Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think we shouldn't be funding this on the NHS?

571 replies

AgileJadeDog · 28/12/2024 09:29

I recently had my first stay in hospital due to a respiratory issue and I kid you not, every other person in the bay smoked+had a smoking related disease.

I have no idea if this is typical in other specialties/hospitals but it really hit me how much gets spent on completely self inflicted stuff. AIBU to think we shouldn't be funding stuff like this?

OP posts:
Sushu · 28/12/2024 10:31

dragonfliesandbees · 28/12/2024 10:22

Nice side step. I'm a nurse and we no longer have smokers by the main entrance of hospitals because smoking is banned on hospital grounds.

Please answer the question. Which hospital were you in that allowed/encouraged this?

The OP is not a nice person but I don’t know why you don’t believe that people smoke on hospitals grounds.

It may be illegal but people do not care. I regularly am at a hospital where there are 2 hospitals next to each other - the Royal Marsden (cancer specialist) and Royal Brompton (heart and lung specialist). It is unbelievable the number of people who light up cigarettes right next to the main entrance. They’re both on busy roads so the smokers could step away.

The Royal Free trust hospitals do not have enough security to deal with inside issues let alone outside. People sit on the benches and smoke under the do not smoke signs. It’s just lovely for the poor people who are waiting to be collected and cannot sit down unless they want to be next to a smoker.

aodirjjd · 28/12/2024 10:31

catlovingdoctor · 28/12/2024 10:30

Except pregnancy is a normal, natural function which every species is driven to do, as opposed to sucking on a roll of dozens of hazardous chemicals.

How many pregnancies should we fund? The first two maybe? Anything more isn’t “normal” right?

catlovingdoctor · 28/12/2024 10:30

OhhYoureSpikey · 28/12/2024 09:35

Pregnancy is self inflicted, so should the NHS also stop providing antenatal care? Leave women to birth in their own homes alone?
YABU.

Except pregnancy is a normal, natural function which every species is driven to do, as opposed to sucking on a roll of dozens of hazardous chemicals.

aodirjjd · 28/12/2024 10:30

PandoraSox · 28/12/2024 10:17

Come on @AgileJadeDog where in the UK is this hospital that allows smoking in its grounds?

I’ve recently finished cancer treatment and although there was big signs saying don’t smoke in hospital grounds people would smoke right underneath the signs. Used to really upset me as I had to stand next to it waiting for a lift home! Bloody rude.

ButterCrackers · 28/12/2024 10:29

toomuchfaff · 28/12/2024 10:25

there's no upside to smoking - agreed.

BUT ITS HIGHLY ADDICTIVE... as is alcohol, sugar and all the other ingredients to the unhealthy lifestyle that OP thinks shouldn't be treated.

And tovacco companies plied it to people as "it's good to smoke" back when these people started smoking.

(non smoker)

Quadruple or more the cost of cigarettes and tobacco and vapes. Put that extra tax into the nhs.

Plastictrees · 28/12/2024 10:29

Jifmicroliquid · 28/12/2024 10:27

It is. This is why I feel torn about it. But the reality of smoking is that there is nothing to it that is beneficial or necessary. Driving a car to get to work is a necessity, but there’s obviously a risk of an accident. Same with sport. Sport is seen as healthy and guards against things like obesity and heart disease etc, but obviously there’s a risk in any sport of an accident (some more than others). But there is nothing necessary, healthy or good about smoking. It is a pointless and totally dangerous habit. The warnings are there for all to see. It’s printed on the packets.
Thats why I feel it is slightly different to normal ‘risk’.
If that makes sense.

You’ve completely missed the main point which is that it is an addiction. Many older people smoked and became addicted before knowing about all the health risks. I suppose they should just be left to die then?

Who are you to judge who is worthy of hospital treatment? The NHS is free to ALL. It’s not a judgement based tick box system.

