Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

One child has inherited AGAIN

885 replies

EWAB · 10/01/2025 16:20

A decade ago my younger son benefited from a massive inheritance.

Essentially my MiL bypassed her three children and left everything to her 6 grandchildren.

The grandchildren: 2 siblings, 3 siblings and my younger child.

SHE WAS ENTITLED TO DO AS SHE PLEASED. IT WAS HER MONEY.

The fallout was quite seismic for lots of reasons. My partner felt that as he only had one child the family of the brother with 3 children benefitted disproportionately.

It was said at the time and I believe this to be the case that the will was designed like this. to stop my elder child from a previous relationship from benefiting as he might have done 40/50 years later if the money had gone directly to my partner.

As for my relationship, my partner refused to consider changing our wills leaving more to elder child who was at the time very unlikely to inherit from his own father. He is now on property ladder but any inheritance will pale into insignificance compared with younger child’s

Well it’s happened again!

Late MiL’s half brother has left his entire estate to the MALE grandchildren of his siblings. Younger son and partner’s nephew and we think 2 or 3 others.

HE WAS ENTITLED TO DO WHAT HE WANTED WITH HIS OWN MONEY.

I genuinely can’t contemplate my two sons having such vastly different lives.

I want advice to come to terms with it . I have disabled voting. I can’t talk to anyone.

OP posts:
Choccyscofffy · 10/01/2025 21:11

HollyKnight · 10/01/2025 21:08

Recognised within their family. As in stepdad can say "these are my sons". But outside of that, no one else has to consider a stepchild to be family. Such as in this case where the stepfather's extended family does not recognise the older child as a grandchild/nephew. He's part of the stepfather's family, not theirs.

Most people do consider step-children to be part of the nuclear family.

This is why there is an uproar when one child is given a Christmas gift and a step-child is not.

That’s not to say the step-child should inherit from their step-parent’s family. It’s simply saying that when two siblings grow up together, seeing one get opportunities and material possessions that you’re not getting hurts. That’s human nature. A compassionate person would acknowledge that.

People are attributing adult rationalisation to a child.

ComebackQueen · 10/01/2025 21:11

Jesus, the amount of histrionics on this thread…

Understandably It’s an emotive subject for the OP but some people almost vomiting reading the opening post, get a grip!

The uncle who bequeathed only the male family members, that’s his right, perhaps culturally from his generation that was considered the norm. Females generally married into their spouses family who would be benefiting from inheritance from that family be it via their husbands and/or children.

Secondly, suck it up, buttercup, your son is of no blood relation to your partner’s family. Just like the uncle of your partner only recognised male heirs for inheritance purposes, your MIL only recognised blood grandchildren for her inheritance purposes.

You can look to redress the balance by leaving more in your will to the eldest but to try and manipulate a man of no blood relation to leave more than presumably an equal share amongst the children is quite simply a reflection of your character.

Commonsense22 · 10/01/2025 21:10

soupfiend · 10/01/2025 21:02

This is terrible advice, what planet are you on. OP has no right, no one has any right, to discuss a 3rd party's financial information with someone else

That's the theory, not real life.

If there's eldest discovers later in life what happened he'll feel utterly betrayed by not knowing. The secret being kept will be a far worse wound than the financial difference. If he is told now, it will likely be OK.

Sometimes you just have to do the least bad thing.
Edit: this should absolutely not lead to the youngest being expected to share his money. I don't see why it would unless the eldest is a bully.

HollyKnight · 10/01/2025 21:10

We don't even know if the man considers the eldest to be his son or if the eldest considers the man to be his father. He has his own father. This man might just be "mum's partner" to him.

Sooverwork · 10/01/2025 21:08

Barrenfieldoffucks · 10/01/2025 16:28

Your older child wasn't her grandchild, and has his own paternal family to inherit from. He won't have counted as a male member of the family, because in terms of bloodlines he isn't.

This. If your older child’s paternal family don’t have much in the way of assets that they can inherit than that’s just the way it is. He wasn’t your MILs biological grandchild.

