To wonder if Starmer can survive the vibe-shift?

Why not just start another petition demanding a general election, it went so well last time....

Showing your true colours now ( and that’s colour NOT color) .

It’s basic

start now with all the posts using phrases like “hanging on” or “can’t survive”. Build up the association with those phrases over time. You don’t have to post anything of substance or even truthful, just keep banging the posts in with the bingo phrase…

I made clear that I meant those who posted on social media expressing their discomfort about migration levels have been jailed for dissidence

No you did not make that clear when you talked about political dissidents. If you think I have smeared you report to MNHQ and they will remove the offending post if they agree. I seem to have touched a nerve.

Anyway Starmer isn't going anywhere or changing tack in the near future, because there's simply no need for him to do so. He has a huge parliamentary majority and the opposition remains fractured. Though I suspect he may stand down about a year or so before the next general election.

What a weird thread. The US President doesn't get to select the UK Prime Minister, any more than we get any say in who becomes US president. Starmer has a large parliamentary majority so I don't think he is going anywhere for the time being.

Apparently so. And always with the ‘bot’ accusation at the op within a couple of posts.

He dealt very well with the Southport murders, no gun was used, so i assume you re yet another "bad actor"

No one from the UK would make that mistake.

No one has been jailed for posting discomfort!

you care about misinformation, don’t post it yourself

He got 4 and half years and a massive majority in parliament. A week can be a long time in politics.

Tory are still main opposition party - and they are in disarray really still - and other parties aren't having huge media interest at minute. The pollsters think at moment - it all over the place a snap election would likely by a collation government but time can and will hugely impact that.

I wouldn't say Starmer's* *doing great - but there are lots of built up problems no-one really got great plans to deal with.

UK tends to be more on left than USA based policies and while some Trump polices may be agreed with doesn't mean everything he does will be - and frankly while we may all speak English thus share a language our politics and culture do differ hugely and that's not always well understood.

No, Kamala lost as she was a late replacement for Joe Biden, a man who was struggling with his age.

The US economy has been through a period of high inflation and the last government to the blame for that.

The more cynical part of me thinks that Trump won a he realised a significant part of the US electorate are racist morons who are happy to blame immigration for all of the countries ills. He then pandered to them. A unprincipled wanker who just desires power.

I think people are so used to the Tories changing leaders, they think it’s a given.

Starmer has a mandate for 5 years. Let’s wait more than six months to see what he makes of it.

I think most people in most west democracies have realised that left and right are just different colours of shit and on a day-to-day basis neither make much difference to how most people live. For years, all politician of all hues have been promising the earth and none of them have delivered. No one has any new vision, new hope, or new ideas. We're all just going to trundle on forever until capitalism completely collapses, or we all drown under rising sea levels, or we get wiped out by an asteroid like the dinosaurs - all possibly all three.

Those that don’t see a difference are either not paying attention, or don’t want to see

its hugely different to the previous government

That bubble is called the countryside. People are really very unhappy about Labour's dekulakisation.

God who remembers that thread way back in the summer that said the right wing were better losers than the left? 😂 Well these endless, endless threads about Starmer and Labour sure would suggest otherwise

I do think Trump is sexist and maybe not the most moral person, I don't disagree with all of his views though he is right on some things.
Starmer is a weak leader and just more of the same.. I honestly don't see a difference between the tories and Labour at this point. He made a right cock up in his response to the Southport shootings.
That's my opinion really I don't have a problem..

Could resign, could be pushed, could be dragged out in chains by US Marines.

Let's see.

That isn't true is it about not calling British MPs names. Nice try though.

No we haven't, we've just done what they wanted... Iraq war for starters, they were dead against us defending the Falklands too.

When it came to contracts for rebuilding Iraq, the French got the lions share of ones given to European countries, UK missed out.

They fucked us over Afghanistan too.

Oh and took over 2 years to help us out in WW2.

😁 Right

I guess he had his fingers crossed that the pound would tank, the cost of borrowing would rise, that the treasury would borrow more than four billion extra than the extra detailed in the autumn budget, that there'll need to have a spring budget to do another round of tax rises and that welfare cuts would have to go harder and deeper than they imagined, that the party would have to u-turn on grooming gang national inquiries because they labelled the 77% of the population who considered it a necessity as far right, that his corruptions minister would be corrupt, that his foreign minister doesn't know where Lybia is, that Louise Haigh would have to resign, that everyone would know that he is too cheap to pay for his own clothes, how very clever.

So, now we've got the shit out of the way, when do you think we'll see the good stuff?

Thé majority of the responses on this thread show why Kamala lost.

Why would he do that? Who do you think would replace him?