Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that Musk is now overstepping himself and the UK gvt should threaten action

610 replies

Bogginsthe3rd · 07/01/2025 02:02

Musk has just posted this on twitter (among other unhinged tweets). To me this reads as a thinly veiled threat to democratically elected UK MPs and actually the UK government should consider sanctions to the US if he continues this attack when he enters the White House?

To think that Musk is now overstepping himself and the UK gvt should threaten action
OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
yohohoCrimbo · 08/01/2025 07:32

@LondonLawyer ignore my question. I've just read one of your other posts and found the answer.

What about those perps who were advised by their lawyers to renounce their Pakistani citizenship? Rendering them stateless? Was this done to avoid deportation?

yohohoCrimbo · 08/01/2025 07:18

@LondonLawyer can someone with dual citizenship be deported?

JessaWoo · 08/01/2025 04:04

1dayatatime · 07/01/2025 23:21

Musk has brought back into the spotlight the fact that so far none of the recommendations of the 2022 Jay inquiry have been implemented.

Those who wish that Musk should stop posting about the child abuse scandal are of a scarily similar mindset to those that wanted to brush the matter under the carpet at the time.

Sure, but what is his motivation for doing so? It isn't likely that he has justice at heart. It's self-interest. He's playing around in British politics just like a digital puppeteer - it's working brilliantly, too.

LondonLawyer · 07/01/2025 23:50

I've just looked up some articles about this, and @EmmaMaria 's post was also, frankly, pretty misleading. The statement, "The other 28 were guilty of minor offences such as possession or in at least one case a driving offence." is not correct. Our of the 29, one appears to have been convicted of murder, but the other 28 or so can't reasonably be described as "minor offences". The BBC says, "The individuals on the flight - who numbered more than 30 - included 14 people convicted of drugs offences, six people convicted of a violent crime and one person convicted of dangerous driving." 14 people convicted of drugs offences doesn't mean 14 people convicted of simple possession, "drugs offences" covers quite a range up to and including massive dealing. Dangerous driving isn't what most people would ever think was just a "driving offence".

The Independent said, "Vance Brown, the father of Chevon Brown, 23, who was placed on the flight after serving a seven-month sentence for a driving offence – the only crime he has been convicted of – said he felt “sick to his stomach” by the home secretary’s claims." https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/sajid-javid-jamaica-deportation-crimes-home-office-hostile-environment-immigration-a8767986.html

If you search for that name, however, he didn't serve a 7 month sentence, he spent 7 (elsewhere it says 8) months in prison out of a 14 month sentence (taking it over the 12 months I mentioned above, which is a crucial test). Turns out that Chevon Brown was arrested after a high-speed car chase through Oxford (115mph!) and had no licence or insurance. "The 21-year-old led a police chase for about five minutes, drove on the wrong side of the road, through red lights and across front gardens outside a block of flats"
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48237126

Whether or not you think those particular deportations were right or wrong, it is no more correct to say 28 of them were for "minor offences" than it is to say they were all rapists, murderers, etc

Home secretary urged to apologise for falsely claiming Jamaica deportees were all guilty of ‘very serious crimes’

‘They’re labelling us. When their only answer is to falsely claim that we are all murderers, rapists, traffickers, it says a lot about how the government operates,’ says father-of-three Owen Haisley

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/sajid-javid-jamaica-deportation-crimes-home-office-hostile-environment-immigration-a8767986.html

LondonLawyer · 07/01/2025 23:28

EmmaMaria · 07/01/2025 14:15

I have no idea if anyone has actually got around to answering the question asked many times on this thread - what actual vote is Elon Musk referencing?
In case anyone is interested in facts as opposed to fiction, IT IS ALL A LIE.

There has never been a vote on deporting criminals who commit rape in the UK. Not one of those people named in his tweet or whatever he calls them now - Xing? sounds a bit like a Chinese dictator, doesn't it? - has voted on that issue and the list has nothing at all to do with any vote ever taken.

