotbourne · 05/02/2025 13:39

I don’t know but it end with us was the biggest pile of bollocks I’ve ever encountered and massively detrimental to lives of women worldwide. It’s

I watched it ends with us on a Saudia flight and when it finished I realised they’d cut an awful lot out of it 🤣

As for Lively, no opinion really, I’ve never met her.

Princessconsuelabananahammock9 · 24/02/2025 21:26

Verv · 24/02/2025 16:57

I find it interesting that women are assassinating the character of a woman they wouldnt have thought twice about had she not accused a man of sexual harassment.
Until she stepped out of line and seemingly beyond her station - nobody had a thought about Blake Lively above and beyond a shark film and a marriage to deadpool.

What are you talking about?

Blake Lively has Gossip Girl, Sisterhood of the Travelling Pants. Age of Adeline, The Town, A Simple Favor.

She’s also pretty much the main attraction at the Met Gala each year.

What you wrote is so misogynistic. She had a very full career before Ryan Reynolds.

JB has far more evidence supporting his claims, but it’s absurd to say no one thought about her.

She has millions of followers on Instagram.

WhyDidPunxutawneyPhilHaveToSeeHisShadow · 24/02/2025 21:26

AliceMcK · 24/02/2025 21:14

If you read my original comment I made it clear that I had very little in way of knowledge or opinion on both BL & JB, it was only after several days of internet diving I formed my option on either which I have made clear.

I also feel it’s fascinating that some women will just believe another woman just so they have a another reason to hate another man. Just because I share the same sex as someone dose not mean I’m blindly going to go on a man hating march. I share the same sex as Myra Hindley, Rosemary West, Emma Tustin, Mangdalena Luczak and many other child killers, should I just blindly support them because they are women?

So far there has been absolutely no proof of any inappropriate behaviour on the film set, yes a PR firm has been engaged AFTER RR & BL engaged their own unscrupulous firm.

There has also been no proof of any attempt at a smear campaign against BL despite her representatives using unscrupulous and possibly illegal tactics against JBs agent to obtain proof.

However, there is plenty of evidence backing JBs version of events.

No proof of a smear campaign?
Ahem. The texts where he is quoted as saying he wants to feel as though she could be buried?
Then the text acknowledging they can destroy her but obviously can't say that!

WhyDidPunxutawneyPhilHaveToSeeHisShadow · 24/02/2025 21:22

The thing that's odd to me is the sexual abuse part seems less of an issue to BL & RR than the PR smear because I don't get why RR would make a joke about it.

This is how it's been spun, that he's minimised it.
However, the "joke" itself - and I use that term ill advisedly as it wasn't particularly funny - Hey Ryan, how are you? <cue knowinglook> Why? What you heard? - is meant to be funny as it's addressing the elephant in the room, namely that their names have been in the press/on social media non-stop.
It wasn't a joke about sexual harassment.
Cue card guy insists it was Ryan's line. Everyone else says it was written for him.
Either way, I do agree it backfired spectacularly.

AliceMcK · 24/02/2025 21:14

Mirabai · 24/02/2025 17:06

It’s fascinating the amount of time and effort (some) women will go to prove another woman (in this case a famous and attractive one) is not a nice person.

All of which is irrelevant to the issue of inappropriate behaviour on a film set followed by a PR takedown.

If you read my original comment I made it clear that I had very little in way of knowledge or opinion on both BL & JB, it was only after several days of internet diving I formed my option on either which I have made clear.

I also feel it’s fascinating that some women will just believe another woman just so they have a another reason to hate another man. Just because I share the same sex as someone dose not mean I’m blindly going to go on a man hating march. I share the same sex as Myra Hindley, Rosemary West, Emma Tustin, Mangdalena Luczak and many other child killers, should I just blindly support them because they are women?

So far there has been absolutely no proof of any inappropriate behaviour on the film set, yes a PR firm has been engaged AFTER RR & BL engaged their own unscrupulous firm.

There has also been no proof of any attempt at a smear campaign against BL despite her representatives using unscrupulous and possibly illegal tactics against JBs agent to obtain proof.

However, there is plenty of evidence backing JBs version of events.

AngryBird6122 · 24/02/2025 20:03

AgentJohnson · 24/02/2025 19:47

I don’t form opinions on celebrities based on media headlines (from rag newspapers) and social media bullshit stories.

This with bleeding bells on.

Odd. There are hundreds of pages of court documents and evidence. Literal proof. Not bullshit stories. Sorry if the truth hurts

AgentJohnson · 24/02/2025 19:47

I don’t form opinions on celebrities based on media headlines (from rag newspapers) and social media bullshit stories.

This with bleeding bells on.

DeeDeeFuzzbot · 24/02/2025 19:41

wipeywipe · 24/02/2025 18:37

IF…Baldoni literally did nothing to cause the online tsunami of anti Blake sentiment?

I thought some of the texts of the PR people show them discussing how they can't believe the public/press have turned on Blake & how they haven't had to do anything?

