Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Friend earns as much as me on benefits

343 replies

NattyFinch · 04/02/2025 20:21

I felt really shocked and conflicted after a discussion with a friend recently that revealed that she receives over £2000 a month on benefits for 2 children while I work full time as a single parent with one child for a similar amount (once I’ve paid all my taxes, ni etc). It stemmed from her saying she was going for ivf treatment at 48 at a total cost of £8000. I’m supportive as a friend and try not to be a judgmental person but this just seems unjust when I’ve worked so hard to stay in employment and raise my son single-handedly for 12 years. She doesn’t want to move to England because if the ivf is successful she will get more money to stay in Scotland. AIBU to think this is all bonkers ?!

OP posts:
JimHalpertsWife · 04/02/2025 21:14

It's probably worth noting that this is the OPs first post on Mumsnet.

Kindofembarrasing · 04/02/2025 21:14

threelittlescones · 04/02/2025 21:05

It could very easily be £2k. Single element over 25 plus 2 kids born after 2017 is £986 alone. Add rent then any additional elements for childcare/disability etc and it could very well be over £2k.

Think she said the kids don't have any disabilities. Plus she's unemployed so no childcare. Plus lives in Scotland so rent won't be that high.

threelittlescones · 04/02/2025 21:12

Also for people saying it couldn't possibly be £2k on UC (which it absolutely could be) the OP just said in benefits if I'm not mistaken. So that includes child benefit of £170 every 4 weeks and then she'll also be receiving an extra £27 or so per week per child for Scottish Child Payment which is £215 every 4 weeks. So that's around £1600 of UC which means her rent wouldn't be much over £600 which isn't sky high.

cadburyegg · 04/02/2025 21:11

Canonlythinkofthisone · 04/02/2025 21:06

Lots of people claiming this isn't possible etc. I had a recent conversation with a friend as she was ranting about money and COL.

She does admittedly work part time, but gets UC top up and all in her take home is just over 2600 per month. She owns her house, so whilst she pays her mortgage out of that, she is investing in her and her children's future.
She also only pays 20% nursery fees for her 2 DC and pays less than 100 for both children to go 2 days per week, whilst I pay over 600 a month for 2.5 days for one child and her father has her the other days as I work full time.

It's BONKERS. I also don't pay into a pension as I simply can't afford to until nursery fees ease up.

Another acquaintance has 4 children, is a single parent and her net income is 3200, no disabilities. plus child maintenace of over 800 per month from the 2 dads. Not worked since she had her first 8 years ago. She has a new car on finance and private rents a very nice house in a very nice area, gets her hair done regularly and the children are always in new clothes etc.
I rent a tiny 2 bed in an okish area because it's all I can afford.
People seem to think you only get a few hundred a month on UC but that's simply not the case, and it's all the other "free" things that add up, prescriptions, dental care, eye tests, nursery, breakfast clubs etc.
It's a frustrating place to be.

So how much do you earn? You must earn more than your friend otherwise presumably you'd also qualify for benefits?

ChishiyaBat · 04/02/2025 21:11

Zebedee999 · 04/02/2025 21:06

Nope. It is broken Britain where someone that makes the effort to work and contributes ends up after tax with less than someone on benefits who pays no tax. It is not right, those that struggle to work and keep a family together should always be better off than similar set up but on benefits. Else we may as well all stop at home and stuff society that needs tax payers to pay for services.

No it's people making out that life on benefits is cushy when it's not! Sure there may be some people who milk and cheat the system, but that is the exception and not the rule!

arcticpandas · 04/02/2025 21:11

OnlyDespairRemains · 04/02/2025 20:54

I'm just laughing at all of those people talking about the added benefits of working, outside of the financial rewards. I can only presume that they aren't working the shit, tedious jobs with exploitative employers, awful managers and unlikeable co-workers that a lot of those at the bottom of the employment market have to put up with.

This! I also have one friend who is getting brnefits for being a single parent with 2 kids. Except her partner lives with her and he works but it's not declared. She works part time and says she will never work more because then the benefits will go down.

