Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Ex pissed off im changing childcare arrangements. AIBU?

332 replies

Childcare101sans · 29/01/2025 08:27

Background (I have friends on here who will guess who I am with this info - please don’t out me!)

-I left my ex husband after I had an emotional affair with a woman
-I am now live with and in a LT relationship with her
-Ex inherited a house 6-7 years ago which we sold and we bought the family home which he lives in and up for sale
-he see’s the kids 2 hours after work twice a week and every other weekend
-when we broke up, because he earns little, I asked for 50% of the house, will count that as him providing for his kids and he doesn’t need to pay maintenance

Ive just found out I have a new job, I have moved up in my career rapidly and will be getting a higher paid banding.

It means I’m less flexible and have to be in the office 9-5 M-F

We currently and have never had childcare on Fridays, so I collect our primary age son from school every Friday and either keep him if it’s my weekend with the kids or drop him to his dads later if it’s his weekend.

Ive asked my ex if he will collect him from school on his Fridays and I will have to somehow figure out my Fridays since I will be starting this new job.

He’s gone mad.
He hasn’t said yes or no.
He’s just said “so I lose out on work and money while you go to work for more money?” (He’s self employed)

I feel like I’m providing for the three kids on a day to day basis and 4 hours less a month for him isn’t that much of a hit.

I live rurally and I’ve been searching for 2 weeks for alternative options.
No after school clubs.
No friends available for that time.
No other childminders or teens of friends that could help. My older kids work/don’t drive unable to help.
Im still trying to find alternatives but failing.

Am I being unreasonable changing the goal posts to benefit the fact that I have a new and better paid job?

OP posts:
Rosscameasdoody · 29/01/2025 11:32

biscuitsandbooks · 29/01/2025 11:28

@Childcare101sans but being suitably housed could mean that you private rent, or use your own money, or your new partners money - it just seems very callous that you chose to have an affair and then chose to walk off with 200k "in lieu of maintenance" knowing he was a low earner and would never come close to ever paying you that amount.

You ask why people bring up the inheritance and it's because it's all part of a bigger picture. When it comes to emotions you can't just isolate one part of the whole picture - a lot of your ex's current behaviour is likely due to how you behaved all those years ago.

You reap what you sow, as they say.

Can I ask why on earth you think it would be fair for OP to just walk away from their joint marital home and take nothing, despite having a financial interest in it and having care of their two children for 90% of the time ? And given that CMS don’t expect the partner of the NRP to contribute to childcare, why would you expect the OP’s partner to ?

JudgeJ · 29/01/2025 11:31

littleluncheon · 29/01/2025 08:45

If he's not paying maintenance then he should be doing 50% of the childcare.
Up his childcare hours so he's got them 7 nights a fortnight.

The OP is going to be getting 50% of his inheritance to which she wasn't entitled. it's what financed 'their' house.

KingTutting · 29/01/2025 11:30

If you find someone to sort your Friday issue then he will benefit anyways. He is responsible as it’s his day but you also need to find a solution. The main thing is he will need to pay for his days.

Does he have someone who could pick up for him, mother? Is he actually working Friday afternoons? My BIL makes a big fuss being self employed but he is often finished early afternoon most days anyway.
If he is so poorly paid should he be self employed, would he be better off in employment (although you have no control of this now).

biscuitsandbooks · 29/01/2025 11:30

I did mention upthread a little that some posts come across as advocating a kind of punishment for recognising your sexuality and not being prepared to live a lie.

Nobody has said OP should have lived a lie 🙄 they're saying that being gay isn't an excuse to have an affair - she could have just ended the marriage amicably first.

Ellie1015 · 29/01/2025 11:30

Yabu to title the post "changing childcare arramgements" sounds like childminder had them amd now moving to after school club. All of which would be none of his business. The problem is you want him to do a Fri afternoon. Perhaps he genuinely cant give up the flexibilty of being able to work Fridays or perhaps it is out of spite. It is rubbish he doesn't see it as good opportunity for extra time with child. There is nothing you can do to make him change unfortunately. Perhaps it can just confirm you made the right decsion to leave.

The finances and the housing are all seperate issues which you both previously agreed and arent really relevant. Neither is the emotional affair so dont think people should be jumping on that either.

For your own peace i would be focusing on solution rather than if ex being unreasonable.

Rosscameasdoody · 29/01/2025 11:29

Childcare101sans · 29/01/2025 11:23

I’m not sure they are.

I believe they feel that morally I should not be using 50% of the equity to house the children due to my emotional affair.