Ratfinkstinkypink · 28/12/2024 10:29

You have to go off site at both of the local hospitals I use regularly, security send you on your way if you try to smoke outside the entrances. The smoking shelters have been removed and I can't remember the last time I saw a member of staff supporting a patient who had been taken outside to smoke.

SinisterBumFacedCat · 28/12/2024 10:29

OP my DM paid over £100K this year in care costs because she has Alzheimer’s. The NHS already discriminates.

Fromheretothen · 28/12/2024 10:29

AgileJadeDog · 28/12/2024 10:05

It was a respiratory ward but given what I've seen I wouldn't be surprised if the cardiac ward is full of obese people and the gastro ward is full of alcoholics/drug addicts.

Possibly they are. That could well be heaving with them.

So what's the plan? A fat person goes to the GP and complains of chest pain - what happens next? A lifestyle review before the ambulance is called? And if it's determined they 'did this to themselves' then they're asked to just go home to make themselves comfortable and say good bye to their loved ones? A triage nurse wanders through A&E and asks security to remove all those who have done this to themselves? Where do they go? To the street to die? Or should the hospital at least fund a taxi? Perhaps they could spend a bit of the money they're 'saving' to build purpose-built dying rooms in the basement. Normal, good people shouldn't have to look at that, so put it out of sight.

PandoraSox · 28/12/2024 10:28

AgileJadeDog · 28/12/2024 10:23

Yes, but this obviously happens everywhere in the country even at private hospitals.

How do you know where taxguru's OH is being treated?

ShowMighty · 28/12/2024 10:28

TMGM · 28/12/2024 10:19

I think OP means that there is really no upside to smoking, there’s no way the benefits outweighs the massive risk, with smoking you’re guaranteed to have some kind of negative effect whether small like a furry gross tongue/gross teeth, or big like cancer/death.

People saying what about exercise or driving etc is such a ridiculous comparison it’s laughable.

Smoking can suppress your appetite meaning less likely to be obese. Not saying this outweighs the risk of smoking. Obviously it doesn’t. But. You could argue that at least they might lower the risk of obesity and its issues.

You are not guaranteed to have a negative effect when smoking. I never had a furry tongue or gross teeth (I have 2 fillings from childhood and no gum disease). I so far haven’t had cancer or any respiratory issues. Maybe I will in the future I don’t know. I might also get skin cancer from my early years of sunbathing in Ibiza or liver disease from my binge drinking in Kavos. Maybe the lung cancer I’ll get will be due to my father’s heavy smoking and not my own. But who could prove which one caused it?

Spirallingdownwards · 28/12/2024 10:28

I am more concerned that you have been given access to their confidential medical information.

MrTiddlesTheCat · 28/12/2024 10:28

AgileJadeDog · 28/12/2024 10:03

I'm really shocked by these purposely obtuse replies, you know these are all really rare compared to smoking => lung cancer/COPD or obesity => heart disease/diabetes.

I will address the skin cancer bit though, I wear suncream everyday including in winter. You're acting like this is a ridiculous thing to do? Like we don't already know the sun gives you cancer?

So you'll be going private for any osteoporosis related treatment, including broken bones, in the future seeing as you're choosing to reduce your vitamin D levels?

TeenLifeMum · 28/12/2024 10:28

poetryandwine · 28/12/2024 10:18

What is your source for your bladder cancer statistic?

Two highly responsible 2024 statistics for the link between smoking and bladder cancer are

Cancer Research UK says that ‘about half’ of bladder cancers are caused by smoking,

and

the highly respected Cleveland Clinic (USA) says that up to 65% of bladder cancers are caused by smoking.

Both serious statistics, but nothing like 98%

It was a conversation with a urology consultant at work - maybe he was talking about his patients at the time.

WhimsicalGubbins76 · 28/12/2024 10:27

So you got to know all 5-7 people on your ward on such a personal level that they declared their smoking past?