InDogweRust · 04/02/2025 21:11

Whilst I understand your frustration you can progress with your career, go for promotions, better paid jobs as you gain experience, build up a pension.

Another issue - many jobs no longer offer this progression potential. You can be offered a "promotion" and find it pays little more - after tax it is barely noticeable.

sky1267 · 04/02/2025 21:09

Your child will be proud of you just remember that. You’re setting an amazing example unlike her.

Obscurial · 04/02/2025 21:08

Whilst I understand your frustration you can progress with your career, go for promotions, better paid jobs as you gain experience, build up a pension.

Benefits mean you’re stuck with no hope of more, and getting off them can be nigh on impossible. You’re literally trapped. It might seem like free money and therefore unfair, but in reality you have far more freedom and potential than she does.

As for having another baby at 48? Bonkers!

allthemiddlechildrenoftheworld · 04/02/2025 21:08

@NattyFinch OP just know that I and many more, have respect for you but will never respect your lazy, good for nothing friend, who lives on benefits!

AndThereSheGoes · 04/02/2025 21:07

XDownwiththissortofthingX · 04/02/2025 20:41

Your friend receives a sum the government has decided is the minimum necessary for her and her dependents to have a minimum standard of living. You need to ask yourself why, then, if the same government insists that work should pay, they are not willing to give you a salary that permits you to enjoy a higher standard of living than your friend.

Because children shouldn't live in poverty, it's not a race to the bottom , a decent society raises the standard for everyone". etc etc.

At some point either the unemployed get to live at a basic standard, which will also be the same as low paid working people or they will get less and live below the basic standard.
If you raise the salary of the lowest that shortly becomes the new lowest standard doesn't it.

InDogweRust · 04/02/2025 21:07

There is an issue with benefits that a parent with a couple of kids, can receive more in benefit income, especially working part time, than someone else working full time. It can feel like people are compensated for choosing to work fewer hours.

So what if the benefit income include rent? Someone on a wage also has to pay rent out of their income too.

Miley1967 · 04/02/2025 21:06

Vertigo2851 · 04/02/2025 20:56

You can google uc amounts op. It isn’t £2000.

It absolutely could be if rent is highish?

Canonlythinkofthisone · 04/02/2025 21:06

Lots of people claiming this isn't possible etc. I had a recent conversation with a friend as she was ranting about money and COL.

She does admittedly work part time, but gets UC top up and all in her take home is just over 2600 per month. She owns her house, so whilst she pays her mortgage out of that, she is investing in her and her children's future.
She also only pays 20% nursery fees for her 2 DC and pays less than 100 for both children to go 2 days per week, whilst I pay over 600 a month for 2.5 days for one child and her father has her the other days as I work full time.

It's BONKERS. I also don't pay into a pension as I simply can't afford to until nursery fees ease up.

Another acquaintance has 4 children, is a single parent and her net income is 3200, no disabilities. plus child maintenace of over 800 per month from the 2 dads. Not worked since she had her first 8 years ago. She has a new car on finance and private rents a very nice house in a very nice area, gets her hair done regularly and the children are always in new clothes etc.
I rent a tiny 2 bed in an okish area because it's all I can afford.
People seem to think you only get a few hundred a month on UC but that's simply not the case, and it's all the other "free" things that add up, prescriptions, dental care, eye tests, nursery, breakfast clubs etc.
It's a frustrating place to be.

Zebedee999 · 04/02/2025 21:06

ChishiyaBat · 04/02/2025 20:53

Oh great another benefit bashing thread!

Nope. It is broken Britain where someone that makes the effort to work and contributes ends up after tax with less than someone on benefits who pays no tax. It is not right, those that struggle to work and keep a family together should always be better off than similar set up but on benefits. Else we may as well all stop at home and stuff society that needs tax payers to pay for services.

Ziggy30 · 04/02/2025 21:05

Don’t get me started! My SIL has 3 children to 2 different fathers. Claims almost £6000 because each child has ‘some sort of additional need’ - they really don’t! I don’t make half of that, nor do DH and myself make that combined! She complains about her 3 bedroom house and is entitled to a 4 bed house, according to her. Belittled me for ‘only spending £150ish on my DC at Christmas because she had spent £2500 on one child alone! Never worked a single day in her life.

