Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Can we stop talking about men being trapped?

194 replies

ForRealCat · 30/01/2025 14:32

Just from another few threads; we talk about women getting pregnant either intentionally, or accidently and carrying on against the mans wishes and how it "traps" the man. I can see how decades ago this may have been the case, women would get pregnant and any 'decent' man would be expected to step up and marry her. Thus securing a husband and a degree of financial security.

Nowadays I can see why a woman may get pregnant intentionally against her partners wishes, (maybe she wants more kids, feels like se is missing her chance etc), but can we stop talking about "trapping" a man. Very few men nowadays will wed a girl just because she is pregnant, and the financial support he is obliged to provide is to support the child and not the mother.

Very few women find themselves financially better off getting pregnant and claiming child maintenance. So AIBU to think the 'trapped' narrative has had its day.

OP posts:
JandamiHash · 30/01/2025 17:35

SouthLondonMum22 · 30/01/2025 15:36

and lying isn't stupid?

Yes.

But that doesn’t mean men shouldn’t use condoms

MissFancyDay · 30/01/2025 17:34

ginasevern · 30/01/2025 17:27

I do know a number of married women who "accidentally" got pregnant with a third child which the DH definitely did not want. They said they were on the pill but had stopped. Having children in a stable, loving relationship should be a mutual decision. It isn't a woman's right to press ahead regardless.

Again, if a man, even in a stable relationship, one hundred percent wants no more children, then he should have a vasectomy, wear a condom, or accept that accidents might happen.
Of course some women may come off the pill and not tell their husbands, which is wrong, but men have to accept that if they want control over the amount of children they have it is THEIR responsibility and no one else's.

CheekyHobson · 30/01/2025 17:30

I imagine the number of women who are able to get pregnant to a man who is taking responsibility for not having a child is vanishingly small.

SouthLondonMum22 · 30/01/2025 17:28

tothelefttotheleft · 30/01/2025 17:21

@SouthLondonMum22

Why do you have no expectation that a man should take control of their fertility?

So what if a women says she's on the pill. It's not 100% effective. That's well known.

Why do men not play their part in preventing pregnancy?

It isn't going to be effective at all if she is lying about it.

Why do you have no expectation of honesty in a relationship?

ginasevern · 30/01/2025 17:27

I do know a number of married women who "accidentally" got pregnant with a third child which the DH definitely did not want. They said they were on the pill but had stopped. Having children in a stable, loving relationship should be a mutual decision. It isn't a woman's right to press ahead regardless.

MissFancyDay · 30/01/2025 17:25

SouthLondonMum22 · 30/01/2025 17:11

It definitely isn't reliable when you pretend to take it because you want a baby.

Aaaahhh, poor naive and trusting men, ensnared by all these terrible women...instead of just being responsible for their own lives.

tothelefttotheleft · 30/01/2025 17:21

@SouthLondonMum22

Why do you have no expectation that a man should take control of their fertility?

So what if a women says she's on the pill. It's not 100% effective. That's well known.

Why do men not play their part in preventing pregnancy?

Alaimo · 30/01/2025 17:18

In my marriage, I am the one who is adamant that I do not want children, DH is more ambivalent. I could not imagine DH having sole responsibility for us not getting pregnant. Even if DH wore a condom each time, there's no way I'd give up control over whether we'd have a baby or not. And yet so many men seem happy to make it their partner's responsibility/problem.

Alaimo · 30/01/2025 17:12

BananaNirvana · 30/01/2025 16:50

This has been done to death but I know of at least two friends who did this to their husbands - assured them they were sorting contraception and then a “whoops how did that happen?” pregnancy 🙄

But did they also use a condom or not?

It is mindblowing to me that if you don't want children that you would place 100% of the responsibility for that not happening on another person.

SouthLondonMum22 · 30/01/2025 17:11

MissFancyDay · 30/01/2025 16:48

The pill isn't 100% reliable though.

It definitely isn't reliable when you pretend to take it because you want a baby.