HollyKnight · 10/01/2025 21:08

Choccyscofffy · 10/01/2025 21:03

A step-child is a socially recognised child. Socially recognised does not mean legally recognised. The meaning of nuclear family has evolved and includes step-members.

The function is the same, a nuclear family is two adults raising their kids in one home, as opposed to an extended family structure, where multiple generations of individuals, including biological parents, children, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins live together.

Edited

Recognised within their family. As in stepdad can say "these are my sons". But outside of that, no one else has to consider a stepchild to be family. Such as in this case where the stepfather's extended family does not recognise the older child as a grandchild/nephew. He's part of the stepfather's family, not theirs.

poemsandwine · 10/01/2025 21:07

InvisibilityCloakActivated · 10/01/2025 21:03

How is a conversation "emotional blackmail"? I'm genuinely baffled by your interpretation.

My interpretation is in line with InterIgnis' post.

HereForTheAnimals · 10/01/2025 21:05

soupfiend · 10/01/2025 20:58

Vomiting!!!!!!!

Thanks Soupfiend 😁

UndermyShoeJoe · 10/01/2025 21:05

Choccyscofffy · 10/01/2025 21:03

A step-child is a socially recognised child. Socially recognised does not mean legally recognised. The meaning of nuclear family has evolved and includes step-members.

The function is the same, a nuclear family is two adults raising their kids in one home, as opposed to an extended family structure, where multiple generations of individuals, including biological parents, children, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins live together.

Edited

Socially recognised by some but again not all.

InterIgnis · 10/01/2025 21:04

InvisibilityCloakActivated · 10/01/2025 21:01

Who said anything about emotional blackmail? There is a big difference between talking to someone and emotionally blackmailing them. Or at least there is for most people.

Would you choose not to share with your sibling?

Sure, but it’s up to the youngest if he wants to talk about it, and potentially open himself up to emotional blackmail. His finances are his business, it’s not for OP to share that info with her eldest.

He’s not wrong to decide not to share with his sibling. The inheritance is his, from his relatives, and he has zero obligation to consider himself responsible for putting his brother on an even footing.

Choccyscofffy · 10/01/2025 21:03

HollyKnight · 10/01/2025 21:01

"consisting of a pair of adults and their socially recognized children"

The OP's eldest is not her partner's child. And nuclear family does not include grandparents let alone one parent's partner's extended family. The OP's family is a stepfamily. Not a nuclear family.

A step-child is a socially recognised child. Socially recognised does not mean legally recognised. The meaning of nuclear family has evolved and includes step-members.

The function is the same, a nuclear family is two adults raising their kids in one home, as opposed to an extended family structure, where multiple generations of individuals, including biological parents, children, grandparents, aunts, uncles, and cousins live together.

ThatRareUmberJoker · 10/01/2025 21:03

Choccyscofffy · 10/01/2025 21:01

Should ops son be emotionally blackmailed to hand over some of his inheritance?

No, why would you think that?

You don't think that so what are you talking about?

InvisibilityCloakActivated · 10/01/2025 21:03

poemsandwine · 10/01/2025 20:57

Emotionally blackmail her child for circumstances he can't help? What a brilliant idea!

How is a conversation "emotional blackmail"? I'm genuinely baffled by your interpretation.

Choccyscofffy · 10/01/2025 21:03

UndermyShoeJoe · 10/01/2025 21:00

So some say biological, some say not.

The family the op has married into says biological only.

The point is one sibling inherits and one does not, it does hurt. I’ve repeatedly said that that’s nit the inheriting child’s fault, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t sting.

poemsandwine · 10/01/2025 21:03

UndermyShoeJoe · 10/01/2025 21:02

If he wanted to share he will without any whispering in ears.