The list is a list of signatories to a letter to the Home Secretary who was then Sajid Javid after he told Parliament that 29 people deported in 2019 were all guilty of very serious crimes such as rape and murder, firearms offences and drug-trafficking. This was a lie. One of the 29 had committed murder. The other 28 were guilty of minor offences such as possession or in at least one case a driving offence. Most were part of Windrush and had no ties to Jamaica having come to the UK as children. The letter asked for an apology for lying and assurances relating to the Windrush scandal.

NOT ONE OF THEM WAS A RAPIST.

It may come as a shock to some people, but Elon Musk is a liar.

That is relatively unlikely. A driving offence or simple drugs possession doesn't lead to a deportation order being made, unless by "driving offence" someone means "causing death by dangerous driving" or similar. You don't get a custodial sentence to trigger the deportation provisions for long enough for simple possession or a standard driving offences, and people who've lived in the UK since childhood might well fall within one of the exceptions to deportation even if they do get sentences over 12 months.

1dayatatime · 07/01/2025 23:21

Musk has brought back into the spotlight the fact that so far none of the recommendations of the 2022 Jay inquiry have been implemented.

Those who wish that Musk should stop posting about the child abuse scandal are of a scarily similar mindset to those that wanted to brush the matter under the carpet at the time.

Notaflippinclue · 07/01/2025 23:21

He terrifies you - bloody hell you've obviously never lived in the north!

BIossomtoes · 07/01/2025 23:13

1dayatatime · 07/01/2025 23:08

Well he has at least triggered action on the recommendations of the Jay enquiry when for the last 2.5 years nothing has been done by either the Conservatives or Labour.

No he hasn’t, that was in the King’s speech last year.

abracadabra1980 · 07/01/2025 23:08

IfOnlyOurEyesSawSouls · 07/01/2025 02:56

He is extremely dangerous.

This what happens when we as humans allow greed and money to accumulate to such a degree that people then have the power to buy the media and influential figures to manipulate humankind for their own agenda.

100% agree.

1dayatatime · 07/01/2025 23:08

BIossomtoes · 07/01/2025 23:02

He’s exposed nothing. There have been seven if not eight investigations and the previous government never even discussed the Jay report in cabinet.

Well he has at least triggered action on the recommendations of the Jay enquiry when for the last 2.5 years nothing has been done by either the Conservatives or Labour.

BIossomtoes · 07/01/2025 23:02

He’s exposed nothing. There have been seven if not eight investigations and the previous government never even discussed the Jay report in cabinet.

kirbykirby · 07/01/2025 22:54

Whoarethoseguys · 07/01/2025 12:25

He is extremely dangerous and his influence terrifies me.
I have no idea what we can do about it though.

Bonkers. Cognitive dissonance. He's exposed the mass rape and torture of thousands of girls, many of them children. How can anyone read the descriptions of what happened to these poor girls (their treatment by the authorities is almost as shocking as the rapes and torture) and come to the conclusion that Musk is the terrifying one. The brutality and dehumanisation was hidden under the anodyne use of the word "grooming" and without Musk few people would be exposed to the details - inhumane and barbaric abuse these girls endured. I'm pleased there is a Musk (however flawed) to expose such awful details.

JHound · 07/01/2025 22:48

JRSKSSBH · 07/01/2025 20:24

I have multiple post-graduate qualifications but I am incapable of thinking of a single valid reason to vote against the deportation of foreign rapists, other than reasons that put the welfare and human rights of violent criminals above the welfare and safety of British women, children and girls.

I can think of many.

  1. They do not /no longer posess foreign nationality.
  2. They are only “technically” foreign (e.g arrived in the UK at months old ) and lived their entire life here
  3. They have underaged dependents who are British nationals who will not be removed from them full time
  4. The nature of the crime (e.g an 18 year old having “consensual” sex with a 15 year old has committed a crime but potentially not meeting the threshold for it to be considered a deportable offence.

Simply off the top of my head but I would need to read the details of the case before making a decision.

And being a post graduate in and of itself does not make an individual intelligent of capable of complex thought. I have known many a grad with a highly skilled profession that still is thick as mince.

BIossomtoes · 07/01/2025 22:16

Clavinova · 07/01/2025 21:19

Thanks Clav. I particularly like this bit of the article

”The idea that a letter from MPs questioning process led to dangerous criminals going on to commit crime is as weak as this government’s running of the Home Office.”

