Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Circumcision should be banned.

634 replies

ArabellaScott · 24/01/2025 14:44

https://www.secularism.org.uk/news/2025/01/judge-and-parents-call-for-boys-to-be-protected-from-circumcision

Article describes an upsetting case of two doctors performing these ops without anesthesia, and with sometimes serious side effects. One boy nearly died.

The National Secular Society is running a concurrent campaign to ban all 'religious cutting' - that includes both FGM and male circumcision. I wholeheartedly agree that no baby or child should suffer in this way. More info:

https://www.secularism.org.uk/religious-surgery/

YABU - circumcision for religous reasons is fine
YANBU - circumcision should be banned (unless there is a medical reason)

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
SleepyHippy3 · 24/01/2025 22:13

Why are we applying religious traditions, from a few thousands of years ago, to modern day living, when every day life has so very obviously changed and advanced? Its like when people talk about the seeming positives of these ancient, archaic religions and say, in their defence, things like „”my religion gives women rights” etc etc. But we are in 2025. There are robust human rights, enshrined in law, giving all human beings, including women and children, basic fundamental freedoms and rights. And yet, given all of this, we permit these ancient religious laws, thousands of years later, dictate certain rules around modern day living? How is that right?

Redoubchair · 24/01/2025 22:11

Magnastorm · 24/01/2025 22:02

It's a fair point though, isn't it.

Deliberately causing pain to an unconsenting child for no good reason is a pretty good example of abuse.

Just try to argue otherwise.

Edited

The point I was trying to make was this: if that's the definition of child abuse - causing children pain unnecessarily, all parents are abusers (including you, if you're a parent). There's no parent alive who hasn't deliberately caused their child pain. Had a divorce? You caused your child pain. Got into a different relationship? Pain. Had a sibling? Probably pain as well (though of course it has benefits as could being in a happier relationship). My point isn't that circumcision doesn't cause pain, it's that looking at it from such a narrow viewpoint is too simplistic

Edited to add: even correcting a child's behaviour is likely to cause then pain. So a more nuanced argument against circumcision would hold more water and likely influence more people against the practice...which I guess is the whole point rather than being inflammatory for it's own sake

ticktickticktickBOOM · 24/01/2025 22:10

The unnecessary mutilation of a child's genitals should always be illegal.

There's something really fucking weird about how humans have come to view this as an acceptable way to treat children.

Icanttakethisanymore · 24/01/2025 22:08

Redoubchair · 24/01/2025 21:53

True but lots of parents harm their kids unnecessarily. Does that make them all abusers? Lots of things we all do as parents has been proven to be harmful, including the relationships with their dads or other men. Our job choices, childcare choices etc I think most parents are doing their best, though they cause harm along the way. Doesn't make all parents abusers in my book to be honest

*Edited for spelling

Edited

I suppose I agree to an extent. No parent perfectly protects their children 100% of the time, that’s surely true. I suppose whereas o think of circumcision as being such an ‘active’ choice (because it’s not part of my culture) I am perhaps judging it more harshly. Perhaps if the default was to circumcise then I’d think of it differently.

PepeParapluie · 24/01/2025 22:08

Redoubchair · 24/01/2025 21:53

True but lots of parents harm their kids unnecessarily. Does that make them all abusers? Lots of things we all do as parents has been proven to be harmful, including the relationships with their dads or other men. Our job choices, childcare choices etc I think most parents are doing their best, though they cause harm along the way. Doesn't make all parents abusers in my book to be honest

*Edited for spelling

Edited

There is a world of difference between doing your best day to day and getting things wrong which inadvertently ‘harm’ your children and deliberately subjecting them to a medically unnecessary surgical procedure which will permanently affect them though, isn’t there?

ArabellaScott · 24/01/2025 22:07

Cunningfungus · 24/01/2025 20:25

No - we don’t need to help men’s issues. Let them do that for themselves.

I'm classing this as a child issue. And I do think that is everyone's responsibility, whatever the sex of the child.

OP posts:
ArabellaScott · 24/01/2025 22:02

PepeParapluie · 24/01/2025 21:27

Yes totally. It’s interesting that circumcision is prevalent e.g in the US where as you say, there should be access to proper information and where religion is less of a motivator. I suppose it shows how strong prevailing cultural influence can be, even in countries that would consider themselves ‘enlightened’ or advanced.

