Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU in thinking the government have made the correct decision not to blanket pay all WASPI women £3k? This goes against the Ombudsman recommendations to pay between £1k-3k to every WASPI women.

583 replies

caringcarer · 17/12/2024 13:35

At the time it was in every newspaper for weeks, in the radio and on the TV news a lot of coverage via the media. Most women of this age agree they knew about pension age changes. At the time it was huge. I fail to understand how any women could not have known unless they lived off grid. No individual letters were sent out to the women who would be affected. The Ombudsman's recommendation was that a blanket payment of between £1k-3k be paid to all WASPI women. Labour have just announced no money will be paid out at all. It would have cost the taxpayer up to £10.5 billion pounds on top of the huge amount of my ney it has cost to review it for several years. It is money that the government just don't have. Assuming lessons have been learned and any future changes will see DWP send out letters to any individuals who it will directly affect. The only worry is that it sets a precedent of ignoring what the Ombudsman's recommendations.

OP posts:
caringcarer · 17/12/2024 16:14

unsync · 17/12/2024 13:48

It's just another example of ageism by the current government. What is the point of the Ombudsman if their recommendations are not followed. Just because people knew about the changes doesn't mean they were able to take action to mitigate those changes.

Not all pensioners are rolling in money, contrary to popular opinion on here.

The recommendation from the Ombudsman is purely about if these women knew about the age rise not if they were happy with it or took action to mitigate, just about being told it was changing.

OP posts:
goldencabbage · 17/12/2024 16:11

Nanny0gg · 17/12/2024 16:07

What letters?

There wasn't proper notification of the pension age rising past 65

Which is the whole crux of the matter. Not the rise the fact the government forgot at the end of this was a woman who need to be told and perhaps have it explained and they weren't all financially savvy.

1apenny2apenny · 17/12/2024 16:10

Young people need to sit up and take notice. I predict within the next 10 years the state pension will start to be removed/reduced altogether.

Those working in reasonably paid jobs especially need to take note, you'll have spent your whole life funding others and putting up with crap services/stuff being taken away only to find that your retirement will look similar to someone who never bothered to work. In fact there are quite a few pensioners now who are better off than others due to the uplift of pension credit.

Wrong decision imo, a process wasn't followed, the women weren't written to. I suspect some hapless civil servant thought it wasn't worth bothering as it only affected women.

goldencabbage · 17/12/2024 16:09

TallulahBetty · 17/12/2024 16:04

Why wouldn't they? Can they not take responsibility for watching the news, reading letters sent, doing their own research?

You can't expect everyone to live the same life and want to research and watch the news. These days financial services have to be crystal clear and watch out for vulnerable customers, those who don't have the financial knowledge or understanding would come under this. Why shouldn't the government be held to the same standard.

MoreDangerousThanAWomanScorned · 17/12/2024 16:09

Nanny0gg · 17/12/2024 16:06

Work how?

No funded nurseries back then. No maternity pay. No jobs even held open till the 80s
So what did they do with the children?

Women have always worked. Only middle class women didn't, and no, tbh, I don't think a few years caring for preschoolers is a lifetime of work.

Nanny0gg · 17/12/2024 16:07

TallulahBetty · 17/12/2024 16:04

Why wouldn't they? Can they not take responsibility for watching the news, reading letters sent, doing their own research?

What letters?

There wasn't proper notification of the pension age rising past 65

LikeWhoUsesTypewritersAnyway · 17/12/2024 16:06

Kingoftheroad · 17/12/2024 15:59

I couldn’t agree with you more. I am disgusted by the comments. If this had happened to men it would have been settled long ago. Given that the Scottish Government have failed to account for 8 billion guven during covid, this amount is a drop in the ocean.

This affects the poorest women in the country who have already suffered having their winter fuel allowance removed.

20 years ago Gordon Brown identified the oap’s as being the most deprived in our society thus the reason for introducing the winter fuel payment.

Don’t worry all of you 30+ jummy mummy’s what goes around comes around. By the time that you retire there will be no state pension and you’ll be working till you drop

What is a jummy mummy?

Nanny0gg · 17/12/2024 16:06

Ginmonkeyagain · 17/12/2024 15:04

@EmmaMaria so people who did not work for a lot of their adult life are pissed off at not being funded by current workers to get their pensions earlier? Fuck that frankly.

Work how?

No funded nurseries back then. No maternity pay. No jobs even held open till the 80s
So what did they do with the children?

IKEAJesus · 17/12/2024 16:05

Iwantmyoldnameback · 17/12/2024 16:02

I knew my pension age increased to 64 but suddenly the coalition escalated it to 66. That's the issue for me and that's what most people don't understand.

And if that was the only thing they were campaigning about I think there would be a lot more sympathy - but there was a very vocal cohort who were campaigning to still be allowed to take state pension at 60

MoreDangerousThanAWomanScorned · 17/12/2024 16:04

Don’t worry all of you 30+ jummy mummy’s what goes around comes around. By the time that you retire there will be no state pension and you’ll be working till you drop

I think that's exactly why people aren't keen on paying out £10bn in compensation to people who still got to retire much eaŕlier...

Like others, I think the ombudsman was wrong on this and so support the government. You just can't set the precedent that people deserve compensation for well advertised changes to state benefits - and the only reason anyone contemplates it here is that people are really squeamish about accepting that the state pension is a benefit. It was fundamentally wrong and based on sexist assumptions to have a different retirement age for men and women and it's not reasonable to say that a government couldn't change that without writing to everyone individually.

