Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Teaching Assistant said...

35 replies

Cheeseandcrackers40 · 01/02/2025 18:08

Dd6 asked me today why she didn't go to preschool at her school. I explained that she went to a child minder where she was very happy and we didn't want to move her until proper school started in F2.

She told me that they had been talking about it in her phonics group and the TA said that she must have gone to a childminders because her mummy and daddy didn't have time to look after her.

AIBU to think this is off? My daughter was upset about it but doesn't want us to raise it with the school. DH was really annoyed.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Stealthmodemama · 01/02/2025 23:11

Some people never learn phonics -yet can still read and write - others lap up phonics but never comprehend what they have read!

OP - why did you use a childminder? Did you have time to work and look after your child?

What a strange thing to get on your high horse about. I would talk to your child about 'why' she went to the childminder - so you could work - to have a house to live in? Buy food to eat? Have money for treats and holidays - I don't know.. why do you work..

Sometimeswinning · 01/02/2025 22:11

RobinHeartella · 01/02/2025 18:47

Do you want your dd to think that she was at the childminder because it was better for her education? Because it'll be obvious even to a 4yo that the ones from the preschool have a headstart on phonics.

My dd is aware she started reception with much less phonics knowledge than her classmates who went to the local prep school preschool. 4yos notice this stuff. (She's catching up amazingly, as we knew she would.)

Edited

This is not true. Some children just take to phonics and others cannot get on with them. It doesn’t matter if they went to pre school.

CoralHare · 01/02/2025 21:46

I don’t think even if she said this, it’s a big negative. Most children who don’t go to school nursery class it’s because their parents are working and need longer hours. She didn’t say oh your mummy and daddy didn’t care about you enough to look after you, she said you didn’t have time, which presumably is the truth.

Glulam · 01/02/2025 21:44

Is there a language issue here? I can imagine someone who has learnt English saying something like this, meaning no offence, but just not understanding the nuance of what they are saying.

DoggoQuestions · 01/02/2025 21:37

Spurber · 01/02/2025 18:21

And if they did say it watch them squirm as they explain themselves to you

Yes. Favourite pastime of mine, watching minimum wage workers squirm because they might have said something clumsily to inadvertently offend you.

Just make sure you don't wear your best tiara while you lord it over the plebs - they might steal it!

BeefBoogyOn · 01/02/2025 21:35

Cheeseandcrackers40 · 01/02/2025 20:10

Ok to clarify a couple of points.

I was upset because my daughter was upset when she told me and I realised she had been mulling it over all day.

My daughter loved her childcare setting and still tells me she misses being there 2 years later.

She only went 2 days a week so, no I don't have a trigger about her feeling she didn't have time with us.

This is verbatim what she said the TA said. I haven't reworded it, but appreciate DDs report may not be accurate.

We have had experience in this school with another TA who said/did some questionable stuff regarding DS. Which probably effected my immediate reaction hence asking a question on here.

Edited

I would be very surprised if the TA literally said this. Your daughter may not be lying, but children don't always understand, mishear, aren't listening and then fill in the blanks themselves.

A child once told their parent that I'd told them I'd smack them in the face, what I'd actually said was "oh, be careful with that, you don't want to smack yourself in the face" (They were whizzing wooden beads round on a string.)

blackbird77 · 01/02/2025 21:27

You’re attaching a judgement value to her comment instead of taking it literally. She was most likely explaining how you and your partner had to work so hired a childminder as you didn’t have time to look after her (because you obviously had to work). Your child has inferred this as the TA saying you don't have time to look after her for some sort of neglectful/don’t like her reason instead of the absolute normal reason why people have childminders - because they have to work to put food on the table.

She’s a child, she’s young and interprets it like this. Just explain to her what the TA meant. Think about how you would explain to a child about why they have a childminder. It’s literally impossible to do without saying something along the lines of your parents work to earn for the family so don’t have the time to be at home with you.

stichguru · 01/02/2025 21:15

That is essentially why people use childminders.

Cheeseandcrackers40 · 01/02/2025 20:10

Ok to clarify a couple of points.

I was upset because my daughter was upset when she told me and I realised she had been mulling it over all day.

My daughter loved her childcare setting and still tells me she misses being there 2 years later.

She only went 2 days a week so, no I don't have a trigger about her feeling she didn't have time with us.

This is verbatim what she said the TA said. I haven't reworded it, but appreciate DDs report may not be accurate.

We have had experience in this school with another TA who said/did some questionable stuff regarding DS. Which probably effected my immediate reaction hence asking a question on here.

OP posts:
Spurber · 01/02/2025 20:00

TishHope · 01/02/2025 18:18

I think it is perfectly possible that the TA did say that - why would some posters doubt it?

Because they think everyone who works in education is a perfect saint

Parlezz · 01/02/2025 19:47

It sounds like the TA said something, your daughter told her version and you've altered it to your own version here. You don't know the exact words. Maybe she did say something about not having time or being busy. How else do you explain it to young children? Apparently you tell her she was very happy in a weird way as if to convince her...