That’s what I saw too.
I think that’s why Lively’s team want 2.5 years worth of communication…
Texts
Voicemails
Emails
Location information
etc etc not limited to etc etc

of 15 different people!

to find evidence And prove their suspicions.
Not sure if the judge will agree to it.
It’s an unprecedented request apparently.
Who knows what they will find in the discovery process!

Atomickitten · 24/02/2025 18:37

Mirabai · 24/02/2025 16:20

Working without a signed contract doesn’t mean you’re free from contractual obligations. An implied contract can be formed based on your communications and actions with your employer which create legally binding terms even without a signed agreement.

She could have easily absorbed a breach of contract penalty, but she knew they desperately wouldn’t want her to leave. She had them over a barrel .

wipeywipe · 24/02/2025 18:37

IF…Baldoni literally did nothing to cause the online tsunami of anti Blake sentiment?

I thought some of the texts of the PR people show them discussing how they can't believe the public/press have turned on Blake & how they haven't had to do anything?

FrippEnos · 24/02/2025 18:33

Atomickitten · 24/02/2025 18:27

I’m curious about that. I know the writer is all buddy buddy with Blake . As for the others , maybe their publicists advised against appearing to suppprt JB?

It could well be that they have been told to distance themselves from it all, I just find it weird that it is rarely if ever mentioned.

Atomickitten · 24/02/2025 18:27

FrippEnos · 24/02/2025 17:35

I seem to recall with this that all the other cast members including the writer of the book were avoiding JB during the PR for this or at very leased the premier of it.

I’m curious about that. I know the writer is all buddy buddy with Blake . As for the others , maybe their publicists advised against appearing to suppprt JB?

Atomickitten · 24/02/2025 18:23

DeeDeeFuzzbot · 24/02/2025 17:59

I think too many of us have been the victim of sexual harassment.
It shouldn’t still be happening.
Regardless of who you are or who your husband is.
Whether you are likeable or not.
I like to think we can all agree to that.

The unanswered question is whether this harassment actually took place.

No sexual harassment complaints were made until the legal complaint in December last year, well after filming wrapped.
Which surprised me.
No HR complaint, no involvement of the people who you usually turn to in order to resolve such problems. There are a number of routes on set, that could have been taken to register a complaint and have it dealt with swiftly and effectively.

Boom! Over and done with!

Team Lively opted instead, for a list of demands which insinuated harassment or accused unacceptable behaviour.
Demands which were non negotiable AND non revise able!
Yes. That’s right! Lively’s team refused to negotiate.
So, the only option for the production was to accept, regardless of whether they felt they were baseless or unjust.

Or Blake Lively would refuse to come back to work.
Risking 100’s of jobs and millions of dollars of investment. Not to mention time and creative work. And potentially having to find other new actors? Disaster!!!

If we consider, JB and BL , previous to this, were talking, working while breast pumping, text messaging, voice messaging, on a daily basis…sometimes well into the night.

And after some of these instances of sexual harassment were said to have taken place?

That is so weird.

We know there is more to this story than we currently have in our sights.

Of course, we don’t have all the facts yet.

We have accusations, rebuttals, counter accusations.
SH, extortion, bullying, smearing! What a mix!

So I don’t think there’s any point in insulting people who have an opinion on a half (if that) told story.

Please be kind. Even if the world isn’t. ❤️

I feel free to disagree on a lot of things in this thread. But to be clear, my mind isn’t made up yet on who did what because we aren’t in a position to know it all.

A position maybe some of Blake Lively’s co-stars may also be in at the moment too. Which may explain some of the repositioning we have seen online and in the press.

In terms of who was in a position of power, we may need to look not only at the outcome but how they got there.

Who was placating whom and at what stage in production, will show the individuals who really had the “power” in all this.

From what has been released to the public so far, the people involved are not looking too good. Regardless of what gender they are.

Unfortunately the internet is rife with misogyny. And proof of it being weaponized will be found. It hasn’t been…so far.

The thing I remember is, they both need to find evidence for EVERYTHING they are accusing each other of doing.
An accusation is only that. An accusation.

If they have been found to have lied or intentionally misrepresented JUST ONE thing, it will undermine their credibility as a witness.

They will be interviewed under oath in deposition. And any variations in answer will literally be picked apart. Because the truth should be consistent.

We have some evidence presented. Which has been revealing and fascinating.
But not all of it.

Back to the point of what I think about Blake Lively?
Watching interviews with the actress reveals some horrible attitudes and behaviours. Not only about her interactions with interviewers and co-stars but also how she intentionally (and with dishonesty) approaches her fellow colleagues on set. They were words from her own mouth. And how she chose through her own volition to represent herself to the public.
Unedited.

And it’s worth remembering that Team Lively only dropped their lawsuit about SH because they felt they were being smeared.

Can you imagine if that wasn’t the case?!!
IF…Baldoni literally did nothing to cause the online tsunami of anti Blake sentiment?
Then all this is a gigantic waste of time!!!! 😜

It’s a fascinating and rather grimy insight into their world.

