Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the call back into the office is an example of the patriarchy very much alive and well?

720 replies

Yestttlo · 11/01/2025 19:21

And anyone who thinks otherwise is either brainwashed by the patriarchy or isn’t a mother with a huge proportion of child related responsibility on her shoulders? (Or someone who is in a job where they can’t work from home so don’t want to support other women having the right to).

I have worked from home since covid. Been in the office eight times where it was necessary, for instance a company away day or face to face client meeting. I have a young dc and the call back to the office will damage my career progression due to time spent travelling which means I can’t be online longer and because I will be stretched to get household stuff done .. no I don’t mean I clean the toilets during work hours but that I can put a wash on first thing and know I can unload it at lunch, or get cooking done for the evening during my lunch break which means my evening is not chaotic and I can actually rest a little before starting in full force again the next day.

I will be fighting it to the very end. I will make my views clear. I strongly believe that forcing people into offices hugely disproportionately affects women. My work can be done anywhere. Forcing back into offices is a neon sign that the patriarchy is alive and well. Thoughts?

OP posts:
setmestraightplease · 12/01/2025 02:17

Just wondering how everyone went into the office 5 days a week pre-covid and didn't think it strange to have to do so?

Now we think it strange to have to go into the office 5 days a week.

What are the advantages of not doing so - apart from the obvious one of commuting time?

Sesameopen · 12/01/2025 01:15

Yes it’s more a class issue I believe @MerryMaker when you look at the main motivations behind it - this is hypercapitalism in action.

Also seen as how many people are allegedly in favour of office working -if this thread is anything go by - there’s clearly plenty who would happily go into the office 3-5 times a week. So why not allow those to do that and then allow the others who struggle in offices to stay at home most days? If there’s performance concerns or that doesn’t meet the needs of the business due to the specific role then obviously that’s another matter. I used to work in a corporate events role where WFH wasn’t suitable some days for example.

But why the heavy handed approach to telling everyone, irrespective of their needs and circumstances, to get back to the office when many are WFH just fine.

MerryMaker · 12/01/2025 00:56

I agree with another poster that this is much about class. The senior people imposing this already have flexibility. If they want to leave early to fit something in and work in the evening, they can. If they want to work in a quiet office to get away from the noise of an open plan office they can. The rest of us can not,

And I cant believe those claiming large open plan offices are quiet. They bloody are not. I appreciate more call centre workers wfh as I can now here what they are saying properly. In the past often you would hear them talking over a din in the background.

I personally hate working in large open plan offices. They are noisy, and if it is hot desking you can't sit next to anyone you actually work with anyway. But I am supposed to enjoy collaborating by being sat next to Darren who does not understand the job I do, but think he does. And he works in marketing, but just happens to be part of my section, even though we never work together, except when I ask him to tweet a post about a new project. Its such a nonsense.

Jumpingthruhoops · 12/01/2025 00:54

MerryMaker · 12/01/2025 00:25

Because we must just accept the status quo set up for senior able bodied men, and not try and change anything?

Except women DID change something; women campaigned for the right to vote; fought for equal opportunities in the workplace; campaigned for good maternity benefits, fought to be considered for the top jobs, fought to not just be seen as just housewives and childbearers.
The result: Womens' contribution to the workforce was then taken very seriously because of changes WE asked for.

However, those changes meant women were then expected to be breadwinners, expected to pay half towards a mortgage and any household bills AND still maintain a home and care for children.

This is what we wanted. Apparently.

Fast forward to now and we want to WFH so we can put our washing on!

setmestraightplease · 12/01/2025 00:49

@Yestttlo Wfh removes the stress involved in pick up with extra travel etc etc as I assume you know

I don’t want to farm out my child all hours possible because my employer can’t be flexible. Again, being a parent and having childcare responsibilities should be honoured. It’s not because it’s seen as the women’s job.

InkHeart202
But why do you have the greater responsibility for household chores? Can your husband/partner not be responsible for putting a wash on or making dinner?