I did mention upthread a little that some posts come across as advocating a kind of punishment for recognising your sexuality and not being prepared to live a lie. I know you mentioned that the marriage was over by that point anyway, but that situation wouldn’t have been sustainable long term. MN is guilty of double standards sometimes and I think this is one of them.

biscuitsandbooks · 29/01/2025 11:28

@Childcare101sans but being suitably housed could mean that you private rent, or use your own money, or your new partners money - it just seems very callous that you chose to have an affair and then chose to walk off with 200k "in lieu of maintenance" knowing he was a low earner and would never come close to ever paying you that amount.

You ask why people bring up the inheritance and it's because it's all part of a bigger picture. When it comes to emotions you can't just isolate one part of the whole picture - a lot of your ex's current behaviour is likely due to how you behaved all those years ago.

You reap what you sow, as they say.

MsMarch · 29/01/2025 11:26

OP - you are getting very upset about people who are making moral statements about your affiar. But I notice you're largely ignoring posts who are pointing out that you are changing the goal posts and thats not okay.

I honestly don't give a toss that you had an affair. Even if HE had had the affair and that is why the relationship ended, I'd still say you are being unreasoable to just expect hi to suck it up now that you've agreed chidlcare and long-term financial arrangements.

The only bit where you having an affair might be relevant is that if you'd divorced amicably perhaps he'd be more willing to agree o a new solution.

Rosscameasdoody · 29/01/2025 11:26

Childcare101sans · 29/01/2025 11:22

Agreed. The original post was not about that.

Im wondering why people are trying to discuss the housing thing as well. 🤷‍♀️

Because this is MN and posters will pick an OP apart and concentrate on something totally irrelevant to the advice you’re looking for. In this case it’s because you happened to mention that your ex inherited a house and posters have skimmed past the fact that it was sold to buy your joint marital home, and that you contributed to that, because the narrative is that you cheated on your ex and then made off with half his inheritance !!

Childcare101sans · 29/01/2025 11:26

MissUltraViolet · 29/01/2025 11:23

Lots of talk by you about the children being housed securely but he also needs to provide this for them, which is probably why, being on a low income, he is worried about losing more money.

You’ve also not mentioned yet how you’re going to make your Friday work even if he ends up agreeing to it, seeing as you’ve exhausted all other options?

I have discussed and clarified both of these things.

OP posts:
Childcare101sans · 29/01/2025 11:23

Rosscameasdoody · 29/01/2025 11:21

Thanks for clarifying. I think a lot of posters are misreading your OP and think you actually lived in the inherited house as the marital home.

I’m not sure they are.

I believe they feel that morally I should not be using 50% of the equity to house the children due to my emotional affair.

OP posts:
MissUltraViolet · 29/01/2025 11:23

Lots of talk by you about the children being housed securely but he also needs to provide this for them, which is probably why, being on a low income, he is worried about losing more money.

You’ve also not mentioned yet how you’re going to make your Friday work even if he ends up agreeing to it, seeing as you’ve exhausted all other options?

aCatCalledFawkes · 29/01/2025 11:22

Childcare101sans · 29/01/2025 11:08

Anyone?

I think you are confusing a few things. Housing children could also be renting, Ultimately the house is your financial asset which is why it keeps being brought up.

Anyway, I don’t think anyone should be asked to cut there work hours back, especially if you don’t know there outgoings or debt, You need to find a solution that works round the children or of thought about it before accepting the job rather than relying on somebody unreliable. I earn a lot more than my ex and wouldn’t expect him to cut back paid work to accommodate my career, that money goes back in to our daughter when he does see her.

Childcare101sans · 29/01/2025 11:22

TheLargestToblerone · 29/01/2025 11:19

Am I being unreasonable changing the goal posts to benefit the fact that I have a new and better paid job?

Your OP was not about the children being housed securely. It was about you changing the goalposts in an agreed arrangement. You would have more of the moral highground about that if you hadn't cheated and were now trying to change the agreement to suit you and your job to the detriment of his.

Edited

Agreed. The original post was not about that.

Im wondering why people are trying to discuss the housing thing as well. 🤷‍♀️

OP posts:
Rosscameasdoody · 29/01/2025 11:21

Childcare101sans · 29/01/2025 10:50

No. It’s in both our names. I paid towards the mortgage and home.

Thanks for clarifying. I think a lot of posters are misreading your OP and think you actually lived in the inherited house as the marital home.

Childcare101sans · 29/01/2025 11:21

biscuitsandbooks · 29/01/2025 11:18

@Childcare101sans wow, you certainly have a way of twisting people's words don't you?

Nobody forced you to cheat, you could have done the decent thing and separated properly before finding another woman 🙄

Don't act like you and your kids are all hard done by when this was 100% a choice you made!