I shouldn’t enjoy this so much 😉

Agree with everything you said, great post :)

Atomickitten · 24/02/2025 18:21

.

Atomickitten · 24/02/2025 18:17

Verv · 24/02/2025 16:57

I find it interesting that women are assassinating the character of a woman they wouldnt have thought twice about had she not accused a man of sexual harassment.
Until she stepped out of line and seemingly beyond her station - nobody had a thought about Blake Lively above and beyond a shark film and a marriage to deadpool.

I like a couple of Blake’s films including it ends with us. When I heard about her law suit and what she asked JBs team to sign for her to return to the film set I immediately took her side and thought badly of JB. I’d never heard of him before I watched this film. HOWEVER, I then read up on it and realised there was more to the story and I now lean towards team JB. Admittedly I don’t know the full story but I’m now sceptical of BL’s intentions…

Ontobetterthings · 24/02/2025 18:08

I just saw an old interview of her spose to be talking about a film but she was rambling on trying to sell her husbands gin. She was rambling on for about 10 mins word vomit and the interviewer couldn't get a word in. I think she was trying to be funny but it just looked so rude and the interviewer looked uncomfortable.

DeeDeeFuzzbot · 24/02/2025 17:59

I think too many of us have been the victim of sexual harassment.
It shouldn’t still be happening.
Regardless of who you are or who your husband is.
Whether you are likeable or not.
I like to think we can all agree to that.

The unanswered question is whether this harassment actually took place.

No sexual harassment complaints were made until the legal complaint in December last year, well after filming wrapped.
Which surprised me.
No HR complaint, no involvement of the people who you usually turn to in order to resolve such problems. There are a number of routes on set, that could have been taken to register a complaint and have it dealt with swiftly and effectively.

Boom! Over and done with!

Team Lively opted instead, for a list of demands which insinuated harassment or accused unacceptable behaviour.
Demands which were non negotiable AND non revise able!
Yes. That’s right! Lively’s team refused to negotiate.
So, the only option for the production was to accept, regardless of whether they felt they were baseless or unjust.

Or Blake Lively would refuse to come back to work.
Risking 100’s of jobs and millions of dollars of investment. Not to mention time and creative work. And potentially having to find other new actors? Disaster!!!

If we consider, JB and BL , previous to this, were talking, working while breast pumping, text messaging, voice messaging, on a daily basis…sometimes well into the night.

And after some of these instances of sexual harassment were said to have taken place?

That is so weird.

We know there is more to this story than we currently have in our sights.

Of course, we don’t have all the facts yet.

We have accusations, rebuttals, counter accusations.
SH, extortion, bullying, smearing! What a mix!

So I don’t think there’s any point in insulting people who have an opinion on a half (if that) told story.

Please be kind. Even if the world isn’t. ❤️

I feel free to disagree on a lot of things in this thread. But to be clear, my mind isn’t made up yet on who did what because we aren’t in a position to know it all.

A position maybe some of Blake Lively’s co-stars may also be in at the moment too. Which may explain some of the repositioning we have seen online and in the press.

In terms of who was in a position of power, we may need to look not only at the outcome but how they got there.

Who was placating whom and at what stage in production, will show the individuals who really had the “power” in all this.

From what has been released to the public so far, the people involved are not looking too good. Regardless of what gender they are.

Unfortunately the internet is rife with misogyny. And proof of it being weaponized will be found. It hasn’t been…so far.

The thing I remember is, they both need to find evidence for EVERYTHING they are accusing each other of doing.
An accusation is only that. An accusation.

If they have been found to have lied or intentionally misrepresented JUST ONE thing, it will undermine their credibility as a witness.

They will be interviewed under oath in deposition. And any variations in answer will literally be picked apart. Because the truth should be consistent.

We have some evidence presented. Which has been revealing and fascinating.
But not all of it.

Back to the point of what I think about Blake Lively?
Watching interviews with the actress reveals some horrible attitudes and behaviours. Not only about her interactions with interviewers and co-stars but also how she intentionally (and with dishonesty) approaches her fellow colleagues on set. They were words from her own mouth. And how she chose through her own volition to represent herself to the public.
Unedited.

And it’s worth remembering that Team Lively only dropped their lawsuit about SH because they felt they were being smeared.

Can you imagine if that wasn’t the case?!!
IF…Baldoni literally did nothing to cause the online tsunami of anti Blake sentiment?
Then all this is a gigantic waste of time!!!! 😜

It’s a fascinating and rather grimy insight into their world.

I shouldn’t enjoy this so much 😉

FrippEnos · 24/02/2025 17:35

I seem to recall with this that all the other cast members including the writer of the book were avoiding JB during the PR for this or at very leased the premier of it.

AngryBird6122 · 24/02/2025 17:10

Mirabai · 24/02/2025 17:06

It’s fascinating the amount of time and effort (some) women will go to prove another woman (in this case a famous and attractive one) is not a nice person.

All of which is irrelevant to the issue of inappropriate behaviour on a film set followed by a PR takedown.

I don’t think the pp had to go to any effort