^ in my circumstances he is not able to work from home.^

What you're saying seems to imply you consider it to be YOUR responsibility alone.
Your DP can't work from home, so it's all down to you to make it work by WFH?

Are you not feeding into the patriarchy by prioritising the value of his job over yours ?

Whoever is doing it - and it’s mostly women for the reasons I’ve said - gets no credit for it. Should your employer give yout credit for having a child? No not directly.

Why do you want credit from your employer for having a child?

Your employer employs people to make his business a financial success. Is this not what you would do if you set up a business?

I really do get your point, but I think it's not just the 'patriarchial society' i.e. employers that's the problem.

Shouldn't your husband/partner also take into account the effect on your employment conditions and prospects when you have a child?

Where are all the ordinary men standing up saying that women have drawn the short straw.
That their wives are having to make sacrifices because of pregnancy and raising a family - because they are both starting a family

I agree that having children usually impacts far more on women than on men. Women are so often the default carer.

But why aren't our husbands and partners speaking out?

Why aren't they asking for more flexible hours so they can do nursery/school drop-off and pick-up . Asking for time off so they can do doctor's appointments / dentist's appointments / looking after aged parents .......... etc

It's not all down to employers to make changes if their male workforce isn't complaining and pushing for change?

Yes OP, I agree it's still a patriarchal society! - but it's going to take a big push from everyone to change the status quo.

*edited to add @OP

MerryMaker · 12/01/2025 00:25

Jumpingthruhoops · 12/01/2025 00:14

But surely that's just the unfortunate consequence of having children AND a full time job? You will 'cope' because that's all you can do.

I decided very early on that I didn't want to just 'cope' in life - which is why I decided not to have children. I made that decision. No one else.

Because we must just accept the status quo set up for senior able bodied men, and not try and change anything?

Jumpingthruhoops · 12/01/2025 00:22

Duvet18 · 11/01/2025 19:46

What bullshit. Most histories of feminism will tell you that a, or even THE, main method of patriarchy was confining women to the home, while making public life the sole sphere of men. This is still the case in many countries in the world today. Fighting the patriarchy involves claiming our right to be out there in the public sphere, not claiming that we should be stuck alone at home because it’s easier to do the laundry, FFS.

This! 👏👏

Senior management want our largely female workforce to come back to the office to highlight the vital contribution these women make to the business.

Jumpingthruhoops · 12/01/2025 00:14

Yestttlo · 11/01/2025 19:39

@Vannymcvan yes most women cope. And it’s long overdue to stop forcing women to simply ‘cope.’

But surely that's just the unfortunate consequence of having children AND a full time job? You will 'cope' because that's all you can do.

I decided very early on that I didn't want to just 'cope' in life - which is why I decided not to have children. I made that decision. No one else.

ThatLimeFatball · 12/01/2025 00:13

olympicsrock · 12/01/2025 00:07

DH works from home and now does far more housework than me .

Poor bloke. Does his boss know?

olympicsrock · 12/01/2025 00:07

DH works from home and now does far more housework than me .

Jumpingthruhoops · 12/01/2025 00:06

Oh please... Many of the companies wanting staff back in the office will be run by women. The facts are that this was always going to happen eventually.

Respectfully, OP, YABU to think any employer will give a shit about whether you can put a wash on while you're WFH!!
Working full time, you just have to find some way of fitting all that in to be honest

BurntBroccoli · 11/01/2025 23:58

Thepeopleversuswork · 11/01/2025 19:56

There are some valid reasons for wanting people to go back into the office. Certain elements of some jobs are much better done physically. Team building, training, mentoring of younger staff suffered hugely during the period when all white collar jobs were remote.

That said it's true that there's a powerful impetus in the "all back to work" lobby which is threatened by WFH predominantly because its been driven mainly by the needs of women. WFH tends to benefit women more for the oft-stated reasons that it allows a more flexible approach to childcare, enables life admin and errands of the sort that women tend to do.

