Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Tories and Labour mooting possible means testing of State Pension

578 replies

Turmerictolly · 17/01/2025 20:58

www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/jan/17/kemi-badenoch-pensions-triple-lock-means-test-alarm-tories

I would be so gutted if this happened but there's noise from both parties about this recently. I think it might be inevitable. What will happen to those of us nearing 60 who have made plans that include the full state pension we've paid contributions for?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
Miley1967 · 19/01/2025 20:42

Coldanddamp · 19/01/2025 20:33

I know a few people (relatives) who get AA, they all holiday regularly.

Do they seem to have many difficulties with health/ disabilities ? Myself and my colleagues are frequently amazed at who gets awarded it and we do see people in their own homes when we fill out the forms. I had one guy awarded it recently and he was still riding a bike daily although did have some minor mh struggles? I honestly thought his claim would get thrown out straight away but no- he was awarded AA and then a load of pension credit on top, all council tax paid etc. I'm amazed how easy it is to get yet so hard for younger people to get awarded PIP. I think things really need to change. I'm not sure about means testing but I regularly help people to claim it and they have 200K + in the bank. I'm not disputing that many who do claim it do have significant disability, but a lot seem to get awarded it based on not a lot.

cakeorwine · 19/01/2025 20:40

Coldanddamp · 19/01/2025 20:37

And I'm not saying for one second they don't have impairments or disabilities but I just don't understand why it isn't means tested.

But it comes down to the same stuff - if it's means tested, then it will have a cliff edge like other means tested stuff, so there will be people who get it who have little money, people who have lots of money and who don't need the extra AA and then people who are just over the threshold and who lose out.

NormaleKartoffeln · 19/01/2025 20:39

Good.
Pretty much all other benefits are either means tested and/or assessed on some other qualifying need.

cakeorwine · 19/01/2025 20:37

Coldanddamp · 19/01/2025 20:33

I know a few people (relatives) who get AA, they all holiday regularly.

Do you think they are "ill enough" and have enough care needs to claim AA?

Coldanddamp · 19/01/2025 20:37

And I'm not saying for one second they don't have impairments or disabilities but I just don't understand why it isn't means tested.

Coldanddamp · 19/01/2025 20:34

I've seen the form, it's long but many have help from wider family to fill it in.

Coldanddamp · 19/01/2025 20:33

I know a few people (relatives) who get AA, they all holiday regularly.

cakeorwine · 19/01/2025 20:31

Coldanddamp · 19/01/2025 20:19

If they're having multiple foreign holidays each year it unlikely they're receiving AA

AA isn't means tested, my aunt gets it & frequently visits her Spanish holiday home....

AA isn't means tested as you know. It's very hard to claim AA and the form is complicated.

I am sure you know that someone who needs to claim AA has to go into a lot of detail about their personal needs, long term personal care etc.

Will people who need to claim AA generally be going on multiple foreign holidays?

Coldanddamp · 19/01/2025 20:22

the tax bands need to move & inflation has devalued money. 70k today is probably 50k 4/5 yrs ago.

You're overestimating inflation. £70k in Dec 2024 is equivalent to £56k in 2020

Hence my use of the word probably but my guess wasn't that far off...

Coldanddamp · 19/01/2025 20:19

If they're having multiple foreign holidays each year it unlikely they're receiving AA

AA isn't means tested, my aunt gets it & frequently visits her Spanish holiday home....

Coldanddamp · 19/01/2025 20:17

So it's really about intergenerational fairness not what the stat owes us or you.

Perhaps it's easier to deny the above if you don't acknowledge the change in demographics

Coldanddamp · 19/01/2025 20:16

I think perhaps people are over estimating the burden of the unemployed on other work age tax paying adults.

Yep because as I said so many don't want to
acknowledge the demographics

Bouledeneige · 19/01/2025 20:03

I think perhaps people are over estimating the burden of the unemployed on other work age tax paying adults. Currently only 4.3% of working age adults are unemployed. But 19% of the population are over 65.

So the burden on working age adults comes from those who have retired and unless the birth rate rises that tax burden will increase on our children - who will be paying an ever higher price for our pensions, health and care. That will materially affect their ability to buy houses and save for their retirements and health and care needs. So it's really about intergenerational fairness not what the stat owes us or you.

