Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Swiped - The school that banned mobile phones

109 replies

chaosmaker · 13/12/2024 11:06

Watched both episodes and was fairly astounded as to how clueless the presenters were about phone use in children and the sites that can be accessed. Also algorithms.

The children in the experiment were 12 with smartphones that they spent hours on and this seemed to stop them doing things they should be doing at 12 like playing and socialising in person.

I'm just interested in why people just don't give their children dumb phones if they think they need them. The studies on brain development seem to point to traits that can be present in ND so given that fact, I'm wondering if that is correlated with so much SEN and ND diagnoses in children.

It's an interesting programme and worth watching just for the science bits if nothing else. Also for how the children themselves felt during the 21 days they didn't have their phones and other devices for.

Reasonable - children should only have dumb phones and parents could make this a cultural shift en masse

Unreasonable - children need to learn social media at any cost and must have tech.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Ohnonotmeagain · 17/12/2024 09:52

Midlifecareerchange · 17/12/2024 09:34

I know there is an element of truth to this but it's completely defeatist thinking. We have to ban and censor and limit all sorts of things that aren't good for teens - drugs, alcohol, porn being obvious ones. Of course they push back- some more than others but we can't just say 'I know you'll drink alcohol anyway so here's a bottle of scotch' any more than we should be giving them unlimited phone use

Which is why I said we need to educate kids (and parents) on safe phone use. Not just give them one and tell them to crack on, but to teach them how to set parental controls, time limiters, and teach kids what to watch out for and how do deal with it.

with sex and porn it’s also been shown that telling kids to abstain, end of, doesn’t work. Children who receive sex education have lower teen pregnancy rates, and I would hope teaching them that porn does not equal loving sex empowers them to say no to what boys may have seen and try to get them to do. Nearly every school in the Uk has sex and phse education from primary age, we don’t just tell them “no”.

alcohol the same. We don’t have an outright ban on drinking under 18. Children are legally allowed to drink alcohol much younger in certain contexts. Many parents choose to let teens have a wine or beer at home so they can test their limits, and are less likely to go out on their 18th birthday and get dangerously drunk.

it’s gradual introduction and education on the dangers we need, not just a ban. That’s avoiding the problem.

Midlifecareerchange · 17/12/2024 09:34

Ohnonotmeagain · 15/12/2024 13:27

You also have to look at it from the angle of banning them makes them more attractive. The kids with them will have social social status.

how will kids get them if they’re banned and their parents don’t buy them? How do you think? Girls will go out with older men who buy them one, boys will be exploited criminally. There will be a roaring trade in second hand phones.

even now kids who’d parents have “banned” phones, or only allow their kids dumb phones- in 99% of cases that child has a smart phone somewhere. Bought off school mates, or worse off exploitative adults.

my mate is a social worker. Says if a kid goes missing and they aren’t allowed smart phones, they will have a secret second phone. Even if the parents think they don’t have social media, or even better set them up with accounts so they can log in and monitor- those kids aren’t stupid and will have secondary secret accounts. So the parents think they know what their kid is doing online and get a false sense of security.

best option is to educate kids- lessons in schools on internet use. At the very least it might help their critical thinking with

I know there is an element of truth to this but it's completely defeatist thinking. We have to ban and censor and limit all sorts of things that aren't good for teens - drugs, alcohol, porn being obvious ones. Of course they push back- some more than others but we can't just say 'I know you'll drink alcohol anyway so here's a bottle of scotch' any more than we should be giving them unlimited phone use

mikado1 · 16/12/2024 15:51

OrchardBlack · 16/12/2024 15:05

I watched it. Nothing surprised me. (Police officer) but it is shocking isn't it.

I think in 100 years time we'll look back at this the way we view Victorian children going up chimneys now.

That's it.. so many of us are feeling the same. It us crazy to think we are giving something to our children that in our hearts we don't want to give them and that we know will be more negative than positive for them. There's probably no other similar scenario where as parents we are doing what we think is not best for our children.

OrchardBlack · 16/12/2024 15:05

I watched it. Nothing surprised me. (Police officer) but it is shocking isn't it.

I think in 100 years time we'll look back at this the way we view Victorian children going up chimneys now.