TheFlowersIKnew · 30/01/2025 17:11

When I see someone saying a person was trapped with a pregnancy, I've never seen it as trapped into marriage, rather trapped into parenthood. That does happen and I've known it personally a couple of times (all confirmed by the pregnant woman, definitely not just an assumption).

Maybe people are meaning this. Not marriage related at all, which I agree, a pregnancy definitely does not trap someone into!

SouthLondonMum22 · 30/01/2025 17:09

tothelefttotheleft · 30/01/2025 16:40

If only someone would invented something so that men could control if they have a child or not.....

If only people didn't lie about something so big in what is supposed to be a trusting relationship.

Boomer55 · 30/01/2025 17:05

JandamiHash · 30/01/2025 14:42

It’s not like women press a button and become pregnant. Men have to have sex with them. And they COULD use protection but choose not to, knowing it could result in pregnancy. The only disgusting thing about that is how stupid men are

And how stupid/irresponsible some women are, not protecting themselves from conceiving a baby with a man who doesn’t want them or the child. 🙄🤷‍♀️

It takes two - both should protect themselves against any unwanted results.

KimberleyClark · 30/01/2025 17:01

ForRealCat · 30/01/2025 15:54

Abortion is hugely traumatic. No woman should be forced to have an abortion on a mans say-so. That's fucking barbaric

I didn’t say anything about abortion. I was talking about contraception.

PalePurplePumpkin · 30/01/2025 16:58

Women should be able to talk about what they want without anyone trying to silence them OP.

Plus if you're so dead against it, it wasn't really a wise choice of thread subject, was it?

BananaNirvana · 30/01/2025 16:50

JandamiHash · 30/01/2025 14:38

Should’ve used a condom then. It’s not like they aren’t taught these things

This has been done to death but I know of at least two friends who did this to their husbands - assured them they were sorting contraception and then a “whoops how did that happen?” pregnancy 🙄

MissFancyDay · 30/01/2025 16:48

CherryPopShowerGel · 30/01/2025 16:43

If you think some women don't lie to their partners saying they're on the pill when they're not in order to get pregnant against his wishes then you've lived a very sheltered and naive life.

The pill isn't 100% reliable though.

heyhopotato · 30/01/2025 16:45

No it's still trapping him because he's trapped into paying for a human being he didn't agree to. He's also tied to that woman whether he likes it or not, for the next 18 years, through having to communicate about the child etc.

CherryPopShowerGel · 30/01/2025 16:43

If you think some women don't lie to their partners saying they're on the pill when they're not in order to get pregnant against his wishes then you've lived a very sheltered and naive life.

AcrossthePond55 · 30/01/2025 16:42

If you mean 'trapped' as in society at large will expect him to 'do the right thing', then yes it's a pretty much an antiquated idea. Unless there are family, cultural, or religious pressures then no he's not 'trapped'. Even then he can still walk away, it's just that he'll pay a price for it in being alienated by his family, church, or cultural 'group'.

I think the only 'trapped' other than that is what the man may feel himself, if he does feel anything. A man in a bad marriage may feel trapped at walking out on his wife and/or other children. A man with a conscience may feel trapped because he does feel some sense of responsibility for a child he's 'created'. But those men will also realize that it's at least partly of their own making by failure to use contraception.

And no, I don't feel that walking away but having to pay child maintenance is 'being trapped'. That's just the 'price' you pay for having sex.

But from time immemorial men have walked out on unwanted children without a backward glance, it's nothing new. And it was pretty rare that that man was completely 'ostracized' forever, they've always been able to get away with it after a period of finger pointing and tut-tutting. I'm from the generation of 'shotgun marriages' and it was always the girl/woman who paid the price in the end. The man or boy was forgiven after a bit because 'She must be no better than she should be. A nice girl/decent woman would have said NO in the first place'.

tothelefttotheleft · 30/01/2025 16:40

SouthLondonMum22 · 30/01/2025 14:34

Getting pregnant on purpose against a partners wishes is disgusting. Does that work?