As has been explained earlier our current taxes are paying for tge pensions of those who are retired. There is no magic pot you've paid into that the government could be raiding in future. It's being spent now to support our parents.

Papyrophile · 19/01/2025 19:40

Thank you @JenniferBooth . It wasn't an experience I'd wish for anyone, but the NHS were absolutely awesome from top to bottom on this occasion and DH is feeling fitter than I think is possible so soon after the event. All the rabbits were pulled from all the hats to get him back on track. There's not enough praise.

TwentyKittens · 19/01/2025 19:39

Turmerictolly · 19/01/2025 09:06

I hope you're right @Boomer55 but look what happened with the waspi women and with the fairly sudden withdrawal of the winter fuel payment. I'm hoping we can trust Labour to be more measured about any changes (maybe this is misguided) but I wouldn't trust the Tories on this.

The WASPI women had 15+ years of advance notice for the change from 60 to 65.

Whilst I am angry about the winter fuel payment because my elderly mum is just above the pension credit threshold, it's hardly the same thing.

JHound · 19/01/2025 19:28

That makes literally zero sense. It’s contributions based. It also removes an incentive for people to make their own provision. The more you make all parts of the welfare state and the aocial contracy only available to the most impoverished, the more you erode public support. Everybody should get a basic state pension (based on year’s of contribution) and then people encouraged to build on that basic amount with private provision.

JenniferBooth · 19/01/2025 19:23

Papyrophile · 19/01/2025 19:13

@MereDintofPandiculation I am the person you think is rich. We bought our house with a mortgage 27 years ago. But DH is still at work. A fortnight ago I watched his health crisis and was in the ambulance that roared through at 105 mph. He lived, but he's already back at work on light duty. Promise you that while we receive SP, we are still paying tax on earned income at 40%.

Sorry to hear this @Papyrophile Hope hes better now and recovers quickly

Papyrophile · 19/01/2025 19:13

@MereDintofPandiculation I am the person you think is rich. We bought our house with a mortgage 27 years ago. But DH is still at work. A fortnight ago I watched his health crisis and was in the ambulance that roared through at 105 mph. He lived, but he's already back at work on light duty. Promise you that while we receive SP, we are still paying tax on earned income at 40%.

MereDintofPandiculation · 19/01/2025 18:48

Why don't you focus on wealthy pensioners with asset wealth and personal pensions who own their home mortgage free, have gifted deposits to their DC, can afford to buy a new car every couple of years, take multiple foreign holidays each year and can afford to lunch out multiple times a week BUT are also receiving SP and AA because it is not means tested? If they're having multiple foreign holidays each year it unlikely they're receiving AA

MereDintofPandiculation · 19/01/2025 18:44

Coldanddamp · 19/01/2025 15:46

With increases in the NMW, it won't be long until a couple each working full time on the NMW will have a gross household income of over £50k. Nothing wrong with that but we can't then say that a single earner household on just above that salary should be paying higher rate tax!

the tax bands need to move & inflation has devalued money. 70k today is probably 50k 4/5 yrs ago.

You're overestimating inflation. £70k in Dec 2024 is equivalent to £56k in 2020

cakeorwine · 19/01/2025 17:52

1dayatatime · 19/01/2025 17:34

@Jabtastic

"It seems to me sometimes that there is no point working in this country because the more you work, the more you pay for everyone else "

Which is exactly why 9 million people are economically inactive in the UK - I mean what's the point?

And those that are higher earners are taxed so high that they may as well either retire early, go part time or if they're really wealthy move abroad.

And this is exactly why productivity is so low in the UK.

Economically inactive

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-52660591

A lot of students and carers

Tories and Labour mooting possible means testing of State Pension
Jabtastic · 19/01/2025 17:52

@1dayatatime I was quoting another poster and agreeing with them but yes I think you're right about the issue of low productivity.

Coldanddamp · 19/01/2025 17:42

And this is exactly why productivity is so low in the UK.

productivity has been low for years & years.

1dayatatime · 19/01/2025 17:34

@Jabtastic

"It seems to me sometimes that there is no point working in this country because the more you work, the more you pay for everyone else "

Which is exactly why 9 million people are economically inactive in the UK - I mean what's the point?

And those that are higher earners are taxed so high that they may as well either retire early, go part time or if they're really wealthy move abroad.

And this is exactly why productivity is so low in the UK.