That's a very good point.

OP posts:
Magnastorm · 24/01/2025 22:02

Redoubchair · 24/01/2025 21:53

Ah well, if that's how you think...

It's a fair point though, isn't it.

Deliberately causing pain to an unconsenting child for no good reason is a pretty good example of abuse.

Just try to argue otherwise.

admirible · 24/01/2025 22:00

Yes it should be banned, because banning things always make things better.

Thegoatliesdownonbroadway · 24/01/2025 22:00

A small aside. Should they turn out to be transsexuals and want MTF surgery, if circumcised, penile inversion isn't possible, which apparently gives a better result than scrotal inversion.

PepeParapluie · 24/01/2025 21:58

CoralHare · 24/01/2025 21:57

There is a HUGE difference between male circumcision (done safely and with anesthetic) and FGM. Anyone conflating the two lacks any credence. Male circumcision is an very significant religious and cultural practice AND does not cause any long term harm to men. I’m not ‘for’ it and haven’t had any personal part in it, but banning it would be an extreme level of religious intolerance without just cause.

You might want to read the thread re your assertion that it causes no long term harm, several posters have shared information that shows that’s clearly incorrect - perhaps not all men will suffer long term effects, perhaps the majority won’t, but you can’t say it causes no harm ever.

CoralHare · 24/01/2025 21:57

There is a HUGE difference between male circumcision (done safely and with anesthetic) and FGM. Anyone conflating the two lacks any credence. Male circumcision is an very significant religious and cultural practice AND does not cause any long term harm to men. I’m not ‘for’ it and haven’t had any personal part in it, but banning it would be an extreme level of religious intolerance without just cause.

ChiliFiend · 24/01/2025 21:54

In my family we call this "male genital mutilation."

Redoubchair · 24/01/2025 21:53

namechangeGOT · 24/01/2025 21:41

Plus just to say, this comment is unnecessarily inflammatory. I'd delete it if I were you

@Redoubchair

Why on earth would I ask for a comment I 100% stand by to be deleted? I find people who mutilate their children without medical need to be 'inflammatory'. So, they stop doing it to their children and I'll ask for my post to be deleted. Deal?

Ah well, if that's how you think...

Redoubchair · 24/01/2025 21:53

Icanttakethisanymore · 24/01/2025 21:42

although I don’t have first hand experience, I can definitely imagine these are difficult conversations. I’m sure that millions of perfectly good parents have circumcised their babies because it’s the cultural / religious norm. There but for the grace of god go I. However, if harming your child unnecessarily is abuse and someone asks you whether that makes those millions of people child abusers…what’s the answer? I’m struggling to find an answer that’s not ‘yes’

True but lots of parents harm their kids unnecessarily. Does that make them all abusers? Lots of things we all do as parents has been proven to be harmful, including the relationships with their dads or other men. Our job choices, childcare choices etc I think most parents are doing their best, though they cause harm along the way. Doesn't make all parents abusers in my book to be honest

*Edited for spelling

Icanttakethisanymore · 24/01/2025 21:50

torkandgrunt · 24/01/2025 17:08

I was circumcised within days of being born. Our family doctor was adamant that the foreskin served no useful purpose, and increased the possibility of infection.
In later years, I was happy with having been circumcised and always flinched at the idea of a penis that was "uncut."
I will have to reread this thread to see if there are posts from women who express any preference either way in respect of partners

No one here is talking about what adult women think about adult men’s dicks. We’re discussing whether it’s ok to chip a bit of skin off a newborn baby gif no medical purpose.

namechangeGOT · 24/01/2025 21:48

White woman's burden hanging heavily today?

@Porcuporpoise

Your assumption that I am white is quite telling!

AliasGrace47 · 24/01/2025 21:47

ditalini · 24/01/2025 17:46

If men want to get this amazing sensitivity that Gloria's suggesting, there's nothing stopping them paying to have their foreskin lopped when they're old enough to consent to other modifications such as a genital piercing or a tattoo.

Equally, if men think it's worth getting their foreskin lopped to lower their risk of HIV, they can pay to have it removed when they're old enough. With the advantage that they'll also be old enough to consult with the doctor re: how much they want removed.

