Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To find it too hard to stick to 1200 calories a day

187 replies

Lilacdreamowl · 16/01/2025 18:51

I’m two stone overweight. I’ve started calorie counting and upping up my steps and on couch to 5k in my third week.
i can’t stick to 1200 calories :( i find it very tough. I have one meal a day where i allow carbs that i like such as bread, rice or pasta as whenever I’ve tried very low carb it just doesn’t work. The other two meals I don’t have carbs.
im ranging between 1205-1500 this week.

Can I still lose weight if i do a smaller deficit instead? Wanted to hear other experiences on a smaller deficit and how long it took?

OP posts:
Ylylyll · 16/01/2025 21:35

unless you’re incredibly short that’s a very small amount for someone your age for weight loss. 1200 which MFP kicks up for most people isn’t sustainable for most people.

kick it up to at least 1500. You can spread it over the week too - a day at 1200 which isn’t much fun you get to then have 1800 the next day. Unless you’re training for a marathon don’t eat back all calories you’ve “lost” from exercise - they’re meant to be an addition - subtract circa half.

we don’t put the weight on overnight we won’t lose it overnight too. Best advice I ever after a year of restrict then binge which left me no lighter actually having realistic patience is what worked.

cardibach · 16/01/2025 21:34

soupfiend · 16/01/2025 21:31

Do you know me and have you seen me?

Not to my knowledge you havent.

Who do you think you are to tell someone about themselves as if you know better than them!!!

Bizarre.

Facts speak for themselves. Nobody at a healthy BMI is ‘chunky’ in any objective sense. Health outcomes are actually better for those 8n the ‘overweight’ category, incidentally

ManyATrueWord · 16/01/2025 21:34

Lilacdreamowl · 16/01/2025 19:02

MFP puts 1200 for 2lb weight loss a week. Maybe I need to lower it. 1lb a week puts me at 1600

That's your issue. 1lb is quite enough. Any more from diet alone is unhealthy. Low GI carbs (but fewer than you expect), high protein, some fats, lots of vegetable bulk and I can eat in deficit and not get hungry.

xyz111 · 16/01/2025 21:33

Target weight in lbs x 12 = calorie target a day.
My DS6 eats more than 1200 calories.

soupfiend · 16/01/2025 21:31

cardibach · 16/01/2025 21:13

I didn’t say it was. I said you weren’t chunky at a hair over 25.

Do you know me and have you seen me?

Not to my knowledge you havent.

Who do you think you are to tell someone about themselves as if you know better than them!!!

Bizarre.

comedycentral · 16/01/2025 21:31

That's really low, you'll have some awful side effects. I've found intermittent fasting to be really good and it's also reduced bloating and cravings for me. I basically stop eating between 8pm and noon Monday - Friday. I don't overdo it at the weekends. Reduced alcohol and sugar.

Lookingafterthepennies · 16/01/2025 21:30

5’3, 50s, BMI just in the healthy range, long days on my feet all day but not many steps.
If I eat more than 1600a day I gain.

Been on 1000 cals a day for 2 weeks and actually loving it. I am/was a sugar junky and currently enjoying the absence of carb lulls and over eating guilt! Clothes fitting better and scales kinder are a bonus
I’m drinking lots of water: A pint as soon as I wake up and a litre or more before lunch, then as and when after. Two meals a day - either protein meals or carb meals - rarely both together.
Couple of chocolates after my tea. Not getting hungry, enjoying food again and full of energy. Approach is loosely based on The human being diet.

Low call for a while doesn’t have to be miserable, and it’s not going to kill anyone!

Brooomhilda · 16/01/2025 21:30

That's the same number of calories as a 2-3 year old needs. Not an adult woman. No wonder you're finding it hard.

TheGoogleMum · 16/01/2025 21:28

When I've put weight loss goals on my fitness pal it tells me 1200 calories too but it's a real struggle so I tend to fail. I think part of it for me is being so short so the put mine down to the minimum (they don't suggest below 1200). Maybe a different strategy is needed

XWKD · 16/01/2025 21:20

You only need to lose two stone. With a small deficit it can happen in a more natural and healthy way.

NoCarbsForMe · 16/01/2025 21:14

Go low carb and eat loads of protein op. Drink shed loads of water.

cardibach · 16/01/2025 21:13

soupfiend · 16/01/2025 20:51

I dont think its unhealthy to aim for a BMI of about 23 plus, dont be so ridiculous. I also know what I feel better at
I am chunky at the current weight, I didnt say I would be chunky at my goal, my stomach is completely out of proportion for the rest of me at the moment, the half stone sits there and is bloated, you dont know anything about me.

Its also unhealthy to have a waist size as big as mine and the asociated health risks of weight being big on the stomach and waist not only do I know this myself and dont need to be told but my doctor and nurse have also said this.

