Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

So what exactly is the point of it all then?

163 replies

Thinkingthesethoughts · 18/12/2024 15:41

Life? What are we here for?

I’m not depressed, just having a midweek musing while ill at home on the sofa.
If it’s just to reproduce and pass our genes on, how does that explain infertility?
Unless we have occupations that make a huge difference in people’s lives, or change the course of history somehow, how are we making any difference?

Why do you feel we’re here?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
toucheee · 19/12/2024 06:14

Catza · 18/12/2024 15:51

I think we can pretty much agree that it is a scientific fact. Unless you are religious, in which case there is probably no shortage of purposes in scripture of your choosing.

It’s a theory, not a fact. No one really knows. Yet.

CheekyHobson · 19/12/2024 06:07

If nature didn't want birds to have nests, it wouldn't have given them the ability to make them.

If nature didn't want IVF or for premature babies to survive, it wouldn't have given humans the intellect to make such things possible.

In principle I agree with your underlying point but nature doesn't want anything. If humans got better with the idea that what is, is, we would all be a lot happier.

Firefly1987 · 19/12/2024 05:52

Parents create life so you'd have to ask them what they think the point is. They're basically bored and want to kill a couple decades of their own life and/or fill a void would be my guess and unfortunately nature gave them that power. Then their offspring get to the same age and do the same thing, ad nauseum.

XWKD · 19/12/2024 05:02

If nature didn't want birds to have nests, it wouldn't have given them the ability to make them.

If nature didn't want IVF or for premature babies to survive, it wouldn't have given humans the intellect to make such things possible.

ForeverDelayedEpiphany · 19/12/2024 00:17

PartTimeModel · 19/12/2024 00:01

To feed domesticated cats.

That is all.

All cat lovers will obviously surely agree with you. Absolutely, of course this is fine, but I think there is always a bit more to life than this, at least for me, anyway 😅🙃

PartTimeModel · 19/12/2024 00:01

To feed domesticated cats.

That is all.

MasterBeth · 18/12/2024 23:54

AgileGreenSeal · 18/12/2024 19:55

I get you.

Suffering, calamity, disasters, disease, wars etc are all part of life in a fallen world where all of creation is in a kind of groaning anguish, longing for this age to be over and for “the age to come” to finally arrive. Children aren’t exempt from any of that and their plight is often exacerbated by their powerlessness and dependence on adults.

God is bringing everything to its culmination, and subsequent re-creation, when “He will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away.” Revelation 21.

We’re just not there yet.

You make god sound like a reluctant husband who says he'll put a shelf up in the bathroom but just hasn't got round to it yet. But instead of the outcome being nowhere to put the cotton buds, your god's reluctance to act just yet means unimaginable human suffering, calamity, disasters, disease and war.

It's no wonder so many people have decided to LTB.

MasterBeth · 18/12/2024 23:49

RedToothBrush · 18/12/2024 23:32

We aren't alive. We are computer generated programmes who think life is real.

Well, you obviously don't.

MasterBeth · 18/12/2024 23:48

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Or perhaps evolution explains the benefits of altruism, as most famously outlined in The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins.

KimberleyClark · 18/12/2024 23:44

beetr00 · 18/12/2024 22:11

I am absolutely horrified @Wellingtonspie

"Infertility as harsh as it sounds is nature weeding out those who should not reproduce"

Shame on you

@Wellingtonspie how do you explain the fact that most people who have IVF have healthy children, and a lot of those who conceive naturally do not?

KimberleyClark · 18/12/2024 23:39

BunnyLake · 18/12/2024 18:11

I knew someone once who couldn’t conceive because she was incompatible with her husband’s sperm. I didn’t know that was a thing before.

Or it might have been that her husband was incompatible with her eggs…..

Thinkingthesethoughts · 18/12/2024 23:36

@Wellingtonspie Those were your words…right?

OP posts:
Thinkingthesethoughts · 18/12/2024 23:36

Thinkingthesethoughts · 18/12/2024 23:27

@Wellingtonspie There was…

It had to be taken down though as it was sort of a thread about a thread.

