Oh dear...Harry and Meghan's Christmas card photo

I was called it yesterday after starting this thread. My original post saying that she looked more like a 6 year old than a 3 year old!! Go figure 🤦‍♀️🤣

Ooh no don't say the girl looks older!! You'll be accused of bullying 😱🤦‍♀️🙄

What's wrong with being ugly???
or plain??

Stop with the pretty privilege please.

The truth is the majority of people including kids don't look beautiful, that's why beauty is so coveted. Most people and kids look plain. Only perhaps 5% of the population are conventionally attractive.

I like plain, its' normal and human..

I do not like obsessively and artificially altered looks, it's neurotic.

People should accept their plain selves and embrace others' plain looks.

You said the chances of their kids winning any genetic lottery Is slim that's just plain nasty
How would you like people to mply your two very small children will ugly????

^ Well said but it won't be popular!

OMG how can you say that about children you haven't even seen? How do you know they are "gorgeous"??

I think the Wales children are pretty good looking, but then I have been able to see their faces!

Andrew wasn't always "a fat ugly fucker" (charming description!!) - he was actually an attractive man in his youth!

I give you the full comment I was responding to.

Well Meghan is beautiful and I presume that both her children are gorgeous. Much better looking than anyone else in the Royal Family

Ffs how nasty can you be these are two small children is it not enough fir you to call the parents ugly but now you have to imply the kids. Will be ???
Utterly vile .

There's no proof that Virginia slept with Andrew, and I don't think he did. She tried to say that Alan Dershowitz slept with her too, but when she realised that he wouldn't back down but would defend himself, she said "Oh, I must have been mistaken." Mistaken?! The RF had to pay Virginia off because the alternative would have been a messy trial where everything private about Andrew, including information about his genitalia, was put into the public domain. It was sheer extortion on her part, and it worked with the RF but not on Dershowitz. She accused Dershowitz and then withdrew. Well, he either raped you or he didn't. I also don't think she was trafficked; she was not kept prisoner and went home to her dad every night. She could have left any time, and others who she tried to recruit and rejected Epstein's advances were told to leave, they weren't forced. She was a willing and well-paid sex worker.

@ThatKhakiMoose I say this very gently, but if you have children please do some safeguarding training or at least reading to understand the grooming process. You need to understand this to protect your children.

@UniqueOP you are wrong. Trafficking has never only covered cases where people are physically dragged somewhere and locked up.
The girl was sex trafficked i.e. flown to an island for a party and coerced into having sex with men.
You are minimising what happened. I wonder if you also minimise what happened to the girls in Rotherham since they were not physically dragged into flats and locked up?

Honestly your comment is disgusting. A disgrace to minimise the rape and sexual abuse of girls.

It's better to call out nastiness rather than ignore it.

Is this how you would act in the street if you see someone be nasty, just walk away?

When a particular couple are targeted for criticism over and over again and on a huge scale - despite the fact that there are far more appropriate objects for criticism and despite the fact that this couple's relentless targeting distracts from legitimate criticism of others - it takes on the character of hate.

I don't have a lot of sympathy for him I'm afraid. Unlike us he occupies a hugely privileged role, and the reality is that his private life is going to be of interest to the public. Particularly after his lavish very public (and publicly funded) wedding to Diana.

I don't buy that he was forced to marry Diana instead of the so called 'love of his life' (though Camilla was just one of many married lovers). He was 32 at the time of his engagement, Diana was 19. And I am a bit tired of Diana's supposed failings being rehashed, the woman has been dead nearly 30 years and doesnt have to impress us any more whereas C&C do.

It is true that the Church preaches forgiveness, but that is supposed to follow repentance. And I don't see a lot of repentance or humility in the way the most unpopular Camilla is shoved in our faces after a lengthy and expensive (to the taxpayer) PR campaign.

There's no proof that Virginia slept with Andrew, and I don't think he did. She tried to say that Alan Dershowitz slept with her too, but when she realised that he wouldn't back down but would defend himself, she said "Oh, I must have been mistaken." Mistaken?! The RF had to pay Virginia off because the alternative would have been a messy trial where everything private about Andrew, including information about his genitalia, was put into the public domain. It was sheer extortion on her part, and it worked with the RF but not on Dershowitz. She accused Dershowitz and then withdrew. Well, he either raped you or he didn't. I also don't think she was trafficked; she was not kept prisoner and went home to her dad every night. She could have left any time, and others who she tried to recruit and rejected Epstein's advances were told to leave, they weren't forced. She was a willing and well-paid sex worker.