Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

DO NOT give your kid a smartphone this Christmas

488 replies

Firey40 · 20/12/2024 08:54

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DDd86TftyNT/?igsh=MTZueGVicm1udDllNw==

The evidence is overwhelming.

Their brains are only young once.

We might not have known before….. but we know now.

STOP GIVING KIDS SMARTPHONES

Instagram

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DDd86TftyNT?igsh=MTZueGVicm1udDllNw%3D%3D

OP posts:
taybert · 20/12/2024 13:27

OP is correct that the evidence that smartphone use is bad for adolescents is building. PPs are also correct that the world is now set up for smartphone use and it’s quite hard not to have one once you’re getting more independent in the world. That isn’t a reason to give in to it though. Parents can act with a collective voice to put pressure on schools and the government for clearer guidance and support to create smartphone free environments. If there was legislation that governed smartphone use in teens, mobile phone manufacturers and providers would be forced to design products that were suitable and safe for teenagers. No one is saying to go back to phone boxes but parents have little choice between a “dumb” phone with can’t be used for timetables and tickets etc or a smartphone which can do everything (and teenagers are better at getting around restrictions on devices than parents are at setting them!) Subsequently parents tend to choose a smartphone in the hope of keeping their child safe but in doing so, expose them to all kinds of risks.

The tide is turning on this and it isn’t too late to change things for the better.

katepilar · 20/12/2024 13:25

katepilar · 20/12/2024 13:22

I am planning to read this:

Sorry, its was ment to have a picture. Its a book called Digitale Demenz. Wie wir uns und unsere Kinder um den Verstand bringen, 2012. By Manfred Spitzer

Kdubs1981 · 20/12/2024 13:25

There's plenty of research evidence that smart phones are very bad for adults. I hate the fact I struggle to use mine in a way that isn't compulsive. Young minds are even more vulnerable to this than my relatively old mind.

Smart phones are not good for children and teens. Some people don't like that fact. It makes them feel defensive. Of their choices and of their own behaviour. But that doesn't change the fact they are harmful.

My plan is to allow a brick phone at high school.
Or alternatively there might be something on the market that is appropriate for teens. There are quite a few in development.

Next project is to wean myself off social media and my phone and try and set a better example. But it's really hard: this is why I worry for them. With even less developed prefrontal cortex they are even less able to modify compulsive behaviour

TreeSquirrel · 20/12/2024 13:24

Don’t agree with this at all:

  1. Banning social media/smartphones is an easy solution that avoids dealing with the real issue. Like it or not, we’re not in 2004 and they are here to stay. DC need to be taught how to use them safely and responsibly, and teachers and parents need resources and support to do this.
  2. Phones/social media as tools in themselves are not dangerous- the issue comes with how and what they are used to do. They can be a place for teens to discover communities that align with their interests and mine (now mid 20s) used it to stay in touch with friends and relatives abroad. It would make no sense to ban TVs for under 16s because they can be used to view porn, but that’s what’s being proposed with phones/social media.
  3. For me the idea of not allowing DC near smartphones/social media for 16 years or whatever and then giving them free rein at a time when they are all gaining independence and freedom in other areas is a recipe for disaster.
notbelieved · 20/12/2024 13:23

My teen uses his as a medical monitoring device so no, he won't be having it taken off him.

katepilar · 20/12/2024 13:22

MiraculousLadybug · 20/12/2024 09:33

So I'm supposed to click on some Instagram reel to see "overwhelming evidence" on this? If you're going to rant at me, at least provide a real reputable source that isn't behind a login rather than some shit you saw on social media. I think you're the one who needs to come off your phone OP if you think an Instagram post passes as "overwhelming evidence".

I am planning to read this:

OhCrumbsWhereNow · 20/12/2024 13:22

Teaching an 11 year old to use a smart phone responsibly is relatively easy.
You can restrict where and when they use it
You can demand to see it on a regular basis
You can legitimately ban or restrict social media
You can have a system that restricts use and where a parent has to approve new apps.

The idea of doing that with a 16 year old... nightmare.

Most 15/16 year olds today have grown up with smart phones and social media and are far less interested in likes and follows than those who are now in their early 20s are. Restricting to 16 is likely to start that back up again.

There are so many uses for smart phones. DD uses it for travel - bus and train apps and tickets, contacting friends, homework apps, guitar tuning apps, music apps. It's a godsend.

I have a tracker on it - we live rurally and she has a long commute to school or to see friends at weekend. I can log on and check that she's at school, or when her train is likely to get in, or if she's made it to her friend's house without having to message her.

In any case the genie is out of the bottle.

What is far more likely is your child will end up with a hidden smartphone you know nothing about and have zero control over.

WhimsicalGubbins76 · 20/12/2024 13:17

Hard disagree. Kids of a certain age use smartphones for all sorts of reasons, not just to keep in touch with friends. It’s about parenting and making sure they don’t use them at inappropriate times. You can also absolutely restrict what they can see on the internet.

