Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

14yo odd quiz at school- do I complain

183 replies

Cornecopia · 31/01/2025 07:01

My ds came home yesterday and said that he had to fill in an online form ( not just him the whole of his year) and the questions were- what is your sexual orientation, are you comfortable in your gender, have you had sexual experiences, have you ever sent or received inappropriate pictures.
I understand some questions are safeguarding views. But bloody hell the sexual orientation etc why on earth is that relevant to my sons schooling?? I just feel his privacy has been really invaded and he doesn’t know himself whether he’s is straight/gay or whatever- I did ask him if there was. ‘Prefer not to say’ option and he said yes but the teacher said not to use that!
I just don’t really know what to think about it all

OP posts:
CranfordScones · 31/01/2025 09:47

I did ask him if there was. ‘Prefer not to say’ option and he said yes but the teacher said not to use that!

Absolutely unacceptable - kick up a huge fuss - if it's an 'official' survey demand that everyone repeats it because the results may have been compromised on account of the inappropriate instructions. Demand that the original results be destroyed on the grounds that people may have been forced to disclose things against their will. Kick up a huge fuss.

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 31/01/2025 09:44

Pushmepullu · 31/01/2025 09:36

A teenager’s ’had to’ usually means we were asked to. Teacher was wrong to tell them not to use the prefer not to say but my guess is they thought that most kids would use this to rush the questions so useless in gathering data.

You're probably right, in which case the instructions for the teachers should tell them to advise pupils clearly that all the answers are acceptable. It shouldn't depend on the teacher's assumptions. Not telling teachers how to run the survey correctly makes it useless in gathering data.

maddening · 31/01/2025 09:44

sonnunny · 31/01/2025 07:08

Why would you complain if it's about flagging up issues and offering support ?

But flagging up issues to who, on what basis, why without parental contact, and what support given by whom? Certainly not the teachers I hope who are not trained to provide psychological support.

What support do you think is appropriate in the event that a child discloses their sexuality but have not indicated any distress etc and what involvement do you think the parents should have?

Crocsake · 31/01/2025 09:41

Need a bit more context on what it was for and why. And who would have access to this information, including if it was anonymous.

I actually think schools understanding the situations their pupils are in is important, so they can learn how to support young people.

I'd also question if the teacher actually said don't use that box, or if they encouraged them to provide as much information as they could.

Dramatic · 31/01/2025 09:40

Littoralzone · 31/01/2025 07:48

Either is totally unacceptable.

No it's not, teenagers sometimes need a bit of prompting to not just take the easy way and click "prefer not to say" just because they can't be arsed to read the rest. There's nothing wrong with telling them only to use that option if they are really uncomfortable with the question.

maddening · 31/01/2025 09:39

MrsOvertonsWindow · 31/01/2025 09:18

One common thread is that these are revenue generating exercises for the authors with them anticipating more profits from using (or abusing) personal data in the future.

Schools really need to start using more critical thinking about all this. Until they do, then parents are having to step up and challenge / refuse to allow their child to participate.

Especially where schools are engaging outside companies - eg "No Outsiders" which are attached to lobby groups or groups with particular agendas

Deesmond · 31/01/2025 09:38

What I don’t like about this is having to announce your sexuality at a young age. At that age, I had zero sexual experience! I fancied wholly inappropriate people because I didn’t know any real people (ie boys). Eg recall fancying princes from my history text books, seriously! I was also quite scared of boys, again since I didn’t actually know any. Sexuality changes too, including depending on availability (at a girls school like mine, for instance, only girls were available…).

Pushmepullu · 31/01/2025 09:36

A teenager’s ’had to’ usually means we were asked to. Teacher was wrong to tell them not to use the prefer not to say but my guess is they thought that most kids would use this to rush the questions so useless in gathering data.

maddening · 31/01/2025 09:35

sonnunny · 31/01/2025 07:10

Safeguarding is absolutely the school's business and that is what this questionnaire is about, I've seen it and used it in school

To be honest I question that in some instances school safeguarding has overrached and teachers acted outside their professional boundaries - especially where it comes to a child's sexuality or gender identity- teachers are not trained psychologists/psychiatrists

brunettemic · 31/01/2025 09:33

Adamante · 31/01/2025 07:14

It seems obligatory - he “had” to fill it in and wasn’t allowed to use the “prefer not to say” option.

Edited

Yes because everything that comes out of the mouth of a teenager is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth 🙄

denhaag · 31/01/2025 09:30

NoBinturongsHereMate · 31/01/2025 09:23

Basic research ethics - subjects must give informed consent
This includes knowing who is carrying out the research, its purpose, and how data will be handled and used.

For children, parental consent is needed. And opt in, not opt out - so if a parent misses an email the child shouldn't take part.