I think a lot of the hot air coming from some financial institutions and certain Right Wing papers about how WFH is a "skivers charter" is self-serving bollocks. The people who complain about "popping on a wash" being theft of time from your employer are the same people who are happy to spend an entire day at the golf course or in the pub boozing in the name of "networking". Why is five minutes doing laundry or 45 minutes at the dentist worse than a boozy lunch? The only real difference is that men have been doing the latter for time immemorial whereas flexible working is a relatively new development and something which women have tended to do.

It's unadulterated nonsense that people work harder in the office. I'm infinitely more productive at home: I don't have an hour of dead time either side of the day commuting and I don't have to spend a good chunk of my day sitting in pointless meetings or listening to people wittering on about what they're watching on Netflix when I could be working.

I think a mix of home and office is probably the solution for most people, but I think the complaints about "skivers charters" are mainly the last gasp of blokes who are threatened by the fact that they're no longer able to limit women's progression on the basis that "children get in the way". It's just common sense that allowing people to work in a way which suits their lives is likely to make them more productive. The only real objection men have to it is that it makes it easier for women to get more done.

Totally agree with all this!

When I was 16 and worked for a bank in my first job, the manager would be sat in his office reading the paper all morning smoking a cigar. He would often disappear at 3pm to "meet" clients via the golf course.

Men (at least those working in offices and finance have always had flexible working).

In my line of work, the ones who were pushing for more office time for all were all men!

Whydoeseveryonewanttoargue · 11/01/2025 23:57

coralsky · 11/01/2025 23:20

'the call back to the office will damage my career progression due to time spent travelling which means I can’t be online longer'

So you're only progressing in your career by working extra hours (around office hours when you'd be commuting)?

And you're not breastfeeding .... and your husband needs to start pulling his weight.

I'm all for wfh but your arguments sound petty and agressive.

My question would also be what did you do before covid when working from home was pretty rare?

Treesandsheepeverywhere · 11/01/2025 23:54

VivX · 11/01/2025 23:22

I feel that you're one of the main people who is upholding the patriarchy tbh, particularly as you're the one who wants to wfh in order to do chores and childcare.

I doubt that there are many men who have ever said it would be useful to wfh in order to be able to put on a load of washing, for example.

100 Thank Yous!!! 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏.

MerryMaker · 11/01/2025 23:50

@GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing I totally agree. How dare the plebs have any flexibility

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 11/01/2025 23:38

I think it’s more a class thing than men v women.

Or maybe more wealthy v poorer people rather than class as such.

Business owners etc are able to make their own rules, have flexibility etc Often more senior employees too. It’s a way of stopping people further down the “food chain” having the same flexibility, work/ life balance and sense of ownership over what they’re doing.

maddening · 11/01/2025 23:37

Nomorechipsforme · 11/01/2025 23:08

Just a question WFH, if you job is WFH you are generally still contracted to your office hours to be available for other team members/customers.
How do people do the school run when it is inside office hours? Also young children and work don't mix.

@Jennaveeve correct. I don’t want to farm out my child all hours possible because my employer can’t be flexible. Again, being a parent and having childcare responsibilities should be honoured. It’s not because it’s seen as the women’s job.

???Oh! So the expectation is to work whilst looking after small children?? Childcare was never seen as a women's job in my household, it was a shared responsibility. Anyone can request flexible working to accommodate childcare and it doesn't piss off other team members men or women 😂

I work 9-5 and dh works 7-3 so I do drop off and dh does pick up
ds now 14 so he can look after himself But even when smaller and even if both 9-5 it is easier to collect a child from close to home than rushing back from a commute

Even though dh already wfh when ds was small we did use wrap round care as we would not have ds at home and try to work at the same time- less relevant to us now though.

TempestTost · 11/01/2025 23:31

Copernicus321 · 11/01/2025 22:59

If you think you are all great working from home, then if I were your'e boss I would ourtsource the lot of you to India and get your job done at 1/3 of the cost and at twice the productivity.

That's what the Government is really worried about, a total offshoring of our entire service economy... or haven't you woken up to that thought yet. When you are all redundant, you will have all the time in the world to switch on that load of washing.

