Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

New baby in-laws won't visit as we chose to move away

232 replies

dragonflyden · 22/12/2024 19:46

We have a 12 week baby who in-laws have yet to meet because they won't come and visit as we chose to move away and in their words we made our bed by moving away.
I didn't feel up to travelling the 4 hour journey to begin with to see them but was happy for them to come to us but they refused.
Now with Christmas around the corner I could do the journey in theory but I invited them to us as I thought it would be easier to be at home with all mine and babies things but they have said no they will not be putting themselves out because we decided to move away so we either go to them or not at all.
Not visiting them will mean they don't meet their Grandchild AIBU to think if they can't come and see us then never mind and not bother to travel 4 hours for them to meet their Grandchild?

OP posts:
JJsss · 22/12/2024 23:23

Let them! It’s entirely their loss. I’d swim an ocean to meet my new grandchild and I’d want to do anything possible to make sure mum/baby were happy. It sounds like this is a bigger issue than this one trip. If they haven’t been bothered enough to see them in 12 weeks I can’t see them playing a huge role in their life as they grow up

MeTooOverHere · 22/12/2024 23:14

KarenAndSusanAreMyBesties · 22/12/2024 22:31

As I suspected, there is more to this. I was thinking perhaps they didn’t have transport or may have had pets to consider, but you now let us know that you are not invested in seeing them and I’m sure they know that. I am sure your partner knows that. Had they been keen to visit, you may well have been posting about toxic in-laws. Either way, would you say you just enjoy a good moan about them?

No she didn't say that. She said
I'm not as invested in seeing them as I would imagine they might be in seeing their first grandchild.
Pretty sure we all know the difference between seeing our parents-in-law and seeing a new grandchild. Then add on the difference between travel for 2 new parents with new baby vs fit healthy 40-something grandparents, and we all know what this situation is.

MeTooOverHere · 22/12/2024 23:00

toomuchfaff · 22/12/2024 19:52

Let them.

Look up the "Let them" theory. You can't control how others act, you can only control your reactions to their actions. If they don't want to visit "because you moved away" so fkin be it, the trash took itself out. Enjoy your peace with your new baby. When they moan they havebt seen the child, remind them they decided not to come. AS A NEW MOTHER, ITS NOT YOUR JOB TO TAKE THE CHILD TO VISIT PEOPLE. It's your job to recover from BIRTHING A BABY. Let them cut their fkin nose off to spite their face. Enjoy being a new mum.

As someone who has not given birth but does have assorted nieces, nephews, grand nieces and grand nephews, THIS. Esp so soon after giving birth.
And WTF is wrong with them in their 40's unable to travel? I drove 1300kms round trip (alone) last year aged 61 to visit. Is Cornwall stuck in the 17th century?

ManchesterLu · 22/12/2024 22:54

dragonflyden · 22/12/2024 20:08

Aged late 40s dh and I are in our 20s.

I can't imagine my parents preferring me to travel for that long with a baby when they could just come to me.

Put your foot down and say you won't be doing it. If they want to get into a routine of taking it in turns to visit, that's fine, but you won't be travelling that far with a baby at the moment.

DinosaurMunch · 22/12/2024 22:51

No way would I travel 4 hours with a 12 week old baby. Stay home and enjoy the peace. I would consider going next year or the year after depending on how the baby is with car travel.

To be honest both of mine were so terrible in the car (screaming non stop that would drive me demented and probably cause an accident) that I didn't go anywhere over 2 hours until the youngest was 2.5. I did shorter journeys but it could sometimes require a lot of stops.

Travel will be easier in a few years, in the meantime they should come to you.

Nain5 · 22/12/2024 22:49

jellyfish2121 As a grandparent of five I totally disagree. It is so much easier for these young grandparents to travel than the poor parents. If the grandparents are controlling like this no wonder the young couple moved away.

NewName24 · 22/12/2024 22:49

jellyfish2121 · 22/12/2024 22:07

No I'm not but the situation is a result of the OP's actions, not the grandparents so why should they suffer even more for it.

"Suffer" ? Confused

We are talking about meeting a new grandchild. How is that suffering ?

I mean, I'd have visited to get to see the house, to get know the area my ds and his wife were now living in and, yes, just to see them, as a couple, even before the baby was born, but I'd have been up to meet the new baby as soon as the parents said it was okay, and would be offering to be back soon afterwards too. They change so much when little.

RampantIvy · 22/12/2024 22:47

For context they are Cornish and anywhere outside of Cornwall to them is like moving abroad

My cousin lives in Cornwall and jokingly says that there are only 5 families in Cornwall Grin

Nain5 · 22/12/2024 22:43

I would move mountains never mind make a four hour journey to see a new grandchild. Sorry don't understand their attitude, it is quite normal for adult children to move some distance away, sounds like sulking to me. They are young grandparents no reason for them not to travel, it is so much easier than you doing the journey with all the baby paraphernalia. I raised my eldest grandchild so I still can remember all the hassle involved. Enjoy your little one's first Christmas, try to focus on that it is a very special time. Bless you x

Lunde · 22/12/2024 22:42

BreatheAndFocus · 22/12/2024 20:53

Do you live near a mainline train station? If they don’t want to drive, your DH could suggest they get the train and make a long weekend of it. I doubt they’re “wacko” as suggested above, but probably just anxious about going anywhere new, particularly if you’ve moved to a large city.