Abhannmor · 07/01/2025 22:03

BIossomtoes · 07/01/2025 18:11

Brown said she wasn’t because it would have made a nonsense of his apology if he hadn’t. In my opinion she was a bigot and he got it right first time.

Brown thought she was swearing - misheard 'flocking' as ' fucking' apparently? Or so I've read. Certainly seemed very angry.

LondonLawyer · 07/01/2025 21:55

Notaflippinclue · 07/01/2025 18:52

Implement the reports findings. Perhaps if they deported the ones with dual passports when they are released it would be a deterrent but it is still going on and no one seems able to stop it - maybe Musk is the one who can.

You can't deport British citizens. A British citizen with another nationality can't be deported. One of the fundamentals of British citizenship is that you have the "right of abode" - which means you can't be chucked out.

Abhannmor · 07/01/2025 21:53

He wants to buy Liverpool Football Club according to his dad. Ah well. I'll have to revert to my no 2 club Southend United. I know it's a bit of a drop but needs must when the devil drives.

BornFreeButinChains · 07/01/2025 21:35

Omg, progressive Muslim Dr taj Haregy.

The left have strange bed fellows, they have an unholy alliance with ultra conservative extremist Muslims.

Clavinova · 07/01/2025 21:19

BIossomtoes · 07/01/2025 20:44

I thought that was Lammy and Mahmood, who represented their constituents, one of who had a career in the UK armed forces. The vast majority of the offences were relatively minor drug offences.

Keir Starmer ‘opposed’ expulsion of rapist Fabian Henry;

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/law/article/keir-starmer-opposed-expulsion-of-rapist-fabian-henry-7ccts05zk

User37482 · 07/01/2025 21:19

Annabella92 · 07/01/2025 21:18

Yes, I keep hearing this "best intentions" and "noble motives", this only applies if you see these girls as acceptable sacrifices.

I see it as craven self interest tbh.

Annabella92 · 07/01/2025 21:19

BornFreeButinChains · 07/01/2025 21:02

@Annabella92 so we sacrifice our children?

Our governments job is to look after us, no one else us.

That is literally their job.

I was playing devil's advocate actually. I fully agree which is why I called two tier Kier treasonous upthread.

User37482 · 07/01/2025 21:18

Annabella92 · 07/01/2025 20:57

It puts women and girls of their origin country at risk.

Generally it’s because it puts the perpetrators at risk. I remember a sentencing by a judge in Pakistan of a serial child rapist and murder. He was to be cut up and dissolved in acid like his victims were. Unfortunately he died in prison (or committed suicide, can’t remember which) before this could happen.

Annabella92 · 07/01/2025 21:18

Puzzledandpissedoff · 07/01/2025 21:13

Not too sure about the "best intentions", but otherwise I agree completely

Except there's a problem in that many of those possessed of these attitudes are the very ones running our institutions now, be that government, the police, the judiciary or whatever

Many of the wider public may well have moved on, but those ossified in their extreme liberalism haven't, and it's precisely because they feel neither guilt nor shame that they won't be easy to dislodge

Yes, I keep hearing this "best intentions" and "noble motives", this only applies if you see these girls as acceptable sacrifices.

Annabella92 · 07/01/2025 21:16

I don't support any political party. Don't even vote, who on earth is there to vote for?

Puzzledandpissedoff · 07/01/2025 21:13

NotTerfNorCis · 07/01/2025 19:20

The people who tried to conceal abuse in places like Rotherham, thinking they were avoiding community tensions, made a very serious mistake. They acted with best intentions. Unfortunately they're the kind of people who are not likely to doubt themselves or feel any shame. That's a pity, but it can't be helped. The important thing is that we don't end up in this situation again. The law should apply to everyone equally.

Not too sure about the "best intentions", but otherwise I agree completely

Except there's a problem in that many of those possessed of these attitudes are the very ones running our institutions now, be that government, the police, the judiciary or whatever

Many of the wider public may well have moved on, but those ossified in their extreme liberalism haven't, and it's precisely because they feel neither guilt nor shame that they won't be easy to dislodge

Swipe left for the next trending thread