TallulahBetty · 17/12/2024 16:04

goldencabbage · 17/12/2024 16:02

And? Lots of other people wouldn't have understood or realised it meant them.

Why wouldn't they? Can they not take responsibility for watching the news, reading letters sent, doing their own research?

Cyclebabble · 17/12/2024 16:03

Right decision. For tax and pensions it is the responsibility of the individual to keep up to date on changes. Retiring at 60 in the current economic climate and with current longevity is simply not reasonable. Sorry.

olderbutwiser · 17/12/2024 16:03

Waspi here. I never bought the Waspi argument - I felt I had plenty of time to catch up, and anyway it was nuts that women could get their pension 5 years earlier than men, especially when women’s life expectancy has always been longer. I’d rather the money was spent on the NHS (which I am increasingly benefitting from).

goldencabbage · 17/12/2024 16:02

TallulahBetty · 17/12/2024 15:58

My mum is affected. She knew and understood; said it was communicated very clearly and she had plenty of time/opportunity to rectify the matter and get more information.

And? Lots of other people wouldn't have understood or realised it meant them.

Iwantmyoldnameback · 17/12/2024 16:02

I knew my pension age increased to 64 but suddenly the coalition escalated it to 66. That's the issue for me and that's what most people don't understand.

goldencabbage · 17/12/2024 16:01

Ginmonkeyagain · 17/12/2024 15:58

@goldencabbage Yeah but the state pension isn't a pension and you don't have any Ts&Cs to vary. The government just change eligibilty criteria for a state benefit. They do it all the time.

Edited

Then they probably should write a letter every time they do that until they learn people need notice to plan financially

Ginmonkeyagain · 17/12/2024 16:01

@Kingoftheroad I mean we know that, which is why we aren't keen on giving billions of pounds to people pissed off they couldn't retire at 60.

FuzzyPuffling · 17/12/2024 16:00

tfresh · 17/12/2024 15:57

Why is it offensive? It's the truth. Where do you think the money is coming from? You're wanting to take it from people with less than you, who will retire later than you, who will never have the opportunity for housing that you have.

If you want the money, own it. But you have to live in the reality that it is selfish.

Less than me? I have never stated my income.

Kingoftheroad · 17/12/2024 15:59

EmmaMaria · 17/12/2024 14:42

No it doesn't - because everybody "knew" that the pension for women was paid at 60. That was probably all they knew.

I find it astonishing that a site that lauds itself on being pro-women, driven by equality and "for mums" has so many posters that actually do not support the poorest women in society. But unsurprising. There were more complaints about a handful of rich farmers possibly having to pay inheritance tax.

I couldn’t agree with you more. I am disgusted by the comments. If this had happened to men it would have been settled long ago. Given that the Scottish Government have failed to account for 8 billion guven during covid, this amount is a drop in the ocean.

This affects the poorest women in the country who have already suffered having their winter fuel allowance removed.

20 years ago Gordon Brown identified the oap’s as being the most deprived in our society thus the reason for introducing the winter fuel payment.

Don’t worry all of you 30+ jummy mummy’s what goes around comes around. By the time that you retire there will be no state pension and you’ll be working till you drop

Tryingtokeepgoing · 17/12/2024 15:59

EmmaMaria · 17/12/2024 14:42

No it doesn't - because everybody "knew" that the pension for women was paid at 60. That was probably all they knew.

I find it astonishing that a site that lauds itself on being pro-women, driven by equality and "for mums" has so many posters that actually do not support the poorest women in society. But unsurprising. There were more complaints about a handful of rich farmers possibly having to pay inheritance tax.

It’s difficult to reconcile the views on this board sometimes. On the one hand, when it comes to the WFA it was right to withdraw it and no one needed it. And anyway, pension credit or whatever it’s called is there for those in need. On the other hand, just 5 to 7 years apart, this bunch of women are all destitute and it’s a grave injustice that they won’t be compensated. Even though, if they truly are that hard up universal credit will plug the gap.

Say what you like about this government, they are at least consistent. I’ve made my own judgement about whether consistently good or bad, but certainly consistent at ‘U’ turns on its position before being elected. It’s almost as if the grown ups didn’t realise how hard being in government is when they were playing student politics in opposition…

TallulahBetty · 17/12/2024 15:58

My mum is affected. She knew and understood; said it was communicated very clearly and she had plenty of time/opportunity to rectify the matter and get more information.

Thepurplepig · 17/12/2024 15:58

Pulled 50 million out of his arse for Syria at the start of the week though didn’t he.

Ginmonkeyagain · 17/12/2024 15:58

@goldencabbage Yeah but the state pension isn't a pension and you don't have any Ts&Cs to vary. The government just change eligibilty criteria for a state benefit. They do it all the time.

tfresh · 17/12/2024 15:57

FuzzyPuffling · 17/12/2024 15:49

This is just unpleasant. Like most generations there are haves and have lots. The notion that all women of a particular demographic are living it up and care nothing for anyone else is really offensive.

Why is it offensive? It's the truth. Where do you think the money is coming from? You're wanting to take it from people with less than you, who will retire later than you, who will never have the opportunity for housing that you have.

If you want the money, own it. But you have to live in the reality that it is selfish.

chocolatemademefat · 17/12/2024 15:57

It makes me sad to see and hear how people talk about today’s pensioners. These are the people who paid tax and national insurance to help fund other peoples pensions. It’s as if people now claiming pensions are a drain on society and on young people who can’t get on the property ladder because older people are hanging onto their homes.

The Ombudsman should be listened to - the demographic on here is mostly younger so asking if the government is correct in going against the decision is a bit of a waste of time.