Ohnonotmeagain · 16/12/2024 15:03

MountainSnow · 16/12/2024 13:31

We are transitioning our tween kids to the pinwheel phones - they look like smart phones but are not. We have added WhatsApp (which I think is ok as long as you are regularly reading messages and checking contacts) but they don’t have internet browsers and apps like tik tok are completely blocked. Early days and set up has not been easy but I think these could be the answer

We have tried different parental controls on smart phones and none are bullet proof (and are incredibly difficult to set up and use, are not consistent but bizarrely quite easy for tech savvy kids to crack)

What’s app is one of the worst. Especially when they make groups to bully each other, send pictures etc.

there’s no restrictions on age and what they can send, and if it does come down to evidence it’s end to end encrypted so unless you’ve screen shot there’s no proof. Because of the encryption not even WhatsApp can see what’s being sent so they can’t do anything or pick up any offences.

TikTok, Snapchat and instagram are much better communication apps imo. There is at least a level of monitoring by the platforms who will report anything illegal to the relevant country’s authorities.

MountainSnow · 16/12/2024 13:31

We are transitioning our tween kids to the pinwheel phones - they look like smart phones but are not. We have added WhatsApp (which I think is ok as long as you are regularly reading messages and checking contacts) but they don’t have internet browsers and apps like tik tok are completely blocked. Early days and set up has not been easy but I think these could be the answer

We have tried different parental controls on smart phones and none are bullet proof (and are incredibly difficult to set up and use, are not consistent but bizarrely quite easy for tech savvy kids to crack)

TeenToTwenties · 16/12/2024 12:46

chaosmaker · 16/12/2024 12:41

@TeenToTwenties There were always written notes but they'd be in a physical book in the person's house which I far preferred. Most people have a set schedule for when their carers arrive and our office send out paper rotas for service users on request.

I'm at a distance though, so knowing when carer has been in etc is very helpful. Mum receives a paper schedule and an online one, but the real time app is very good.

chaosmaker · 16/12/2024 12:41

@TeenToTwenties There were always written notes but they'd be in a physical book in the person's house which I far preferred. Most people have a set schedule for when their carers arrive and our office send out paper rotas for service users on request.

OP posts:
LyingWitchInTheWardrobe · 16/12/2024 11:22

I was really shocked at how late these children were staying up, well into the night. I can't imagine they were effectively managing to participate in school the next day.

On another issue, I attended a training course recently about lithium batteries and it was mentioned how many people (children especially) charge their phones under their pillows. Battery heats up/fire risk increases. Children hiding their phones from their parents, under pillows. Terrifying.

TeenToTwenties · 16/12/2024 11:15

@chaosmaker I do find the app for my mum's caters really helpful. I can see the schedule, and the visit notes. In particular I can see when a visit is in progress so I know not to phone.

It does seem to be the things like Instagram and TicTok, plus large group chats that are the big issue for teens.

RhiannonEMumsnet · 16/12/2024 11:13

Hi OP,

Hope you don't mind us popping our head round the door to let you know that Josh MacAlister MP has written for us about his Bill on safer smart phone/social media use for kids - and he's keen to hear from Mumsnetters about the measures he's proposed. You can read his piece and share feedback here.

Thanks,
MNHQ

Guest Post: "Smartphones have become such a presence in children’s lives that change requires collective action" - Josh MacAlister MP writes for Mumsnet about why he's tackling this issue with a Private Member's Bill | Mumsnet

Sometimes Parliament finds itself way behind public opinion on a certain issue. When I decided to use the opportunity of a Private Member’s Bill to ta...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/guest_posts/5224179-guest-post-smartphones-have-become-such-a-presence-in-childrens-lives-that-change-requires-collective-action-josh-macalister-mp-writes-for-mumsnet-about-why-hes-tackling-this-issue-with-a-private-members-bill

chaosmaker · 16/12/2024 10:58

The train station used to be far more helpful when it was manned. It meant less anti social behaviour on the platform, help to work out which journeys would be cheaper/take less time when going long distance and jobs for humans.

Tech may create jobs for some but it also takes away a hell of a lot. Where are all these future jobs going to come from when we make self learning and probably self repairing systems in the tech field?

I work in care and it is of course an app. I walk around with so many people's personal data in my device. The company doesn't provide a separate work phone either, in fact my current phone may not support the new system they are going on to. I will not buy a new phone until this one conks out.

OP posts:
OrlandointheWilderness · 16/12/2024 10:56

Oh and her school doesn't allow them out at all.

OrlandointheWilderness · 16/12/2024 10:55

There is a middle ground. My DD (13) has a smart phone, she is allowed WhatsApp to communicate with friends, but it is checked 3 x a week - and it IS checked. She isn't allowed any form of social media ie TikTok, Insta, FB etc. Her phone content is age restricted and she is only allowed to access certain list of websites - she wants to get on a different one then she asks. All apps have to be approved by me.
Her tv is also controlled via our phones - we can cut the internet off to it much to her horror and again its age restricted.
No devices allowed upstairs after 9 pm (bedtime + wind down reading time). Limited time on it.
And she gets plenty of fresh air etc.

They have their good points - life 360 is brilliant, we also have family WhatsApps etc and I see no harm in her chatting to her friends. Just need limiting and parenting!

Winter41 · 16/12/2024 09:42

Its difficult. We replaced our teens phone with a a dumb phone for a few months when he made some stupid choices with it. We have it back eventually as he was becoming isolated from his friends. All.communicatiin, meet ups etc. happens via whatsapp. Even when he was able to meet up with them, he wasn't wanting to because they all sit around on phones and he couldn't.

All their school info, communication and homework is also online now.

I am totally in favour of kids having no or very limited access to a lot of the internet but it needs legislation to make this happen. The companies running sites like snapchat and tiktok could prevent access if they wanted to. The simple fact is they dont want to. They want to make money.

LindorDoubleChoc · 16/12/2024 09:34

We'd all be better off without them I think but they are insidiously woven into our lives now.

I think the same. We know how addictive they are for adults, what hope have children got? It makes me feel really sad somehow, I can't just roll with it.

MissRoseDurward · 16/12/2024 09:30

But how do you get your paper ticket, out of thin air?

From the ticket window, as I always have done. When it's open, that is.

GoBackToTheStart · 16/12/2024 09:26

Sorry just to chime in here - I'm against really young kids having screens too, but screens do not cause autism or ADHD or sensory processing disorder etc.

Early and prolonged screen use affects white matter in the brain (which impacts cognitive skills, language, and literacy) and there's also evidence it disrupts neurotransmitter balance. It's linked to the development of autistic-like traits in children which are "virtually indistinguishable" from idiopathic autism, and there's a strong correlation - the more screen exposure there is, the higher the risk of these traits developing.

No one is saying all children that have autism or adhd have been neglected/given screens and that's how it was caused. We know that isn't the case, but the problem is it looks like autism-like traits are being induced by parents in children through parenting choices, and it's not easily possible to tell which cohort is which.

Yes, it's 'only' correlation that has been found so far, but it's still very worrying that the link is so clear. We hear so much about the risks of SM etc but comparatively little about the developmental risks of sitting a baby in front of screens.

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10442849/

Allfur · 16/12/2024 08:10

MissRoseDurward · 15/12/2024 20:20

Phone app is quick and easy, no waste paper.

Not always quick and easy. I frequently travel by train to a university city. Always a crowd at the exit with students waving their phones at the ticket barriers, and those of us with paper tickets standing and waiting.

So you're saying other peoples choice to use echnology is slowing you down? But how do you get your paper ticket, out of thin air?

AspirationalTallskinnylatte · 16/12/2024 08:10

Agree they are detrimental. DS had to get one at 16 as it was no longer viable to do life without (decided by him, we would have let him have one earlier). This was helped by the fact they are strictly banned at his school.
We'd all be better off without them I think but they are insidiously woven into our lives now.

lljkk · 16/12/2024 08:05

I really miss the freedom of being out/occupied and not there to answer the phone

Just turn it off? I do.

things they should be doing at 12 like playing and socialising in person.

Socialising out of school would almost only ever be with us adults & siblings, then, since their mates took bus to school, otherwise lived far away from our home.

Zebrashavestripes · 16/12/2024 07:56

You also have to look at it from the angle of banning them makes them more attractive

Lots of things are banned if you're a child. Should we give them cigarettes, bottle of vodka and a motorbike?

chaosmaker · 16/12/2024 01:23

BeyondMyWits · 15/12/2024 19:53

Phone app is quick and easy, no waste paper... takes less driver time.

Why do you miss the freedom? If I'm out walking, my phone is on silent. It is a tool... for me.

That would be to do with other people's expectations and stupid work.

OP posts:
MissRoseDurward · 15/12/2024 20:20

Phone app is quick and easy, no waste paper.

Not always quick and easy. I frequently travel by train to a university city. Always a crowd at the exit with students waving their phones at the ticket barriers, and those of us with paper tickets standing and waiting.

BeyondMyWits · 15/12/2024 19:53

chaosmaker · 15/12/2024 18:41

The extra expense for tickets etc for not buying on an app really shouldn't be legal. What is the justifiction for it if any at all?
Lots of really good points made on the thread. I personally resisted a smartphone or even a mobile until I was 32 and in university.
I really miss the freedom of being out/occupied and not there to answer the phone :D

Phone app is quick and easy, no waste paper... takes less driver time.

Why do you miss the freedom? If I'm out walking, my phone is on silent. It is a tool... for me.