Maybe a little bitter but I can’t wait until the kids are older and she gets next to nothing!

I think it’s about time we stop and give out naff all to those who play the system. They should be house in a hotel like structure with a studio apartment with bunk beds and necessities. A canteen to cater for them. No need to give them any money whatsoever. Why should people who don’t work be able to afford multiple holiday, £1000’s on Christmas pressies, new cars, etc! They might actually be inclined to get off their lazy arse and do something. And not just reproduce for the money!

This way people who genuinely need help because they are going through a rough patch; in between jobs, unforeseen medical conditions/sickness, etc, can actually get the help they need.

Rant over!

laidir · 04/02/2025 21:05

@Vertigo2851 Yeah exactly!

threelittlescones · 04/02/2025 21:05

Vertigo2851 · 04/02/2025 20:56

You can google uc amounts op. It isn’t £2000.

It could very easily be £2k. Single element over 25 plus 2 kids born after 2017 is £986 alone. Add rent then any additional elements for childcare/disability etc and it could very well be over £2k.

Vertigo2851 · 04/02/2025 21:04

If you're over 25 you would be entitled to £393 then £575 for 2 kids (born after 2017. If they were born before it's slightly more)

This sounds grand. You should quit your job and go on uc op.

laidir · 04/02/2025 21:04

It's total nonsense. Unless her rent is sky high - which in Scotland it probably won't be.

Also, if people would actually look up the rules for benefits, then single parents with youngest children as young as 1-3 years old have to work. I certainly was not given much leeway.

I have been a single parent of 2 children on benefits not that long ago and it is nowhere near that amount, even including rent. The calculators are mostly wrong and over estimate as well, if that's where your stats are coming from. They usually include things like free prescriptions and free dental, which I accept are relevant, but they are not take home money, and renting is far more expensive than mortgages, and your 'friend' will never own their home (perhaps the most important difference).

TomatoSandwiches · 04/02/2025 21:03

Oh aye.

JimHalpertsWife · 04/02/2025 21:02

You are a lone parent paying rent and earning a below average wage - you should be claiming UC too

OnlyDespairRemains · 04/02/2025 21:02

ToKittyornottoKitty · 04/02/2025 20:57

If you are a single working parent who rents and takes home less than 2k a month then it’s incredibly likely you are eligible for UC.

I know it's a bit off topic, but isn't it all just a little bit wrong that we have to subsidise some full time workers with benefits in order to increase the amount that the owners or shareholders of a business take home.

OP says she works for the government though and so if she really is elegible for UC, I'm not sure if that actually makes it better or worse.

Guavafish1 · 04/02/2025 21:01

I suspect she doing cash in hand jobs… I don’t think it’s all benefits

threelittlescones · 04/02/2025 21:01

As other posters have said, you're very likely to be entitled to UC yourself if you have 2 children, rent and take home under £2k a month. Probably quite a sizeable amount too. The wage deduction from UC for a take home pay of £1900 a month after deductions is £822. This is the amount they deduct from your total UC award. They deduct it at a rate of 55p in every £1. If you rent, the first £404 of your wages is disregarded before they start making deductions from your UC for the rest.

If you're over 25 you would be entitled to £393 then £575 for 2 kids (born after 2017. If they were born before it's slightly more)

So that's £986 already.

With regards to rent. If it's council/social housing you'll get the full amount. If it's private you need your LHA amount because that's all UC will pay. You can look this up by googling the LHA calculator.

Add the rent/LHA amount to the £986.

Deduct £822 for wages from this total.

That will give you a rough idea of how much UC you could receive. And then you would also still have all your wages on top of that too. If you currently pay childcare, you could receive up to 85% of that back from UC too so that's even more.

Then you'll be much better off than your friend so emm...then you won't have to feel annoyed/angry/jealous/whatever it is you feel about it.