Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think couples who can’t afford IVF shouldn’t try to crowdfund it?

305 replies

DearOpalFinch · 20/01/2025 10:37

Having a baby is a personal choice. Is it fair to expect strangers to pay for it?

OP posts:
Lavender376 · 20/01/2025 12:37

I don’t understand the logic behind this at all. Anyone can ask for help. I count myself lucky that I didn’t need to.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 20/01/2025 12:36

DearOpalFinch · 20/01/2025 11:13

I see your point. I agree, there are many situations where crowdfunding feels entirely appropriate even if the circumstances are deeply personal. The examples you mention reflect that; helping someone rebuild after a house fire addresses urgent, life-altering needs where the stakes are immediate and tangible.

I think my hesitation around something like crowdfunding for IVF stems from the fact that it’s a personal, long-term choice rather than an immediate crisis. It’s not about saying IVF is less valid - far from it - but the lines between private and public feel different in those cases.

That said, you’re right that it’s hard to draw a clear line. It’s likely a matter of personal perspective and maybe I’m overthinking it. I just wonder if crowdfunding for personal decisions like having a child - or even a dream wedding for example - signals a shift in how we see responsibility and support.

IVF is actually urgent for a lot of people. The earlier you have it, the more likely it is to work. This is why my friend, despite theoretically being entitled to three cycles on the NHS, ended up abandoning that route and going private at vast expense. Because what is the point of getting three cycles on the NHS if you have to wait so long that you have almost zero chance of it working?

My friend was able to ask her and her partner's families for financial assistance to go private.

I can totally understand why people crowdfund if time is of the essence and they don't have wealthy family able to chip in.

QuimCarrey · 20/01/2025 12:35

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 20/01/2025 12:34

You are saying it's wrong to crowdfund for it though. That's literally what it says in your thread title. That they shouldn't do it.

Yes, the OPs argument is getting less coherent with repetition.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 20/01/2025 12:34

DearOpalFinch · 20/01/2025 11:06

That’s not what I’m saying at all. I absolutely don’t think IVF is a selfish indulgence - it’s a deeply personal and often heartbreaking journey for many people. My point is more about how crowdfunding changes the dynamics of what’s considered private and public.

Taxes, in theory, are about creating a system that benefits everyone collectively, including families and children, which is why things like maternity care and child support are included. But crowdfunding feels different because it’s a direct, personal appeal to individuals, often strangers, to support a specific cause.

I’m not saying it’s wrong to crowdfund for IVF - I understand why people do it. I just think it raises broader questions about where we draw the line for what’s appropriate to ask for publicly and whether that shift in boundaries is something we’re comfortable with. It’s less about IVF specifically and more about the growing role of crowdfunding in deeply personal matters.

You are saying it's wrong to crowdfund for it though. That's literally what it says in your thread title. That they shouldn't do it.

DaDaDoDaiDa · 20/01/2025 12:34

LochKatrine · 20/01/2025 12:30

You said you didn't "believe" in it. It exists. Your choice to donate, or not.

Since you seem unfamiliar with this common phrase, I will help by directing you to meaning 2. here:

To think couples who can’t afford IVF shouldn’t try to crowdfund it?
Unpaidviewer · 20/01/2025 12:33

I didn't chose to suffer from infertility. We eventually had a baby without IVF but I feel for women who have to go through that. Those who fell pregnant easily will never understand.

So maybe it's because I've experienced some of what these women go through but I'm far more likely to donate to these kind of crowdfunders than others.

LochKatrine · 20/01/2025 12:33

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 20/01/2025 12:31

I think this is OK. No one is forced to donate.

I know, I do wonder why some people don't twig that. Give/don't give 🙍

mindutopia · 20/01/2025 12:32

My friend (‘work acquaintance I have on social media’) recently crowdfunded money for dinners out because she went on holiday with her parents and they got in a fight and they all refused to have meals together on holiday after that, but she has no savings, so set up a GFM so she could eat out without them for the rest of her trip. 🤷🏻‍♀️ She had some lovely brunches and dinners by the looks of it. World is your oyster if you’re willing to ask I suppose!

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 20/01/2025 12:31

I think this is OK. No one is forced to donate.

LochKatrine · 20/01/2025 12:30

DaDaDoDaiDa · 20/01/2025 12:29

Hence I said 'there's nothing to stop people trying it' 🙄

You said you didn't "believe" in it. It exists. Your choice to donate, or not.