It was about the comments you made about infertility…

Why is it funny 🤷🏻‍♀️

So what exactly is the point of it all then?
OP posts:
RedToothBrush · 18/12/2024 23:32

We aren't alive. We are computer generated programmes who think life is real.

Thinkingthesethoughts · 18/12/2024 23:27

@Wellingtonspie There was…

It had to be taken down though as it was sort of a thread about a thread.

It was about the comments you made about infertility…

OP posts:
LonginesPrime · 18/12/2024 23:25

Shame on me for pointing out a biological fact? If you cannot reproduce naturally that is natures way is pretty simple.

You didn't say that, though - you said

Infertility as harsh as it sounds is nature weeding out those who should not reproduce, this can also be evidenced partly in the huge increase in sen since things like IVF and being able to keep 24weekers alive.
...
Yes I get the argument but broken bones, but antibiotics, but they just keep someone alive they don’t create people that nature never wanted to exist.

Are you seriously saying that it's a biological fact that nature has its own will and that it actually wants things and makes moral judgements about who should and shouldn't reproduce?

That description of what nature is and how it works about as far from biological fact as I've ever read.

It sounds more like the way someone might describe a deity, but it doesn't sound like science at all.

Wellingtonspie · 18/12/2024 23:22

Thinkingthesethoughts · 18/12/2024 23:22

@Wellingtonspie Did you read the other thread about you?

A whole thread about me? I highly doubt it.

Thinkingthesethoughts · 18/12/2024 23:22

@Wellingtonspie Did you read the other thread about you?

OP posts:
Onabench · 18/12/2024 23:21

YANBU. We're life. We will procreate, we will die. Not much more. Just a blip in time. Irrelevant really. Enjoy it while it lasts

beetr00 · 18/12/2024 23:16

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

LonginesPrime · 18/12/2024 23:16

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Like the Hamlet thing: "there's nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so".

I don't think that hedonism and caring about others are necessarily mutually exclusive - I think many moral relativists who don't believe in a divine creator enjoy being kind to others, so that can be their version of hedonism.

There are lots of kind people who don't believe in a divine creator and who can justify their actions without referring to God. Also, even if they were being totally selfish, it's good for social cohesion and one's own emotional wellbeing to be kind to others, so it's an evolutionary survival strategy if nothing else.

I don't personally think there are adequate logical arguments for the existence of a creator, because that's not really how faith works. The notion that one's inner thoughts are proof that there are outer thoughts (i.e. from a creator) is only convincing to people who already believe there are outer thoughts. I get how people with faith get there, but it can feel like a bit of a leap to non-believers.

Wellingtonspie · 18/12/2024 23:08

beetr00 · 18/12/2024 22:11

I am absolutely horrified @Wellingtonspie

"Infertility as harsh as it sounds is nature weeding out those who should not reproduce"

Shame on you

Shame on me for pointing out a biological fact? If you cannot reproduce naturally that is natures way is pretty simple.

Same as animals that go extinct because they refuse to breed. Dogs that cannot breed and give birth naturally because their bodies are these days so mis figured they cannot safely.

From a purely scientific way if you cannot breed and give birth that is natures ways of stopping your genes. Nature or biology gives no fucks to your feelings or mine it cares about survival the same as viruses.

A successful virus or disease does not kill all its hosts. It kills enough but keeps enough to spread. If not killed too fast it would die out due to lack of hosts. Fertility is the same be it animal or human it wants the best to survive the faults live but not enough to end the species otherwise it all dies and fails anyway.

The HIV virus as horrific as it is, is a bloody magnificent virus to view from a scientific point of view the way it takes over an evolves.

Thinkingthesethoughts · 18/12/2024 22:40

beetr00 · 18/12/2024 22:11

I am absolutely horrified @Wellingtonspie

"Infertility as harsh as it sounds is nature weeding out those who should not reproduce"

Shame on you

Agreed

OP posts:
Thinkingthesethoughts · 18/12/2024 22:22

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Exactly…interesting point

OP posts:
DayAfter · 18/12/2024 22:21

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Swipe left for the next trending thread