Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Recent study of children joining reception class

538 replies

Liveandletlive18 · 03/02/2025 07:55

A recent study by kindred2 of a 1000 teachers resulted in finding a quarter of children today joined reception class when still in nappies. Many children are unable to climb a staircase or sit properly on the floor due to lack of exercise & muscle tone. The children used expressions more common in America such as trash & vacation due to excessive screen time. Teachers stated covid is no longer an excuse. They say a lot of this is due to busy parents working & having less time to interact with children & teach them basic skills. Is this a worrying trend.

OP posts:
Barbadossunset · 03/02/2025 10:45

Recently talked about this on a Safeguarding course - it's called 'Affluent Neglect' apparently- very sad

I don’t understand why this has to be yet another class issue. There are good parents and bad parents, neglectful ones and helicopters ones, kind, cruel, and so on, from every social background.

SatinHeart · 03/02/2025 10:44

Jimmyneutronsforehead · 03/02/2025 09:56

To be fair, I also tried to potty train young.

Then I received advice from the health service that starting young can cause problems later on with continence, so to stop and wait for signs of readiness.

So we took a short hiatus.

Then the next bit of advice from the health service was "why are you wanting for signs of readiness? You just need routine" so we followed that and it didn't work. We were consistent to the T. It caused so much stress.

Then when we found out my son was autistic they recommended we speak to ERIC. I did and also did their webinar and everything that was said was contradictory.

Don't wait until signs of readiness, go to a routine, unless a routine causes apprehension and then wait for signs of readiness. Always change your child's nappy in the bathroom so they can associate the bathroom with toileting, except if the bathroom is a sensory nightmare for your child and then don't as it will cause trauma. Just get rid of nappies completely because they wick too much wee away for your child to notice, with the exception of if your child gets extremely distressed by being wet as crisis point isn't going to teach them anything. Never let them poo in a nappy unless they will only poo in a nappy and then allow them to poo in a nappy until they're showing signs of readiness. Always tell your child what to do unless your child has a PDA profile and then telling them what do do will just cause anxiety.

The stuff they were saying was all common sense stuff but didn't actually help us SEN parents or parents who's children were still not toilet trained by age 5. It just offered more confusion.

So between the NHS switching up their advice in what felt like an overnight 180, it feels like you can't get consistent support externally either.

This is so true. Whenever parents start potty training, there is so little support available if your child doesn't just 'get it' after however many attempts, just conflicting advice and judgement.

In our area there is an 18 month waiting list for the children's continence service, which doesn't accept referrals until children are 4, so basically useless for what should be their primary purpose - supporting families in getting children toileting confidently before starting school.

MrsMariaReynolds · 03/02/2025 10:43

Cornflakes123 · 03/02/2025 08:18

I know at least 4 adults in their 30s who have American accents.some of them mentioned that watching tv all the time
as kids is a reason when asked. a couple of them I suspect may have slight autistic tendencies. All of these adults are what I would describe as above average intelligence.
i don’t really think that aspect is a new thing.

Alarm bells went off when my son was being assessed for ASD and ADHD a few years ago. He rocked up to his first appointment with a perfect American accent. Then the developmental paediatrician met with myself and DS's dad, revealing our own American born, native accents 😁 and she thought..."Oh."

He was diagnosed with both ASD and ADHD, and oddly enough had formed a perfect British accent by age 12. High school peer influence does count for something...

Theresidents · 03/02/2025 10:42

I agree with nappies being bigger sized. Size 6 used to be the biggest.

MrsSunshine2b · 03/02/2025 10:40

2025NewUserName · 03/02/2025 10:32

"I don’t recall any four year old in their classes being in nappies, and we didn’t live in an affluent area"

So many statements like this on the other two threads. How on earth would the average parent or child know how many other children in a class are in nappies or having accidents?

If the data was based on more than anecdotal teacher reflections, and instead recorded over x years the percentage of children in Reception year in nappies, I think that would be more useful. It's quite hard to quantify feelings of "getting worse", and, of course, correlation is not causation.

Is it not immediately obvious when a child is wearing a nappy? My child's class is very small, so it has taken me less time to get to know all the children, but my husband or I see them almost every weekend at birthday parties and every morning/afternoon and I would definitely notice if one was wearing a nappy.

Ryeman · 03/02/2025 10:39

There's a reason why the government have over the years significantly increased their contributions towards childcare costs. Government-funded research shows that children in nursery or formal childcare during their early years on average have better outcomes, despite some comments here disagreeing. My son has been part of one of these studies (SEED) for over 10 years so I keep an eye on the results.