DaDaDoDaiDa · 20/01/2025 12:29

LochKatrine · 20/01/2025 12:24

It doesn't matter whether you "believe" in it or not. It happens. Don't donate, it's entirely voluntary.

Hence I said 'there's nothing to stop people trying it' 🙄

LlynTegid · 20/01/2025 12:28

I am OK with this, it is an individual choice to donate or not. The crowdfunding I am not happy with is where someone faces expenditure which could have been avoided by reasonable steps, such as those who went on holiday without travel insurance and became ill.

Greyish2025 · 20/01/2025 12:27

DearOpalFinch · 20/01/2025 12:20

I think there’s a big difference between societal safety nets, like child/childcare-related benefits, and crowdfunding for something as specific and personal as IVF. Benefits are part of a broader social contract, where everyone contributes through taxes to support families and children, recognising that raising the next generation benefits society as a whole.

Crowdfunding, on the other hand, feels more personal and targeted - it’s about asking individuals for support in a way that’s often tied to emotional appeals rather than collective responsibility. I think that’s where the discomfort arises for me. It’s not that I think people shouldn’t ask for help if they need it but it does raise questions about fairness and access.

For example, would someone who doesn’t have a compelling story or wide network be less likely to succeed in crowdfunding, even if their need is just as great? It’s an interesting contrast to public benefits, which are more structured and, ideally, equitable.

You are pretty much saying the same thing over and over again but phrasing it differently

mossylog · 20/01/2025 12:27

Whenever a friend is raising money— for a charity run, a new wheelchair, whatevever — I always chuck in £5-£20 because they're my friend and it's not a big deal.

YouveGotAFastCar · 20/01/2025 12:27

DearOpalFinch · 20/01/2025 10:43

I guess what bothers me is the underlying idea that some things, like having a baby, are deeply personal choices. Crowdfunding makes it feel like those personal decisions are being shared in a way that almost expects others to take responsibility for them.

I think it’s great if people want to help, but it also raises questions for me about what we consider appropriate to ask for support with. Would we feel the same if someone crowdfunded for something like plastic surgery or luxury expenses? I suppose it’s not so much about the asking itself but the way it changes the boundaries of what’s considered private and public.

Loads of people do. There used to be popular sites where women could post “appeals” for money towards boob jobs, and men could donate and then request photos. Plenty of people crowdfund for holidays or new furniture or moving costs, many are nowhere near destitute.

I’d rather eat my own eyeball than crowdfund for anything, but I know a mum who has recently raised £250k for her 4 year old to go to the US for cancer treatment; and I’m full of admiration for her. I’d hope I could get the hang of it in that situation! It could be life changing for them.

MrsBobtonTrent · 20/01/2025 12:27

It should be a free choice whether to donate or not donate to crowdfunding. But personally we are increasingly finding ourselves being pressured into donating. Two people (one a friend and one a family member) repeatedly asking for donations for something uncritical they should save up and pay for themselves imo. And a family member who wants ivf which I don't think would be a good idea (addiction issues, older single woman with no steady job and no fallback to look after the child if something happens to her). And yet the pressure if constantly there. Every meet up or event in the wider family is spent discussing the (nonexistant) baby, who has contributed, who hasn't. It's an absolute circus and increasingly difficult to opt out of.

LochKatrine · 20/01/2025 12:24

DaDaDoDaiDa · 20/01/2025 12:23

I don't believe in crowdfunding for selfish enterprises. There's nothing to stop people trying it but they should be aware others will judge them.

It doesn't matter whether you "believe" in it or not. It happens. Don't donate, it's entirely voluntary.

LyingWitchInTheWardrobe · 20/01/2025 12:24

If I don’t want to donate I can still wish them well. No one is making anyone else be a judgey cow to those in desperate situations they themselves have never faced

Might also be a judgey bull...

LochKatrine · 20/01/2025 12:23

DearOpalFinch · 20/01/2025 12:20

I think there’s a big difference between societal safety nets, like child/childcare-related benefits, and crowdfunding for something as specific and personal as IVF. Benefits are part of a broader social contract, where everyone contributes through taxes to support families and children, recognising that raising the next generation benefits society as a whole.

Crowdfunding, on the other hand, feels more personal and targeted - it’s about asking individuals for support in a way that’s often tied to emotional appeals rather than collective responsibility. I think that’s where the discomfort arises for me. It’s not that I think people shouldn’t ask for help if they need it but it does raise questions about fairness and access.

For example, would someone who doesn’t have a compelling story or wide network be less likely to succeed in crowdfunding, even if their need is just as great? It’s an interesting contrast to public benefits, which are more structured and, ideally, equitable.

So, your problem isn't with the privacy or public sharing of infertility?
You don't have a problem with IVF?
It's crowdfunding and fundraising per se?

DaDaDoDaiDa · 20/01/2025 12:23

I don't believe in crowdfunding for selfish enterprises. There's nothing to stop people trying it but they should be aware others will judge them.

miniaturepixieonacid · 20/01/2025 12:22

Nothing wrong with asking as long as no pressure is put on anybody (which I don't think crowdfunding does.) It's much better than putting people on the spot by asking them to their face.

If it was my sister or one of my cousins I'd give everything I could afford.
If it was a friend I'd make a donation.
If it was someone I barely knew I'd just scroll past.

Nothing wrong with any of those reactions and, as long as the crowdfunders accept them all, there's nothing wrong with what they're doing, imo.

IdaFlowers · 20/01/2025 12:21

It wouldn't bother me, as long as I wasn't forced to contribute. Having a child isn't a frivolous want. We are going to need people to be paying taxes and keeping the country running in future. They may have an income which would enable them to support a child but not the money upfront to spend on IVF. Some are lucky and have no issues getting pregnant. It's not their fault they aren't lucky. I'd be less impressed at someone wanting me to fund their holiday or lack of travel insurance.

MissDoubleU · 20/01/2025 12:21

DearOpalFinch · 20/01/2025 12:01

Interesting comparison. I agree that inherited wealth or financial gifts from family are also forms of external support that can massively shape someone’s opportunities in life. The difference, I think, lies in the level of public involvement. Inheritance or family gifts are typically private, while crowdfunding brings a personal situation into the public sphere in a way that invites scrutiny or judgment, whether intended or not. That’s where I feel the discomfort - how public and emotionally charged these campaigns can become.

I don’t think there’s anything wrong with people asking for help if they need it and I certainly wouldn’t want to deny anyone the opportunity to explore crowdfunding. My point is more about how it reflects a wider conversation about fairness and access. For example, if someone’s ability to have a child is determined by how compellingly they can share their story or how much emotional appeal they can create, it highlights how uneven the playing field is for something as significant as starting a family.

You’re absolutely right that many people live without inherited wealth or safety nets, and they face barriers others can’t imagine. It’s not about denying anyone the chance to ask for help - it’s about grappling with the broader implications of using crowdfunding as a solution for deeply personal needs and how it reflects systemic issues of inequality.

You say it invites judgment and scrutiny and yet, you can choose not to engage in these things with relative ease. You can accept the profound privilege gifted at your birth, that you have never been in the position to have to ask for this help publicly.

You seem to recognise it is an incredible privilege to maintain the privacy allowed to people who can get everything they want through accumulated wealth, yet do not recognise that the great injustice to those that don’t. You would rather engage in public discourse cutting down these people and joining in their judgement.

I say, let people find whatever happiness they can. The great majority of these crowd fundings never reach their goal and I don’t think anyone crowd funding anything like IVF or private medical treatment takes any great joy in having to beg strangers for even just £1.

If I don’t want to donate I can still wish them well. No one is making anyone else be a judgey cow to those in desperate situations they themselves have never faced

DearOpalFinch · 20/01/2025 12:20

Redoubchair · 20/01/2025 11:43

@DearOpalFinch would you say there should be no child/childcare -related benefits given to families then? Because they should be able to afford to raise their children on their own?

I think there’s a big difference between societal safety nets, like child/childcare-related benefits, and crowdfunding for something as specific and personal as IVF. Benefits are part of a broader social contract, where everyone contributes through taxes to support families and children, recognising that raising the next generation benefits society as a whole.

Crowdfunding, on the other hand, feels more personal and targeted - it’s about asking individuals for support in a way that’s often tied to emotional appeals rather than collective responsibility. I think that’s where the discomfort arises for me. It’s not that I think people shouldn’t ask for help if they need it but it does raise questions about fairness and access.

For example, would someone who doesn’t have a compelling story or wide network be less likely to succeed in crowdfunding, even if their need is just as great? It’s an interesting contrast to public benefits, which are more structured and, ideally, equitable.

OP posts:
theescapeladder · 20/01/2025 12:20

YABVU

Infertility is utterly devastating and soul-destroying.

People go to great lengths in their struggle to overcome it, often finding themselves bankrupt in the process.

Do you/would you condemn cancer sufferers asking for help with - sometimes similarly hopeless - treatments in the same way?