I get a lot of speculative emails from recruitment agents and there was one a few years ago whose emails started:
"I have recently been speaking with Mohammed, a lovely man, well spoken, originally from India, but moved here in 2000. Very very slight accent, but clear and completely understandable."
or
"I have personally interviewed Stanislav, originally from Bulgaria. He has excellent communication skills, speaking in a clear accent."
interestingly, when faced with a British name I got:
"I have personally interviewed Matthew this morning. He comes across as extremely knowledgeable and professional."
Matthew could very well have been from Northern Ireland or Liverpool with the strongest accent you could imagine, yet it was not mentioned.
I called her out on it and told her I wasn't comfortable with the first description of every candidate being their accent and place of schooling, but only if their name was "foreign" sounding and they were schooled in the UK. I pointed out that most companies send neutral CVs without names, age or sex being apparent so employers could decide, based on experience and qualifications.
I also went so far as to say that as an equal opportunities employer we recruit based on the person that is best suited to their job based on their abilities and not their country of origin, ethnicity or accent and suggested that their leading descriptions about candidates accents could be perceived as discrimination under the Equality Act. Then asked to be removed from their distribution list.
She came back to me with "Thank you for your opinion. I have removed you from our distribution list."