If a man wants to show his commitment to the covenant with his deity he can pay to do so when he's old enough to consent to such a radical procedure. Arguably it would be a more valuable sacrifice since it would be freely given rather than taken.

Just to add, Steinem doesn't support circumcision. She was just quoting an argument that some pro circumcision people used, but concludes that there's no proved increase in pleasure, despite a few doctors' claims, & a lot of cons. While her historical analysis can be sketchy, I think she's right that the influence of patriarchy in religions is a major cause : setting men apart as superior, but in a painful way that ensures they conform to the dictates of God & male leaders.

Tricho · 24/01/2025 21:44

SquaredShoulders · 24/01/2025 15:23

Attempting to yoke male circumcision together with FGM is trolling, a bit. The former is a pretty small procedure with trivial hygiene/health benefits and no lifelong downsides. It’s also impractical to outlaw it whilst it remains a religious practice for two major world religions.

no lifelong downsides? at all? not one?

ok.

thats incorrect but go off

Porcuporpoise · 24/01/2025 21:43

namechangeGOT · 24/01/2025 21:41

Plus just to say, this comment is unnecessarily inflammatory. I'd delete it if I were you

@Redoubchair

Why on earth would I ask for a comment I 100% stand by to be deleted? I find people who mutilate their children without medical need to be 'inflammatory'. So, they stop doing it to their children and I'll ask for my post to be deleted. Deal?

White woman's burden hanging heavily today?

Icanttakethisanymore · 24/01/2025 21:42

Redoubchair · 24/01/2025 21:21

I do think it's best to be scientific about topics like this, factual and unemotional as that's more likely to actually influence people. When I've had conversations on this topic with acquaintances who belong to religions that practice circumcision, factual conversations have been really positive. They have mentioned that they get lots of people looking down on their decisions and saying they hurt their children for no reason but pointed out that the "social and moral decay" and family unit breakdown in our UK culture causes far more hurt to children than circumcision ever will and I wasn't sure how to respond to that. It's better to present facts as that gets you further, in my opinion

although I don’t have first hand experience, I can definitely imagine these are difficult conversations. I’m sure that millions of perfectly good parents have circumcised their babies because it’s the cultural / religious norm. There but for the grace of god go I. However, if harming your child unnecessarily is abuse and someone asks you whether that makes those millions of people child abusers…what’s the answer? I’m struggling to find an answer that’s not ‘yes’

namechangeGOT · 24/01/2025 21:41

Plus just to say, this comment is unnecessarily inflammatory. I'd delete it if I were you

@Redoubchair

Why on earth would I ask for a comment I 100% stand by to be deleted? I find people who mutilate their children without medical need to be 'inflammatory'. So, they stop doing it to their children and I'll ask for my post to be deleted. Deal?

AliasGrace47 · 24/01/2025 21:38

Thegoatliesdownonbroadway · 24/01/2025 21:33

Some relatives of the grooming gangs blamed the girls for leading their men astray and the parents of the girls, not the groomers themselves.

Tbf girls do tend to be more likely to dress skimpily on average than boys. Though I don't agree, I don't have an issue w religious morality against skimpy clothes, as long as it's evenly applied to both sexes. & not used to victim blame...

AliasGrace47 · 24/01/2025 21:35

PepeParapluie · 24/01/2025 21:27

Yes totally. It’s interesting that circumcision is prevalent e.g in the US where as you say, there should be access to proper information and where religion is less of a motivator. I suppose it shows how strong prevailing cultural influence can be, even in countries that would consider themselves ‘enlightened’ or advanced.

I'm not sure how enlightened the US is tbh.. Eg in 2013 1/3 of the population thought homosexuality should be illegal. Look at the influence of Bible-is-the-literal-word-of-God style Christianity, creationism etc. There's a lot of regional variations ofc, but I think overall the culture of religion can discourage critical thinking. Across the board they seem prone to getting swept up in riots & extreme thinking.

Thegoatliesdownonbroadway · 24/01/2025 21:33

Redoubchair · 24/01/2025 21:25

It was both but you're right, primarily girls who they felt dressed in ways they didn't agree with...showing excess skin, barely clothes were phrases used etc

Some relatives of the grooming gangs blamed the girls for leading their men astray and the parents of the girls, not the groomers themselves.

Swipe left for the next trending thread