The grandparents are in their 40s - not their 90s!

Lunde · 22/12/2024 22:40

jellyfish2121 · 22/12/2024 22:03

I'll be in the minority here & side with the grandparents. They obviously didn't want you moving away, you chose to do it, although with good reason it was still your choice, so you should be the ones having to travel and put yourselves out, not them.
I have seen this happen with another family & majority of the time the ones to travel to visit, are the ones who decided to move away. I think that's fair.

That's idiotic. It is hardly difficult for grandparents in their 40s to do their fair share of the travelling.

CantHoldMeDown · 22/12/2024 22:33

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

KarenAndSusanAreMyBesties · 22/12/2024 22:31

dragonflyden · 22/12/2024 20:33

I understand that completely but I'm not as invested in seeing them as I would imagine they might be in seeing their first grandchild and if they haven't come to meet them by 12 weeks then they are not going to are they?

As I suspected, there is more to this. I was thinking perhaps they didn’t have transport or may have had pets to consider, but you now let us know that you are not invested in seeing them and I’m sure they know that. I am sure your partner knows that. Had they been keen to visit, you may well have been posting about toxic in-laws. Either way, would you say you just enjoy a good moan about them?

BarbaraHoward · 22/12/2024 22:26

That's so shit of them. Your DH must be so hurt.

LindaDawn · 22/12/2024 22:24

I would not be undertaking a 4 hour journey with a new baby. Your in laws are being very selfish. Please do not let it spoil this special time with your baby.

JustAboutMuddlingThrough · 22/12/2024 22:23

Bollocks to them, then!!

pizzaHeart · 22/12/2024 22:22

Gymnopedie · 22/12/2024 20:24

But when parents move away and their adult children don't want to visit as often the MN response is that they chose to move and that's one of the consequences.

While the OP and her family might have moved for a good reason, it was still them who moved. So why now is it the fault of the ones who didn't move?

I get it would be nice if they wanted to see their DGC, but again - when parents who've moved would like to see their DGC the OP is told that it isn't her job to put herself out.

People should be realistic - whatever were the reasons for the move it would be much more sensible for two 50 y.o grandparents to visit 12 weeks baby then the other way around especially when it’s 4 hours trip.
And it sounds like grandparents is able to do the trip ( they are not denying it) they are just making a point of not doing it. It’s very mean.

PiperLeo · 22/12/2024 22:20

We moved the same distance away. My in-laws have visited 3 times since we moved here 12 years ago. My kids don't really care...no love lost. I am happy I don't need to engage very often. Honestly, your child is better off without that negativity. They clearly don't care enough to visit. It's a long journey for a baby. Would take longer than 4 hours with feeding and nappy changes etc too.

Oreyt · 22/12/2024 22:19

Late 40s?

My husband is mid 40s and works 6 hours away from us.

This is not an age thing.

What has your husband said?

Flatandhappy · 22/12/2024 22:18

Assuming you could put them up for a night or two (or they could find accommodation nearby) I think it is sad that they won’t make the effort. To me it’s cutting off your nose to spite your face but I am no longer surprised by how badly people behave. Our GD brings a lot of joy to our lives and we regularly “inconvenience” ourselves as we want a relationship with her.

ManhattanPopcorn · 22/12/2024 22:17

Their loss.

Sapphire29 · 22/12/2024 22:16

jellyfish2121 · 22/12/2024 22:03

I'll be in the minority here & side with the grandparents. They obviously didn't want you moving away, you chose to do it, although with good reason it was still your choice, so you should be the ones having to travel and put yourselves out, not them.
I have seen this happen with another family & majority of the time the ones to travel to visit, are the ones who decided to move away. I think that's fair.

We moved away for a better life. Who wouldn't want that for their children?

jellyicecreamandpasstheparcel · 22/12/2024 22:15

WhoopsNow · 22/12/2024 22:10

Fuck them. I wouldn't take a 12 week old baby in a 4 hour drive. Realistically, you'll have to stop every hour or so. It will probably take nearer 6 hours. If they don't want to come then that's on them.

Yep, we travelled similarly with my babies to visit family and we had to stop 3/4 times (200 miles) to feed them, change their nappies. One of them took to screaming non-stop most of the way.
We had to stop travelling with them until they they were older.

NotMeForBakeoff · 22/12/2024 22:13

dragonflyden · 22/12/2024 19:53

Mobility wise they are both fit and healthy and only in their late 40s

Late 40s 😲

This is crazy. I have a feeling they would be a nightmare if they were in your lives though, so it may be a blessing in disguise.

Really hard to find work in Cornwall, what did they expect?

jellyicecreamandpasstheparcel · 22/12/2024 22:13

jellyfish2121 · 22/12/2024 22:07

No I'm not but the situation is a result of the OP's actions, not the grandparents so why should they suffer even more for it.

you're making it sound like the OP did something weird when all she did was move a few hours away.
People move all the time and family visit each other.
It's very petty to refuse to visit your baby grandchild because their parents moved away.