I didn’t say it was. I said you weren’t chunky at a hair over 25.

NeedToChangeName · 16/01/2025 21:08

TunnocksOrDeath · 16/01/2025 19:40

What worked for me was calculating required calorie intake at the target weight and usual activity levels. Then eating that. The weight came off quickly at first then slowed down nearer the target until it stabilised. If it stabilises slightly higher or lower than required the calculation was just slightly off.
Going into a massive calorie deficit to fast-track the process is going to be miserable, and possibly lead to some yo-yo-ing when you try to eat "normally" again.
You'll get a load of people telling you that calories are meaningless, and yes, there is some evidence to show that the other nutrients also have an impact, but as a yard-stick, caloric intake is an extremely useful tool.

That sounds like a great approach

Goldenmemories · 16/01/2025 21:06

Lift weights

saltinesandcoffeecups · 16/01/2025 20:54

1200 is hard. I found my sweet spot to be 1400. It was still a deficit and I still lost weight.

I think I was more successful because it fit better in my life and it wasn’t overly restrictive. It also allowed me to be more consistent.

Also make sure you are averaging… A 1600 day doesn’t ruin everything if you are a little lower on other days.

‘’My last bit of advice is to be careful about eliminating things… have the biscuit, eat the candy. Have pasta if that’s what you’re craving… just eat sensible amounts.

TriangleLight · 16/01/2025 20:53

Halfemptyhalfling · 16/01/2025 20:27

Calorie counting rarely helps. Cut out ultra processed foods and try to eat 30 different fruit/veg/nuts a week

Calorie counting is brilliant. You can eat anything, and enjoy all food within your calorie targets

The MFP calculator is rubbish. Go James Smith

soupfiend · 16/01/2025 20:51

cardibach · 16/01/2025 20:26

You aren’t chunky at that BMI (or half a stone over it). Stop pushing unhealthy body ideals.

I dont think its unhealthy to aim for a BMI of about 23 plus, dont be so ridiculous. I also know what I feel better at
I am chunky at the current weight, I didnt say I would be chunky at my goal, my stomach is completely out of proportion for the rest of me at the moment, the half stone sits there and is bloated, you dont know anything about me.

Its also unhealthy to have a waist size as big as mine and the asociated health risks of weight being big on the stomach and waist not only do I know this myself and dont need to be told but my doctor and nurse have also said this.

TroysMammy · 16/01/2025 20:39

I went from 10.9 stone to 8.8 stone in 6 months using Nutracheck, 1400 calories and literally no additional exercise. I still ate pizza and cake but much smaller portions than before.

PassMeTheCookies · 16/01/2025 20:35

I second the James Smith calculator. It gives you higher calories but also a higher protein target to reach. It works great.

BlueEyes90 · 16/01/2025 20:35

The problem with eating little (1200kcal) is you’re more likely to binge at the weekend because you’re hungry. That will blow your deficit over the week.

You’d be much better off starting at 1700/1800kcal and doing this for a few weeks - as long as the scales are dropping, then stick with it. Then once you haven’t lost for a few weeks, slightly decrease your calorie intake.

I think it’s important to eat enough, especially as you’re doing c25k you’re going to feel more hungry as your body is using more energy.
As others have said - protein is important & will keep you fuller for longer.

Jabtastic · 16/01/2025 20:30

Aiming for 1lb a week is much more sustainable. My daily allowance is around 1680 but I find if I eat enough protein, fruit and veg I have around 300 left to use or not.

Halfemptyhalfling · 16/01/2025 20:27

Calorie counting rarely helps. Cut out ultra processed foods and try to eat 30 different fruit/veg/nuts a week

cardibach · 16/01/2025 20:26

soupfiend · 16/01/2025 20:20

Same here, technically I think Im a few pounds over the BMI maximum for a health weight, so 'slim', I look slim, no one would say Im overweight.

However, Im too big for what I know my stomach should be, its sticking out over my trousers at the moment, disguised cleverly of course

Once I get half a stone off again, I will feel less bloated and chunky and then my BMI will be around 23.5 I think it was.

You aren’t chunky at that BMI (or half a stone over it). Stop pushing unhealthy body ideals.

PlumpAndDeliciousFatcat · 16/01/2025 20:25

MissTrip82 · 16/01/2025 20:24

These questions always bring out undereaters who insist they can only lose weight on one bite of food a day. Some of the tips and hints belong on pro-ana sites.

There are some extraordinarily unusual metabolisms on MN.

Yep. I really need to learn not to engage.

I’m 6’ so I appreciate that I’m at the other end of the normal range but my BMR would blow their minds.

MissTrip82 · 16/01/2025 20:24

These questions always bring out undereaters who insist they can only lose weight on one bite of food a day. Some of the tips and hints belong on pro-ana sites.

There are some extraordinarily unusual metabolisms on MN.