I agree. Scientific research, consent and ethics is my line of work.

I would expect to be informed of this beforehand so that I could check these issues had been addressed, and I would use it to demonstrate to my son the importance of checking - just because the school says so, or a form looks official doesn't mean they have to do something like this. Not when it involves highly personal data.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 31/01/2025 09:25

Cornecopia · 31/01/2025 07:01

My ds came home yesterday and said that he had to fill in an online form ( not just him the whole of his year) and the questions were- what is your sexual orientation, are you comfortable in your gender, have you had sexual experiences, have you ever sent or received inappropriate pictures.
I understand some questions are safeguarding views. But bloody hell the sexual orientation etc why on earth is that relevant to my sons schooling?? I just feel his privacy has been really invaded and he doesn’t know himself whether he’s is straight/gay or whatever- I did ask him if there was. ‘Prefer not to say’ option and he said yes but the teacher said not to use that!
I just don’t really know what to think about it all

I’m going to quote the original post as it’s the only post from the person who knows anything concrete on the thread! Everything else is supposition and assumptions.

OP can I suggest you email the teacher and just ask what the form was about as your DS was confused. If it’s a national thing and you are not happy with a young person being quizzed about their sexuality (to be fair I don’t think I’d be happy about that either) then ask if there was an opportunity to opt out in the future.

I wouldn’t go in guns blazing. The important thing is finding out where this form has come from, what the purpose of it is and whether there’s going to be more of it in the future.

NoBinturongsHereMate · 31/01/2025 09:23

Basic research ethics - subjects must give informed consent
This includes knowing who is carrying out the research, its purpose, and how data will be handled and used.

For children, parental consent is needed. And opt in, not opt out - so if a parent misses an email the child shouldn't take part.

heyhopotato · 31/01/2025 09:21

Silvertulips · 31/01/2025 07:25

It’s a national survey. Do you not see the result highlights every year? How else are they supposed to gather information for planning?

I just feel his privacy has been really invaded and he doesn’t know himself whether he’s is straight/gay or whatever

He does know, so do you! Being gay isn’t a choice or lifestyle option. It’s who they are.

What planning are they doing off the back of knowing how many kids are having sexual experiences and what those are? Deciding to bring back HS2 after all?

MrsOvertonsWindow · 31/01/2025 09:18

DrBlackbird · 31/01/2025 09:15

We’ve had two different surveys now mentioned as well as reference to a ‘national survey’ that seems to be commonplace by teachers (?) on this thread.

Interesting that there are multiple surveys collecting personal and sensitive data about children. Yet just where is this magical support that will materialise once the data is collected? A friend has been waiting over a year for MH support for their DC. Another was directed to a couple of self help websites by their GP.

As an aside, surely everyone knows by now that nothing we do online is anonymous in the true sense. I would sincerely hope that every parent informs their child about this. It won’t stop them, but at least they’d know.

One common thread is that these are revenue generating exercises for the authors with them anticipating more profits from using (or abusing) personal data in the future.

Schools really need to start using more critical thinking about all this. Until they do, then parents are having to step up and challenge / refuse to allow their child to participate.

OwlInTheOak · 31/01/2025 09:18

Telling them not to use "prefer not to say " basically skews the data. That's often going to be "yes but I'm embarrassed to say", and if it's removed as an option it will result in incorrect "no" answers rather than those votes just not being included.

DrBlackbird · 31/01/2025 09:15

MrsOvertonsWindow · 31/01/2025 08:51

If it's the BeeWell survey, there's a massive issue with numerous aspects of it.
It's a commercial enterprise harvesting children's data with some very dubious practices about confidentiality and plans in the future use this data and match it to a child's adult health and other data! See this discussion

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5209872-the-beewell-survey

It's also unhelpfully steeped in gender ideology:

https://www.transgendertrend.com/beewell-pupil-wellbeing-gender-identity-indoctrination/

We’ve had two different surveys now mentioned as well as reference to a ‘national survey’ that seems to be commonplace by teachers (?) on this thread.

Interesting that there are multiple surveys collecting personal and sensitive data about children. Yet just where is this magical support that will materialise once the data is collected? A friend has been waiting over a year for MH support for their DC. Another was directed to a couple of self help websites by their GP.

As an aside, surely everyone knows by now that nothing we do online is anonymous in the true sense. I would sincerely hope that every parent informs their child about this. It won’t stop them, but at least they’d know.

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 31/01/2025 09:15

"Anonymity" is a can of worms. You can't have both anonymity and support for vulnerable individuals. Or, if you are only trying for anonymous aggregated data then you need complex safeguards in place to avoid de-anonymisation. Especially if you're going right down to a school level or - blimey! - a year group in a school.