Pleaselettheholidayend · 03/02/2025 10:38

denhaag · 03/02/2025 08:28

The Kindred surveys are perceptions, not research results.
It's important to recognise this.

Yh, I feel like this is getting lost in the many threads on this topic. It's not really hard "data" so I'm not sure how useful it is to start a panic on child development. I think there's been a massive social malaise since lockdown and it colours everyone's perception.

Cattery · 03/02/2025 10:36

Too much screen time and lazy parenting.

TY78910 · 03/02/2025 10:35

I don't read all of the comments here but some..

DD just started reception, had some issues with number 2s but seems to be getting out of them. It was psychological due to having some constipation issues and therefore toilet = pain. Number 1s she's been excellent with though, very quickly.

I went back to work full time when she reached 12m. She was in nursery.

Reflecting on potty training, maybe I have left it a little late (won't make that mistake again) as I started around two. The information out there I found very confusing for a first time mum.

My own mum and MIL kept pushing to say that I should've potty trained her from 12 months and all the information elsewhere said 'when your child is showing signs of interest'. Although those signs never really showed…

Like I say, she was potty trained before starting reception, had a couple of accidents but not consistently. I think I should have addressed her fear of the toilet a lot earlier than I have, but the device constantly given to me by health visitors and nursery staff was that it was just going to correct itself at some point...

I'm definitely not a lazy parent, I just didn't know what I didn't know and had to figure it out with all this conflicting information online, NHS, other peoples experiences. I found it quite hard to navigate as a first time parent.

With second DC I feel I'm equipped to do better

MrsSunshine2b · 03/02/2025 10:34

scalt · 03/02/2025 09:52

Can we scream this ten times louder, please? The minimising of the very, very real damage caused by lockdowns has begun in earnest. Those who made the decisions about lockdowns (i.e. government ministers) have very comfortable lifestyles and homes, and forget how the other half live; and some of them don't even know, as they were born into wealth. Lockdown certainly did not affect their lives, and people from the Prime Minister downwards simply ignored the rules anyway; probably a lot more than we know about.

As for kids being unable to climb stairs; as they were ordered to stay at home, how about those who lived in bungalows, or flats, or high-rise flats where it's either twenty flights of stairs, or the lift? How would they practise stairs? Going by a literal reading of the absolute fucking crap which Saint Boris was telling us to follow in the early stages, venturing outside your front door was forbidden; and if you did, you were a ruthless granny killer, and a selfish arsehole.

Sorry to burst your bubble but my "Covid baby" was born in a tiny flat and we followed the rules. We also talked to our child, read to her every day, took her out for a daily walk as the rules allowed, did tummy time and built up her muscle tone and potty trained her. The first time she saw stairs she climbed them with no problem because she is strong and healthy. She met all her milestones on time or early.

It was a year, and even then, not the whole year, just a few months in spring and some more in winter. It's had more of an impact on children who were taken out of school. Babies only need their parents really. Unless their parents are rubbish.

UnstableEquilibrium · 03/02/2025 10:34

Redflagsabounded · 03/02/2025 09:08

Something's changed and the only thing I can think of is 24/7 children's TV, streaming and smartphones. There have always been inadequate and neglectful parents. But now there are more of them due to overuse of these things.

All the other factors mentioned on this thread have always been there.

Logical thinking.

The other thing I'd add to your list is widespread WFH, which may result in parents being more likely to attempt to work while caring for children, resulting in really substandard parenting (albeit possibly motivated by genuine financial desperation).

Stats also suggest that children cared for by grandparents while parents work tend to have worse outcomes on average because some grandparents will be unwilling or unable or just too busy to give dedicated and stimulating care.

That situation might perhaps be more likely post pandemic due to COL issues, and because we now have a higher proportion of 50+ people economically inactive and hence perhaps available for childcare.

Moulook31 · 03/02/2025 10:34

Zippidydoodah · 03/02/2025 08:12

Saying that, it’s upsetting how many toddlers I see being pushed round town or the supermarket in their buggies, with mobile phones held up to their faces, watching goodness knows what and not taking in their environments at all.

I agree with you. I also cannot help but be shocked when I see kids in prams with mobiles or iPads and showing no interest in their environment. Sad indeed.

NormaleKartoffeln · 03/02/2025 10:34

Dreammouse · 03/02/2025 09:53

Children starting reception now wouldn't have been walking during lockdown. Sure, the parents may have been affected but blaming lockdown rather than the actual tangible fallouts we are still seeing today in services, funding and early years setting is more valuable than hyperbolic statements.

We're not blaming lockdown instead of other things, we're including it in the reasons!

Leavesandacorns · 03/02/2025 10:33

I don't think this can be down to busy parents. Surely their children are mainly at nursery so will be exercising etc every day. Nurseries also help potty train children.

