Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Shared disability toilets with baby changing facilities

267 replies

MobilityCat · 28/12/2024 16:17

Yesterday, I found myself in an embarrassing and upsetting situation when I crapped myself while waiting outside the disabled toilet. A mum was inside, chatting and cooing to her baby while changing its nappy. While I completely understand that she needed a suitable place to change her baby, I couldn’t help but wonder: why does it have to be in the one facility specifically designed for the disabled? Why can't the baby changing facilities be located in the women's toilet or have a separate dedicated room for this purpose?

OP posts:
Applesandpears23 · 28/12/2024 17:27

YANBU and you are right they should be separate. If changing a nappy with poo it is faster if you chat with the baby because otherwise they try to grab things or turn over. If you talk to them it sometimes distracts them and makes it faster. So just because she was chatting doesn’t mean she was going slowly.

MolkosTeenageAngst · 28/12/2024 17:24

MobilityCat · 28/12/2024 17:15

I don't expect that the "accessible" toilet will always be unoccupied, just like any other toilet. My concern was just that it was combined with baby changing.

But why was that a concern? The baby change has to go somewhere? If it wasn’t in the accessible toilet it would most likely have to go in the men’s or the women’s, which would likely make it inaccessible for many disabled parents or for disabled children requiring it. I appreciate that in an ideal world there would be space to have an accessible toilet plus an accessible baby change facility plus separate men’s and women’s facilities but the reality is most places won’t have room for this. The only issue I can see is if having the baby change facilities in the accessible toilet stops them being accessible, for example if there is a changing table which takes up floor space so doesn’t leave enough room to turn a wheelchair or if the changing table obscures the grab rails etc. Your only issue seems to be that having the baby changing space in there is that it means the facility is busier and so there may be a queue, but it should be expected that sometimes there will be a need to queue for public facilities.

MobilityCat · 28/12/2024 17:24

I wish I hadn't mentioned the cooing, so many are fixating on it. I just wished that that baby changing was elsewhere.

OP posts:
Hankunamatata · 28/12/2024 17:21

In an ideal world no they should not be combined. Baby changing should have its own room. Sadly not all places have the space or the inclination to do this.
It's not fair as lack of disabled toilets is awful.

Richard1985 · 28/12/2024 17:16

MobilityCat · 28/12/2024 17:00

I quite understand that she needed to use the space. My question was why it needs to be combined with the disabled toilet. Adding to that she appeared to be taking her time about it, but that may have felt longer because I had an urgent need to crap.

I’m sorry this happened to you and as a man who often finds himself in the disabled loo changing a nappy, I always try to be as quick as possible

The answer to the question ‘why do they need to be combined’ is that a lot of places were built when the requirement to provide accessible toilets and space for men to change nappies wasn’t a consideration and so businesses are struggling to add in those facilities with limited space to play with

MobilityCat · 28/12/2024 17:15

MolkosTeenageAngst · 28/12/2024 16:50

It was a shared space and I don’t think it’s unreasonable for there to be shared spaces. The requirements of an accessible toilet is that it is suitably equipped for a person with a disability to use it, so it needs adequate floor space and grab rails etc. The requirement is not for it to be kept empty or free from the non-disabled at all times, it’s okay that somebody (disabled or otherwise) has to queue sometimes. I appreciate it’s difficult if you can’t wait for the toilet but what would you have done if there had been another disabled person in the toilet in front of you? You can’t expect the toilet to always be available I’m afraid, just as the non-disabled facilities won’t always be available either. Needing to queue for a public toilet because somebody else is using it is fairly standard and it’s not reasonable to expect it won’t ever happen.

Edited

I don't expect that the "accessible" toilet will always be unoccupied, just like any other toilet. My concern was just that it was combined with baby changing.

OP posts:
JPC123 · 28/12/2024 17:14

fuzzychic · 28/12/2024 16:51

Then a parent with a disability wouldn't have anywhere to change their child they'd have to have to do their thing in the accessible loo and then go to a non accessible loo to change their child.

Not at all. Disabled facilities need proper, disability friendly, changing facilities. These would be perfect r for a parent wanting to change a disabled child and far more appropriate than baby changing facilities for someone with an older child who needs changing.

lleeggoo · 28/12/2024 17:11

@AgnesX

Oh don't be obtuse. 🙄

I wasn't, you can't tell. However OP clarified and I posted immediately after the comment you have quoted to acknowledge it.

AgnesX · 28/12/2024 17:10

lleeggoo · 28/12/2024 16:32

@Purplevelvetshoes

Because she was taking her time. It wasn’t a quick nappy change.

You cannot tell that by the fact she was vocal with her baby.

Oh don't be obtuse. 🙄

MobilityCat · 28/12/2024 17:08

SaveMeFromMyBoobs · 28/12/2024 16:59

I think there's also a terminology thing here. When I go out they're almost anyways 'accessible toilets' not 'disabled'. To those with disabilities they think they're one and the same. But lots of people need a toilet with a large floor space.

Yes it includes people with wheelchairs etc. It also includes people with pushchairs. They don't fit in a normal stall and you can't exactly leave your baby outside so you have to use the accessible toilet. Same with room for baby change table, pram etc.

Accessible toilets are for people who need space, it's not specifically a queue jumping exercise. Should there be more? Yes. But businesses are reluctant to give up more space for toilets, taking away space they can make money from.

An accessible toilet is specifically designed to accommodate people with disabilities, so we have the necessary space and facilities to use the toilet comfortably and safely. The design of accessible toilets follows very specific standards to meet the needs of wheelchair users, and people with mobility issues. Quite often there isn't even provision for someone who has a colostomy bag.

OP posts:
Bogginsthe3rd · 28/12/2024 17:05

Completely agree with you OP. Need more facilities as standard.