You can analyse the survey data for each year that you have completed, or you can analyse a year/year group that you are particularly interested in and highlight pertinent issues or concerns,

You'd better not.

We would also encourage you to involve pupils/students as much as possible in the analysis

Really, you'd better not.

And no-one should be telling children to avoid ticking one of the boxes.

LookItsMeAgain · 31/01/2025 09:15

The bit that I would have an issue with is that the teacher said not to use the "Prefer not to say" option.

I'd be asking the teacher if they were faced with a form like this at aged 14 or any age, and they weren't sure of their sexuality or orientation or gender or any of the questions being asked in the form (even if it is anonymous), wouldn't they like to be able to use the 'Prefer Not To Say" option? Being instructed not to use it is going to skew the results.

If you know who the organisers are behind the survey, I'd be contacting them directly to advise them that the results from X school are going to be skewed as you have been made aware that at least one teacher advised pupils to not use the "Prefer not to say" option.

It's there for a reason.

Ginnyweasleyswand · 31/01/2025 09:14

Littoralzone · 31/01/2025 09:12

That is shocking if they are making school level data available to the school that completed it. It can very quickly become identifiable when you start with maybe only 100 responses and the respondents all know each other. Incredibly unethical.

Surely also a breach of GDPR? Excellent point.

Littoralzone · 31/01/2025 09:12

DrBlackbird · 31/01/2025 09:01

That website seems to suggest the survey was designed by Leeds council, not the NHS. That the data collected in this particular survey is for each individual school, not the NHS. Is that your understanding. I’m not clear how it supports funding though. Perhaps for Leeds council?

Though the survey itself is not publically available due to copyright (which I find odd). I thought this bit ‘what can I do with the data’ was interesting particularly being encouraged to involve students in data analysis:

What can I do with the data from the My Health My School Survey: You can analyse the survey data for each year that you have completed, or you can analyse a year/year group that you are particularly interested in and highlight pertinent issues or concerns, as well as areas you believe your school is doing well in. This can then be compared to your local authority average, and from 2018/19, to national data to assess where your school fits within these.
If you choose an area or several areas to action plan to improve, you can use our action plan resource to help you. We would also encourage you to involve pupils/students as much as possible in the analysis and also in student leadership.

They also say this:

  • We will publish the anonymised results on Leeds Data Mill & Data Mill North as open data.
  • The data will be shared with Leeds City Council, Public Health, the School Nursing Service and third parties including research and evaluation partners (currently but not confined to University of Leeds and Leeds Beckett University).

That is shocking if they are making school level data available to the school that completed it. It can very quickly become identifiable when you start with maybe only 100 responses and the respondents all know each other. Incredibly unethical.

Ginnyweasleyswand · 31/01/2025 09:12

Porcuporpoise · 31/01/2025 09:11

Given we know that mh support for the young is scarier than hens teeth I'm not sure this is a good use of resources. Why not put the money straight into CAMHS?

Also a very excellent question. Dodgy beyond belief. Who does this survey benefit? Not the children whose data is being harvested.

Porcuporpoise · 31/01/2025 09:11

LemonTT · 31/01/2025 07:49

By providing statistical evidence of a problem or lack there of. This can be used to support a need for investment or intervention or the need to disinvest and not intervene.

it should not be used in isolation either way as survey responses can be skewed by people giving answers they think are socially acceptable.

Given we know that mh support for the young is scarier than hens teeth I'm not sure this is a good use of resources. Why not put the money straight into CAMHS?

Ginnyweasleyswand · 31/01/2025 09:11

Greywhippet · 31/01/2025 08:54

Sadly, many many many 14 year olds are having sex. You may not like it but it’s true. And it’s a rare 14 year old who doesn’t know who they ‘fancy’ or have crushes on

That doesn't make it ok for teachers to initiate discussion with their students about sex outside of the PHSE curriculum. Doing so is a red flag. As is this survey from the sound of it.

Good point about them asking about committing a criminal offense.

Sharptonguedwoman · 31/01/2025 09:09

Cornecopia · 31/01/2025 07:01

My ds came home yesterday and said that he had to fill in an online form ( not just him the whole of his year) and the questions were- what is your sexual orientation, are you comfortable in your gender, have you had sexual experiences, have you ever sent or received inappropriate pictures.
I understand some questions are safeguarding views. But bloody hell the sexual orientation etc why on earth is that relevant to my sons schooling?? I just feel his privacy has been really invaded and he doesn’t know himself whether he’s is straight/gay or whatever- I did ask him if there was. ‘Prefer not to say’ option and he said yes but the teacher said not to use that!
I just don’t really know what to think about it all

Think I'd ask to see it. Was permission to do the survey requested? Why did the teacher comment at all? If the staff can see it, it's not anonymous.
I'm long past this as is my DD but I wouldn't want this in schools at all, personally.