The American accent thing has been going on for years. I'm in my 30's and all my Barbie's spoke with a fake American accent (I still slip into an American accent when playing make believe with my own children!). They definitely pick it up from watching American content online, but I don't think it needs to be excessive... it can just be a convenient way to put on a character voice because it's different to their own but familiar to them.

2025NewUserName · 03/02/2025 10:32

"I don’t recall any four year old in their classes being in nappies, and we didn’t live in an affluent area"

So many statements like this on the other two threads. How on earth would the average parent or child know how many other children in a class are in nappies or having accidents?

If the data was based on more than anecdotal teacher reflections, and instead recorded over x years the percentage of children in Reception year in nappies, I think that would be more useful. It's quite hard to quantify feelings of "getting worse", and, of course, correlation is not causation.

Cornflakes123 · 03/02/2025 10:30

HalloBasel · 03/02/2025 10:27

I was going off what a previous poster said….

i know. I’m glad you are glad lol.

TheYearOfSmallThings · 03/02/2025 10:29

TwilightAb · 03/02/2025 09:29

Yes, this. I hate articles like this because they just focus on statistics which we know are often bullshit and don't take in to consideration specific factors. It would be interesting to see where this research was and how it was carried out.
I think these articles just serve as another stick with which to beat Mother's with, especially working mothers who are often accused of neglecting their children by working.

In fairness having looked at the report it doesn't attribute most of the problem to working parents at all, and none of the specific instances reference this. Not attending nursery while being propped in a corner sofa with an iPad is the type of thing mentioned - no mention of whether either parent worked.

In the one case working parents are mentioned it is because the teachers have been specifically asked whether they think parents working long hours due to the high cost of living contributes to the problem, so it has basically been set up to get at least partial agreement.

HalloBasel · 03/02/2025 10:27

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I was going off what a previous poster said….

Cornflakes123 · 03/02/2025 10:26

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ThighsYouCantControl · 03/02/2025 10:25

Wemaybebetterstrangers · 03/02/2025 08:59

A lot of parents aren’t working and have a lot of time to interact with their children, teach them basic skills. Like potty training. They’re lazy and feckless, so they’re not doing it. Sitting the kids in front of iphones and iPads then sending them to school. Poor teachers. Nursery staff take all responsibility now do they? What responsibility do parents have, in your world (apart from working..)?

We worked, our children started school potty trained.

Edited

What? I was replying to someone else who seemed annoyed that working parents are being blamed for so many children starting school without skills they need. That is annoying as it implies that parents are just dumping them somewhere with an iPad and haven’t spent time and money finding the best childcare they can afford while they’re at work. Childcare providers do a lot to prepare children for school. So do parents.

“In my world” (wtf?) my children went to nursery and preschool but I toilet trained them, taught them to feed themselves, chatted to them lots and read to them every single night. Amongst other things. And nursery/preschool supported all of that too. I never said parents shouldn’t actually raise their children and it was all down to childminders and nurseries. I don’t know how you’ve got your wires so crossed 😳

HalloBasel · 03/02/2025 10:24

Cornflakes123 · 03/02/2025 10:23

All of my colleagues with kids took annual leave to potty train. I live in Ireland and the nurseries here won’t do it. They are supportive but won’t do the work for you.

I have no experience in nursery so I cankot comment on how much they help. I’m just quoting a previous poster who said theirs did the majority.

Cornflakes123 · 03/02/2025 10:23

HalloBasel · 03/02/2025 10:18

A previous poster said the “majority” of potty training was done by nursery which is probably where the response came from. But glad your experience was diff!

All of my colleagues with kids took annual leave to potty train. I live in Ireland and the nurseries here won’t do it. They are supportive but won’t do the work for you.

MrsSunshine2b · 03/02/2025 10:23

denhaag · 03/02/2025 08:24

It is tragic if this is how children are starting school, but it is not a class based issue. It is a parenting choice issue.

There will definitely be a correlation between socio/economic status and readiness for Reception. It has always been thus.

Is it? Or is it that people who are stupid and lazy are much more likely to end up un/underemployed? I don't think the working class want to claim them any more than the middle class does.

HalloBasel · 03/02/2025 10:22

MidnightPatrol · 03/02/2025 10:21

This doesn’t mean children are there all that time, it’s to accommodate people’s working patterns.

It’s not a school with compulsory attendance times - children arrive and depart at their parent’s convenience.

Such strong opinions, with absolutely no knowledge or experience!

Wow. Defensive.

TwentySecondsLeft · 03/02/2025 10:21

@Liveandletlive18

A child choking and a member of staff not being present because ratios are not adhered to..