If only someone would invented something so that men could control if they have a child or not.....

hazelnutvanillalatte · 30/01/2025 16:36

Every man I have ever known has known that with unprotected sex there is a risk of pregnancy, so yes agree

Catza · 30/01/2025 16:33

mashingwachine · 30/01/2025 14:37

Surely the trapping is the woman hoping he will stay because she loves him. That's what I always understood it to mean, women who have little self worth and think the man will love them and stay if they have a child to bind them together.

That's how I always envisioned it too. So many couples end up having a child (intentionally or not) in a hope that it would "fix" the marriage just to end up making it far far worse.

OwlInTheOak · 30/01/2025 16:31

Jacobeen · 30/01/2025 14:47

Compulsory reliable contraception for both men and women would be a good idea. And if they decided to bring a baby into being they would have to both sign to say they understood the long term commitment they were making. And only then could the contraception be removed. Like when you get a rescue animal. It has to be a considered and ratified move. I know it won’t happen…

There's no contraception other than condoms which doesn't have health impacts, and condoms fail, so that's not even possible.

ForRealCat · 30/01/2025 16:21

AlmostAJillSandwich · 30/01/2025 16:12

A persons desire to have a child, will never trump another persons desire to not have a child.
That you can "see why" some women intentionally get pregnant against their partners wishes is shocking and disgusting. Wanting another child or not wanting to miss her chance to be a mother, does not make it in any way acceptable to get pregnant by deception. She ALWAYS has the option of leaving the man who does not want a(nother) child, and finding a partner who does, or going the sperm donor option alone.
Wanting more children but wanting them to have the same father when he doesn't want more kids, or loving the man she is with and wanting the baby to be his hoping he'll stay after she "accidentally" gets pregnant when he desires to be childfree, or not wanting a donor father because then there's nobody to go after for financial support, are all 100% trapping the man.

Can't you see the emotional effect having an unwanted baby has on any person, regardless of their Gender? Quite rightly women should have the legal right to terminate an unwanted pregnancy, but men don't get the right to choose to end a pregnancy that they don't want, as it isn't happening inside their body. "He can just walk away" is bullshit, he will be forever mentally affected by the fact he has created a life, and theres the massive social stigma of abandoning your child if you don't want to be a parent. It's also a financial commitment he never wanted to have, that hes in for 18 years and affects every aspect of his life. It's not about the money supporting the child not the mother, it's about how that commitment then has a knock on effect and reduces what money he has to sustain the lifestyle he wants, which for some people who choose to be child free, is travel, which quickly becomes unaffordable when theres a child to provide for. Nobody should be allowed to effectively force someone into that position, hence "trapping" being a perfectly fitting term.

Imo in the case of accidental pregnancy, if a woman wants to proceed but the man does not, and the woman decides to continue knowing this, then it should be on the terms that the man is absolved of the legal commitment financially, as the woman is continuing the pregnancy knowing the man doesn't wish to have the child, and has the option to terminate if those conditions do not suit.

If she's intentionally gotten pregnant by lying about being on contraception, how is that any different to a man "stealthing" by taking a condom off mid sex? Stealthing is legally considered rape, because the consent was only given for protected sex. So, a woman lying about being on contraception to obtain unprotected sex by deception makes it sexual assault (since rape specifically requires the perpatrator to use a penis) making the women that do it abhorrent sex offenders.

How can you possibly "see why" someone intentionally commits sexual assault and think it's in any way understandable?!

I didn't say it was understandable. What I meant by see why- was that I acknowledge there are a number of reasons why a woman may get pregnant without her partners knowledge or consent. I am not saying it is acceptable, but on a thread where I wanted to discuss the idea that women get pregnant to secure financial support, rather than all the reasons why it may or may not happen.

Often when a woman gets pregnant we fall back on the idea that she does it to trap a man into financially supporting her, whereas in reality I don't feel that has been the reality for decades. I think we should challenge that particular stereotype.

If I hadn't acknowledged there are other reasons why a woman might do this it bogs down the argument. It doesnt mean I condone it

OP posts: