Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To resent the cognitive dissonance that exists around climate change

388 replies

JacquesHarlow · 10/01/2025 09:21

Let’s be real - will anything get better when folk’s priorities are usually about themselves?

Let me explain my rather emotional opening point.

There’s been lots of news this week unsurprisingly about how we had the hottest year on record last year. The last 10 years have been the hottest on record. Wildfires, floods, you name it - the earth is changing.

Yet here in the temperate, largely rainy UK, many people I see around me are very happy to have their head in the sand, while also bizarrely choosing just one or two lines of attack on the climate crisis to shame others.

One of the parents i know has an electric car. It’s nice, I’m happy for them. They also take at least five flight a year. They have three children.

Yet if you hear them talk about diesel cars… it’s as if the owners are personally killing everyone around them.

Now don’t get me wrong. Emissions locally are important, the air our kids breathe is important. that might be a focus.

However you see it in the choice of car journeys over trains, of large SUVs over a normal family car like a Golf.

The latter particularly grates. We have a huge climate crisis. Yet Joanna or Nicola has to have a Discovery Sport for her three kids because she needs to sit high up, it’s easier to load them in, and she worries about crash worthiness.

The history books will show that rather than looking up and out for each other, we’re actually turning more inwards. Our own personal economy will always triumph over needing to protect others. If I’m able to pay £400 a month PCP on a Dispcvery Sport, then “I’ll protect my family over anything”, even though the entire thought process is irrational.

We need to take fewer flights and more rail journeys. working from home should mean more walking to school as the commute has gone. instead we’re seeing more car journeys. More flights. More large purchases; throwaway electronics; fast fashion.

AIBU to think there’s a lot of cognitive dissonance and head in the sand about climate change in the UK, and spending power (and the choices it unlocks) is king?

OP posts:
DdraigGoch · 14/01/2025 14:40

Everythingisnumbersnow · 14/01/2025 13:34

Maybe, maybe not. I don't care and I'm not willing to have a terrible life so that people in 70 years can have a 2 degree increase instead of 3 (I also think only a mug in the UK would take responsibility when there are billions of people in India and China who won't)

Car dependency lowers quality of life in the present, never mind in the future. It cuts off social contact, reduces physical activity, increases ambient noise levels and parks a heavy financial burden on the most marginalised people.

DdraigGoch · 14/01/2025 14:22

Anniedash · 14/01/2025 13:22

What’s your point? LA is one of the most densely populated cities in the world and will continue to be. They will build it back and manage the risk.

You are denying that climate change causes natural disasters (your evidence apparently being that some rich people are carrying on anyway so it must be fine). I am pointing out that the most expensive natural disaster in the history of the US has just happened. Climate change was a large part of the cause.

You claim that "clearly they are not stupid". Celebrities and politicians are pretty stupid on the whole (have you seen who's in the new US government?). Some refuse to believe that climate change is a thing, others are aware that it will happen but as long as they can buy their way out of trouble it doesn't matter if everyone else starves. Meanwhile closer to home there are some politicians who do appear to get it, but are too cowardly to take the necessary action.

Anniedash · 14/01/2025 14:15

Lentilweaver · 14/01/2025 14:03

I think only a mug in the UK would blame an Indian or Chinese person for buying one car per family per lifetime when British and American peoppe have seversl cars per family.

Not really. It means not subscribing to climate hysteria and the cult like obsession.

Lentilweaver · 14/01/2025 14:03

I think only a mug in the UK would blame an Indian or Chinese person for buying one car per family per lifetime when British and American peoppe have seversl cars per family.

Everythingisnumbersnow · 14/01/2025 13:34

HangryLikeTheHulk · 14/01/2025 10:54

There was plenty we did which caused this. We are clearly capable of changing our climate through our activities. It will be the end of the world (as we know it) because many places will become uninhabitable, agriculture will no longer be viable in many parts of the world, and the risks posed by natural disasters will eliminate stability. Stability and a stable, temperate climate is what brings economic success. Think about which parts of the world were able to enjoy generally reliable harvests for centuries, which parts of the world were able to industrialise first, and which parts thereby became the richest ? The clue is places with a stable, reliable, predictable climate with a low risk of natural disasters.

We are also capable of fixing it. Climate action isn’t a hair shirt, it’s mainly about stopping the use of fossil fuels. Anything we can do to move off them is a step in the right direction.

Maybe, maybe not. I don't care and I'm not willing to have a terrible life so that people in 70 years can have a 2 degree increase instead of 3 (I also think only a mug in the UK would take responsibility when there are billions of people in India and China who won't)

Anniedash · 14/01/2025 13:22

DdraigGoch · 14/01/2025 13:04

How are the rich and the famous in Southern California getting on at the moment?

Insurers are the world's experts in assessing risk, why do you think that they are withdrawing coverage from places like California or Florida?

What’s your point? LA is one of the most densely populated cities in the world and will continue to be. They will build it back and manage the risk.

Anniedash · 14/01/2025 13:20

VoodooRajin · 14/01/2025 10:00

Us, India and china emit so much because of their size

And?

DdraigGoch · 14/01/2025 13:04

Anniedash · 14/01/2025 06:50

The thing that no one is ever able to answer is that if there is really a so-called climate emergency, why do the US, China, India and others continue to emit so much. Why do celebrities and activists who lecture the rest of us, live their lives as there is no emergency.

Clearly, they are not stupid, if there is going to be some climate related catastrophe, then they will be impacted as much as everyone else. It’s like Nuclear weapons, everyone knows that they are assured mutual destruction, so every country avoids first strike as much as possible. While witn carbon emissions, the rich and the powerful live their lives and powerful countries run themselves normally.

There is only one explanation. There is no climate emergency. The gullible have fallen for that line and are being taken for a ride.

Do as they do, not as they say.

How are the rich and the famous in Southern California getting on at the moment?

Insurers are the world's experts in assessing risk, why do you think that they are withdrawing coverage from places like California or Florida?

DdraigGoch · 14/01/2025 12:48

scalt · 13/01/2025 16:06

First, let's have the celebrities and politicians stop using their private jets and helicopters. They are the ones with money, power and influence; if they care about this, they need to lead by example. It's ironic that some of them use private jets to attend their climate change "conferences".

We also need to have a discussion about the media constantly frightening the pants off the public to sell newspapers; and the government doing likewise to make the public compliant. Because of all this, it is now so hard to tell what is truth and what is lies.

Then, we can talk about sacrifices made by ordinary people in the name of "climate change". Some of us remember when the scary buzzword of the day was "global warming", or even further back "the greenhouse effect" and "the hole in the ozone layer".

You realise that the reason that you no longer hear about the ozone layer is that people listened to scientists and did something about it? All 197 countries signed a treaty banning CFC production. The hole is gradually shrinking and is expected to return to 1980s levels by the mid-21st century.

DdraigGoch · 14/01/2025 12:42

jasjas3008 · 13/01/2025 13:26

Well, you ve just agreed with what i ve said BUT as far as i can, there are no moves to address driving standards, nothing on changing sentencing etc.

20mph zones and pedestrianisations are all very well BUT the cyclist still has to get there and what about everywhere else???

Protected cycle lanes just get used by walkers etc who then shout at cyclists for going too fast....... plus the country has no money... though there seems to be always enough to waste.

Another issue is the road surface, driving in Devon yesterday to attend a XC running race... some sections of road would have a cyclist over the bars or smash up your wheels & roads are getting worse, not better.

The car, in the eyes of the justice system, the govt and the public is King, until that changes, nothing will.

Instead we get nonsense about Heat Pumps and EPCs of C... i thought the last lot were useless, this lot are just as useless.

Perhaps AI will save us ?

At least London and Paris are getting somewhere. Anne Hidaglo in particular has done a lot of good. Once critical mass is achieved the rate of change grows exponentially.

DdraigGoch · 14/01/2025 12:40

Gogogo12345 · 13/01/2025 15:25

And the kitchen filters? Just seen a load of units and washing machine being carried on a bike Maybe in Vietnam

Says he's doing it for 2 months and he lives in a city. Maybe e not so easy if places 20 miles apart in rural areas.

Edited

84.4% of the population is urbanised. Let's sort out traffic in towns and cities first, that's the easy win (though safe cross-country routes between rural towns and villages are needed too, fast country roads are the most dangerous). Then we can worry about the 15.6% who live rurally. Likewise, most of the population aren't kitchen fitters, most of the population are going to work, going to school, getting some shopping etc. Every one of those who isn't in a car is a win.

Those people (delivery vans etc.) who need to drive will benefit from everyone who doesn't need to drive no longer being in their way. The Netherlands (famously hot on active travel and public transport) is a far better place to drive than North America (very car-centric) because shifting as many people as possible onto bicycles and trains reduces congestion for the people who remain in their cars. A 10% decrease in traffic makes a massive difference, you see this every time the school holidays start.

EasternStandard · 14/01/2025 12:36

gamerchick · 14/01/2025 12:32

Just matching your energy hinny.

I've always said the same. We, as a species are distructive. We breed, consume resources, rinse and repeat. We won't be allowed to do that forever. None of us are of any importance in the grand scheme of things

When a population of parasites overwhelms its host, the host takes care of it. It's not that hard to understand.

I picked up on your first post saying you hoped it would happen

I don’t think anyone does in reality, when push comes to shove, anymore than they hope their house is taken out by a tornado tomorrow

gamerchick · 14/01/2025 12:32

EasternStandard · 14/01/2025 12:26

Moving on from the bless you response as a bit silly

That view of being team planet survival instinct crops up on all these threads, but in reality if the planet were to take out a house I don’t think it would be offered up by same posters

Just matching your energy hinny.

I've always said the same. We, as a species are distructive. We breed, consume resources, rinse and repeat. We won't be allowed to do that forever. None of us are of any importance in the grand scheme of things

When a population of parasites overwhelms its host, the host takes care of it. It's not that hard to understand.

EasternStandard · 14/01/2025 12:26

Moving on from the bless you response as a bit silly

That view of being team planet survival instinct crops up on all these threads, but in reality if the planet were to take out a house I don’t think it would be offered up by same posters

gamerchick · 14/01/2025 12:12

EasternStandard · 14/01/2025 12:02

You are reacting quite strongly in that last line. I can’t say I care that you do or don’t tbf

Yes survival instinct, I’d say most humans have it even those who type they want to be wiped out alongside their dc on these threads.

Ah bless you man.

EasternStandard · 14/01/2025 12:02

gamerchick · 14/01/2025 11:58

Not many people have experienced survival instinct now you've touched on it. It's very strong and overrides pretty much everything. I've never experienced it.

I wonder what the planets survival instinct is like.

Dude for the last time, I don't give a shit if you find anything I'm saying is odd.

You are reacting quite strongly in that last line. I can’t say I care that you do or don’t tbf

Yes survival instinct, I’d say most humans have it even those who type they want to be wiped out alongside their dc on these threads.

gamerchick · 14/01/2025 11:58

EasternStandard · 14/01/2025 11:48

I haven’t related this to my family or taken it personally I’ve said I find statements like yours about hoping for destruction as odd

Especially since as a parent it would include your family

You’ve now said you would brick it as you’re only human. That was my point, typing stuff like I hope we get wiped out isn’t typical for human behaviour it’s internet bumpf on all these threads. Self survival is more typical.

Not many people have experienced survival instinct now you've touched on it. It's very strong and overrides pretty much everything. I've never experienced it.

I wonder what the planets survival instinct is like.

Dude for the last time, I don't give a shit if you find anything I'm saying is odd.

EasternStandard · 14/01/2025 11:48

gamerchick · 14/01/2025 11:44

I do hope the planet acts in time to save itself yes. The only way the planet will survive is if the human race is removed.

I'm not sure why it's offended you so much. Im not wishing your family dead. Don't take shit so personally and see the bugger picture.

I haven’t related this to my family or taken it personally I’ve said I find statements like yours about hoping for destruction as odd

Especially since as a parent it would include your family

You’ve now said you would brick it as you’re only human. That was my point, typing stuff like I hope we get wiped out isn’t typical for human behaviour it’s internet bumpf on all these threads. Self survival is more typical.

HellsBalls · 14/01/2025 11:48

All it takes is one decent volcano firing up for a few weeks or a decent sized meteorite to hit us and the population will soon reduce.

gamerchick · 14/01/2025 11:44

EasternStandard · 14/01/2025 11:41

First line, so what.

Second contradicts your hope that it will happen.

I do hope the planet acts in time to save itself yes. The only way the planet will survive is if the human race is removed.

I'm not sure why it's offended you so much. Im not wishing your family dead. Don't take shit so personally and see the bugger picture.

EasternStandard · 14/01/2025 11:41

gamerchick · 14/01/2025 11:40

I don't care about what you're saying.

If course I'd be bricking it, I'm a human. That's an odd thing to say.

First line, so what.

Second contradicts your hope that it will happen.

gamerchick · 14/01/2025 11:40

EasternStandard · 14/01/2025 11:34

So you admit you have little argument? fine

‘I think this I hope we all get wiped out including my dc’ you see on these threads is just internet bumpf

Push came to shove and they’d be bricking it as much as any

I don't care about what you're saying.

If course I'd be bricking it, I'm a human. That's an odd thing to say.

Ohgodthisishard · 14/01/2025 11:37

jasjas3008 · 14/01/2025 11:23

Whilst i agree a terminal or huge fall in the worlds population would assist the planet, i don't believe that would automatically ensure its existence.

Those things could go hand in glove with wars, inc Nuclear & then what would be left after the likely "Nuclear Winter" and huge damage to the ozone layer.

The planet would recover eventually though, even from a nuclear winter. It's existed for 4.6 billion years. A lot will have happened in that time frame, we are a mere blip and we'll be gone in the blink of an eye too

gamerchick · 14/01/2025 11:37

jasjas3008 · 14/01/2025 11:23

Whilst i agree a terminal or huge fall in the worlds population would assist the planet, i don't believe that would automatically ensure its existence.

Those things could go hand in glove with wars, inc Nuclear & then what would be left after the likely "Nuclear Winter" and huge damage to the ozone layer.

Wars like that are a human thing. If the planet were to wage war on us it wouldn't be in the form of nuclear weapons really would it?

There are large chunks of ice on this planet which is melting. We don't know what will be defrosted with it that could affect us. There's shit at the bottom of the ocean that we don't know about. There are areas of our planet that aren't accessible to us at the minute. We don't know what's in those areas. The human race being what it is will have a look though.

We don't know what will happen as the planet heats up and other organic life forms evolve along with it that could turn on us.

There's a load of theories on how the planet could turn on us and probably a few that can't be imagined. But we won't be allowed to just carry on, everything has a fail safe meant to protect it installed somewhere

EasternStandard · 14/01/2025 11:34

gamerchick · 14/01/2025 11:31

Heh you got it. Grin

So you admit you have little argument? fine

‘I think this I hope we all get wiped out including my dc’ you see on these threads is just internet bumpf

Push came to shove and they’d be bricking it as much as any