Im not twisting words.

I agree I could have handled things better.

I was leaving him anyway.

However none of the above, nor the affair negate the fact that the home is in both our names, and all three children should be suitably housed upon a division of the marriage.

OP posts:
Ceramiq · 29/01/2025 11:20

Childcare101sans · 29/01/2025 08:27

Background (I have friends on here who will guess who I am with this info - please don’t out me!)

-I left my ex husband after I had an emotional affair with a woman
-I am now live with and in a LT relationship with her
-Ex inherited a house 6-7 years ago which we sold and we bought the family home which he lives in and up for sale
-he see’s the kids 2 hours after work twice a week and every other weekend
-when we broke up, because he earns little, I asked for 50% of the house, will count that as him providing for his kids and he doesn’t need to pay maintenance

Ive just found out I have a new job, I have moved up in my career rapidly and will be getting a higher paid banding.

It means I’m less flexible and have to be in the office 9-5 M-F

We currently and have never had childcare on Fridays, so I collect our primary age son from school every Friday and either keep him if it’s my weekend with the kids or drop him to his dads later if it’s his weekend.

Ive asked my ex if he will collect him from school on his Fridays and I will have to somehow figure out my Fridays since I will be starting this new job.

He’s gone mad.
He hasn’t said yes or no.
He’s just said “so I lose out on work and money while you go to work for more money?” (He’s self employed)

I feel like I’m providing for the three kids on a day to day basis and 4 hours less a month for him isn’t that much of a hit.

I live rurally and I’ve been searching for 2 weeks for alternative options.
No after school clubs.
No friends available for that time.
No other childminders or teens of friends that could help. My older kids work/don’t drive unable to help.
Im still trying to find alternatives but failing.

Am I being unreasonable changing the goal posts to benefit the fact that I have a new and better paid job?

Yes of course your exH needs to pick your DS up from school on Friday EOW! You might need to get your solicitor involved here.

TheLargestToblerone · 29/01/2025 11:19

Childcare101sans · 29/01/2025 11:14

I see!

So because I had an emotional affair, the children should not be housed as securely.
Gotcha.

Am I being unreasonable changing the goal posts to benefit the fact that I have a new and better paid job?

Your OP was not about the children being housed securely. It was about you changing the goalposts in an agreed arrangement. You would have more of the moral highground about that if you hadn't cheated and were now trying to change the agreement to suit you and your job to the detriment of his.

Childcare101sans · 29/01/2025 11:18

femfemlicious · 29/01/2025 11:17

Not necessarily. You are very likely to leave at least 50% of the house to your partner/ husband/wife!

Not according to my Will. 😊

OP posts:
biscuitsandbooks · 29/01/2025 11:18

@Childcare101sans wow, you certainly have a way of twisting people's words don't you?

Nobody forced you to cheat, you could have done the decent thing and separated properly before finding another woman 🙄

Don't act like you and your kids are all hard done by when this was 100% a choice you made!

ERthree · 29/01/2025 11:17

Childcare101sans · 29/01/2025 10:54

Ok so question.

If I hadn’t had an emotional affair, and we broke up because I’m gay, THEN would it be ok to have 50% of the home to make sure our children are housed?

What has being gay got to do with your low morals and high demands?

femfemlicious · 29/01/2025 11:17

Childcare101sans · 29/01/2025 09:24

Better for me?

Im housing his three children. All of which will benefit from the home upon my death.

Not necessarily. You are very likely to leave at least 50% of the house to your partner/ husband/wife!

biscuitsandbooks · 29/01/2025 11:15

@Rosscameasdoody her sexuality is irrelevant- being gay doesn't give you a free pass to cheat on your partner.

If OP was unhappy she could have just left. Absolutely no need to cheat.

RareFinch · 29/01/2025 11:14

Viviennemary · 29/01/2025 11:11

If I was that man I would be as awkward as I possibly could be. OP is in the wrong, had an affair. Walks away with her ex D h's inheritance and is now quibbling over a Friday pick up. He should have sat tight in the so called marital home.

If your partner had an affair you would be a shit parent to your DC to make your exs life harder? It sounds like the inheritance has been her exs only contribution to raising the DC. He refused to get a stable job, do or pay for any childcare during their marriage. No wonder she had a bloody affair!

Childcare101sans · 29/01/2025 11:14

biscuitsandbooks · 29/01/2025 11:12

I think you'd have more of the moral high ground if you hadn't cheated, yes.

I see!

So because I had an emotional affair, the children should not be housed as securely.
Gotcha.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread