Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

My partner not wanting my mum to see my new baby

545 replies

Joelm1066 · 11/01/2025 16:33

I have recently had a baby boy with my partner. We have been together for six years. In the course of our relationship she has not got on well with my mother. My mum can be a bit tactless, but she has a good heart. However, my partner wants very limited contact with her despite my mum reaching out and trying to improve relations between them. After 6 years I have come to accept that she doesn’t want regular contact with her. However, since the birth of our child 8 days ago, she is insisting that she wants to wait at least a month before my mum sees the child even though he has met all of her close family and close friend. She says that it is because she only wants contact with people she’s comfortable around, but I think I have a right to introduce my child to his grandmother sooner than a month. AIBU?
It’s causing me a great deal of sadness and stress at a time when I should be happy. I don’t really know what to do.

OP posts:
LegoBingo · 11/01/2025 22:34

XelaM · 11/01/2025 21:47

People keep repeating this as if being pregnant and giving birth gives the mother some kind of superiority and right to be a complete arsehole. It doesn't. People give birth all the time and behave civilly. I did.

And a lot of them don't as their hormones and postnatal mental health issues prevent them from doing so

valentinka31 · 11/01/2025 22:34

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 11/01/2025 21:18

Thank you, I like it!

so much more exciting than britishshorthaironahottinroof.

I really try to pretend not to be British at every opportunity.

But I am quite excited by being Yorkshire.

IdylicDay · 11/01/2025 22:32

WonderingAboutThus · 11/01/2025 22:31

To be fair, I explicitly said all along the mother has the right to NOT see the MIL. That doesn't mean she has the right to block the baby from being seen by the grandmother at the other parent's request though!

She is not blocking MIL, she is only asking for 4 weeks. Christ.

BlueSky2024 · 11/01/2025 22:32

Spaniellover2 · 11/01/2025 22:27

I find it depressing that people automatically assume a relationship has to be toxic. The MIL let them live with her and sounds imperfect, but not nasty. It is cruel to exclude her from their new family.

Agreed, in this case, based on the amount of info the OP has given us, the birth mother is the one who is coming off as being difficult and deliberately withholding the baby to hurt/ punish the MIL and the father is stuck in the middle

IdylicDay · 11/01/2025 22:31

ThDanielDay · 11/01/2025 22:26

You need to put your foot down on this and be very aware of other controlling behaviour from your partner.

@ThDanielDay His partner is the mother of the baby who gave birth only 8 days ago! If she doesn't want a visit with MIL so soon, that is her choice! The mother's wishes trump the wants of the male and MIL.

Gremlins101 · 11/01/2025 22:31

Your partner doesn't sound very kind. My MIL is a narcky witch but I wouldn't have stood in the way of my husband having the joy of introducing our babies to his mother in the very first few days.

WonderingAboutThus · 11/01/2025 22:31

404ErrorCode · 11/01/2025 22:15

I don’t think the partner would be against her coming over if she was a hoarder though, do you? 😅

The behaviours mentioned by the OP directly affect his partner during a vulnerable time - being judged, unwanted advice being tactless. Why should she have to deal with that whilst recon in from birth?

It is the OPs place to bat this unkind behaviour back when it happens, to enforce a boundary that clearly hasn’t been respected. I suspect he doesn’t want to upset his mum by putting her in her place, so he turns a blind eye.

If he isn’t willing to catch the bullets she fires at his partner, he cannot expect her to stand in the firing line.

That's not to say when the baby is a bit older he can’t go see her independently of his partner long term.

Edited

To be fair, I explicitly said all along the mother has the right to NOT see the MIL. That doesn't mean she has the right to block the baby from being seen by the grandmother at the other parent's request though!

MrsSunshine2b · 11/01/2025 22:30

"I appreciate you don't want to see my Mum, and that's fine, I can't (and wouldn't try to) force you to have contact with anyone if you'd rather not. However, this is my home too and that is my child as much as yours, and I will be inviting my Mum over to meet him on (X day). You can go out, or you can stay in a different room, but the baby will be staying with me and meeting his Grandma."

End of discussion.

IdylicDay · 11/01/2025 22:29

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 11/01/2025 22:25

Keep going with the insults. You don't bother me.

The one giving insults is you. Not me.

Spaniellover2 · 11/01/2025 22:27

ttcat37 · 11/01/2025 21:45

Your MIL probably wasn’t a nightmare. It isn’t cruel. It’s the mother’s prerogative. And that’s a hill I’ll die on.