HousesofHolbein · 01/02/2025 19:42

That's why mine went to a childminder though?

We both worked so they had to go to a CM. My youngest used to be dropped off in PJ's barely awake and none if then had breakfast until they got there etc. it was a bit rubbish for them and we always acknowledged that. They all knew that it was because Daddy works away and Mummy had to be at work early and that both of us worked hard so that they could have nice things and trips out etc.

They knew that when we were home and bit working, we happily looked after them and had more time at home with them ourselves.

The TA wasn't implying anything negative, just explaining the situation. She might use a CM herself even!

RobinHeartella · 01/02/2025 19:18

Cheeseandcrackers40 · 01/02/2025 19:02

Hi all - I am and was always going to leave it as Dd asked me to, but I was interested to hear how others would have reacted to hearing this. I hear what you are saying about my child interpreting the explanation and inferring a meaning - I can see how that might have happened, was just a bit taken a back to hear it from her.

I haven't said at all that I'm following up on it in my post so not sure why it's been interpreted that way. Just said it sounded a bit off.

My child's phonics work is very good and she is in top set for reading so I don't think it's effected her negatively from an educational perspective to be in childminders but thanks for that 😅.

I didn't say it had an adverse effect on her education. Interesting that you jumped to that though, is that why you are feeling defensive about what the TA said?

If your genuine reason for choosing the childminder is a different reason from what the TA said, then just explain it to your child.

Cheeseandcrackers40 · 01/02/2025 19:02

Hi all - I am and was always going to leave it as Dd asked me to, but I was interested to hear how others would have reacted to hearing this. I hear what you are saying about my child interpreting the explanation and inferring a meaning - I can see how that might have happened, was just a bit taken a back to hear it from her.

I haven't said at all that I'm following up on it in my post so not sure why it's been interpreted that way. Just said it sounded a bit off.

My child's phonics work is very good and she is in top set for reading so I don't think it's effected her negatively from an educational perspective to be in childminders but thanks for that 😅.

OP posts:
purpleme12 · 01/02/2025 18:56

Oh god honestly who cares about this
People go to a childminder because their parents work ergo they don't have time to look after them
It's not worth even thinking about

mirrorglitterball · 01/02/2025 18:55

VickyEadieofThigh · 01/02/2025 18:49

OR - just leave it.

This. Honestly why would you even bother.

VickyEadieofThigh · 01/02/2025 18:49

NiftyKoala · 01/02/2025 18:41

Sorry responded too fast. I'd think a misunderstanding but I would definitely ask the TA in person to see her reaction just in case.

OR - just leave it.

RobinHeartella · 01/02/2025 18:47

Do you want your dd to think that she was at the childminder because it was better for her education? Because it'll be obvious even to a 4yo that the ones from the preschool have a headstart on phonics.

My dd is aware she started reception with much less phonics knowledge than her classmates who went to the local prep school preschool. 4yos notice this stuff. (She's catching up amazingly, as we knew she would.)

RobinHeartella · 01/02/2025 18:44

I actually think that's not a bad explanation. (The wording might be off, but it's your dd's wording not the TA's.)

My dd goes to wraparound care 3dpw and doesn't particularly like it. It's very important to us that she understands that she goes because we're working, so can't look after her, not because we don't want to spend time with her. If either of us have an unexpected day off or relative visiting, we always pull her out of wraparound. So to my dd, she'd explain this the same as your dd, she's there because we can't look after her at that time. Ditto DS being at nursery.

What alternative explanation do you prefer...?

NiftyKoala · 01/02/2025 18:41

NiftyKoala · 01/02/2025 18:38

I really don't think the TA said this.

Sorry responded too fast. I'd think a misunderstanding but I would definitely ask the TA in person to see her reaction just in case.

NiftyKoala · 01/02/2025 18:38

I really don't think the TA said this.

onwardsup4 · 01/02/2025 18:34

Kids interpret things differently, she may have been upset but you just need to explain to her. I doubt very much it was meant maliciously or any need for your husband to be annoyed

Shelby2010 · 01/02/2025 18:23

Is it the type of preschool that is only open term time or does short hours? So anyone who needs regular childcare would use a childminder or nursery?

It would then make sense for the TA to say to DD that she probably went to childminder because Mummy & Daddy needed someone to take care of her. At least she suggested Daddy had a role in this! Just explain to DD, that yes, she went to the childminder because you were at work.

Spurber · 01/02/2025 18:21

PizzaPunk · 01/02/2025 18:14

It's even less likely to be something a TA actually said.

Just have a quiet word and get the TA to clarify.

And if they did say it watch them squirm as they explain themselves to you

Moonnstars · 01/02/2025 18:21

Very unlikely. I imagine there was a conversation about whether they went to nursery or not, some children may not have had any childcare at all, and the TA may have made a comment to try and reassure the children who did go to daycare that it's because mummy and daddy were busy at work