Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

TW To notice that a lot of child murders have one thing in common

309 replies

Worldinyourhands · 14/12/2024 00:01

Has anyone else noticed the chilling common theme in the child murders that keep being reported (it feels like) in recent times? There's another today, and as soon as I read the heartbreaking report, that same factor jumped out yet again.

An unrelated partner being involved in the child's life. A parent and a boyfriend/girlfriend or (less commonly) new husband/wife.

Before anyone jumps on me, I'm obviously OBVIOUSLY not saying that step parents are all evil. Nor am I saying that biological parents can't be evil. In all the cases I'm thinking of, the biological parents were totally complicit.

But I am wondering if there needs to be some more red flags raised when school or social workers or whoever become aware that a child is having to live with a parent's romantic partner. Particularly a young child or a new partner, though I'm aware of at least one case involving a teenager (it broke my heart - I'm not naming any of the children on this post, but there have been multiple over the past few years). Not doing a poll either as it's too flippant.

But has anyone else noticed this factor coming up time and time again? And does anyone else think that this aspect of safeguarding seems to be missed - presumably because we place far too much value on the parent's perceived 'right' to have a live-in romantic partner and not enough weight on the chlld's right not to live with an unrelated adult who doesn't love them?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
PotholesAnonymous · 14/12/2024 09:36

Infanticide is a common phenomenon in the animal world. There is no reason it wouldn't also be represented in the human species too.

Just a horrible reality.

Whiteskies · 14/12/2024 09:33

I have a friend whose wife had an affair when their children were young. She moved the kids to live with the new man. My friend has spent his life putting his kids first. He has never had more than casual relationships because his house and family is sacrosanct. The kids mother is on her third marriage and has had two more children. As soon as the kids were old enough they moved to live permanently with their Dad. They went to university but both of them are living back with him now they have graduate jobs. He is a good, caring Dad and always put his children first.
More men and women with children should avoid live in partners until their children are old enough to move out if they are unhappy. Date and enjoy relationships but avoid live in partners.

Scarfitwere · 14/12/2024 09:32

Startinganew32 · 14/12/2024 09:24

It’s also surprising that some women will put their want to have kids above the fact that their partner is abusive and go ahead and have kids with them anyway. Maybe lulled into a false sense of security that biological dads wouldn’t hurt their children. Yet all the family annihilation cases are biological dads.

Absolutely. Unfortunately there are a lot of stupid, selfish people out there who are reproducing....and so the cycle continues!

Whiteskies · 14/12/2024 09:24

It is important that accepted patterns of behaviour inform the welfare of children. Social workers need to be aware of domestic arrangements and potential red flags to ensure children are kept safe from harm.
A known red flag is a parent ( generally the mother) living with a partner who is not biologically related to the child. You cannot ignore known patterns and predictors of abuse.
No one is saying biological parents never abuse but they are much less likely to do so.

Startinganew32 · 14/12/2024 09:24

Scarfitwere · 14/12/2024 09:22

Same. It always surprises me how people put their own sexual needs over the welfare of children. It's part of being a parent. I can wait a few years to have a boyfriend.

It’s also surprising that some women will put their want to have kids above the fact that their partner is abusive and go ahead and have kids with them anyway. Maybe lulled into a false sense of security that biological dads wouldn’t hurt their children. Yet all the family annihilation cases are biological dads.

Scarfitwere · 14/12/2024 09:22

Drearycommuter · 14/12/2024 00:08

the possible risks to the child is a significant part of why I stay single with two young children. Lots of my friends think that’s mental but I think it can wait till they’re older

Same. It always surprises me how people put their own sexual needs over the welfare of children. It's part of being a parent. I can wait a few years to have a boyfriend.

Wasywasydoodah · 14/12/2024 09:19

Garlicwest · 14/12/2024 00:22

Yes, I think it's likely that men with bad intentions towards children seek out single mothers. Not necessarily sexual intentions (though I know the precise cause of death may not be mentioned when it was sexual), but also men with 'complicated psychology' who need to exert power over vulnerable people; no-one's more vulnerable than a baby. They're usually controlling the mother as well.

People do inadvertently kill infants if they lose it when the baby won't stop crying. But I suspect those people are usually the mothers, who can be viscerally affected by their distressed child (and may have PND/PPP). A man getting pissed off by a wailing infant's more likely to just walk out, I'd have thought.

~ I don't have data on this, I'm just thinking it through.

Absolutely agree about control - it’s all about control. From my anecdotal knowledge, the unrelated man is just as likely to shake the baby. Dangerous men don’t walk off, they act aggressively.