Topseyt123 · 28/12/2024 17:00

She didn't do anything wrong if that's where the only baby changing table was. When my children were babies the only public baby changers were nearly always in the disabled toilets. There was nothing I could do about it.

Why does talking/singing to her baby mean that she was taking longer? It doesn't. I often used to talk/sing to mine when changing them because it kept them calmer and meant I could get the nappy change done faster.

I'm sorry you went through this. I have IBS myself and it can certainly cause accidents. I do understand how you must have felt. I wouldn't say that this was the other woman's fault though. Complain to your local council about the poor provision of proper facilities, and maybe to your MP.

MobilityCat · 28/12/2024 17:00

ThejoyofNC · 28/12/2024 16:37

Sometimes nappy changes aren't quick. I don't understand why you're so bothered that she was talking to her own baby, but YABU. She was using the facility designated for her, not her fault it's a shared space.

I quite understand that she needed to use the space. My question was why it needs to be combined with the disabled toilet. Adding to that she appeared to be taking her time about it, but that may have felt longer because I had an urgent need to crap.

OP posts:
SaveMeFromMyBoobs · 28/12/2024 16:59

I think there's also a terminology thing here. When I go out they're almost anyways 'accessible toilets' not 'disabled'. To those with disabilities they think they're one and the same. But lots of people need a toilet with a large floor space.

Yes it includes people with wheelchairs etc. It also includes people with pushchairs. They don't fit in a normal stall and you can't exactly leave your baby outside so you have to use the accessible toilet. Same with room for baby change table, pram etc.

Accessible toilets are for people who need space, it's not specifically a queue jumping exercise. Should there be more? Yes. But businesses are reluctant to give up more space for toilets, taking away space they can make money from.

Mrsttcno1 · 28/12/2024 16:57

MobilityCat · 28/12/2024 16:31

She was taking her own sweet time about it

Not necessarily. I chat/coo to my baby while changing her nappy, it keeps her occupied and stops her from trying to roll/crawl away mid-change which actually makes the changing process much quicker than me trying to silently wrestle her into a nappy while she’s trying to escape.

fuzzychic · 28/12/2024 16:56

lleeggoo · 28/12/2024 16:23

A baby change that is separate from the accessible toilet would also be unisex

Would it be accessible?

BIossomtoes · 28/12/2024 16:56

Purplevelvetshoes · 28/12/2024 16:28

Because she was taking her time. It wasn’t a quick nappy change.

Don’t people talk to their babies whatever speed they’re changing a nappy?

Boomer55 · 28/12/2024 16:55

Disabled loos are for disabled people. Having a baby makes no one disabled. 🙄

Goody2ShoesAndTheFilthyBeast · 28/12/2024 16:55

I'm sorry that happened, op.
It feels very humiliating when it happens.

Yes, baby change facilities should be separate from disabled toilets imo. There's very rarely no space. It may require rejigging spaces but that's not the same as no actual space.

fuzzychic · 28/12/2024 16:52

Samcro · 28/12/2024 16:50

It does annoy me when people use the , oh but that would have happened if another disabled person was using it.
that is not the point of the thread, but it does point out that disabled people already have very limited facilities compared to able bodied. So why make it worse by making it shared with the baby change as well.

So the person with the disability has easy access to a changing table?

Louisetheroux · 28/12/2024 16:52

MobilityCat · 28/12/2024 16:31

She was taking her own sweet time about it

You don't know that.

The people to get annoyed at are the premises for not having adequate facilities, not other people using them.

NewmummyJ · 28/12/2024 16:52

It's really tricky, as a mum of a small baby and a toddler I need a space where I can toilet us all- this is often a shared disabled baby change- as even if there is a changing table in the ladies it's tricky if I or the toddler need to use the toilet as the pram doesn't fit in a cubicle with us. I am acutely aware that changing a baby and having the toddler and/or myself use the toilet is not quick, but what can we do? Not go out, or never use a toilet when we are? Unfortunately that's not possible and space and facilities are often limited or insufficient. It's not fair on either party.
And if you hear me singing or cooing whilst in there- this means I'll be quicker, as it's much quicker to change a calm happy baby than a distressed one kicking and wriggling that I'm fighting every step of the way!

Wonderwall23 · 28/12/2024 16:51

For practical reasons I think the baby changing facilities and the disabled toilet are lumped together as they both need to be large spaces I.e. fit a changing table and a wheelchair (hence term 'accessible' rather than disabled being used more).

I think there is a real lack of understanding / thought given by both designers and public about why people may need an allocated disabled toilet. There is perhaps a perception that someone not in a wheelchair can just go in any old toilet. Of course sometimes this is the case, but not always.

In some places there are only accessible toilets, to make sure everyone is covered (but as above, this isnt really the answer if there's only one or two and a likely queue).

This is 2024. If changing facilities are to be in the other toilets they need to be in both the male and female ones. Definitely not just in the female one!

fuzzychic · 28/12/2024 16:51

JPC123 · 28/12/2024 16:39

Tbh, I have been in the situation where I was changing my baby and someone knocked and called out, obviously a little distressed. I bundled my baby up and finished dressing him outside the toilet. I always felt a bit in the wrong using a baby changing unit in the disabled toilet even when it is the designated space.

It would be more appropriate to put a changing unit in the male and female toilets and keep the disabled toilet for just that purpose.

Then a parent with a disability wouldn't have anywhere to change their child they'd have to have to do their thing in the accessible loo and then go to a non accessible loo to change their child.

Samcro · 28/12/2024 16:50

It does annoy me when people use the , oh but that would have happened if another disabled person was using it.
that is not the point of the thread, but it does point out that disabled people already have very limited facilities compared to able bodied. So why make it worse by making it shared with the baby change as well.

Swipe left for the next trending thread