Of course you’re being unreasonable. A huge portion of patients are there for self inflicted reasons.
Anytime anyone gets into any form of transport, climbs a ladder, walks up or down the stairs, goes for a walk, goes into the sea, etc etc, they’re potentially putting themselves at risk of an accident. Everytime someone drinks alcohol, sunbathes, uses a sun bed, eats UPF they’re putting themselves at risk of developing very specific cancers. You can’t single out two causes of possible ill health and say they shouldn’t be covered.
I say “possible” because not every smoker or overweight person requires nhs care. You’re being ridiculous

KingscoteStaff · 28/12/2024 10:27

Chelsea and Westminster, Charing Cross and the Royal Free have patients with wheel chairs and /or drip stands smoking outside. No staff with them, though. Also, because all 3 open straight onto main roads, it’s tricky to work out where the hospital boundary ends.

Plastictrees · 28/12/2024 10:27

dragonfliesandbees · 28/12/2024 10:22

Nice side step. I'm a nurse and we no longer have smokers by the main entrance of hospitals because smoking is banned on hospital grounds.

Please answer the question. Which hospital were you in that allowed/encouraged this?

I work for the NHS and I’m not hospital based but smoking outside hospitals is commonplace where I live in the west of Scotland, I’ve also experienced this in southwest England. There are signs everywhere that say smoking is banned etc but people were still there. My only feelings around this were sadness and compassion, as it shows how strong addiction is. Lots of the people smoking were elderly patients, in hospital for treatment so were taken out by NHS staff. It was a sad sight, I don’t think I could deny a very sick older person potentially their last cigarette either.

The lack of compassion and snobbery undertones on this thread are disgusting.

Jifmicroliquid · 28/12/2024 10:27

Purgepossessions2025 · 28/12/2024 10:24

Risk is risk. Doesn’t matter if you perceive your risk justified because of the benefits. If we did what you propose your sport should be on the NHS list of banned activities.

Edited

It is. This is why I feel torn about it. But the reality of smoking is that there is nothing to it that is beneficial or necessary. Driving a car to get to work is a necessity, but there’s obviously a risk of an accident. Same with sport. Sport is seen as healthy and guards against things like obesity and heart disease etc, but obviously there’s a risk in any sport of an accident (some more than others). But there is nothing necessary, healthy or good about smoking. It is a pointless and totally dangerous habit. The warnings are there for all to see. It’s printed on the packets.
Thats why I feel it is slightly different to normal ‘risk’.
If that makes sense.

taxguru · 28/12/2024 10:27

HoppingPavlova · 28/12/2024 10:23

@taxguru At the very least, those with self inflicted conditions should be put down the list behind people who equally need treatment but havn't abused themselves

That’s way too simplistic though. Many people who ‘abuse themselves’ have underlying factors that have never been addressed. Childhood abuse, dysfunction, mental health issues etc. So, you would actually be punishing them twice really, which is pretty poor.

What about people who play sports and ‘abuse themselves’. Some of mine played a (I would think fairly common) contact sport, and most games between the two teams someone would be carted off to hospital. We just leave people with broken bones and dislocations, putting them on some naughty list?

What about people like myself who is pretty much riddled with skin cancer? I’m old, older than the knowledge of sun and skin cancer. When we were kids our parents had us out in full sun (in a hot country, not UK), to burn like crisps to ‘toughen your skin up’ because ‘it’s good for you’. Sunscreen didn’t exist when I was a child. There was some useless thing called sunblock that was pure liquid and not waterproof so came off immediately with water (we all swam) or a lick of sweat, not to mention with the slightest grain of sand brushing your skin. The tv was packed with ads promoting tanning reef oils (you literally tried your skin in the sun, albeit with a nice smell of coconut), and we spent hours under tanning lamps and sun beds as there was zero link between them and cancer at the time. Should all of us oldies be told to get to buggery with our resultant skin cancer?