I find it depressing that people automatically assume a relationship has to be toxic. The MIL let them live with her and sounds imperfect, but not nasty. It is cruel to exclude her from their new family.

ThDanielDay · 11/01/2025 22:26

You need to put your foot down on this and be very aware of other controlling behaviour from your partner.

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 11/01/2025 22:25

IdylicDay · 11/01/2025 22:22

Yes, your attitude towards the needs of the baby have been obvious all through the thread.

Keep going with the insults. You don't bother me.

jannier · 11/01/2025 22:25

IdylicDay · 11/01/2025 22:20

If you have bad relations with one side of the family, yes, it is. You haven't read many threads on here where there are toxic family members. A best friend in that case would most definitely see the baby before a MIL that makes the mother uncomfortable.

But is she really toxic or just not the clone of her daughter in law....what happened to tolerance and acceptance? I disagree with someone doesn't make them toxic.

jannier · 11/01/2025 22:22

IdylicDay · 11/01/2025 22:10

Its not "fucking unfair" for the mother to want 4 weeks with her baby before MIL sees them. That's standard advice on mumsnet.

Standard advice to have time on your own....not to have everyone else visit except the in laws.....although why the hell we have to go back to a mentality of lying in and isolation I don't know must be one hell of a shock when it's baby number two and a school run.

IdylicDay · 11/01/2025 22:22

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 11/01/2025 22:19

Shoot me now rofl!!!

I couldn't find one fuck to give.

Yes, your attitude towards the needs of the baby have been obvious all through the thread.

IdylicDay · 11/01/2025 22:20

spuddy4 · 11/01/2025 22:15

@IdylicDay is it natural that non family members would see the baby before actual family? Imagine how you'd feel being the OP and the mother is basically saying his family are not good enough.

If you have bad relations with one side of the family, yes, it is. You haven't read many threads on here where there are toxic family members. A best friend in that case would most definitely see the baby before a MIL that makes the mother uncomfortable.

SemperIdem · 11/01/2025 22:20

I have disagreed with a number of posters on this thread - for the take the baby regardless, centre men comments (though I am not convinced the op is a man).

I do think that 4 weeks is a long time to not meet immediate family, unless there is a significant distance and cost involved in travelling to meet the baby, which is a bit different.

The relationship here sounds fractious but setting this barrier up will not make it any less so.

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 11/01/2025 22:19

IdylicDay · 11/01/2025 22:18

Agreed!

Shoot me now rofl!!!

I couldn't find one fuck to give.

IdylicDay · 11/01/2025 22:18

ttcat37 · 11/01/2025 21:55

Hmm, you’ve just said that you let your smoker MIL around your babies, knowingly risking their health, because basically you didn’t want to hurt her feelings. I’m not sure that your opinion of what is cruel has much credence.

Agreed!

Emilianoo · 11/01/2025 22:18

TriesNotToBeCynical · 11/01/2025 21:08

I'm not talking about a father's right to take his sons to football matches or whatever. We are talking about the immediate post partum period here.

8 days later, when the Mum had let all her family and friends see the baby. But not the partners own Mum. Controlling and unnecessary.

BobbyDazzlers · 11/01/2025 22:17

IdylicDay · 11/01/2025 22:16

The one who sounds unhinged are you and Bluesky who have stalked me around the thread attacking me.

Do you ever consider your use of hyperbole? Like ever. It’s really doing you a disservice. Since when has following a thread become stalking?

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 11/01/2025 22:17

IdylicDay · 11/01/2025 22:16

The one who sounds unhinged are you and Bluesky who have stalked me around the thread attacking me.

Too funny!

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 11/01/2025 22:17

IdylicDay · 11/01/2025 22:12

A say. Not the final say. The mother is the one who has that. Its her who carried the baby, gave birth, and now is recuperating from birth and breastfeeding.

We don't even know if she is breastfeeding!!

On the basis of stats, she's probably not!

BlueSky2024 · 11/01/2025 22:16

IdylicDay · 11/01/2025 22:13

Because that is the mother's choice! And its natural the mother's mum would see the baby first! That is normal!

Why should the mothers mum see the child first? What about the fathers mum, she is also a grandparent,
So the mothers mum can see the child soon after the birth but the fathers mum is to be made to wait a month

IdylicDay · 11/01/2025 22:16

BobbyDazzlers · 11/01/2025 22:14

I have followed it from the beginning and tbh you sound more unhinged with every comment. Sorry if you feel that’s another attack 🤷‍♀️

The one who sounds unhinged are you and Bluesky who have stalked me around the thread attacking me.

Swipe left for the next trending thread