Exactly.

soupfiend · 10/01/2025 21:02

Commonsense22 · 10/01/2025 20:59

This is where you can't follow what your husband says. Your eldest is your son and his feelings of betrayal will not come from the financial disparity but from not knowing.
Your husband is talking nonsense, just ignore him on this. Your eldest will be greatly hurt by you not speaking to him proactively. If you do, he will probably feel gutted but keep his strong relationship with you and move on with his life.

This is terrible advice, what planet are you on. OP has no right, no one has any right, to discuss a 3rd party's financial information with someone else

ThatRareUmberJoker · 10/01/2025 21:02

Commonsense22 · 10/01/2025 20:59

This is where you can't follow what your husband says. Your eldest is your son and his feelings of betrayal will not come from the financial disparity but from not knowing.
Your husband is talking nonsense, just ignore him on this. Your eldest will be greatly hurt by you not speaking to him proactively. If you do, he will probably feel gutted but keep his strong relationship with you and move on with his life.

It's up to her younger son if he wants his older brother to know. Its got nothing to do with the op and her younger son should not be bullied because he has inherited.

UndermyShoeJoe · 10/01/2025 21:02

If he wanted to share he will without any whispering in ears.

HollyKnight · 10/01/2025 21:01

Choccyscofffy · 10/01/2025 20:54

What’s your definition then? Below is the dictionary definition, which OP’s family meets.

nuclear family, in sociology and anthropology, a group of people who are united by ties of partnership and parenthood and consisting of a pair of adults and their socially recognized children. Typically, but not always, the adults in a nuclear family are married.

"consisting of a pair of adults and their socially recognized children"

The OP's eldest is not her partner's child. And nuclear family does not include grandparents let alone one parent's partner's extended family. The OP's family is a stepfamily. Not a nuclear family.

Choccyscofffy · 10/01/2025 21:01

ThatRareUmberJoker · 10/01/2025 20:58

Should ops son be emotionally blackmailed to hand over some of his inheritance?

It doesn't matter what anyone says the ops husband's family doesn't see the ops oldest as a blood relative. They are a blended nuclear family.

Edited

Should ops son be emotionally blackmailed to hand over some of his inheritance?

No, why would you think that?

InvisibilityCloakActivated · 10/01/2025 21:01

ThatRareUmberJoker · 10/01/2025 20:48

Use emotional blackmail bad idea.

Who said anything about emotional blackmail? There is a big difference between talking to someone and emotionally blackmailing them. Or at least there is for most people.

Would you choose not to share with your sibling?

UndermyShoeJoe · 10/01/2025 21:00

So some say biological, some say not.

The family the op has married into says biological only.

Choccyscofffy · 10/01/2025 20:59

UndermyShoeJoe · 10/01/2025 20:56

The nuclear family is considered the ” traditional ” family. The nuclear family consists of a mother, father, and their biological children.

A nuclear family (also known as an elementary family, atomic family or conjugal family) is a family group consisting of parentsand their children (one or more), typically living in one home residence. It is in contrast to a single-parent family, a larger extended family or a family with more than two parents. Nuclear families typically center on a married couple which may have any number of children. There are differences in definition among observers. Some definitions allow only biological children who are full-blood siblings and consider adopted or half- and step-siblings a part of the immediate family but others allow for a step-parent and any mix of dependent children, including stepchildren and adopted children.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclearfamily

Duckyfondant · 10/01/2025 20:59

Not remotely what you asked, but yes - your nephew should share his money with his sisters, and everything should be out in the open. Time to start blabbing all round, OP.

Commonsense22 · 10/01/2025 20:59

EWAB · 10/01/2025 20:17

I can’t talk to my elder son as it’s my younger one’s story. That is DP’s argument! He says it’s no body’s business but DS2’s and nephew’s .

This is where you can't follow what your husband says. Your eldest is your son and his feelings of betrayal will not come from the financial disparity but from not knowing.
Your husband is talking nonsense, just ignore him on this. Your eldest will be greatly hurt by you not speaking to him proactively. If you do, he will probably feel gutted but keep his strong relationship with you and move on with his life.

Swipe left for the next trending thread