The whole premise of ‘fault’ is so ridiculous in healthcare, it has no place.

The cash has run out. Hard decisions have to be made IF we want to keep the NHS. We can't keep borrowing money to pay for the public services we think we need to keep. Sooner or later, a line has to be drawn or we, as a country, will be bankrupt and there'll be no NHS for anyone. We're already paying more in interest than we're paying in education.

ButterCrackers · 28/12/2024 10:27

TMGM · 28/12/2024 10:24

Southampton, selfish people smoking standing literally in front of the entrance doors to the children and babies A&E.

Anyone selfish enough to be smoking where children can breathe it should get a hefty fine and/or jail time, but that’s a whole different thread.

No one bothers with the no smoking areas or signs. No one tells this selfish people to move along. I suppose it’s like shop lifting now where it’s tolerated due to risk of violence to the security personnel.

Auburngal · 28/12/2024 10:27

Theextraordinaryisintheordinary · 28/12/2024 10:22

A lot of my patients with smoking related illnesses are victims themselves. Either taught to smoke by their parents before starting work aged 14/15 or working back breaking jobs where smoking was their only pleasure. Remember, it was glamourised years ago. Today cigarettes are hidden away in shops.

Yet when I worked in a supermarket, I ID'd a few people and they are 18/19. Why are people want to smoke now?

arethereanyleftatall · 28/12/2024 10:26

It's a special hospital located under a bridge.

Indeed. The £80K tax vs the stupidity of the thought process has surely given this totally away?!?

But regardless, it's an interesting topic ti discuss.

Someone up thread has detailed the £2billion cost vs the £8billion revenue. Add to that the dying younger so reduced pension. Smokers are nett contributors!

Rosscameasdoody · 28/12/2024 10:26

AgileJadeDog · 28/12/2024 09:37

If you're driving a car responsibly and crash or injure yourself playing tennis I think that should be covered. If it's an obesity related disease or something caused by extreme/obviously dangerous sports then I would be leaning towards the NHS not covering it.

I think my problem is that if my experience is typical it isn't a few people which are in hospital due to self inflicted stuff, it's the overwhelming majority.

I think my problem is that if my experience is typical it isn't a few people which are in hospital due to self inflicted stuff, it's the overwhelming majority.

What utter bullshit. You’ve been in hospital once and this is your conclusion ?I’ve been in and out all my life and not once have l ever concluded that while we have an NHS, we should ever leave anyone untreated because of their choices in life. Grow up.

toomuchfaff · 28/12/2024 10:25

TMGM · 28/12/2024 10:19

I think OP means that there is really no upside to smoking, there’s no way the benefits outweighs the massive risk, with smoking you’re guaranteed to have some kind of negative effect whether small like a furry gross tongue/gross teeth, or big like cancer/death.

People saying what about exercise or driving etc is such a ridiculous comparison it’s laughable.

there's no upside to smoking - agreed.

BUT ITS HIGHLY ADDICTIVE... as is alcohol, sugar and all the other ingredients to the unhealthy lifestyle that OP thinks shouldn't be treated.

And tovacco companies plied it to people as "it's good to smoke" back when these people started smoking.

(non smoker)

Coatsoff42 · 28/12/2024 10:25

Newhere5 · 28/12/2024 10:22

I think all diseases ( including self inflicted ones) should be treated on NHS but comparing smoking to skateboarding is quite wrong.

Breaking your arms whilst skateboarding = accident
Getting lung cancer after smoking 20 years = predictable result of stupidity. Sorry
And I say that as a child of father who has been heavily smoking his whole life.

Skateboarding is intrinsically dangerous, you know you’re going to fall off repeatedly and injure yourself. It’s an accident you know is going to happen.
You could do a less inherently dangerous hobby. It’s a choice to do such
a stupidly risky thing.
I like skateboarding, this is just for the purposes of the argument.

Swipe left for the next trending thread