Edited

This this this.

A huge employer in my town shut down about 5 years ago - all outsourced to India. It work, and not just calls either but more sophiticated things.

Any job that would function 100% as wfh could be outsourced.

If there comes to be a requirement that employers allow WFH for anyone who could, they have zero incentive not to outsource.

CurrentHun · 11/01/2025 23:26

I ageee with you OP. Back to the office when it’s not business need, just a preference, suits men who don’t want to help at home much more than it suits women or men who do need or want to.

UnrequitedFriends · 11/01/2025 23:24

The problem is your husband, not your employer. Get him to pull his weight more and life will be a lot easier.

VivX · 11/01/2025 23:22

Yestttlo · 11/01/2025 22:40

@TheFlyingHorse you do realise the patriarchy is held up by both men and women? As demonstrated by much of this thread

I feel that you're one of the main people who is upholding the patriarchy tbh, particularly as you're the one who wants to wfh in order to do chores and childcare.

I doubt that there are many men who have ever said it would be useful to wfh in order to be able to put on a load of washing, for example.

coralsky · 11/01/2025 23:20

'the call back to the office will damage my career progression due to time spent travelling which means I can’t be online longer'

So you're only progressing in your career by working extra hours (around office hours when you'd be commuting)?

And you're not breastfeeding .... and your husband needs to start pulling his weight.

I'm all for wfh but your arguments sound petty and agressive.

TempestTost · 11/01/2025 23:16

Floralnomad · 11/01/2025 21:21

Because the employers do not think the job is being done properly . It only takes one or two people to slack off and take the piss and it ruins it for everyone because the employers cant just say to those slackers that they need to come in so they say it to everyone .

The other problem is that even if everyone is working conscientiously, many workplaces need at least some people in the office regularly. So how do you decide who gets the privilege of WFH and who doesn't?

In the OPs world it seems to be the employee who makes the most stink.

BurntBroccoli · 11/01/2025 23:13

Badbadbunny · 11/01/2025 19:36

Personally I think 1 or 2 days in the office should be obligatory. People would still have 3 or 4 days at home, but it would massively improve the cohesion between staff and keep staff involved with the employer. Best of both Worlds really. I just can't see how someone who never goes near their office from one month to another can possibly keep themselves aware of what's happening, who their colleagues are, etc. It's also unfair that those who do go into the office bear the burden of training new/young staff, have to deal with whatever happens to need doing in the office at the time, etc.

We have monthly meetings on Teams and also 1-1s every 2 weeks. There's also a company wide monthly meeting online.
I know much more about what's happening now than I did before COVID.

Sesameopen · 11/01/2025 23:12

Another2Cats · 11/01/2025 22:52

"...create huge open spaces with hot desking. I really struggled with the change, I found it very difficult to focus when people were holding conference calls a few feet away, or gathering to chat near my desk."

I have exactly the same issue and that's precisely why I left the job that I mentioned in my post.

It also didn't help that we had to go down to the head office in the Prudential building in London once a week. Never managed to ever get any work done then.

I worked in one open plan office that was brilliant. It was basically very under occupied and I could sit at a desk and not have any one next to me on the next desk. We all respected each others space so would distribute ourselves accordingly so as not to bunch up together. It was also large enough that you could find more quiet areas of the office. Because it was essentially a small team in a large office it was rarely that loud anyway.

There were also multiple small meeting rooms you could either book or just pop into. There was usually at least a couple available. The heat /AC was easy to adjust in these rooms .

There was also an amazing free coffee machine 😆 it was honestly a rare find. I have never worked in an office that compares to that before or since!!

I find most open plan offices are just noisy and full of distractions. Often the toilets can be disgusting too which makes me uncomfortable 🤢 and the office space is too hot or too cold for some of us. Not to mention having to hot desk which is a nightmare as I need to be in corners away from busy aisles.

Why can’t people accept that some of us work better at home? I’m ND but I’m sure many NT work better at home too.

Swipe left for the next trending thread