Meanwhile, how many people (including op) are scrolling on their smartphones to comment that smartphones are terrible……

Practice what you preach

TeamPolin · 20/12/2024 13:15

Agree, Op. Our DS is autistic, extremely young and vulnerable for his age and struggles to understand social interaction at the best of times. I'm holding out on the social media/unfettered internet access for as long as possible. He is getting a dumb phone and only allowed internet access via his tablet when we are in the room.

trivialMorning · 20/12/2024 13:15

TeenLifeMum · 20/12/2024 12:59

From my experience, as mum of teenagers, giving dc smart phones in year 6 means you can control and teach phone use etiquette. You need clear rules and boundaries that are strict and can reduce as you navigate what works for you.

I personally think waiting and giving a 15 yo a smart phone means they won’t listen to a parent’s guidance and you’ve missed the boat in teaching important learning.

My dc are 13 (twins in year 9) and 16 (nearly 17).

rules included:
no social media except WhatsApp
no groups on WhatsApp (that’s where trouble begins ime)
Phone is used for limited time increasing as they get older
when I day “phones down” I mean it and do not expect pushback
phones used downstairs only
put on the family docking station at night

this eased with Snapchat being added at the end of year 8 (I still hate it but dc have proven I can trust them on WhatsApp)
phones are now allowed upstairs for specific reasons and permission has to be requested (eg. Can I phone my boyfriend? Can I listen to music upstairs? type requests).

The advice shouldn’t be “don’t buy dc a mobile” it should, imo, be “make clear rules that are very strict initially and commit to teaching your dc how to use a mobile before purchasing one.”

Giving older teens mobiles and hoping they’ll figure it out is a recipe for disaster imo.

We've found similar stricter rules when young and to help them learn to manage usage.

DD1 19 uses her phone to help her manage her ND conditions as well now she at Uni and away from home. None of them are addicted - and use their mobiles like the tools they are.

It would be easier to restrict phones if more things - like school apps - weren't pushed to them - but it's the way the world has gone and it's teaching them how to managed the world as it is now not hark back to how it used to be.

TheFormidableMrsC · 20/12/2024 13:11

Thanks but my son is fine. Didn't have a phone until year 7. All his homework apps are on it, he doesn't have anything on it I don't approve of. He had a hobby app and a WhatsApp group for that purpose with other kids his age. It's managed well. You do you.

Winterscoming77 · 20/12/2024 13:07

Written from your smartphone

RedToothBrush · 20/12/2024 13:05

anotherside · 20/12/2024 12:57

Giving unrestricted access to YouTube is a bad idea, as is giving 10 year olds smartphones. It’s not either or. Unless of course you restrict the apps etc they can use to such a huge extent … and if you are going to do that then what’s the point of the smartphone? Just give them a dumb phone/watch and an hour or whatever of monitored YouTube use on a parent’s IPad or computer each day.

Giving kids pocket computers to carry around 24/7 which are literally designed to be as addictive as possible and then expecting your 10 or 11 year old to “understand the issues” is laughably naive. And that is of course backed up by the facts whereby British teenagers are averaging around 9 hours of screen time a day. They are hopeless addicts before they even reach adulthood.

Edited

Well DS seems to manage with the lock down and the apps he does have access to. Duolingo is a good example of where a smartphone works but a brickphone wouldn't.

You use the addictive stuff to your own gain.

MrsSunshine2b · 20/12/2024 13:04

RedToothBrush · 20/12/2024 12:38

I agree. It's the latest thing to virtue signal on.

And what has made me laugh hardest about this with discussions with other parents is the lack of understanding over the difference between social media (and it's various forms) and smart phones.

The parents saying 'my child isn't going to have a smartphone' are also the ones that give their kids unsupervised access to YouTube and have done for several years (they are now 9 or 10). And they are the ones with Roblox accounts on their own tablets. And they are playing age inappropriate computer games.

The kids themselves are the ones most obsessed with being cool and having the right brands.

It boggles my mind.

They are utterly utterly clueless.

Knowing the parent they will crack within about two weeks of high school. And then not bother to parent or monitor anything.

And I think that's what it comes down to - not wanting to parent sufficiently.

I don't allow YouTube at all, apart from if I'm managing it to put on something specific.

Having a tablet which can only be used inside the house, when the parent is around and can see what the child is doing, is quite different to having a phone which is taken wherever the child goes. Phones also have 4/5G, whereas if parents turn off the WiFi a tablet becomes useless.

Tablets can also be used for all the other benefits mentioned on here, such as Duolingo and other educational apps.

The problem with mobile phones is the mobile aspect.

nonbinaryfinery · 20/12/2024 13:01

Two books I read recently, both of which have different views but if you read them together will fill in a lot of the gaps the other missed:

  1. The Anxious Generation by Jonathan Haidt
  2. Unlocked: The Real Science of Screen Time by Pete Etchells

They're different viewpoints, but I think a happy medium is taking lessons from each book. I don't think kids shouldn't have smartphone access until they are 16, and we should be teaching internet safety in schools, with a proficiency test to show understanding.

TeenLifeMum · 20/12/2024 12:59

From my experience, as mum of teenagers, giving dc smart phones in year 6 means you can control and teach phone use etiquette. You need clear rules and boundaries that are strict and can reduce as you navigate what works for you.

I personally think waiting and giving a 15 yo a smart phone means they won’t listen to a parent’s guidance and you’ve missed the boat in teaching important learning.

My dc are 13 (twins in year 9) and 16 (nearly 17).

rules included:
no social media except WhatsApp
no groups on WhatsApp (that’s where trouble begins ime)
Phone is used for limited time increasing as they get older
when I day “phones down” I mean it and do not expect pushback
phones used downstairs only
put on the family docking station at night

this eased with Snapchat being added at the end of year 8 (I still hate it but dc have proven I can trust them on WhatsApp)
phones are now allowed upstairs for specific reasons and permission has to be requested (eg. Can I phone my boyfriend? Can I listen to music upstairs? type requests).

The advice shouldn’t be “don’t buy dc a mobile” it should, imo, be “make clear rules that are very strict initially and commit to teaching your dc how to use a mobile before purchasing one.”

Giving older teens mobiles and hoping they’ll figure it out is a recipe for disaster imo.

TinyTear · 20/12/2024 12:59

RedToothBrush · 20/12/2024 12:55

Duolingo is brilliant.

DS loves it.

I'm also doing it with her 😀 only 200 days for me

savoycabbage · 20/12/2024 12:59

My dc got iPads when they were relatively young, about nine and phones when they started secondary. They are 21 and 18 now and neither of them are or have ever been addicted to their devices.

They do loads of things. Sports, friends. There is always something. Right now one is in the city with her school friends as they finished yesterday and the other one is reading a book on a Japanese emperor.

Kibble29 · 20/12/2024 12:58

MugPlate · 20/12/2024 12:15

But learning money management doesn’t alter children’s brains?

It’s not really a parallel, is it.

I mean, you could argue that it’s more like getting them used to vaping, the modern way of smoking…

No you can’t. Vaping has no real benefit to anyone, does it?

Phones, technology & social media do.

trivialMorning · 20/12/2024 12:58

anotherside · 20/12/2024 12:52

Not all social developments are net positives.

I never said they were - but it is the way things are going.

My dd12 is also learning Japanese on Duolingo 300+ day streak
It helped all mine catch up with Welsh and DD2 seems to help with her french GCSE as well.

She also has few other revision apps she does as well.

anotherside · 20/12/2024 12:57

RedToothBrush · 20/12/2024 12:38

I agree. It's the latest thing to virtue signal on.

And what has made me laugh hardest about this with discussions with other parents is the lack of understanding over the difference between social media (and it's various forms) and smart phones.

The parents saying 'my child isn't going to have a smartphone' are also the ones that give their kids unsupervised access to YouTube and have done for several years (they are now 9 or 10). And they are the ones with Roblox accounts on their own tablets. And they are playing age inappropriate computer games.

The kids themselves are the ones most obsessed with being cool and having the right brands.

It boggles my mind.

They are utterly utterly clueless.

Knowing the parent they will crack within about two weeks of high school. And then not bother to parent or monitor anything.

And I think that's what it comes down to - not wanting to parent sufficiently.

Giving unrestricted access to YouTube is a bad idea, as is giving 10 year olds smartphones. It’s not either or. Unless of course you restrict the apps etc they can use to such a huge extent … and if you are going to do that then what’s the point of the smartphone? Just give them a dumb phone/watch and an hour or whatever of monitored YouTube use on a parent’s IPad or computer each day.

Giving kids pocket computers to carry around 24/7 which are literally designed to be as addictive as possible and then expecting your 10 or 11 year old to “understand the issues” is laughably naive. And that is of course backed up by the facts whereby British teenagers are averaging around 9 hours of screen time a day. They are hopeless addicts before they even reach adulthood.

RedToothBrush · 20/12/2024 12:55

TinyTear · 20/12/2024 12:48

My dd12 is also learning Japanese on Duolingo 300+ day streak

Duolingo is brilliant.

DS loves it.

Tiredallthetimeneedsleep · 20/12/2024 12:53

Deargodletitgo · 20/12/2024 09:32

My soon to be 11 year old will be walking to and from school next year and so I wish to track him via a phone and know he can contact me if needed, so sorry, he will be getting one.

My DC are 10/11 and have a watch which you can programme two numbers on. Had a GPS but can't access online content

tantrummingterrors · 20/12/2024 12:52

Take a look at Dr Martha Psycologist and the Brain Doctor on Instagram. Both of them discuss the program the insta post references and provide a balanced and scientific view.
Edited to add, some of the downsides can be mitigated by monitoring and paying attention to your children and what they what. Instead of letting children have free rein and access on ANY device.

anotherside · 20/12/2024 12:52

trivialMorning · 20/12/2024 12:47

There used to be bus timetables in bus shelters there not round here any more - they expect you to use the app. They only take exact cash - which if you don't know fare can be a pain - and cheaper ticket are frequently available only on app.

I personally prefer a train ticket - but you can get phone tickets and the barrier at station near us is quicker than ticket ones.

My Mum used to be able to pay for parking with notes and coins - or at least card now many of the car parks near her local town are app only.

More and more is pushed onto phones - and people harking back to how it used to be - look a bit out of of touch.

Not all social developments are net positives.