Whiteskies · 14/12/2024 09:18

@anatomyk
But statistically, step parents are far far more likely to abuse than biological parents. This does not mean that biological parents do not abuse children but all the research shows that if a parent is biologically related to a child, there is far less likelihood of abuse.
As it stands, one of the biggest threats to a child's well being is living with mum's new partner. It is disingenuous to pretend otherwise.
There is a great deal of peer reviewed evidence to support this.

anatomyk · 14/12/2024 09:13

KimberleyClark · 14/12/2024 08:54

I agree that new step parents are a risk, but it is naive to think biological parents are incapable of harming their children. That’s why so many end up in care.

Exactly. Dysfunction is dysfunction. I grew up in violence from by biological parents.

Lifeomars · 14/12/2024 09:13

Hateam · 14/12/2024 06:40

Lesbian relationships are renowned for high levels of violence.

To the best of my knowledge lesbians don't prowl the streets looking for vulnerable people to assault.

anatomyk · 14/12/2024 09:11

Well yeah anything that occurs too quick points to dysfunction behind it. Such as moving a boyfriend in after a week.

Whatafustercluck · 14/12/2024 09:11

I've often said that if dh and I ever split up, I'd not be getting with anyone else until my dc were adults for this very reason. Unfortunately predatory men prey on single women with young children. Of course it's 'not all men' but I'd never trust anyone enough to take that risk.

Lifeomars · 14/12/2024 09:11

Worldinyourhands · 14/12/2024 00:09

Actually I'm with you on this. It's pretty eye opening when you realise that the news headlines are almost all about bad things done by men. The corrupt royal family members, the sex abusers, the politicians doing the most serious kinds of wrong, the violence, the warmongers, the rapists. I know it's a tangent from the thread but I don't know why we put up with sharing a planet with them, as women. I'm sick of it.

When I go onto the website of our local newspaper I see cases of rape, sexual assault, paedophilia, stabbings, robbery and dangerous driving and I can guarantee that the vast majority of perpetrators are male. It is true that there are male victims but the offenders are men. These are just local cases that will never make the national news and of course this will be replicated in towns and cities throughout the country. I have been the victim of sexual assault twice and when my child was a teenager they were mugged, a female family member was attacked and in each of these incidents the perpetrators were male. Not all men, but almost always a man

oakleaffy · 14/12/2024 09:08

Anonymus89 · 14/12/2024 09:02

I have to disagree. As a step-parent, I find it hard to see what exactly could be flagged, how it would be monitored, who would be responsible for carrying out checks, and, most importantly, what those checks would even consist of.

In my opinion, the real issue lies elsewhere. Far too oftenthough not alwayswomen leaving abusive relationships end up in new relationships with similarly abusive partners. This is a well-documented psychological pattern known as repetition compulsion, where individuals unconsciously recreate traumatic dynamics. That, I believe, is where the real problem lies.

Yes, I have definitely noticed that some people go from one abusive relationship to another - like where do they find these awful men?

Often collecting kids along the way with these awful men.
It’s one thing allowing oneself to be put at risk, but putting step children in harm’s way is really selfish.

I will look at this syndrome- Not heard of it before, but have heard of “trauma bonding”.

Startinganew32 · 14/12/2024 09:08

Sskka · 14/12/2024 08:29

Being something out of folklore shouldn’t make it underestimated. Quite the opposite. If it’s been around forever, then maybe there’s a reason for it.

Indeed if you were so inclined, you might point out that this is yet another example of:

• our predecessors are well aware of problem A
• our predecessors develop a whole system B in order to suppress A
• we junk B in the name of progressive value C
• we get bewildered and unhappy when A reappears
• brows furrowed, we imagine fantasy bureaucracies which will stop A while we frolic with C
• let’s not forget to work hard at reassuring ourselves that there’s no link between C and A
• job done, we get to relax and forget about A for a bit
• we do not, under any circumstances, contemplate that our predecessors might have been onto something

How come there are no fairytales about wicked step fathers then? Because they are the issue and there are countless step mums who feed, clothe, cook for, care for, drop off at school their stepkids because the biological father can’t be bothered. There are a few bad eggs but generally they do a huge amount of unappreciated work and still get slammed. Stepdads get lauded and congratulated for “taking on” kids as their own yet they tend to do very little in terms of childcare. In fact, loads of stepdads tend to have very little time alone with their step kids when the mum isn’t there yet they still manage to abuse and kill them far more frequently than step mums who very often care for step kids on their own.

Also it pisses me off big time that the dad in the fairy tales gets off scot free. So Handsel and Gretel’s stepmum suggests they get the kids lost in the woods so they die and they don’t have to look after them. The dad is all like “yeah sure” and this happens TWICE. Then at the end the stepmum is dead and the kids are happily reunited with their piece of shit father WHO LEFT THEM TO DIE IN THE WOODS TWICE BECAUSE HIS WIFE SUGGESTED IT. Get to fuck. They hated women and people still do.

SemperIdem · 14/12/2024 09:04

I think beneath this notable step parent theme in such cases lies the larger issue - these are families living chaotic lives 99.9% of the time. None of the adults involved appear capable of making educated, positive decisions regarding their own lives never mind the lives of their children. Their own upbringings often seem to be have been marred by poverty, abuse or trauma. They choose to be with people who enable the cycle to perpetuate, they escalate behaviour that at best, was a bit lacking, prior to being with the new partner and the children suffer in the worst ways.

NicolaCasanova · 14/12/2024 09:03

Is it step parent or step father, statistically speaking?

Anonymus89 · 14/12/2024 09:02

I have to disagree. As a step-parent, I find it hard to see what exactly could be flagged, how it would be monitored, who would be responsible for carrying out checks, and, most importantly, what those checks would even consist of.

In my opinion, the real issue lies elsewhere. Far too oftenthough not alwayswomen leaving abusive relationships end up in new relationships with similarly abusive partners. This is a well-documented psychological pattern known as repetition compulsion, where individuals unconsciously recreate traumatic dynamics. That, I believe, is where the real problem lies.

ThePoshUns · 14/12/2024 09:01

WinterCrow · 14/12/2024 00:07

It's been known and accepted for decades that the biggest threat to a child is "mummy's new boyfriend".

This 100%

oakleaffy · 14/12/2024 09:00

Ebeneser · 14/12/2024 00:28

I've just read that article. The mother had only known the boyfriend for 5 months before she left him babysit her child. I don't understand how a mother can leave a small child with a boyfriend they've only known for 5 months.

Children have been left with new boyfriends while mother goes out shopping or whatever-
Often the boyfriend is a “Gamer” online- and he has killed or seriously harmed the child ( Child probably crying for mother) and the boyfriend just loses it.

It’s desperately dangerous to leave a man you don’t know with a young child.

Showerflowers · 14/12/2024 09:00

Kpo58 · 14/12/2024 08:46

Wouldn't it be good if known abusive men weren't allowed to get a slap on the wrist as punishment or no punishment at all and go straight back into abusing more people. Why would they bother acting like decent people when they can already do what they like without any consequences?

This!!!

I have a family member who was seriously harmed by their own father. A tiny baby at the time. Broken ribs and arm fractures. He got six months in prison. To run concurrently with another violent crime he was already in prison for at the time of sentencing. So he did no extra time. Went unpunished while his victim still carries the physical and emotional scars into their adulthood. Effing disgrace.

JLou08 · 14/12/2024 08:56

I'm social worker and this is something that is well documented in research and serious case reviews. It's been the same for years. When children are on child protection plans police checks are completed for anyone coming in to the family and the assessments look at everyone involved with the family. As a parent myself and knowing what I know I would always do a Clare's Law request and really get to know anyone before introducing them to my children.

MyPithyPoster · 14/12/2024 08:56

KimberleyClark · 14/12/2024 08:54

I agree that new step parents are a risk, but it is naive to think biological parents are incapable of harming their children. That’s why so many end up in care.

You are right of course but I also think the demise of the extended family is contributing.
Within my own circumstances, my grandparents basically forced my father to not be an arsehole
The minute my Nanna was dead he became what he always was but he had to keep the act up while she was watching

KimberleyClark · 14/12/2024 08:54

Whatiswrongwithmeffs86 · 14/12/2024 00:20

Family units don't exist like they used to. In general, of course, there are exceptions. A biological mother and father both love and care deeply for their child and want the best. In today's society, it's so normal for people to have children, split up, and have new partners. It comes as a huge risk to young children. The new partner does not have the same connection to the child that the biological parents have. I understand relationships break down for various reasons, but society has normalised this so much, we are going to continue reading these stories, and they are going to become much more prevalent. Family should be everything, but it's not considered important anymore.

I agree that new step parents are a risk, but it is naive to think biological parents are incapable of harming their children. That’s why so many end up in care.

AmICrazyToEvenBother · 14/12/2024 08:51

Drearycommuter · 14/12/2024 00:08

the possible risks to the child is a significant part of why I stay single with two young children. Lots of my friends think that’s mental but I think it can wait till they’re older

You're not mental at all, you're a good mother who puts her children first. So many single parents do not!

There's emotional abuse too, not only physical. Just look at the posts on MN where the step child is viewed as a nuisance and a cuckoo in the next. Women abuse too, but the abuse is often emotional.